Alkaline Electrolyzer Durability Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 17 families, then eased back rather than climbing further — this is not a technology still accelerating into a filing race.
- China dominates the receiving-office count with 39 filings, more than three times the next-largest office (Europe, 11), concentrating prosecution risk and prior art in Chinese-language documents.
- Co-assignment is rare — only 3 pairs across 70 families, meaning most durability improvements are being filed as solo IP rather than through joint development programmes.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 70 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) is the oldest commercial route to hydrogen, and its economics increasingly hinge on how long a stack survives dynamic load cycling, corrosive electrolyte exposure and diaphragm wear rather than on efficiency alone. This landscape isolates filings that combine AWE terminology with explicit durability language — electrode degradation, diaphragm durability, dynamic operation durability and service life — inside the core electrolytic-production IPC classes (C25B11, C25B13, C25B15).
The 70 families identified span filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, with publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months — so 2025 and 2026 counts will rise as later filings publish. The set is small enough that individual assignee moves are visible, and skewed enough by receiving office that geography is itself a signal worth reading.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 70 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings ran from zero in 2017 to a peak of 17 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 5 — a shape that shows a build-up mid-decade rather than steady linear growth. The 2026 figure of 4 is partial and will understate that year's true total once outstanding applications publish.
IPC subclass distribution
C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) anchors every record by search construction, but the secondary classes are informative: C25D (electroplating/electroforming, 10 records) points to electrode coating and surface-treatment durability work, while H01M, B01J and B82Y appearances show catalyst and nanostructure durability claims spilling into adjacent art.
Shares are the percentage of the 70 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited prior art in this set
Chemically Resistant, Oxidic Electrocatalyst For Oxygen Evolution During Alkaline Water Electrolysis
Disclosed is a biphasic electrically conductive perovskite-based mixed oxide of the structure ABO3 with A=Ba, and B=Co, comprising additionally 5-45 at% Co3O4 and 0.5 to 3 at% Ti as dopant, with a preferred stoichiometric formula BaCo1-xTixO3-δ:Co3O4 targeting chemical resistance during oxygen evolution.Filed by Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, published 2020-02-06.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20180334751A1 | Method for electrolyzing alkaline water | 17 |
| 2 | CN116288509A | 一种碱性水电解制氢用阴极及其制备方法和应用 | 11 |
| 3 | US20200040473A1 | Chemically Resistant, Oxidic Electrocatalyst For Oxygen Evolution During Alkaline Water Electrolysis | 11 |
| 4 | CN115094481A | 适应宽功率波动的模块化碱性电解水制氢调度切换方法 | 9 |
| 5 | CN118007157A | 一种模块化碱性电解水制氢设备 | 6 |
| 6 | CN115786950A | 一种水电解用膜电极及其制备方法与水电解池 | 5 |
| 7 | CN115161701A | 一种水凝胶电解质隔膜以及碱性电解水装置 | 5 |
| 8 | CN117684185A | 碱性电解水制氢装置及方法 | 3 |
| 9 | WO2018178135A1 | Chemically resistant, oxidic electrocatalyst for oxygen development during alkaline water electrolysis based … | 3 |
| 10 | EP3399070A1 | Method for electrolyzing alkaline water | 3 |
Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus — read this as a map of influential prior art, not of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers indicate
Four read-throughs from the filing trend, IPC spread, citation table and co-assignment data.
Activity has already crested
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a 2023 peak of 17, then fell back — durability-specific claiming in AWE looks like a wave that has already passed its high point rather than a market still ramping up its filing rate.
Prior art risk is concentrated in Chinese filings
With 39 of the tracked filings routed through China against 11 through the EPO and single digits elsewhere, freedom-to-operate work in this space cannot skip Chinese-language prosecution history without missing the bulk of the art.
Electrode and catalyst chemistry lead citation counts
The most-cited records skew toward electrocatalyst composition and cathode preparation rather than mechanical diaphragm design, suggesting examiners and applicants alike treat catalyst durability as the more heavily referenced problem.
Joint filing is the exception
Only three co-assigned pairs appear in the full set, and the strongest of them repeats across multiple families — most applicants in this niche are filing independently rather than through joint R&D structures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | RWTH Aachen University | 3 |
| De Nora Permelec Ltd. | Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 1 |
| De Nora Permelec Ltd. | Yokohama National University | 1 |
The Forschungszentrum Jülich / RWTH Aachen pairing is the only repeated co-assignment in the dataset, appearing three times — a research-institute/university pattern rather than a supplier-OEM one.
Who is filing, and where the momentum has stopped
The ranking table (rendered separately) lists all assignees behind the 70 families. The pattern worth naming here is what recent-year momentum shows across the named leaders.
No tracked assignee filed in the most recent year
Every named assignee in the recent-momentum data — from De Nora Permelec to Jülich to Aachen to Stiesdal Hydrogen — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, with two Chinese entrants posting a full -100% year-on-year drop.
Research institutes hold durability IP jointly
Forschungszentrum Jülich and RWTH Aachen University are the only pairing that repeats, pointing to a sustained academic-institute research programme rather than a one-off co-filing.
De Nora Permelec bridges corporate and academic filing
De Nora Permelec appears in two of the three total co-assignee pairs — once with Kawasaki Heavy Industries and once with Yokohama National University — making it the only corporate name with more than one documented collaboration in this set.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| De Nora Permelec Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH | 0 | — |
| Stiesdal Hydrogen A/S | 0 | — |
| Hunan Zhongwei New Hydrogen Materials Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| RWTH Aachen University | 0 | — |
| Xi'an Taijin New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Xi'an Qingji Tanneng Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Guangzhou Sinomach Sealing Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this
The dataset points to where claim density sits and where it does not. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision needs a closer read of specific claim sets.
Check freedom-to-operate against the Chinese filing base
With 39 of the tracked filings routed through China, any new electrode or diaphragm durability claim needs a Chinese-language prior art search before drafting, not after.
Run a China-focused FTO searchProbe the under-claimed branches directly
Dynamic curtailment-cycle fatigue and non-PFAS separator durability show thin IPC coverage relative to core electrolytic-production claims — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.
Search white space in EurekaTrack the institutional collaboration pattern
The Jülich/Aachen pairing is the only repeated joint-filing relationship in the set; watching their future filings is a reasonable proxy for where catalyst-durability research is heading next.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaCommon questions on alkaline electrolyzer durability patents
The dataset of 70 patent families shows filing spread across a mix of specialist electrode manufacturers, research institutes and Chinese hydrogen-equipment firms, with no single assignee holding an overwhelming share. De Nora Permelec, Forschungszentrum Jülich and RWTH Aachen appear repeatedly, including in the only recurring co-assignment relationship in the set. The full ranking table on this page lists every assignee by family count, which is the fairer comparison than raw document counts since it neutralises multi-jurisdiction filing.
Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 17 families in 2023 before declining, roughly tracking the broader green-hydrogen investment cycle that drove significant electrolyzer manufacturing capacity announcements through 2022-2023. The pullback since then does not necessarily mean the technology problem is solved; publication lags filing by about 18 months, so recent years understate true filing activity until later applications publish. It is more likely a sign that early movers have already staked out their core claims and follow-on filers are being more selective.
Diaphragm durability claims typically address the separator material's resistance to swelling, cracking or ion-selectivity loss under sustained alkaline exposure and pressure differentials, while electrode degradation claims focus on catalyst coating loss, corrosion of the underlying substrate, and activity decay at the cathode or anode surface. Both problem areas are captured in this dataset's search construction, and the IPC spread suggests electrode and catalyst chemistry claims (reflected in the C25D and B82Y crossover) draw more citation activity than diaphragm-specific mechanical claims. Anyone drafting new claims should check both branches separately since they sit on different prior art bases.
China accounts for 39 of the roughly 70 tracked filings, far more than any other receiving office, which makes it the jurisdiction with the deepest prior art and the highest competitive filing density for this specific technology. That density is a signal of occupied claim space, not necessarily of where commercial value will concentrate — European and PCT filings, while fewer, often correspond to filings intended for broader multi-market enforcement. The practical answer depends on where the applicant intends to manufacture or sell hydrogen equipment, but any China filing strategy here needs to account for a crowded field.
The secondary IPC classes in this dataset are thin relative to the core C25B claiming activity: B01D (separation processes) has only 3 records, B82Y (nanotechnology) has 3, and B05B (spraying/atomising) has just 1, suggesting under-claimed territory around advanced separator membrane materials, nanostructured catalyst adhesion, and coating-application methods for durability. Dynamic operation durability — how electrodes and diaphragms hold up under the load cycling typical of renewable-powered electrolysis — is also referenced in the search terms but appears less densely claimed than static service-life language. These are starting points for a focused prior art search, not confirmed gaps.
Research Alkaline Electrolyzer Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole alkaline electrolyzer reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.