Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 50 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks 50 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine alkaline electrolyzer or alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) terminology with green-hydrogen or power-to-hydrogen framing, restricted to the core electrolytic-production IPC classes (C25B1/04, C25B15, C25B9). It is a narrow, claims-focused slice: general electrolysis prior art and PEM-only filings are excluded by construction.
Because the search pairs a specific electrochemistry term with a specific application framing, the set is small enough that every family matters — this is not a corpus where a handful of records can be ignored as noise.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts will keep rising as later filings publish; treat the most recent two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 50-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings were effectively zero through 2017, held near single digits through the early 2020s (2022 = 3), and only cleared into double digits in 2025 (20). That shape is consistent with a technology area that stayed dormant while PEM and other routes drew attention, then saw a late burst of interest tied to renewable-power buildouts — not a steady compounding trend.
Every record classifies under C25B (electrolytic production), as expected from the search construction. The next-largest subclasses are C02F (water & wastewater treatment, 13 records) and B01D (separation processes, 11 records) — both point to separator membranes, feedwater purity and coupled desalination as the actual site of differentiated claims, well ahead of battery/fuel-cell crossover (H01M, 4) or catalysis (B01J, 1).
Shares are the percentage of the 50 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by ABDİOĞULLARI ARGE MÜHENDİSLİK TASARIM ANONİM ŞİRKETİ, this filing claims a separator membrane built on a woven or non-woven PPS base coated with a kaolin/kaolinite-clay-and-alumina mullite aluminium silicate layer, applied as a slurry of PSU, PVDF and PTrFE binders together with Aloe vera-derived compounds (aloin, aloesin, emodin), aimed at high mechanical strength, alkaline resistance and flexibility.The mineral-coating-plus-plant-extract binder combination is unusual enough in this corpus that it defines its own narrow claim territory rather than crowding an existing one.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN117466365A | 一种电解水制氢耦合海水淡化系统及方法 | 23 |
| 2 | CN113215593A | 一种混合式电解水的绿氢制备系统 | 7 |
| 3 | WO2024183248A1 | 一种电解水制氢耦合海水淡化系统及方法 | 4 |
| 4 | WO2024191979A1 | Selective separators for water electrolysis applications and methods for making the same | 2 |
| 5 | WO2025132855A1 | A separator for alkaline water electrolysis | 1 |
| 6 | CN119465184A | 一种利用电解液浓度差提高碱性电解水制氢效率的方法 | 1 |
| 7 | WO2024094454A2 | A separator for alkaline water electrolysis | 1 |
| 8 | WO2024183249A1 | 一种适用于海上漂浮式风机的电解水制氢系统及方法 | 1 |
| 9 | EP4365334A1 | A separator for alkaline water electrolysis | 1 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of influence on the field's prior art, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Read together, the trend, the IPC spread and the citation table describe a field that is technically shallow in stack hardware but comparatively dense in separator and water-handling claims.
The midpoint year sits at only 3 families; the 2025 peak of 20 is the whole story of growth in this set. Given the 18-month publication lag, 2026's count of 2 is not yet a decline signal.
Combined, water/wastewater treatment and separation-process classifications cover roughly half the corpus, ahead of any battery or catalysis crossover — separators and coupled water systems are where distinct claim language actually accumulates.
The most-cited record in the set pairs electrolytic hydrogen production with seawater desalination — a system-level claim, not a materials or catalyst claim — followed by a hybrid-electrolyte green-hydrogen system at 7 citations.
Every named assignee with prior filings shows zero activity in the latest tracked year. This is a field still being entered by single-cycle filers rather than defended by repeat programmes.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Schlumberger Limited | 2 |
| Autonomous University of Madrid | DH2 ENERGY ESPAÑA SL | 1 |
Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the whole set, the strongest being two affiliated Schlumberger entities filing together twice — evidence of internal group filing rather than cross-company collaboration.
With 50 families spread across research institutes, industrial gas and oilfield-services companies, and a European membrane specialist, no single assignee has built a defensible position — the ranking is a long tail of single- or double-filing entrants rather than a concentrated leaderboard.
Assignees including Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the two Schlumberger entities show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, several with a -100% YoY reading against their earlier activity.
PCT filings lead the receiving-office count, ahead of India (11), China (8) and Europe (7) — a sign that filers are keeping jurisdictional options open rather than committing early to a single national market.
Cross-entity collaboration is minimal in this dataset: the only pairs on record are an internal Schlumberger group pairing and a university–SME pairing (Autonomous University of Madrid + DH2 ENERGY ESPAÑA SL).
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Agfa-Gevaert N.V. | 0 | -100% |
| Evonik Operations GmbH | 0 | -100% |
| Chemours FC, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 0 | — |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Schlumberger Limited | 0 | -100% |
| VOLTA ENERGY | 0 | -100% |
| ABB (Switzerland) Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to open ground in separator chemistry and dynamic operation rather than in core electrolytic-cell claims, which are already crowded by the C25B baseline.
Pull every C02F/B01D-classified family in this set and cluster by base polymer, coating chemistry and pore structure to see how tight the mullite/kaolin approach in WO2024005740A1 actually is.
Explore separator claims in Eureka →Re-run this search in 6–12 months once 2025 and 2026 filings finish publishing, to see whether the jump to 20 families was a one-off or the start of sustained growth.
Set up a monitoring run in Eureka →Renewable-coupled, load-following control appears thin in current claim language — worth a targeted FTO search before committing engineering resources there.
Run an FTO search in Eureka →This dataset identifies 50 patent families published between 2015 and 2026 that combine alkaline electrolyzer or alkaline water electrolysis terminology with green-hydrogen framing, within the core C25B1/04, C25B15 and C25B9 classification codes. That is a narrow slice of the broader hydrogen-production patent universe, since it excludes PEM and solid-oxide electrolysis filings by construction. Filing activity was minimal before 2022 and only reached double digits in 2025, so the total will keep growing as later filings publish.
No single assignee dominates this corpus; the 50 families are spread thinly across research institutes, oilfield-services groups, industrial gas companies and one Turkish membrane specialist. Every assignee with prior filing history shows zero activity in the most recent tracked year, which is a sign of a field still being entered by first-time or single-cycle filers rather than one with an established leaderboard. Co-filing is also rare, limited to two pairs in the whole dataset.
WO2024005740A1 claims a specific alkaline electrolyzer separator membrane: a woven or non-woven PPS base coated with a kaolin/kaolinite-and-alumina mullite aluminium silicate layer, applied using PSU, PVDF and PTrFE binders combined with Aloe vera-derived compounds. It does not block separator work generally — it blocks that specific mineral-coating-plus-plant-extract-binder combination and close variants. Separator approaches using different base polymers, different mineral coatings, or synthetic-only binder systems sit outside its claim scope.
The trend is uneven rather than steadily rising: filings were near zero through 2017, sat at just 3 families at the 2022 midpoint, then jumped to a peak of 20 in 2025. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the 2026 figure of 2 families understates actual filing activity for that year and should not be read as a decline. The honest read is that 2025 marked a genuine acceleration, but one data point is not enough to call it a sustained trend yet.
The clearest under-claimed ground sits in dynamic, renewable-coupled load-following control and in bifunctional separator/desalination membranes — both appear as secondary themes rather than dense claim clusters in this corpus. Alkaline electrolyte-catalyst co-optimisation for intermittent power input is similarly thin. Core electrolytic-cell hardware claims under C25B are comparatively well-occupied, so new entrants are more likely to find open ground in the control-and-materials periphery than in the cell itself.
Go past this page: query the whole alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.