Alkaline Electrolyzer Balance of Plant Patent Landscape 2026
- Filings peaked in 2018 at 24 families and the 2022 midpoint sits at the same level, a flat-to-declining pattern rather than renewed growth.
- China and Europe dominate filing location with 53 and 43 records respectively, more than triple any other receiving office in the set.
- Every named top assignee shows zero filings in the latest tracked year including several at -100% year-over-year, though publication lag understates the most recent period.
Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (17) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 145 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) is the oldest commercial route to producing hydrogen from water and power, and balance of plant is the collection of everything around the electrolyzer stack that makes a system work at scale: lye circulation loops that move electrolyte through the stack, gas-liquid separation tanks that split hydrogen and oxygen out of the returning electrolyte, and the system integration layer — rectifiers, valving, thermal management — that ties a power source to a working hydrogen output. This landscape isolates patent families that claim these system-level functions specifically, rather than the broader universe of electrolysis chemistry or catalyst material patents.
The dataset spans 2015 through the mid-2026 cut-off and holds 145 published patent families, all classified under the electrolytic-production IPC subclass C25B, with a search string built from balance-of-plant terminology rather than general AWE keywords. That framing keeps the set focused on hardware and system integration claims — the parts of an alkaline electrolyzer plant that determine uptime and serviceability — rather than electrode or membrane chemistry on its own.
Filing trend and technology composition
145 published families sit inside this search, filed between 2015 and the mid-2026 cut-off. The trend and the IPC spread below show where claim density has actually built up, not where the technology is headed next.
Filings peaked in 2018 and have not returned
Filings peaked at 24 in 2018, and the 2022 midpoint sits at the same level (24), which points to a flat-to-declining filing pattern rather than sustained growth. Recent years read low partly because publication lags filing by around 18 months, so the final two years in the chart will fill in as those applications publish, but the pattern of no renewed peak since 2018 stands.
C25B carries the whole set; adjacent subclasses are thin
Every one of the 145 records sits in C25B (electrolytic production of compounds), the core electrolyzer subclass. The next largest, H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells), holds only 13 records, and B01J (catalysis) and B05D (coating) each hold single digits — a sign that balance-of-plant claims have stayed close to core electrolyzer mechanics rather than spreading into adjacent materials or process disciplines.
Shares are the percentage of the 145 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Alkaline Electrolyzer Balance of Plant with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about alkaline electrolyzer balance of plant and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents in alkaline electrolyzer balance of plant
US20240003028A1 — Alkaline water electrolysis system and method of operating alkaline water electrolysis system
An alkaline water electrolysis system includes a rectifier connected to a fluctuating power source that converts AC power to DC power; a plurality of bipolar electrolyzers that generate hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis using a DC voltage supplied from the rectifier; gas-liquid separation tanks connected to the electrolyzers that separate hydrogen and oxygen from the electrolytic solution and store it; and open/close valves coordinating the separation process across the stack array.Abstract text is drawn directly from the published filing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN111748822A | 一种大型碱性电解水制氢装置的综合热管理系统 | 84 |
| 2 | EP3575442A1 | Bipolar electrolytic vessel, bipolar electrolytic vessel for alkali water electrolysis, and method for manufa… | 40 |
| 3 | EP3272908A1 | Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, alkaline water electrolysis apparatus, method for producing hydrog… | 36 |
| 4 | US20180073155A1 | Diaphragm for alkaline water electrolysis, alkaline water electrolysis device, method for producing hydrogen,… | 28 |
| 5 | EP3604620A1 | Water electrolysis system, water electrolysis method, and method for producing hydrogen | 18 |
| 6 | CN113089022A | 一种碱性制氢电解槽的碱液循环系统及其工作方法 | 16 |
| 7 | US20210040631A1 | Apparatus for alkaline water electrolysis, and gas production method | 16 |
| 8 | CN114934278A | 一种利用微细纤维诱导气泡聚并提高电解效率的装置及方法 | 14 |
| 9 | EP3575439A1 | Electrolytic bath, electrolysis device, electrolysis method, and method for producing hydrogen | 13 |
| 10 | EP3388553A1 | Negative electrode, method for producing same, electrolytic cell using same, and hydrogen production method | 12 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records are structurally favoured, so treat this as an influence signal rather than a current relevance ranking.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the citation and filing pattern actually indicates
Citation counts here favour older, foundational filings by construction — a searched corpus always rewards records that have had years to accumulate citing references. Read the numbers below as a map of influence within this dataset, not as a verdict on which route is best today.
One thermal management filing anchors the set
CN111748822A, covering comprehensive thermal management for large alkaline electrolyzers, is cited more than twice as often as the next record. That gap suggests it is the reference point other filers design around, not simply the oldest document in the pool.
Filing location tracks manufacturing base, not just markets
China and the EPO together hold 96 of the 145 records. The US, Australia, India and WIPO combined hold fewer records than China alone, which narrows where enforcement actually matters for most competitors in this space.
Claims stay close to the core electrolyzer mechanics
Every record sits in C25B; the next largest subclass, H01M, holds only 13. Catalysis (B01J, 5) and coating (B05D, 4) are barely touched, which is where combination claims remain comparatively unclaimed.
Joint filing is rare and none dominate
Only six co-assignee pairs appear across the set, and the strongest pairs share just two joint filings each. Most patenting activity here is single-assignee, which limits how much can be inferred about supply-chain partnerships from filing data alone.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to alkaline electrolyzer balance of plant, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| De Nora Industrie S.p.A. | Cameron Health, Inc. | 2 |
| De Nora Industrie S.p.A. | VIERING JENTSCHURA & PARTNER MBB PATENT- & RECHTANWÄLTE | 2 |
| Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. | Yokohama National University | 2 |
| Cameron Health, Inc. | VIERING JENTSCHURA & PARTNER MBB PATENT- & RECHTANWÄLTE | 2 |
| Tongji University | Suzhou Jingli Hydrogen Production Equipment Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Qingdao Chuangqi Xinde New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | Qingdao Chuangqi Xinde New Energy Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 |
With only six co-assignee pairs across 145 families, and no pair exceeding two joint filings, this is a field patented largely by single entities rather than through formal joint-development filings.
Who holds the ground, and where it is still open
Filing activity in this set is led by a handful of established electrode and electrolyzer manufacturers, with a long tail of single-institution filers behind them. Recent-year momentum across the named top assignees has flattened to zero, which changes how a new entrant should read the competitive map.
No leading assignee is filing in the most recent tracked year
Asahi Kasei, Tokuyama, De Nora Permelec, De Nora Industrie, Nippon Shokubai and Tongji University all show zero filings in the latest year, several down -100% year-over-year. Combined with the flat 2018-to-2022 trend, this points to a mature claim base among incumbents rather than an active filing race.
Joint filing is present but never dominant
De Nora Industrie appears in two separate co-assignee pairs, once with Cameron Health and once with a German patent attorney firm, and Nippon Shokubai pairs twice with Yokohama National University. No pair exceeds two joint filings across the whole set.
Incumbent filings concentrate in two jurisdictions
With China and the EPO holding 96 of 145 records between them, an assignee's enforcement reach outside those two offices is comparatively thin — useful to check before assuming a incumbent's patent position blocks a US or India-only launch.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha | 0 | — |
| Tokuyama Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| De Nora Permelec Ltd. | 0 | — |
| De Nora Industrie S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Tongji University | 0 | -100% |
| Cameron Health, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Qingdao Chuangqi Xinde New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing and citation patterns above point to specific follow-up checks rather than a single conclusion. These are the questions worth running through the full dataset in Eureka before committing to a filing or freedom-to-operate position.
Run a full freedom-to-operate check on the top-cited cluster
The diaphragm, bipolar vessel and thermal management families carry the bulk of the citation weight in this set. Before designing a system around any of these functions, check claim scope in your target jurisdiction specifically — coverage is uneven across China, Europe and the US.
Open the citation table in EurekaTest a combination claim in the under-claimed IPC branches
B01J catalysis and B05D coating together hold under 10 records against a 145-record core. Drafting a claim that ties a coating or catalytic step to a specific balance-of-plant function is worth testing against prior art before committing R&D time.
Search adjacent IPC classes in EurekaTrack whether recent-year momentum recovers as filings publish
Every named top assignee shows zero filings in the latest year, but publication lag of roughly 18 months means this period is not yet complete. Re-run the momentum view in six to twelve months to see whether the flat trend holds or was a publication artifact.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaFrequently asked questions
In this dataset, balance of plant covers the systems around the electrolyzer stack itself: lye circulation loops, gas-liquid separation tanks, and system integration components such as rectifiers and valving that connect a power source to the stack and manage the hydrogen and oxygen output. It excludes pure catalyst chemistry or membrane material claims unless they are tied to one of these system-level functions. The search here combines alkaline electrolyzer terminology with these specific balance-of-plant terms and restricts to IPC classes C25B15, C25B9 and C25B1/04, so it captures system integration claims rather than the full universe of electrolysis chemistry patents.
The data shows a peak of 24 families in 2018 with the 2022 midpoint at the same level, which is a flat-to-declining pattern rather than one year of decline followed by recovery. This does not necessarily mean the underlying technology has stalled — it more likely reflects that the core system architectures (rectifier-to-stack-to-separator, lye loop design) were claimed early and later filers have had less unclaimed ground to stake out. Readers should also account for publication lag: recent years in any filing trend are understated because it takes roughly 18 months from filing to publication, so the very last one or two years will always look artificially low at the point of any given data cut.
China leads with 53 records in this dataset, followed by the European Patent Office with 43, then Australia and the United States tied at 11 each, India at 7 and WIPO/PCT filings at 5. The gap between China and Europe versus the other offices suggests that companies filing balance-of-plant claims are prioritising the two largest electrolyzer manufacturing and deployment markets first, with US and Australian filings used more selectively. This distribution is useful for freedom-to-operate scoping: a design cleared in the US market still needs separate clearance in China and Europe given how concentrated filings are there.
Yes relative to the rest of the balance-of-plant space — it is one of the two search terms that anchors this 145-family dataset alongside lye circulation, and several of the most-cited records in the set, including the top-cited CN111748822A and the representative US20240003028A1 filing, build their claims around gas-liquid separation tanks and valving. That said, high filing density in this sub-area means the claim space around separation tank geometry and valve sequencing is occupied, not that every possible separation approach is blocked — combinations with catalysis or coating steps from adjacent IPC classes remain comparatively open.
The most visible names in recent-year momentum data — including Asahi Kasei, Tokuyama, De Nora Permelec, De Nora Industrie, Nippon Shokubai and Tongji University — all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, several with a -100% year-over-year change. That flat recent momentum across the named assignees is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining filing trend, though it should be read alongside the publication-lag caveat: some of that apparent drop-off may still be filings working their way through the 18-month publication pipeline rather than genuine inactivity.
Research Alkaline Electrolyzer Balance of Plant in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole alkaline electrolyzer balance of plant corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.