https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aircraft-ice-protection-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aerostructures
Aircraft ice protection patents: who holds the bleed-air and electrothermal claim space
  • Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak. 22 filings that year against 9 at the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery visible in the trend to date.
  • B64D dominates almost completely. 265 of 267 families sit in aircraft equipment (B64D), with gas-turbine plants (F02C) and electric heating circuits (H05B) as the main secondary clusters.
  • The most-cited art is decades old. The top-cited records date to the 1970s–1990s, meaning current filers are building on a foundation set well before today's electrothermal and coating approaches.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
267
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-46%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Aircraft ice protection spans three engineering routes that show up as distinct clusters in the patent record: bleed-air thermal systems drawn from the engine's compressor stage, electrothermal heaters embedded in leading-edge structures, and hydrophobic or ice-phobic coatings that reduce adhesion rather than supplying heat. The search underlying this page combines aircraft-level anti-icing and de-icing claims with technical qualifiers on ice detection, power consumption and bleed-air control, restricted to the IPC classes that cover aircraft equipment and protective coatings.

267 patent families were identified, filed through receiving offices led by the United States, the European Patent Office and Canada. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent filing years in this dataset understate actual activity; treat the last one to two years as incomplete rather than as a genuine drop-off.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1ROHR INC41
  2. 2THE BOEING CO25
  3. 3SAAB AB18
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC CO17
  5. 5MITSUBISHI AIRCRAFT17
  6. 6GOODRICH CORP16
  7. 7MRA SYST LLC15
  8. 8MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD15
  9. 9BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC10
  10. 10SHORT BROTHERS PLC8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 267 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the competing technical routes.

A peak in 2017, then decline

Filings ran at 22 in 2017, the high point in the series, and had fallen to 9 by the 2022 midpoint. The trend line shows no sustained recovery afterward, though the final one to two years are undercounted due to publication lag.

A peak in 2017, then decline061319252220172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

B64D carries almost the entire dataset

265 of 267 families touch B64D (aircraft equipment), confirming this as an aircraft-systems field rather than a materials-science one. F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F01D (turbines) appear as secondary clusters tied to bleed-air sourcing, H05B (electric heating circuits) marks the electrothermal route, and C09D (coatings) is the smallest cluster at only 4 records — a sign that ice-phobic coating claims remain comparatively unclaimed relative to thermal approaches.

B64D carries almost the entire datasetB64D · Aircraft equipment26599.3%F02C · Gas-turbine plants7026.2%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…2810.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines2710.1%B64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters259.4%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)72.6%F16K · Valves & taps62.2%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks41.5%Other4516.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 267 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aircraft ice protection systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US11292601B22022-04-05

Anti-icing system of aircraft, aircraft including anti-icing system, program for controlling anti-icing system, and method for controlling anti-icing system

MITSUBISHI AIRCRAFT CORPORATION

The system exchanges heat between bleed air and outside air through a precooler before the air reaches an anti-icing unit. A flow-rate adjusting section controls bleed air pressure against an altitude-linked upper limit and an outside-air-temperature-linked upper limit, so the anti-icing unit never receives bleed air above the pressure the airframe design tolerates.Filed by Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, published 2022-04-05.

US11292601B2 — patent drawing 1US11292601B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4738416ANacelle anti-icing system202
2US5114100AAnti-icing system for aircraft197
3US3981466AIntegrated thermal anti-icing and environmental control system182
4US5011098AThermal anti-icing system for aircraft154
5US3925979AAnti-icing system for a gas turbine engine126
6EP0436243A2Anti-icing system for aircraft97
7US20020113167A1Aircraft architecture with a reduced bleed aircraft secondary power system75
8EP0376371A2Thermal anti-icing system for aircraft75
9US4752049ALeading edge slat/anti-icing system and method for airfoil75
10US20100199629A1Systeme d'anti givrage et de degivrage de nacelle de moteur d'aeronef a tapis resistif63

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older, foundational filings; read them as a measure of influence on later claim drafting, not as evidence that these systems remain current best practice.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and citation age are read together.

Filing Momentum
22 → 9
2017 peak vs 2022 midpoint

Activity has cooled from its high point

The filing trend peaked at 22 in 2017 and had roughly halved by 2022, with no later year recovering that level. This is consistent with a field where core bleed-air and electrothermal architectures were staked out early and subsequent filers are refining rather than founding.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Technology Concentration
265 of 267
families touching B64D

Almost everything is classed as aircraft equipment

Near-total concentration in B64D means the competitive question is not which IPC class to search, but which sub-architecture within aircraft ice protection a given filing occupies — bleed-air ducting, electrothermal heater control, or ice detection logic.

IPC composition, all years
Coating Route
4 records
in C09D (coatings)

Hydrophobic coatings remain the smallest cluster

Against 265 records in B64D, only 4 fall in C09D. Coating-based ice mitigation is present in the search terms but barely claimed relative to thermal methods, suggesting the claim space around durable ice-phobic surface treatments is comparatively open.

IPC composition, C09D
Prior Art Age
1970s–1990s
era of top-cited records

The most-cited art predates current filers

The five most-cited records were published between the mid-1970s and early 1990s, covering nacelle and thermal anti-icing fundamentals. New filings sit downstream of this foundation, so freedom-to-operate work should trace how current claims narrow or route around these older, still-influential patents.

Citation ranking, top 5 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aircraft ice protection systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it's open

Assignee activity in this dataset is led by established airframe, engine and systems suppliers, with collaboration limited to a small number of co-filing pairs. Momentum across the leading names has gone flat in the most recent complete year, consistent with the field-wide filing decline rather than any one company pulling back.

Airframe & Systems Integrators
0 in latest year
momentum across leading assignees

Legacy leaders, quiet recent year

Names including Boeing, Mitsubishi Aircraft, Rohr, and Honeywell International appear among the more active assignees, but all show zero filings in the most recent complete year in this dataset — in line with the broader decline from the 2017 peak rather than a company-specific pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Thermal Systems Specialists
9 co-filings
strongest co-assignee pair

MRA Systems and Kelly Aerospace Thermal Systems co-file most closely

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — 9 shared families between MRA Systems and Kelly Aerospace Thermal Systems — points to a tight supplier relationship on thermal anti-icing hardware, distinct from the broader field where only 7 co-assignee pairs exist at all.

Co-assignee pairs, strongest link
European Filers
73 EPO filings
second-largest receiving office

Saab and partners file a European track

Saab (Sweden) appears in two of the recorded co-assignee pairs, alongside named individual inventors, reflecting a European filing track that runs parallel to the US-heavy overall dataset — the US and EPO together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity.

Receiving offices: US 108, EPO 73
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show low record counts relative to the core B64D cluster — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming the space is crowded.
Ice-phobic coating durability claimsIce detection sensor fusion logicElectrothermal heater power-management control loopsBleed-air precooler flow regulationWind-turbine-adapted anti-icing (F03D crossover)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Rohr, Inc.0
Boeing0
Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation0
MRA Systems, Inc.0
General Electric Company0
Saab AB (Sweden)0
B.F. Goodrich Company0-100%
Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or monitoring active competitors.

Check freedom-to-operate against the oldest, most-cited claims

Because the highest-citation records date to the 1970s–1990s, a freedom-to-operate review should start there rather than with recent filings, tracing how later claims in bleed-air and electrothermal control narrow around this foundation.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Scope a filing in the coating or sensor-fusion gaps

With only 4 records in C09D against 265 in B64D, and detection logic thinly represented relative to hardware claims, these are the branches most likely to support a clean first claim.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track momentum before assuming any leader is retreating

Every major assignee shows zero filings in the latest year, which tracks the field-wide decline from 2017 rather than signalling exit — worth confirming against each company's broader aerospace portfolio.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on aircraft ice protection patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aircraft Ice Protection Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aircraft Ice Protection Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aircraft ice protection systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.