Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 55 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape draws on 55 published patent records matched against liquid hydrogen transfer, cryogenic transfer line, boil-off recovery, flow-rate control, electrostatic grounding and automated coupling terms — the technical building blocks of ground-side hydrogen refuelling. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, capturing both the storage-hardware filings that dominated the early part of the window and the control-and-monitoring filings that have followed.
Filing offices span the United States, WIPO's PCT route, Europe, Australia, China and Canada, with the United States carrying the largest single share of receiving-office filings. Patent families, rather than raw publication counts, are the fairer unit for comparing filers here, since a single underlying invention can generate several published documents across jurisdictions.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The 55 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with activity concentrated in storage and transfer engineering rather than airport-specific ground infrastructure claims.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2021, then fell to 5 by 2024 — a documented -62% move across that span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be read as a continued decline.
F17C (pressure vessels and gas storage) appears in 50.9% of the 55 records, more than any other class, with B63B (ships and marine vessels) a distant second at 18.2%. Control, valve and pump classes each sit at or below 7.3%, indicating that the transfer and monitoring layer around the storage vessel is comparatively lightly claimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 55 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about airport hydrogen refuelling infrastructure and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA model-based fault detection device for a liquid hydrogen refuelling system uses a cumulative sum (CUSUM) control method: a processor obtains process variables from a simulation model of the liquid hydrogen storage system, generates normal and fault scenario data using steady-state and dynamic-state models, and calculates upper and lower cumulative sum indices to flag deviations during refuelling.Filed 2025-07-24 by Kwangwoon University Industry-Academic Collaboration Foundation — among the newest records in scope, illustrating the shift toward control and monitoring claims.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20150308621A1 | Method and system for tank refilling using active fueling speed control | 49 |
| 2 | US20230067726A1 | Pumping of liquid cryogen from a storage tank | 17 |
| 3 | US20210262618A1 | Gas filling method | 15 |
| 4 | WO2011098527A1 | Bow loading station with double deck for cryogenic fluid | 14 |
| 5 | US20210404604A1 | Cryogenic Fluid Dispensing System and Method | 13 |
| 6 | WO2009009853A1 | Hydrogen system | 11 |
| 7 | US9605804B2 | Method and system for tank refilling using active fueling speed control | 8 |
| 8 | US11193632B2 | Gas filling method | 5 |
| 9 | US20240309995A1 | Systems, methods, and apparatus for refueling hydrogen aircraft | 4 |
| 10 | WO2013068561A1 | Offshore LNG flushing station | 4 |
Citation counts favour older records inside this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the 55 records are broken down by class, assignee and year: a storage-engineering core, a thin but real control-layer gap, and a filing peak that has since cooled by a measured amount.
The ranked leader holds 13 of the 55 records in scope; the top ten combined hold 45, or 81.8%. Past the tenth position, filers drop to 2 records or fewer, which means most of the 28 ranked companies are single-digit filers competing around the edges of the leaders' claims.
Pressure-vessel and gas-storage claims (F17C) appear in just over half of all records, ahead of marine transfer (B63B) at 18.2% and liquefaction (F25J) at 10.9%. Control, valve and pump classes trail well behind, each at 7.3% or less.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to 13 in 2021, then eased to 5 by 2024. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025 and 2026 counts in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuing decline.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to airport hydrogen refuelling infrastructure, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of assignees working in storage and marine-transfer engineering, with a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants working on narrower control and detection problems.
The ranked leader's 13 records sit well ahead of the fifth-place count of 4, giving it the deepest coverage of the storage and cryogenic-transfer claim space in this dataset.
Ten assignees account for 45 of the 55 records in scope. Past that group, filers hold 2 records or fewer, leaving room for new entrants to build position in less-crowded control and monitoring classes.
Bow-loading and marine cryogenic transfer claims form the second-largest technology bloc, relevant to any airport operator sourcing liquid hydrogen by sea rather than by pipeline or road tanker.
The most recent representative record in this set comes from a university collaboration foundation rather than an established industrial filer, and targets fault detection rather than storage hardware — a sign the control layer is still open to new entrants.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Single Buoy Moorings Inc | 0 | — |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Chart Inc | 0 | — |
| Kalsi Engineering Inc | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Hymaster Tech Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Tatsuno Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Co | 0 | — |
| L'Air Liquide SA pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude | 0 | — |
The figures here establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper into specific claims and specific assignees.
The most-cited storage and marine-transfer records carry broad independent claims that later filers have had to design around. Reviewing their full claim sets is the first step before drafting in the F17C or B63B space.
Review claims in EurekaNewer filings, including academic and university-linked filers, are moving into fault detection and monitoring methods rather than storage hardware. Watching this group closely will surface competitive moves before they show up in aggregate filing counts.
Set up monitoring in EurekaControl, valve and pump classes each sit at 7.3% share or below, well under the storage-engineering core. Testing draft claim language against this thinner prior art before filing reduces the risk of colliding with the leading assignees' coverage.
Explore white space in EurekaThe dataset in scope contains 55 published records spanning 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, all matched against search terms covering liquid hydrogen transfer, cryogenic transfer lines, boil-off recovery, flow-rate control, electrostatic grounding, vapour return lines and automated coupling connections. These 55 records also form the complete assignee ranking, so every figure quoted for concentration or leadership is a share of that same total. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for 2025 and 2026 filings will rise as more applications publish.
The ranking covers 28 companies, with the leader holding 13 of the 55 records in scope and the top five combined holding 32 records, or 58.2% of the total. That leaves a long tail: the tenth-ranked entrant holds only 2 records, so beyond the leading handful the field is held by companies with a handful of filings each. This is a ranked list drawn directly from the data endpoint, not a curated top-50 or top-100, so smaller or newer filers can and do appear in it.
Storage and pressure-vessel engineering, classified under F17C, still accounts for just over half of the 55 records in scope and includes the most-cited single document in the dataset. Newer records, including the representative fault-detection patent filed in mid-2025, lean toward control and monitoring methods such as cumulative-sum anomaly detection rather than tank or coupling hardware. That pattern — older filings concentrated in storage hardware, newer filings drifting toward software-based monitoring — is visible in the data but should be read cautiously given the 18-month publication lag on the most recent years.
Control-of-variable methods (G05D), pumps (F04B), valves (F16K) and electric-propulsion-adjacent claims (B60L) each account for 7.3% or less of the 55 records, well below the storage and marine-transfer blocs. Electrostatic grounding and automated coupling connection, both explicitly covered by the search scope, do not surface as a distinct heavily-claimed class, suggesting the safety-interlock and grounding layer around a refuelling event carries less claim density than the storage vessel it protects. That gap is a reasonable place to look for a first claim that does not collide with the existing storage-hardware art.
Filings peaked at 13 in 2021 and fell to 5 by 2024, a -62% change across that three-year span according to the dataset. That drop should not automatically be read as declining interest, because patent publication typically lags the underlying filing date by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are still incomplete. A fuller picture of the 2022-2024 filing wave, and any recovery since, will only be visible once those later years finish publishing.
Go past this page: query the whole airport hydrogen refuelling infrastructure corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.