Book a demo

Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aluminum-lithium-alloy-corrosion-resistance-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance Patents
  • Filing activity has flattened since a 2018 peak of four families a year and sits at or below that pace through the most recent full years, suggesting the core chemistry claims were staked out early and few new entrants are pushing fresh filings.
  • Heat-treatment claims (C22F) sit inside 64 of 103 families alongside the base alloy composition class (C22C, 95 families), showing that corrosion resistance in this system is claimed almost entirely through post-processing rather than novel alloy chemistry alone.
  • Europe and the US together receive more filings than China (32 and 19 versus 18), with Canada and WIPO PCT routes adding a further 17 between them — a filing geography still anchored in the alloy's traditional aerospace-materials base.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
103
Published Records
56%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 103 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families where aluminum-lithium (Al-Li) alloy claims intersect with corrosion resistance, stress corrosion cracking, exfoliation resistance or anti-corrosion treatment, filtered to the alloy composition and metal-treatment IPC classes (C22C21/00, C23F11, C22F1/057). It spans 103 published families filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, giving a compact but technically dense view of a field defined less by new alloy chemistries than by how existing Al-Li systems are aged and treated to resist environmental attack.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in the trend chart will read lower than actual filing activity — treat the most recent bars as provisional, not as a real decline on their own.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1ALCOA INC15
  2. 2KAISER ALUMINUM FABRICATED PRODUCTS LLC14
  3. 3THE BOEING CO13
  4. 4PECHINEY ROLLED PRODUCTS LLC9
  5. 5CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD LLC7
  6. 6REYNOLDS METALS CO6
  7. 7MARTIN MARIETTA CORP4
  8. 8SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIV4
  9. 9ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA3
  10. 10HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 103 families: when they were filed, and which parts of the metallurgical claim space they occupy.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings rose to a peak of four families in 2018, then settled back toward the two-family level seen at the 2022 midpoint. There is no sustained upward trend in this window — this looks like a mature claim space being maintained rather than a technology in an active land grab.

A flat-to-declining filing curve0123422017420184201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Treatment classes dominate over new compositions

C22C (alloys) and C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment) together account for the large majority of records, with casting (B22D) and heat treatment (C21D) as secondary supporting classes. The presence of F24S (solar heat collectors) among the IPC hits is a reminder that Al-Li corrosion claims occasionally surface in unrelated end-use contexts, not that solar hardware is a real front in this landscape.

Treatment classes dominate over new compositionsC22C · Alloys9592.2%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment6462.1%B22D · Metal casting1413.6%F24S · Solar heat collectors87.8%C21D · Heat treatment of metals54.9%B21B · Metal rolling11.0%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing11.0%B21D · Sheet-metal working11.0%Other54.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 103 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aluminum-lithium alloy corrosion resistance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents this field cites back to

Representative filing
US4532106A1985-07-30

US4532106A — Mechanically alloyed dispersion strengthened aluminum-lithium alloy

INCO ALLOYS INTERNATIONAL, INC., A DE CORP.

A dispersion-strengthened aluminum-base alloy system is provided which is prepared by mechanical alloying and is characterized by high strength, high elastic modulus, low density and high corrosion resistance. The alloy system is comprised, by weight, of at least above 1.5% up to about 3% Li, about 0.4% up to about 1.5% O, about 0.25% up to about 1.2% C, and the balance essentially Al.Filed by INCO Alloys International in 1985, this record predates the dataset window but anchors the mechanical-alloying route that later corrosion-resistance claims build on or design around.

US4532106A — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5198045ALow density high strength Al-Li alloy109
2US4816087AProcess for producing duplex mode recrystallized high strength aluminum-lithium alloy products with high frac…75
3US4861391AAluminum alloy two-step aging method and article56
4CN106521270A一种改善铝锂合金耐腐蚀性能的热处理工艺49
5US5389165ALow density, high strength Al-Li alloy having high toughness at elevated temperatures45
6WO1998033947A1Method of improving fracture toughness in aluminum-lithium alloys31
7US4795502AAluminum-lithium alloy products and method of making the same29
8US4603029AAluminum-lithium alloy27
9JP1986023751AManufacture of al-li alloy having superior ductility and toughness21
10US4532106AMechanically alloyed dispersion strengthened aluminum-lithium alloy21

Citation counts favour older, foundational filings inside a searched corpus — read them as markers of influence on later claim drafting, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Filing pace
2018 peak: 4 families
highest single year in the window

The land grab already happened

A peak of four families in 2018 followed by a flattening to two by 2022 indicates the core composition-and-treatment claim space was staked out in the last decade. New filers now compete for narrower process refinements rather than broad alloy or treatment claims.

Based on 103 families, 2017-2026
Claim structure
C22F in 64 of 103 families
non-ferrous treatment class share

Corrosion resistance is won on aging, not chemistry

The concentration in C22F alongside C22C shows corrosion performance in this system is predominantly claimed through aging and heat-treatment steps applied to known Al-Li compositions, not through novel base alloys.

IPC composition, C22C/C22F overlap
Citation anchors
US5198045A cited 109×
top-cited record in the corpus

Foundational patents still shape drafting

The most-cited records date to the late 1980s and early 1990s low-density, high-strength Al-Li families. Their persistence at the top of the citation table means examiners and drafters still measure new claims against that early art, even decades on.

Citation counts within the searched corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aluminum-lithium alloy corrosion resistance, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of legacy aerospace-materials producers, with co-filing pairs pointing to long-running institutional partnerships rather than active joint ventures.

Assignee
0 filings in latest year
across every listed assignee

No one is currently pushing new filings

Every major assignee in the recent-momentum data — from legacy aluminium producers to aerospace primes — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the flat-to-declining trend and the 18-month publication lag.

Recent-year momentum, top assignees
Co-filing
5 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 4 shared families

Institutional pairs, not active alliances

Co-assignment is rare and concentrated in a handful of pairs, the strongest linking two legacy metals and aerospace-materials entities across four shared families — a historical partnership footprint rather than a live joint-development signal.

Co-assignee pair analysis, 103 families
Geography
EPO 32 · US 19 · CN 18
top three receiving offices

A Western-anchored filing geography

Europe and the United States together outpace China as receiving offices, with Canada and WIPO PCT filings adding further weight to a jurisdiction mix rooted in the alloy's traditional aerospace and rolled-products supply base.

Receiving office counts, all families
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core composition and aging claims
Localized pitting at Li-rich grain boundariesExfoliation resistance in thick-plate rolled productsStress corrosion cracking under combined fatigue loadingTwo-step aging process windows for T8-type tempersSurface conversion coatings compatible with Li-bearing alloys
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Reynolds Metals Company0
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation0
Alcoa Inc.0
The Boeing Company0
PECHINEY ROLLED PRODUCTS LLC0
Alcoa Inc.0
Martin Marietta Corporation0
Shanghai Jiao Tong University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, treatment-heavy claim space with a Western filing base and little recent movement — three directions worth following up.

Map the aging-process sub-claims in detail

With C22F carrying nearly two-thirds of the corpus, a finer breakdown of two-step aging, retrogression and re-aging, and T8-type temper claims would show exactly which process windows are already crowded.

Explore the technology tree in Eureka

Track whether Chinese filers narrow the gap

China trails Europe and the US as a receiving office today; watching whether recent domestic filings (including institutional players such as Shanghai Jiao Tong University) shift that balance is worth a standing search.

Set up a monitoring search in Eureka

Stress-test designs against the top-cited art

Because the highest-cited records date to the late 1980s and early 1990s, any new composition or treatment claim should be checked against that foundational set before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on Al-Li corrosion patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Corrosion Resistance in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aluminum-lithium alloy corrosion resistance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.