https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/alkaline-electrolyzer-green-hydrogen-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hydrogen & Fuel Cells
Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production Patent Landscape 2026
  • Filing is flat, not rising. the midpoint year (2022) sits at just 3 families against a peak of 20 in 2025 — most of that 2025 spike is recent enough that it likely still understates true filing volume.
  • Separator membranes carry the citation weight. the two most-cited records in the set — one at 23 citations, one at 7 — both concern electrolysis-coupled desalination and hybrid electrolyte systems, not stack hardware.
  • No assignee is compounding. every tracked assignee with prior activity shows 0 filings in the latest year and a -100% YoY reading, which points to a field of single-cycle entrants rather than sustained programmes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
50
Published Records
52%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+267%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
WO
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 50 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape tracks 50 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine alkaline electrolyzer or alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) terminology with green-hydrogen or power-to-hydrogen framing, restricted to the core electrolytic-production IPC classes (C25B1/04, C25B15, C25B9). It is a narrow, claims-focused slice: general electrolysis prior art and PEM-only filings are excluded by construction.

Because the search pairs a specific electrochemistry term with a specific application framing, the set is small enough that every family matters — this is not a corpus where a handful of records can be ignored as noise.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts will keep rising as later filings publish; treat the most recent two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2015–2026
  1. 1AGFA GEVAERT NV12
  2. 2DALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES4
  3. 3THE CHEMOURS CO FC LLC4
  4. 4EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH4
  5. 5VOLTA ENERGY2
  6. 6SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA2
  7. 7ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG2
  8. 8SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY BV2
  9. 9BAOWU CLEAN ENERGY CO LTD1
  10. 10SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 50-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A late, uneven ramp

Filings were effectively zero through 2017, held near single digits through the early 2020s (2022 = 3), and only cleared into double digits in 2025 (20). That shape is consistent with a technology area that stayed dormant while PEM and other routes drew attention, then saw a late burst of interest tied to renewable-power buildouts — not a steady compounding trend.

A late, uneven ramp0510152002017201820192020202120222023202420202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C25B dominates; water treatment and separation are the real secondary claims

Every record classifies under C25B (electrolytic production), as expected from the search construction. The next-largest subclasses are C02F (water & wastewater treatment, 13 records) and B01D (separation processes, 11 records) — both point to separator membranes, feedwater purity and coupled desalination as the actual site of differentiated claims, well ahead of battery/fuel-cell crossover (H01M, 4) or catalysis (B01J, 1).

C25B dominates; water treatment and separation are the real secondary claimsC25B · Electrolytic production of com…50100.0%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment1326.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1122.0%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells48.0%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…12.0%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …12.0%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds12.0%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions12.0%Other816.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 50 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative record
WO2024005740A12024-01-04

WO2024005740A1 — Mineral coated alkaline electrolyzer separator membrane

ABDİOĞULLARI ARGE MÜHENDİSLİK TASARIM ANONİM ŞİRKETİ

Filed by ABDİOĞULLARI ARGE MÜHENDİSLİK TASARIM ANONİM ŞİRKETİ, this filing claims a separator membrane built on a woven or non-woven PPS base coated with a kaolin/kaolinite-clay-and-alumina mullite aluminium silicate layer, applied as a slurry of PSU, PVDF and PTrFE binders together with Aloe vera-derived compounds (aloin, aloesin, emodin), aimed at high mechanical strength, alkaline resistance and flexibility.The mineral-coating-plus-plant-extract binder combination is unusual enough in this corpus that it defines its own narrow claim territory rather than crowding an existing one.

WO2024005740A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN117466365A一种电解水制氢耦合海水淡化系统及方法23
2CN113215593A一种混合式电解水的绿氢制备系统7
3WO2024183248A1一种电解水制氢耦合海水淡化系统及方法4
4WO2024191979A1Selective separators for water electrolysis applications and methods for making the same2
5WO2025132855A1A separator for alkaline water electrolysis1
6CN119465184A一种利用电解液浓度差提高碱性电解水制氢效率的方法1
7WO2024094454A2A separator for alkaline water electrolysis1
8WO2024183249A1一种适用于海上漂浮式风机的电解水制氢系统及方法1
9EP4365334A1A separator for alkaline water electrolysis1

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of influence on the field's prior art, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field

Read together, the trend, the IPC spread and the citation table describe a field that is technically shallow in stack hardware but comparatively dense in separator and water-handling claims.

Filing shape
3 → 20
families, 2022 → 2025

A late burst, not a steady climb

The midpoint year sits at only 3 families; the 2025 peak of 20 is the whole story of growth in this set. Given the 18-month publication lag, 2026's count of 2 is not yet a decline signal.

Treat 2025–2026 as provisional.
Claim geography
13 + 11
C02F + B01D records

Water handling out-claims stack chemistry

Combined, water/wastewater treatment and separation-process classifications cover roughly half the corpus, ahead of any battery or catalysis crossover — separators and coupled water systems are where distinct claim language actually accumulates.

C25B is the entry ticket; C02F/B01D is the differentiation.
Citation concentration
23 cites
top record (CN117466365A)

Desalination coupling leads influence

The most-cited record in the set pairs electrolytic hydrogen production with seawater desalination — a system-level claim, not a materials or catalyst claim — followed by a hybrid-electrolyte green-hydrogen system at 7 citations.

Older filings accumulate citations by default; weight this alongside recency.
Assignee activity
-100% YoY
across every tracked assignee

No sustained filer yet

Every named assignee with prior filings shows zero activity in the latest tracked year. This is a field still being entered by single-cycle filers rather than defended by repeat programmes.

Watch for whether 2025's volume repeats in 2026 data once it fully publishes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Limited2
Autonomous University of MadridDH2 ENERGY ESPAÑA SL1

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the whole set, the strongest being two affiliated Schlumberger entities filing together twice — evidence of internal group filing rather than cross-company collaboration.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

With 50 families spread across research institutes, industrial gas and oilfield-services companies, and a European membrane specialist, no single assignee has built a defensible position — the ranking is a long tail of single- or double-filing entrants rather than a concentrated leaderboard.

Momentum
0
latest-year filings

Prior filers have gone quiet

Assignees including Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the two Schlumberger entities show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, several with a -100% YoY reading against their earlier activity.

A pause, not necessarily an exit — recency lag applies here too.
Receiving office
14
WIPO (PCT) filings

PCT is the preferred first gate

PCT filings lead the receiving-office count, ahead of India (11), China (8) and Europe (7) — a sign that filers are keeping jurisdictional options open rather than committing early to a single national market.

US filings, at 3, are comparatively light for a commercial-scale energy technology.
Collaboration
2
co-assignee pairs

Filing is overwhelmingly solo

Cross-entity collaboration is minimal in this dataset: the only pairs on record are an internal Schlumberger group pairing and a university–SME pairing (Autonomous University of Madrid + DH2 ENERGY ESPAÑA SL).

Expect academic-industrial tie-ups to grow as the field matures.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Sub-areas where the current claim density is thin relative to the field's overall activity
Dynamic load-following control for renewable-coupled AWEBifunctional separator/desalination membranesAlkaline electrolyte-catalyst co-optimisation for intermittent powerAloe-derived or bio-based binder chemistries for separators
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Agfa-Gevaert N.V.0-100%
Evonik Operations GmbH0-100%
Chemours FC, LLC0-100%
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
Schlumberger Technology Corporation0-100%
Schlumberger Limited0-100%
VOLTA ENERGY0-100%
ABB (Switzerland) Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to open ground in separator chemistry and dynamic operation rather than in core electrolytic-cell claims, which are already crowded by the C25B baseline.

Map the separator sub-cluster in full

Pull every C02F/B01D-classified family in this set and cluster by base polymer, coating chemistry and pore structure to see how tight the mullite/kaolin approach in WO2024005740A1 actually is.

Explore separator claims in Eureka →

Track the 2025 filing spike as it matures

Re-run this search in 6–12 months once 2025 and 2026 filings finish publishing, to see whether the jump to 20 families was a one-off or the start of sustained growth.

Set up a monitoring run in Eureka →

Check freedom-to-operate on dynamic operation claims

Renewable-coupled, load-following control appears thin in current claim language — worth a targeted FTO search before committing engineering resources there.

Run an FTO search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on alkaline electrolyzer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Alkaline Electrolyzer Green Hydrogen Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole alkaline electrolyzer green hydrogen production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.