Book a demo

Alkaline Fuel Cell for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape

Alkaline Fuel Cell for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Alkaline Fuel Cell for Renewable Hydrogen Patent Landscape in 2026

The alkaline fuel cell for renewable hydrogen field is in a Growth stage, with the three-year filing window up 55% versus the prior period, though annual volume has eased from its 2021 peak. Dai Nippon Printing leads by patent records, but the top five filers account for only 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a fragmented competitive structure with room for new entrants.

268
Patent families in scope
24%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+55%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Fragmented field with a slim lead for Dai Nippon Printing

Dai Nippon Printing holds the top position with 38 patent records, followed closely by Proton Power (36) and Amogy (33). The ranking separates into a tight leading trio and a broader mid-tier that includes Intelligent Energy, Hyundai Motor, Georgia Tech Research Corporation, and ZTEK Corp.

The top five filers collectively represent 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a relatively low concentration figure that indicates no single player dominates and that the landscape is genuinely contested. The gap between rank 1 (38 records) and rank 5 (20 records) is narrow enough that momentum shifts can rapidly reshuffle the order.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.38
2Proton Power Inc36
3Amogy Inc33
4Intelligent Energy Inc25
5Intelligent Energy Ltd20
6Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.17
7Georgia Tech Research Corporation17
8ZTEK Corp14
9Claire Technologies Corp14
10Energyield13
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11KOREA INST OF SCI & TECH13
12Hewlett Packard Development Company LP13
13NE M E SYS SRL13
14Hysytech12
15Claire Technologies Licensing LLC12
16Maceda Joseph Peter11
17Promerus LLC11
18Amminex11
19Annas10
20Millennium Cell Inc10
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Dai Nippon Printing’s lead is anchored in membrane separation and inorganic compound chemistry rather than core fuel-cell stack IP, suggesting the front-runner’s strength is in upstream materials rather than system integration. This creates a distinct opening for stack- and system-focused challengers.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; apparent softness in 20242026 data should not be read as a real decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 surge reshaped the field; hydrogen generation dominates the technology mix

Annual filing activity and IPC class distribution together reveal both the pace of competitive entry and the underlying technical focus of the corpus.

Annual filing trend

Filings jumped sharply to 58 in 2021 — the field’s recorded peak — and have remained elevated at 49–50 through 2022–2023 before tapering in 2024–2025, figures that are further suppressed by publication lag. The three-year recent window is 55% above the prior three-year window, confirming the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis even as annual volume has eased from the 2021 peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 58 in 2021.2220175201813201914202058202150202249202333202423202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) is the dominant IPC class, followed by C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds, covering hydrogen production chemistry) and B01J (catalysis). The substantial weight of C01B and B01J reflects an emphasis on renewable hydrogen generation and reforming chemistry rather than on fuel-cell stack engineering alone. Lower-count branches such as C25B (electrolytic production), F17C (pressure vessels) and C10J (gasification) round out a technically diverse corpus.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 488; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 353.H01M · Batteries, cells …488C01B · Non-metallic elem…353B01J · Chemical/physical…192C25B · Electrolytic prod…156B01D · Separation proces…74C25D · Electroplating & …49F17C · Pressure vessels …47C10J · Gasification of f…26↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
PH12015000302A1Published 2017-03-13

Alkaline fuel cell for various applications

NICOLAS, Roderick R.

The invention relates to an alkaline fuel designed to allow the free flow of hydrogen. Conventional alkaline fuel cells suffer from a gasket that tends to restrict hydrogen flow and limit hydrogen production. By getting rid of the gasket and providing an enclosure comprising a top cover with fittings and a compartment case having plate divider guides used… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Zero/low emission and co-production energy supply …240
2Portable chemical hydrogen hydride system237
3Portable chemical hydrogen hydride system235
4Plasmatron-fuel cell system for generating electri…216
5Portable hydrogen generator-fuel cell apparatus144
6Systems and methods for hydrogen generation from s…142
7Self-regulating feedstock delivery systems and hyd…96
8Hydrogen-producing fuel processing assemblies, hea…94

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where future IP positions can be built most efficiently.

Growth

Growth stage, with annual volume easing from the 2021 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field firmly in Growth: the recent three-year filing window is 55% above the prior three-year window. Annual volume reached its highest recorded level of 58 filings in 2021 and has since eased, a pattern consistent with post-surge normalisation rather than contraction. New entrants such as Amogy and Hyundai Motor entered the corpus recently, reinforcing that the competitive window remains open.

Growth stage
Concentration

Low concentration invites new entrants

The top five filers account for only 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. With the leading applicant holding 38 patent records and rank five at 20, the gap is narrow and not yet entrenched. A focused filing programme in membrane materials, ammonia cracking catalysis, or alkaline electrolyser integration could realistically reach tier-two status within two to three years.

Fragmented
Collaboration

Hyundai–Kia–KRICT triangle is the most active co-filing cluster

The strongest co-applicant relationship is Hyundai Motor and Kia, which have jointly filed 15 patent records, followed by two parallel pairs — Hyundai Motor with Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST, 11 records) and Kia with KIST (11 records) — forming a coherent Korean industrial-academic triangle. Georgia Tech Research Corporation and Promerus have co-filed 11 records, representing the most active US academic-industry pairing. The Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology also appears as a secondary collaborator with both Hyundai and Kia.

Active clusters
Geography

US-centric prosecution with selective PCT and EPO coverage

The United States is the dominant prosecution jurisdiction with 251 patent records, roughly 2.4 times the EPO (103) and PCT (102) counts. China (44), Canada (36), and Australia (33) form a secondary tier. Japan (5) and South Korea (1) show limited national-phase entry, noteworthy given that Korean applicants are among the most active co-filers. Applicants seeking broad commercial coverage should assess whether their PCT and EPO designations adequately mirror their US filing scope.

US-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.Kia Corporation15
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)11
Georgia Tech Research CorporationPromerus LLC11
Kia CorporationKorea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)11
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology5
Claire Technologies CorpClaire Technologies Licensing LLC3
Kia CorporationKorea Research Institute of Chemical Technology3
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.Kia Corporation2
Georgia Tech Research CorporationSumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family validated in multiple jurisdictions contributes once per jurisdiction.Explore insights →
Leaders

Dai Nippon Printing leads on volume; Amogy and Hyundai are the fastest-rising challengers

The top two players differ sharply in technical emphasis and trajectory: the incumbent leader is materials-focused while the fastest-growing challenger is system- and ammonia-cracking-focused.

Leader · Dai Nippon Printing

Dai Nippon Printing

Dai Nippon Printing holds 38 patent records — the largest single-applicant count in the corpus. Its technical emphasis sits in B01D separation processes (membrane filtration) and C01B inorganic hydrogen chemistry, meaning its IP position is strongest in upstream membrane materials rather than full fuel-cell systems. Momentum data for this applicant is not broken out in the trend evidence, so trajectory should be verified independently.

patent records: 38
Challenger · Amogy Inc

Amogy Inc

Amogy holds 33 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in the momentum data, with 30 records filed in the recent window — the highest recent-period count of any tracked applicant. Its technical focus spans C01B hydrogen chemistry, B01J catalysis (ammonia cracking), and H01M fuel-cell stacks, reflecting an integrated ammonia-to-power positioning. This trajectory makes Amogy the fastest-growing challenger in the corpus.

patent records: 33
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum scores for all tracked filers in this landscape.
Intelligent Energy IncHyundai Motor Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Amogy Inc30▲ new entrant
Claire Technologies Corp10▼ -37%
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.12▲ new entrant
Georgia Tech Research Corporation4▼ -69%
Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)6▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Ranking is by patent records; each applicant’s technology emphasis is derived from their top IPC subclass concentrations.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at low share relative to the dominant H01M and C01B branches, signalling areas where technical coverage is sparse. These observations reflect relative filing sparsity and should be assessed against each team’s technical roadmap before being treated as investment targets.

F17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage

F17C accounts for only 3% of the IPC record distribution, despite hydrogen storage being a critical balance-of-plant requirement for any alkaline fuel-cell system. The technical need is well-established — compact, safe, high-pressure storage is a system-level bottleneck — and the sparse filing count suggests that storage integration with alkaline fuel-cell architectures is not yet systematically claimed. Teams with existing pressure-vessel or solid-state storage expertise may find a realistic entry path through integration-focused claims that couple storage design with alkaline electrolyser or fuel-cell stack interfaces.

Search this in Eureka →

C10J · Gasification of fuels

C10J (gasification) holds only 2% of the IPC record distribution despite biomass and waste gasification being a plausible renewable hydrogen feedstock route that pairs with alkaline fuel cells. Proton Power is the primary filer in this branch, indicating that competition is concentrated in a single applicant. For teams working on biomass-to-hydrogen pathways, the sparse and concentrated nature of C10J filings suggests that well-scoped gasification-integration claims could establish a defensible adjacent position with limited direct opposition.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all low-density IPC branches, their technical adjacency scores, and suggested claim strategies across the full corpus.
B01D · Separation processesC25D · Electroplating & electroforming+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are identified by low IPC share within the corpus; sparsity alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 8 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC01B 3 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsB01J 19 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis
Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.Strong · 38Strong · 38AbsentEmerging · 4Absent
Hewlett Packard Development Company LPStrong · 24Strong · 26AbsentAbsentAbsent
Claire Technologies CorpStrong · 18Strong · 15Moderate · 7AbsentAbsent
Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd.Strong · 13Strong · 17AbsentAbsentStrong · 9
Maceda Joseph PeterStrong · 12Strong · 11AbsentStrong · 11Absent
Intelligent Energy IncAbsentStrong · 17AbsentAbsentStrong · 14
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own alkaline fuel cell landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.