Aluminum Alloy Sheet Patents: Who Leads, Where Filing Has Cooled 2026
- Peaked in 2019, not now. Filings rose from 34 in 2017 to 66 in 2019 before easing to 38 by 2022 — this is a maturing filing curve, not a growing one.
- Composition and treatment are filed together. 1,991 records sit under alloy composition (C22C) and 1,843 under non-ferrous treatment (C22F), nearly overlapping — most protection pairs a specific chemistry with a specific heat-treatment step.
- Legacy leaders have gone quiet. Several of the largest historical assignees, including Kobe Steel and UACJ, show zero filings in the latest year, leaving older compositional claims unrefreshed.
Filing growth compares 2021 (42 records) with 2024 (58) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,213 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A field built on paired composition and treatment claims
Aluminum alloy sheet and extrusion technology, as captured by this dataset of 2,213 patent families, sits almost entirely within two overlapping classification areas: alloy composition (C22C) and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F). Filing activity rose through the late 2010s to a peak in 2019 and has since eased, a pattern consistent with a field where the core compositional windows and treatment sequences have already been staked out by a small group of long-standing producers.
Japan leads as receiving office by a wide margin, ahead of the United States, Europe, China, Canada and the WIPO PCT route, reflecting where the largest historical producers chose to prosecute first. The most-cited prior art dates back one to three decades and centres on plastic forming and continuous in-line sheet manufacture, giving current filers a well-worn set of process architectures to build claims around or design around.
Filing trend and technology composition
Publication counts across 2,213 families show where alloy-sheet and extrusion filing activity has concentrated by year and by technical subclass.
Filings have cooled since the 2019 peak
Annual filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2019, then eased toward a 2022 midpoint of 38. The most recent years are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, but the multi-year decline from peak predates that lag effect.
Composition and treatment claims dominate the classification mix
C22C alloy-composition claims (1,991 records) and C22F non-ferrous treatment claims (1,843) cover nearly the entire corpus, with rolling, casting and sheet-metal-working subclasses each present at a fraction of that volume — evidence that most filed protection pairs a specific alloy chemistry with a specific treatment step rather than claiming either alone.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,213 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Extrusion Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aluminum alloy sheet and extrusion technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art shaping today's claims
Aluminum alloy sheet and manufacturing method (EP1883715B1, Novelis)
The patent claims a manufacturing route for aluminum alloy sheet: continuous casting of a 5-15 mm slab from a molten alloy containing 0.40-0.65% Mg, 0.50-0.75% Si, 0.05-0.20% Cr and 0.10-0.40% Fe with balance aluminum and optional Cu and Ti, coiling, hot- or direct-coil rolling, cold-rolling to sheet, continuous-furnace solution heat treatment, and pre-aging.Granted 2008-12-24 to Novelis Inc.
View full claim chart| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6253588B1 | Quick plastic forming of aluminum alloy sheet metal | 170 |
| 2 | US5514228A | Method of manufacturing aluminum alloy sheet | 110 |
| 3 | JP2007009262A | Aluminum alloy sheet with excellent thermal conductivity, strength and bendability and its manufacturing meth… | 97 |
| 4 | US5496423A | Method of manufacturing aluminum sheet stock using two sequences of continuous, in-line operations | 86 |
| 5 | JP1998219382A | Aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability/ workability and coating/baking hardenability and its production | 79 |
| 6 | US5616189A | Aluminum alloys and process for making aluminum alloy sheet | 77 |
| 7 | JP2006009140A | 6000 series aluminum alloy sheet having excellent hardenability of coating/baking and production method there… | 75 |
| 8 | US4614552A | Aluminum alloy sheet product | 74 |
| 9 | EP0473122A1 | Damage tolerant aluminum alloy sheet for aircraft skin | 70 |
| 10 | US20110247730A1 | 2xxx series aluminum lithium alloys having low strength differential | 67 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records accumulate citations over time, so this favours historical influence over recent relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern tells a technical reader
Reading composition, citation and geography together points to a field with settled core chemistry and a handful of specific openings at its edges.
Activity has cooled from a 2019 high
Filings climbed from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2019, then settled near 38 by the 2022 midpoint. Combined with the roughly 18-month publication lag, the most recent years understate true filing activity, but the multi-year retreat from peak is a real pattern, not a data artefact.
Composition and treatment claims are nearly co-extensive
C22C alloy-composition and C22F treatment subclasses cover almost the entire corpus between them, far ahead of rolling, casting or sheet-metal-working subclasses. That density means new filers are almost always claiming a chemistry-plus-process pair rather than either element alone.
Influence is concentrated in a handful of older patents
The most-cited records date to the 1990s and 2000s and describe quick plastic forming and continuous in-line sheet manufacture. High citation counts reflect decades of accumulation and should be read as historical influence, not as a signal of which recent filing matters most.
Japan anchors the filing geography
Japan accounts for more receiving-office filings than the US and EPO combined, with China, Canada and the PCT route trailing further behind. A freedom-to-operate review confined to US filings would miss most of the documented activity in this dataset.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aluminum alloy sheet and extrusion technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space, and where it has gone quiet
Filing volume and recent momentum tell different stories: the largest historical holders are not the most active filers today.
A dense core held by legacy producers
The ranking is anchored by long-established Japanese aluminum makers and Novelis, whose portfolios span decades of composition and treatment claims. That density reflects occupied claim space rather than an actively growing market, since filing volume has declined from its 2019 peak.
Several major holders have stopped filing
Kobe Steel, Nippon Light Metal, Sumitomo Light Metal, Furukawa Electric and UACJ all show zero filings in the most recent year, some with -100% year-over-year movement. Their historical claims remain on the books, but the absence of fresh filings means that territory is not being actively defended or extended.
Joint filing concentrates around captive automotive use
The strongest co-assignee pairing, Nippon Light Metal with Honda, points to alloy-sheet development driven by a specific automotive customer relationship rather than open licensing. Other pairs, such as Furukawa Electric with Kawasaki Steel, suggest similar producer-to-producer collaboration on process steps.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Light Metal Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Alcan International Limited | 0 | — |
| UACJ Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| SKY ALUMINIUM CO LTD | 0 | — |
| Alcoa Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to specific follow-up checks rather than a single conclusion.
Check live status on quiet legacy portfolios
Several major historical assignees show zero recent filings. Before treating their compositional claims as a permanent barrier, check remaining term and family status patent by patent.
Search assignee portfolios in EurekaMap claim scope in the thinner IPC branches
Lamination, sheet-metal working and battery-related subclasses carry a fraction of the volume of the core alloy and treatment classes. A targeted claim chart there will show whether the gap is real white space or a single blocking patent.
Run an IPC-level claim chart in EurekaCompare composition windows across top-cited patents
The most-cited prior art defines the compositional ranges the rest of the field designs around. Lining these up side by side clarifies where a new formulation would sit inside or outside existing claims.
Compare claims in EurekaCommon questions on aluminum alloy sheet and extrusion patents
The assignee ranking behind this dataset is led by legacy Japanese aluminum producers and process-equipment makers, alongside Novelis as a major North American holder. Several of the largest historical filers, including Kobe Steel, Nippon Light Metal, Sumitomo Light Metal and UACJ, show zero filings in the most recent year, which signals that their compositional and treatment claims are largely settled rather than being actively extended. A newer entrant should check both filing volume and recent momentum, since the two tell different stories about who is currently active versus who simply built the largest historical portfolio.
Within this corpus, sheet-focused claims tend to pair an alloy composition (C22C) with a rolling and heat-treatment sequence (C22F, B21B), aimed at properties like formability and bake-hardenability for flat stock. Extrusion-alloy claims overlap heavily on composition but diverge on the shaping step, since B21C-classified extrusion work is a smaller slice of the corpus than rolling. In practice the two share most of their compositional prior art and differ mainly in the mechanical-forming claims layered on top.
Citation counts accumulate over time, so records from the 1990s and early 2000s, like the most-cited patents in this dataset, have simply had longer to be cited than anything filed in the last five years. A high citation count is a signal of historical influence on how the field's claims were drafted, not a measure of which recent filing is most important today. Anyone screening for current risk or opportunity should weight recent filings by IPC clustering and assignee momentum rather than by raw citation count.
The thinnest classification branches relative to the alloy-and-treatment core are layered-product lamination, sheet-metal working, and battery-related applications, each sitting at a fraction of the volume seen in the dominant C22C and C22F subclasses. That gap suggests claims combining a specific alloy composition with a lamination step or a battery-enclosure end use are less crowded than general automotive-body sheet claims. Confirming this requires checking live claim scope in those adjacent subclasses, not just raw filing counts, since a thin subclass can still contain a blocking patent.
Japan is the largest receiving office in this dataset by a wide margin, with more than double the filings of the United States, followed by the European Patent Office, China, Canada and the WIPO PCT route. That distribution reflects where the major historical producers — Japanese aluminum makers and Novelis's Canadian operations — chose to prosecute first. A freedom-to-operate review limited to US filings alone would miss the majority of the documented activity in this field.
Research Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Extrusion Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole aluminum alloy sheet and extrusion technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.