Book a demo

Alkaline Electrolyzer Durability Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026

Alkaline Electrolyzer Durability Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/alkaline-electrolyzer-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Hydrogen & Fuel Cells · Patent Landscape
Alkaline electrolyzer patents: who owns durability and reliability claims
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 17 families, then eased back rather than climbing further — this is not a technology still accelerating into a filing race.
  • China dominates the receiving-office count with 39 filings, more than three times the next-largest office (Europe, 11), concentrating prosecution risk and prior art in Chinese-language documents.
  • Co-assignment is rare — only 3 pairs across 70 families, meaning most durability improvements are being filed as solo IP rather than through joint development programmes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
70
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+1000%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 70 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) is the oldest commercial route to hydrogen, and its economics increasingly hinge on how long a stack survives dynamic load cycling, corrosive electrolyte exposure and diaphragm wear rather than on efficiency alone. This landscape isolates filings that combine AWE terminology with explicit durability language — electrode degradation, diaphragm durability, dynamic operation durability and service life — inside the core electrolytic-production IPC classes (C25B11, C25B13, C25B15).

The 70 families identified span filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, with publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months — so 2025 and 2026 counts will rise as later filings publish. The set is small enough that individual assignee moves are visible, and skewed enough by receiving office that geography is itself a signal worth reading.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DE NORA PERMELEC LTD11
  2. 2FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JULICH GMBH5
  3. 3STIESDAL HYDROGEN AS4
  4. 4RWTH AACHEN UNIV3
  5. 5Hunan Zhongwei New Hydrogen Materials Technology Co., Ltd.3
  6. 6HUA XIA HYDROGEN TECHNOLOGY (XIAMEN) CO LTD2
  7. 7XIAN HYDROGEN BASED CARBON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO LTD2
  8. 8GUANGZHOU SINOMACH SEALING TECH CO LTD2
  9. 9Sany Hydrogen Energy Co., Ltd.2
  10. 10XIAN TAIJIN NEW ENERGY & MATERIALS SCI TECH CO LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 70 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from zero in 2017 to a peak of 17 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 5 — a shape that shows a build-up mid-decade rather than steady linear growth. The 2026 figure of 4 is partial and will understate that year's true total once outstanding applications publish.

Filing trend, 2017-2026051015200201720182019202020212022172023202417202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) anchors every record by search construction, but the secondary classes are informative: C25D (electroplating/electroforming, 10 records) points to electrode coating and surface-treatment durability work, while H01M, B01J and B82Y appearances show catalyst and nanostructure durability claims spilling into adjacent art.

IPC subclass distributionC25B · Electrolytic production of com…70100.0%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming1014.3%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells68.6%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …45.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…34.3%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications34.3%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…22.9%B05B · Spraying & atomising11.4%Other912.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 70 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited prior art in this set

Representative filing
US20200040473A12020-02-06

Chemically Resistant, Oxidic Electrocatalyst For Oxygen Evolution During Alkaline Water Electrolysis

FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH GMBH

Disclosed is a biphasic electrically conductive perovskite-based mixed oxide of the structure ABO3 with A=Ba, and B=Co, comprising additionally 5-45 at% Co3O4 and 0.5 to 3 at% Ti as dopant, with a preferred stoichiometric formula BaCo1-xTixO3-δ:Co3O4 targeting chemical resistance during oxygen evolution.Filed by Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, published 2020-02-06.

US20200040473A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Highest-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20180334751A1Method for electrolyzing alkaline water17
2CN116288509A一种碱性水电解制氢用阴极及其制备方法和应用11
3US20200040473A1Chemically Resistant, Oxidic Electrocatalyst For Oxygen Evolution During Alkaline Water Electrolysis11
4CN115094481A适应宽功率波动的模块化碱性电解水制氢调度切换方法9
5CN118007157A一种模块化碱性电解水制氢设备6
6CN115786950A一种水电解用膜电极及其制备方法与水电解池5
7CN115161701A一种水凝胶电解质隔膜以及碱性电解水装置5
8CN117684185A碱性电解水制氢装置及方法3
9WO2018178135A1Chemically resistant, oxidic electrocatalyst for oxygen development during alkaline water electrolysis based …3
10EP3399070A1Method for electrolyzing alkaline water3

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus — read this as a map of influential prior art, not of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Four read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC spread, citation table and co-assignment data.

Filing shape
Peak 2023: 17
families in the peak year

Activity has already crested

Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a 2023 peak of 17, then fell back — durability-specific claiming in AWE looks like a wave that has already passed its high point rather than a market still ramping up its filing rate.

2026 count is partial due to publication lag.
Geography
China: 39 of ~70
receiving-office filings

Prior art risk is concentrated in Chinese filings

With 39 of the tracked filings routed through China against 11 through the EPO and single digits elsewhere, freedom-to-operate work in this space cannot skip Chinese-language prosecution history without missing the bulk of the art.

Europe, WIPO, the US, Denmark and Australia make up the remainder.
Citation signal
Top cite: 17
citations on the leading record

Electrode and catalyst chemistry lead citation counts

The most-cited records skew toward electrocatalyst composition and cathode preparation rather than mechanical diaphragm design, suggesting examiners and applicants alike treat catalyst durability as the more heavily referenced problem.

Citation counts favour earlier-filed records.
Collaboration
3 co-assignee pairs
across 70 families

Joint filing is the exception

Only three co-assigned pairs appear in the full set, and the strongest of them repeats across multiple families — most applicants in this niche are filing independently rather than through joint R&D structures.

Strongest pair recurs three times.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where joint filing does happen
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbHRWTH Aachen University3
De Nora Permelec Ltd.Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.1
De Nora Permelec Ltd.Yokohama National University1

The Forschungszentrum Jülich / RWTH Aachen pairing is the only repeated co-assignment in the dataset, appearing three times — a research-institute/university pattern rather than a supplier-OEM one.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the momentum has stopped

The ranking table (rendered separately) lists all assignees behind the 70 families. The pattern worth naming here is what recent-year momentum shows across the named leaders.

Momentum check
0 in latest year
across every tracked leader

No tracked assignee filed in the most recent year

Every named assignee in the recent-momentum data — from De Nora Permelec to Jülich to Aachen to Stiesdal Hydrogen — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, with two Chinese entrants posting a full -100% year-on-year drop.

Consistent with the post-2023 pullback in overall filing volume.
Institutional filers
3 shared families
Jülich + Aachen pairing

Research institutes hold durability IP jointly

Forschungszentrum Jülich and RWTH Aachen University are the only pairing that repeats, pointing to a sustained academic-institute research programme rather than a one-off co-filing.

No equivalent repeated pairing exists among corporate filers.
Corporate filers
De Nora pairs: 2
with Kawasaki and Yokohama National University

De Nora Permelec bridges corporate and academic filing

De Nora Permelec appears in two of the three total co-assignee pairs — once with Kawasaki Heavy Industries and once with Yokohama National University — making it the only corporate name with more than one documented collaboration in this set.

Both pairings occur once each.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the IPC spread is thin relative to the core C25B claiming activity.
diaphragm-electrode gap control under load cyclingnon-PFAS separator membrane durabilitydynamic curtailment-cycle electrode fatiguenanostructured catalyst adhesion under alkaline corrosionmodular stack switching control for wide power fluctuation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
De Nora Permelec Ltd.0
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH0
Stiesdal Hydrogen A/S0
Hunan Zhongwei New Hydrogen Materials Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
RWTH Aachen University0
Xi'an Taijin New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Xi'an Qingji Tanneng Technology Co., Ltd.0
Guangzhou Sinomach Sealing Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to where claim density sits and where it does not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claim sets.

Check freedom-to-operate against the Chinese filing base

With 39 of the tracked filings routed through China, any new electrode or diaphragm durability claim needs a Chinese-language prior art search before drafting, not after.

Run a China-focused FTO search

Probe the under-claimed branches directly

Dynamic curtailment-cycle fatigue and non-PFAS separator durability show thin IPC coverage relative to core electrolytic-production claims — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.

Search white space in Eureka

Track the institutional collaboration pattern

The Jülich/Aachen pairing is the only repeated joint-filing relationship in the set; watching their future filings is a reasonable proxy for where catalyst-durability research is heading next.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on alkaline electrolyzer durability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.