Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Aircraft ice protection spans three engineering routes that show up as distinct clusters in the patent record: bleed-air thermal systems drawn from the engine's compressor stage, electrothermal heaters embedded in leading-edge structures, and hydrophobic or ice-phobic coatings that reduce adhesion rather than supplying heat. The search underlying this page combines aircraft-level anti-icing and de-icing claims with technical qualifiers on ice detection, power consumption and bleed-air control, restricted to the IPC classes that cover aircraft equipment and protective coatings.
267 patent families were identified, filed through receiving offices led by the United States, the European Patent Office and Canada. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent filing years in this dataset understate actual activity; treat the last one to two years as incomplete rather than as a genuine drop-off.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 267 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the competing technical routes.
Filings ran at 22 in 2017, the high point in the series, and had fallen to 9 by the 2022 midpoint. The trend line shows no sustained recovery afterward, though the final one to two years are undercounted due to publication lag.
265 of 267 families touch B64D (aircraft equipment), confirming this as an aircraft-systems field rather than a materials-science one. F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F01D (turbines) appear as secondary clusters tied to bleed-air sourcing, H05B (electric heating circuits) marks the electrothermal route, and C09D (coatings) is the smallest cluster at only 4 records — a sign that ice-phobic coating claims remain comparatively unclaimed relative to thermal approaches.
Shares are the percentage of the 267 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aircraft ice protection systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe system exchanges heat between bleed air and outside air through a precooler before the air reaches an anti-icing unit. A flow-rate adjusting section controls bleed air pressure against an altitude-linked upper limit and an outside-air-temperature-linked upper limit, so the anti-icing unit never receives bleed air above the pressure the airframe design tolerates.Filed by Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation, published 2022-04-05.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4738416A | Nacelle anti-icing system | 202 |
| 2 | US5114100A | Anti-icing system for aircraft | 197 |
| 3 | US3981466A | Integrated thermal anti-icing and environmental control system | 182 |
| 4 | US5011098A | Thermal anti-icing system for aircraft | 154 |
| 5 | US3925979A | Anti-icing system for a gas turbine engine | 126 |
| 6 | EP0436243A2 | Anti-icing system for aircraft | 97 |
| 7 | US20020113167A1 | Aircraft architecture with a reduced bleed aircraft secondary power system | 75 |
| 8 | EP0376371A2 | Thermal anti-icing system for aircraft | 75 |
| 9 | US4752049A | Leading edge slat/anti-icing system and method for airfoil | 75 |
| 10 | US20100199629A1 | Systeme d'anti givrage et de degivrage de nacelle de moteur d'aeronef a tapis resistif | 63 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older, foundational filings; read them as a measure of influence on later claim drafting, not as evidence that these systems remain current best practice.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and citation age are read together.
The filing trend peaked at 22 in 2017 and had roughly halved by 2022, with no later year recovering that level. This is consistent with a field where core bleed-air and electrothermal architectures were staked out early and subsequent filers are refining rather than founding.
Near-total concentration in B64D means the competitive question is not which IPC class to search, but which sub-architecture within aircraft ice protection a given filing occupies — bleed-air ducting, electrothermal heater control, or ice detection logic.
Against 265 records in B64D, only 4 fall in C09D. Coating-based ice mitigation is present in the search terms but barely claimed relative to thermal methods, suggesting the claim space around durable ice-phobic surface treatments is comparatively open.
The five most-cited records were published between the mid-1970s and early 1990s, covering nacelle and thermal anti-icing fundamentals. New filings sit downstream of this foundation, so freedom-to-operate work should trace how current claims narrow or route around these older, still-influential patents.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aircraft ice protection systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee activity in this dataset is led by established airframe, engine and systems suppliers, with collaboration limited to a small number of co-filing pairs. Momentum across the leading names has gone flat in the most recent complete year, consistent with the field-wide filing decline rather than any one company pulling back.
Names including Boeing, Mitsubishi Aircraft, Rohr, and Honeywell International appear among the more active assignees, but all show zero filings in the most recent complete year in this dataset — in line with the broader decline from the 2017 peak rather than a company-specific pullback.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — 9 shared families between MRA Systems and Kelly Aerospace Thermal Systems — points to a tight supplier relationship on thermal anti-icing hardware, distinct from the broader field where only 7 co-assignee pairs exist at all.
Saab (Sweden) appears in two of the recorded co-assignee pairs, alongside named individual inventors, reflecting a European filing track that runs parallel to the US-heavy overall dataset — the US and EPO together account for the large majority of receiving-office activity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Rohr, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Boeing | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation | 0 | — |
| MRA Systems, Inc. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Saab AB (Sweden) | 0 | — |
| B.F. Goodrich Company | 0 | -100% |
| Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or monitoring active competitors.
Because the highest-citation records date to the 1970s–1990s, a freedom-to-operate review should start there rather than with recent filings, tracing how later claims in bleed-air and electrothermal control narrow around this foundation.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaWith only 4 records in C09D against 265 in B64D, and detection logic thinly represented relative to hardware claims, these are the branches most likely to support a clean first claim.
Explore white space in EurekaEvery major assignee shows zero filings in the latest year, which tracks the field-wide decline from 2017 rather than signalling exit — worth confirming against each company's broader aerospace portfolio.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaThe patent record splits into three main routes: bleed-air thermal systems that route hot air from the engine compressor to leading edges and nacelles, electrothermal heaters embedded directly in aircraft structures, and hydrophobic or ice-phobic surface coatings that reduce ice adhesion rather than melting it. Bleed-air and electrothermal approaches dominate the dataset by a wide margin, both classified under B64D aircraft equipment, while coating-based approaches under C09D are comparatively rare. Ice detection sensing and control logic runs across all three routes as a supporting technology rather than a standalone cluster.
Filings in this dataset peaked at 22 in 2017 and had fallen to roughly 9 by 2022, with no later year recovering to the earlier level. This pattern is typical of a field where the core architectures — bleed-air ducting, electrothermal heater placement, basic ice detection — were established early, leaving later filers to patent incremental refinements rather than foundational systems. Readers should also account for publication lag: the most recent one to two years in any patent trend are understated because filings take roughly eighteen months to publish, so the apparent decline in the very latest years is partly an artifact of that lag rather than a real drop in activity.
Assignee activity in this dataset is led by established aerospace names including Boeing, Mitsubishi Aircraft, Rohr, Honeywell International, General Electric, and Saab, alongside specialist thermal-systems suppliers like MRA Systems and Kelly Aerospace Thermal Systems. All of the leading assignees show zero filings in the most recent complete year, which tracks the field-wide slowdown rather than indicating any single company has exited the space. Co-filing is limited overall, with only seven recorded co-assignee pairs, the strongest being a nine-family link between two thermal-systems specialists.
The clearest gap is in hydrophobic and ice-phobic coating technology, which accounts for only 4 of 267 families despite appearing directly in the search criteria — a strong signal that durable, aircraft-grade ice-phobic surface treatments remain thinly claimed compared with thermal methods. Ice detection sensor fusion and electrothermal power-management control logic also appear less densely claimed than the core hardware architectures around them. Anyone scoping a new filing should check these branches first, since low record counts there reflect low claim density rather than technical infeasibility.
US11292601B2, assigned to Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation and published in 2022, claims a bleed-air flow control method that caps bleed air pressure to an anti-icing unit based on the joint relationship between altitude and outside air temperature, using a precooler ahead of the anti-icing unit. Anyone designing a bleed-air anti-icing system with dual altitude- and temperature-linked pressure limiting through a precooler stage needs to check their control logic against this claim structure specifically, rather than against bleed-air anti-icing generally. Systems that regulate bleed air pressure by a single variable, or that omit the precooler heat exchange step, sit further from this claim and may represent a workable design-around.
Go past this page: query the whole aircraft ice protection systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.