Airborne Software Certification Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
Airborne Software Certification Patents: Who Holds the Ground on DO-178B/C Compliance Tooling
A narrow field with a short bench. 13 ranked companies cover the whole assignee list for this search, with the leader holding just 3 records and a long tail of single-filing entrants below fifth place. Filings were flat at the start of the window, rose to a peak of 6 in 2023, and have since tapered off. Treat the final one or two years as understated: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so recent activity has not fully surfaced yet.
- 1ANSYS INC3
- 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO3
- 3HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC3
- 4STCLAIR SUMNER AUGUSTINE2
- 5ROCKWELL COLLINS INC2
See the full airborne software certification analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on airborne software certification patents
How many companies actually hold patents on DO-178B/C certification techniques?
This dataset’s assignee ranking returns 13 companies covering the full set of 20 records in scope — it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, it is the entire ranked list the search produces. The leader holds only 3 records, and the count drops to 2 by fifth place, so no single company controls a large share of the filings. Anyone evaluating freedom to operate should treat this as a fragmented field of small portfolios rather than one with a dominant blocker.
What technical areas do most airborne software certification patents cover?
Three-quarters of the 20 records in scope (75.0%) fall under G06F, the electric digital data processing IPC subclass, covering claims tied to software architecture, partitioning and processing management. H04L (digital information transmission) and G08G (traffic control systems) appear in smaller shares, 20.0% and 15.0% respectively. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures overlap rather than summing to 100%, but the pattern is clear: certification IP concentrates on the processing stack itself, not the surrounding communications or traffic-management systems.
Is patent filing activity in this space growing or slowing down?
The trend shows a peak of 6 filings in 2023, with activity tapering in the years after. A reliable growth rate cannot be calculated here because fewer than four complete years remain once publication lag is accounted for, and lag runs roughly 18 months from filing to publication. That means the most recent one to two years in the data almost certainly understate real filing activity, and the apparent decline should be treated as provisional until later publications catch up.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Airborne Software Certification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.