Book a demo

Air Traffic Management for Drones Patent Landscape

Air Traffic Management for Drones Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Air Traffic Management for Drones Patent Landscape in 2026

The drone air traffic management (UTM) patent space is highly concentrated, with Rakuten Group holding nearly one-third of the 241 families in scope and the top five filers accounting for 65% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. Activity peaked in 2019 and has since eased markedly, signalling a maturing field where core airspace management and flight-planning IP is largely claimed.

241
Patent families in scope
65%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-87%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Rakuten leads a heavily concentrated field

Rakuten Group is the clear leader with 73 patent families, more than double the second-ranked applicant Dimetor GmbH at 28 families. LG Electronics (24), KONOX (20), and Ericsson (18) form a mid-tier cluster well behind the leader.

The top five filers hold 65% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, an unusually high concentration for an aerospace-adjacent technology. The gap between Rakuten and the rest of the field is large enough that no single challenger can close it without a sustained multi-year filing campaign.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Rakuten Group Inc73
2Dimetor GmbH28
3LG Electronics Inc24
4KONOX Co Ltd20
5Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)18
6Rhombus Systems Group Inc9
7Nokia Technologies Oy8
8Lightsure LLC7
9Qualcomm Inc7
10Samsung Electronics Co Ltd6
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Ofinno LLC4
12Prodrone Co Ltd4
13InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc4
14Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co Ltd3
15Wing Aviation LLC2
16Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd2
17AirMatrix Inc2
18Noblis Inc2
19Jarrell John A2
20Lenovo (Singapore) Pte Ltd2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Rakuten’s dominance reflects an early, deliberate platform strategy around drone communication, monitoring, and traffic control — anchored in B64C and G08G technology classes. Challengers such as Dimetor and Ericsson have staked positions in wireless network integration (H04W), suggesting the competitive frontier has shifted toward cellular-based UTM.

Filings from approximately 20242026 are subject to publication lag and are under-counted; the apparent near-zero volumes in those years should not be interpreted as a cessation of activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2019 filing surge followed by a sustained contraction, with wireless comms emerging alongside core airspace control

The annual trend chart captures a sharp peak-and-decline pattern centred on 2019, while the technology-composition chart reveals that while B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters) dominates, wireless and digital-communications classes are growing in relative importance.

Annual filing trend

Filings surged to 87 families in 2019 — more than three times the 2017 baseline of 37 — then fell steeply through 2022. The 2023–2026 values are structurally under-counted due to patent publication lag and should not be read as confirmation of further decline. The underlying lifecycle evidence places the field in a decline stage, with annual volume having eased substantially from the 2019 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 87 in 2019.37201724201887201950202021202115202252023120241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters) is the dominant class with 231 records, reflecting the broad vehicle-level framing of UTM patents. G08G (traffic control systems, 120 records) and G05D (control of non-electric variables, 109 records) form the core ATM-specific layer, while H04W (wireless communication networks, 93 records) signals growing integration with cellular infrastructure. Lower-density classes such as B64U (unmanned aerial vehicles, 34 records) and H04L (digital information transmission, 28 records) represent areas where the patent corpus is comparatively sparse.

Technology compositionB64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters leads with 231; G08G · Traffic control systems 120.B64C · Aeroplanes & heli…231G08G · Traffic control s…120G05D · Control of non-el…109H04W · Wireless communic…93B64D · Aircraft equipment70B64F · Ground installati…47B64U · Unmanned aerial v…34H04L · Digital informati…28↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2019050500A1Published 2019-03-14

Planned continuity of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV…

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (PUBL)

A method for managing a wireless connection of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is described herein. The method may include detecting a handover condition for the UAV within a wireless network, wherein the UAV is connected to a source cell in the wireless network when the handover condition is detected; determining, in response to detecting the handover… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Planned continuity of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV… — patent drawingPlanned continuity of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Unmanned aerial vehicle communication, monitoring,…52
2Enhanced flight plan for unmanned traffic aircraft…40
3Techniques for broadcasting flight information for…39
4System for verification of integrity of unmanned a…37
5Unmanned aerial vehicle communication, monitoring,…36
6Method and system for unmanned aerial vehicle flig…35
7Optimal unmanned aerial vehicle flight route plann…35
8Device, system, and method for controlling unmanne…34

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak filing curve, and sparse co-filing activity defines the strategic context for any new or existing participant in drone ATM.

Decline

Field is in decline from a 2019 peak

The lifecycle evidence labels this field as Decline, with annual filings having eased substantially from the 2019 peak of 87 families. Core concepts — flight path planning, conflict detection, and vehicle identification — are well-covered. New entrants face a crowded core and must seek differentiation in adjacent or under-served branches to justify prosecution costs.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Rakuten’s lead is structural, not incremental

With 65% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output held by the top five, and Rakuten alone holding 73 patent families, the IP landscape mirrors an oligopoly. Challengers Dimetor (28 families) and LG Electronics (24 families) have meaningful positions but remain in a separate tier. Any challenger aiming to compete at the platform level would need to target claim gaps in wireless handoff, dynamic geofencing, or ground-infrastructure interfaces rather than core flight-management logic.

High concentration
Collaboration

No recorded co-filing activity in scope

The evidence contains no co-applicant collaboration records for this corpus. This absence suggests that drone ATM IP has been developed largely through internal R&D rather than joint ventures or consortium filings — consistent with competitive sensitivity around platform-level airspace control. Cross-sector alliances between telecom operators and drone operators, if they occur, have not yet produced joint patent filings captured here.

Evidence pending
Geography

US leads filing activity; Japan and Europe are secondary hubs

The United States is the lead jurisdiction with 95 records, followed by Japan (54) and Europe via EPO (33). WIPO PCT filings (18) indicate some applicants are pursuing broad international coverage. India (12 records) and Germany (11 records) are emerging secondary markets, likely reflecting regulatory development. China has only 2 records in scope, a notable gap given the scale of Chinese drone manufacturing, suggesting either a different patent strategy or corpus scope limitations.

US-led, global spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Rakuten dominates on volume; Dimetor and Ericsson lead on wireless-integration depth

The top two applicants differ sharply in strategic emphasis: Rakuten’s portfolio spans core flight management and traffic control, while Dimetor focuses intensively on cellular network handoff for UTM. Recent momentum data show Rakuten’s filing pace has slowed sharply, while Ericsson and Qualcomm appear as new entrants in the most recent window.

Leader · Rakuten Group

Rakuten Group

Rakuten Group holds 73 patent families — by far the largest position in the corpus — concentrated in B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters, 59 sub-class records), G08G (traffic control systems, 47 records), and G05D (flight control, 30 records). This reflects a comprehensive platform covering drone identification, communication, and airspace management. However, its recent filing trend shows a steep –90% decline versus the prior period, indicating the bulk of its foundational portfolio was built during the 2017–2020 window.

families: 73
Challenger · Dimetor GmbH

Dimetor GmbH

Dimetor GmbH holds 28 patent families and is the most cellular-network-oriented filer in the corpus, with H04W (wireless communication networks, 26 sub-class records) nearly matching its B64C coverage (28 records). This positions Dimetor as the specialist in LTE/5G-integrated UTM — a technically distinct angle from Rakuten’s platform-level approach. No momentum data are available for Dimetor in the evidence, but its second-place ranking in a declining field represents a defensible niche.

families: 28
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 applicants including LG Electronics, KONOX, Ericsson, Nokia, Qualcomm, and Samsung.
LG Electronics IncEricsson+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Rakuten Group Inc5▼ -90%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)1▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Inc4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards reflect patent family counts and technology sub-class emphasis from applicant ranking and technology focus evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches at the intersection of ground infrastructure and secure communications

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant B64C and G08G core have low patent density relative to their technical relevance to drone ATM, representing areas where new claims could be filed with less prior-art crowding.

B64F · Ground installations for aircraft

B64F (ground installations) has only 47 records in this corpus — comparatively sparse given that vertiport infrastructure, drone landing pads, and ground-based UTM communication nodes are critical physical enablers of scalable airspace management. The technical gap is in standardised ground-to-air handshake protocols and physical landing infrastructure integrated with live airspace data feeds. Entry paths include filing on vertiport UTM integration or ground-based detect-and-avoid sensor networks, areas where regulatory development is accelerating but patent coverage remains thin.

Search this in Eureka →

H04L · Digital information transmission

H04L (digital information transmission) has 28 records — notably low given that secure, low-latency data links are foundational to any UTM system operating beyond visual line of sight. The technical value lies in applying modern protocol standards (e.g. deterministic networking, time-sensitive networking) to drone command-and-control channels. With only a handful of filers active here and no dominant incumbent, this branch offers a realistic entry point for telecom-oriented players or cybersecurity specialists seeking a foothold in drone ATM without competing head-on in the saturated flight-planning core.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See density scores and filing gaps across all 35 IPC branches identified in this corpus.
B64U · Unmanned aerial vehicles (drones)H04B · Transmission (general)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by relatively low record counts within the corpus; sparsity alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB64C 39 · Aeroplanes & helicoptersG08G 5 · Traffic control systemsG05D 1 · Control of non-electric variablesB64F 1 · Ground installations for aircraftB64C 13 · Aeroplanes & helicopters
Rakuten Group IncStrong · 59Strong · 47Strong · 30Moderate · 21Moderate · 23
Prodrone Co LtdStrong · 23Emerging · 4Strong · 22Moderate · 10Strong · 22
LG Electronics IncStrong · 23Moderate · 5Strong · 19Moderate · 7Emerging · 1
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Ericsson)Strong · 18Strong · 15Moderate · 6Emerging · 1Absent
Dimetor GmbHStrong · 28Moderate · 8AbsentAbsentAbsent
Rhombus Systems Group IncStrong · 12AbsentStrong · 11AbsentAbsent
Jarrell John AStrong · 8Strong · 9AbsentStrong · 6Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own drone ATM patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.