Book a demo

Alkaline Diaphragm / AEM Electrolysis Patent Landscape

Alkaline Diaphragm / AEM Electrolysis Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Alkaline Diaphragm / AEM Patent Landscape in 2026

The alkaline diaphragm and AEM electrolysis patent space comprises 608 patent families and is in a growth phase, with three-year filing volume up 228% versus the prior period, though annual output has eased from its 2023 peak. Activity is moderately concentrated among a Japanese-European industrial core, with Asahi Kasei holding the leading position and a tight cluster of electrolyser and membrane specialists immediately behind.

608
Patent families in scope
37%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+228%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Asahi Kasei leads a moderately concentrated field with a strong industrial core

Asahi Kasei holds the top position with 68 patent families, ahead of Kawasaki Heavy Industries (54), De Nora Permelec (53), Agfa-Gevaert (51), and Nippon Shokubai (39). The top five filers account for 37% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate but meaningful concentration.

The tier gap between the first-ranked applicant and the second is relatively narrow — just 14 patent families — suggesting that the leadership position is contestable. The top four applicants are separated by fewer than 20 families, forming a tightly bunched leading cluster rather than a clear monopoly.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Asahi Kasei Corporation68
2Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.54
3De Nora Permelec Ltd.53
4Agfa-Gevaert NV51
5Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.39
6ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) Ltd.31
7ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers GmbH29
8Tokuyama Corporation27
9Yokohama National University21
10Stiesdal Hydrogen A/S15
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Industrie De Nora S.p.A.14
12Richards, William R.13
13Tsinghua University13
14Cameron Health Inc.12
15LUT University9
16Nitto Denko Corporation9
17Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute8
18ABB (Switzerland) AG8
19Beijing University of Chemical Technology8
20Volker, Alan L.7
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of established Japanese chemical and electrolyser manufacturers, alongside European specialty-materials firms, reflects the technology’s roots in industrial chlor-alkali and water-electrolysis engineering. This incumbency creates a high IP density around core diaphragm cell configurations that new entrants must design around.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and likely undercount actual activity; conclusions about very recent momentum should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth is strong; electrolytic production dominates the technology mix

Two complementary views — annual filing trend and IPC technology composition — reveal both the pace of field expansion and the structural concentration of innovation around electrolytic cell design.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose sharply from 18 families in 2017 to a peak of 129 in 2023, representing the core of a 228% multi-year growth surge. Volume eased to 95 in 2024 and the 2025–2026 figures reflect publication lag rather than any confirmed reversal; the multi-year trajectory remains strongly positive.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 129 in 2023.18201740201829201933202039202110720221292023952024111202572026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) dominates the IPC mix by a large margin, confirming that diaphragm and membrane design for electrolysers is the primary innovation axis. Secondary branches — C08J (polymer processing), H01M (batteries and fuel cells), and B01D (separation processes) — each account for a small share, signalling adjacent but underdeveloped innovation threads.

Technology compositionC25B · Electrolytic production of compounds leads with 721; C08J · Polymer processing & solutions 62.C25B · Electrolytic prod…721C08J · Polymer processin…62H01M · Batteries, cells …48B01D · Separation proces…43C02F · Water & wastewate…23C08L · Polymer compositi…20B01J · Chemical/physical…19C01B · Non-metallic elem…15↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250283226A1Published 2025-09-11

Electrolysis system for hydrogen production and ca…

Uchicago ARGONNE, LLC

An electrochemical reactor for capturing carbon dioxide and producing bicarbonate and hydrogen is described herein. The electrochemical reactor is useful for, among other things, converting biogas to a bicarbonate and hydrogen feedstock for biomethanation. The reactor comprises at least one reactor unit comprising an electrolyzer cell and at least one… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Electrolysis system for hydrogen production and ca… — patent drawingElectrolysis system for hydrogen production and ca… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Ion permeable diaphragm87
2Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis and alka…78
3Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, alkalin…60
4Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis and meth…54
5Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, and met…44
6Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, method …42
7Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, alkalin…36
8Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis and meth…36

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a growth-phase trajectory, moderate incumbent concentration, and active multi-party collaboration defines a field where both incumbents and well-positioned challengers can carve out defensible positions.

Growth

Growth phase — expanding on a multi-year basis from a 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth, driven by a 228% increase in three-year filing volume versus the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 129 families and has eased since, though publication lag means recent years are understated. The overall trajectory remains expansionary, consistent with green-hydrogen policy tailwinds accelerating commercialisation of AEM and improved alkaline diaphragm systems.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a contestable top tier

The top five filers hold 37% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output — meaningful concentration but not a dominant-player lock-in. The narrow gap between the first and fourth ranked applicants (68 vs 51 patent families) means the leading position is within reach of a focused programme. Chinese universities and start-ups are entering the ranking, signalling a broadening competitive base that could compress incumbents’ lead over time.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

A dense Japanese co-filing network anchors the ecosystem

The most active co-filing pairs are Kawasaki Heavy Industries with De Nora Permelec (42 joint families) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries with ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) (28 joint families). De Nora Permelec also collaborates with Yokohama National University (16 joint families), bridging industrial and academic research. These alliances cluster around cell-assembly and electrode-diaphragm integration, suggesting that key system-level IP is jointly held and harder to replicate unilaterally.

Alliance-driven
Geography

China leads filing volume; Europe and Japan hold deep prior-art bases

China accounts for the largest share of patent records among jurisdictions, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). Japan and the United States are tied for fourth. Australia, India, and Canada show meaningful secondary coverage, reflecting global commercial interest in electrolyser deployment. The PCT route is well-used, consistent with applicants seeking broad multi-jurisdictional protection for platform membrane technologies.

China-led, global reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.De Nora Permelec Ltd.42
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) Ltd.28
De Nora Permelec Ltd.ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers (Japan) Ltd.18
De Nora Permelec Ltd.Yokohama National University16
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.Yokohama National University14
Yokohama National UniversitySumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.5
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.Chlorine Engineers Corp.3
De Nora Permelec Ltd.Chlorine Engineers Corp.3
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Yokohama National University3
Industrie De Nora S.p.A.Cameron Health Inc.2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family designating multiple offices will appear under each.Explore insights →
Leaders

Asahi Kasei and Agfa-Gevaert lead on divergent technology emphases

The top two highlighted applicants illustrate the field’s dual innovation axes: integrated electrolyser cell architecture versus diaphragm/membrane material engineering.

Leader · Asahi Kasei

Asahi Kasei

Asahi Kasei holds 68 patent families — the largest position in the corpus — concentrated in electrolytic cell configuration (C25B 9), hydrogen/chlorine production processes (C25B 1), and electrode design (C25B 11). Recent-period momentum shows a 27% decline versus the prior three-year window, suggesting a maturing programme rather than active acceleration, though the absolute portfolio remains the largest.

families: 68
Challenger · Agfa-Gevaert

Agfa-Gevaert

Agfa-Gevaert holds 51 patent families and is the fastest-accelerating major filer, at 3.6× its prior three-year volume. Its emphasis falls on diaphragm/membrane materials (C25B 13) and electrolytic production processes (C25B 1), a profile distinct from the cell-assembly focus of the Japanese incumbents. This momentum and material-science orientation position Agfa-Gevaert as the most dynamic challenger in the current window.

families: 51
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their filing trajectories, and technology emphases in PatSnap Eureka.
ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers GmbHNippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Asahi Kasei Corporation8▼ -27%
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.3▲ new entrant
De Nora Permelec Ltd.3▲ new entrant
Agfa-Gevaert NV36▲ 3.6× vs prior 3-yr
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.9▼ -40%
ThyssenKrupp Uhde Chlorine Engineers GmbH28▲ new entrant
Tokuyama Corporation7▼ -65%
Yokohama National University10▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant counts are at the patent-family level; technology focus codes are derived from IPC classification of each applicant’s families.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant electrolysis core

Beyond the dominant C25B electrolytic-production class, several IPC branches show low patent density relative to their technical relevance to diaphragm and AEM systems, representing areas where prior-art coverage is sparse.

H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells

H01M carries only 48 patent records — 4% of the branch distribution — despite the direct structural and materials overlap between AEM electrolysis cells and anion-exchange membrane fuel cells. Ion-exchange membrane design, electrode-membrane assembly, and degradation mechanisms are shared engineering problems. A team with AEM electrolysis IP could extend into fuel-cell configurations with relatively low incremental R&D, and the sparse prior art reduces freedom-to-operate obstacles.

Search this in Eureka →

B01D · Separation processes (filtration)

B01D holds 43 patent records — 4% share — covering membrane separation and filtration, adjacent to diaphragm permselectivity and gas-bubble management in electrolysers. Improved gas-liquid separation within the cell stack is a known performance bottleneck, and tailored microporous or asymmetric membrane architectures developed under B01D frameworks could address it. The low density suggests this functional angle has not been heavily patented by current participants.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka’s white-space analysis surfaces all under-filed branches and maps them against applicant portfolios.
C02F · Water & wastewater treatmentC08L · Polymer compositions+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to the total IPC record count in the corpus, not to the family total.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across C25B sub-classes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 9 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 13 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 15 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 11 · Electrolytic production of compounds
Asahi Kasei CorporationStrong · 55Strong · 65Moderate · 27Moderate · 19Moderate · 27
De Nora Permelec Ltd.Strong · 40Strong · 48Moderate · 21Moderate · 12Strong · 29
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.Strong · 35Strong · 49Strong · 32Emerging · 5Moderate · 21
Agfa-Gevaert NVStrong · 45Moderate · 25Strong · 51Emerging · 6Absent
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Strong · 27Strong · 22Strong · 39AbsentAbsent
Yokohama National UniversityStrong · 24Strong · 24AbsentAbsentStrong · 21
Tokuyama CorporationStrong · 20Strong · 27Moderate · 9Moderate · 13Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own alkaline diaphragm / AEM landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.