Book a demo

Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aluminum-lithium-alloy-microstructure-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control Patents
  • Filing has cooled from its 2025 peak of 13 families after a flat middle stretch (7 in 2022), suggesting the field is consolidating around known routes rather than expanding into new ones.
  • China dominates filing location with 60 records more than double the next three receiving offices (EPO, US, Japan) combined, reshaping where freedom-to-operate actually needs to be checked.
  • Heat treatment claims (C21D, 18 records) trail alloy composition claims (C22C, 112) by a wide margin pointing to a gap between how the alloy is made and how it is processed afterward.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
131
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+120%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 131 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families addressing aluminum-lithium alloy composition and processing where claims explicitly reference precipitation strengthening, grain refinement, T1 phase control or aging treatment — the microstructural levers that determine strength, density and toughness in these alloys. The search spans C22F1/057, C22C21/00 and C21D classifications, capturing both the alloy formulation side and the downstream heat-treatment side of the same problem.

131 published families sit inside the window from 2015 through the July 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years of activity will read lower than they eventually settle — the 2026 figure in particular is a partial year, not a slowdown signal on its own.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1THE BOEING CO20
  2. 2CENT SOUTH UNIV13
  3. 3SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIV10
  4. 4HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC8
  5. 5KAISER ALUMINUM FABRICATED PRODUCTS LLC7
  6. 6CHONGQING UNIV OF ARTS & SCI5
  7. 7KOREA INST OF SCI & TECH4
  8. 8The Boeing Company4
  9. 9AVIC BEIJING INST OF AERONAUTICAL MATERIALS4
  10. 10PECHINEY ROLLED PRODUCTS LLC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technical composition

Two views of the same 131 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which classification codes carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2025, with a flat mid-period (7 in 2022) that shows growth was not steady — it built, plateaued, then stepped up again before the current partial year.

Filing trend, 2017–2026048111532017201820192020202120222023202413202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

C22C (alloys, 112) and C22F (non-ferrous treatment, 103) carry almost all the claim volume; C21D (heat treatment, 18), B21B (rolling, 11) and the remaining process classes (casting, powder metallurgy, sheet-metal working, extrusion) are each in single or low double digits — the composition side of the problem is far more crowded than the shaping and post-processing side.

IPC subclass distributionC22C · Alloys11285.5%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment10378.6%C21D · Heat treatment of metals1813.7%B21B · Metal rolling118.4%B22D · Metal casting64.6%B22F · Powder metallurgy53.8%B21D · Sheet-metal working43.1%B21C · Metal extrusion & drawing32.3%Other107.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 131 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aluminum-lithium alloy microstructure control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Key cited patents

Representative record
US4842822A1989-06-27

US4842822A — Aluminum-lithium alloy and method of investment casting an aluminum-lithium alloy

HOWMET RESEARCH CORPORATION

Aluminum-lithium alloy and method of investment casting an aluminum-lithium alloy including the steps of providing an aluminum-lithium alloy melt having a composition consisting essentially of about 2.0 to about 2.8 w/o lithium, about 1.2 to about 1.8 w/o copper provided that the combined lithium and copper content does not exceed 4.0 w/o, about 0.8 to about 1.0 w/o magnesium, the balance essentially aluminum, adding an effective amount of a grain refining agent to the aluminum-lithium alloy melt investment casting the melt, solution heat treating the aluminum-lithium alloy investment casting for up to 30 hours at continuously increasing temperatures to within approximately 30 to 40 degrees of the alloy's melting point.Filed by Howmet Research Corporation, granted 1989 — one of the earliest investment-casting routes in this corpus and a frequent reference point for later composition-window claims.

US4842822A — patent drawing 1US4842822A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2021008428A1一种超高强铝锂合金及其制备方法47
2US5389165ALow density, high strength Al-Li alloy having high toughness at elevated temperatures45
3CN110423927A一种超高强铝锂合金及其制备方法37
4CN105648283A低密度、高刚度铸造铝锂合金及其制备方法33
5US4795502AAluminum-lithium alloy products and method of making the same29
6US4603029AAluminum-lithium alloy27
7US5178695AStrength enhancement of rapidly solidified aluminum-lithium through double aging25
8CN110423966A一种提高铝锂合金产品综合性能的制备工艺20
9WO1993023584A1Low density, high strength al-li alloy having high toughness at elevated temperatures19
10US5520754ASpray cast Al-Li alloy composition and method of processing17

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a measure of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

Volume and composition data point to a field that is well-trodden on formulation but still open on process integration.

Filing momentum
13 in 2025
peak year

Growth has plateaued, not accelerated

After holding near 7 filings a year through the 2022 midpoint, the count doubled into 2025. That is a step change, not a trend line — it is worth checking whether it reflects one or two assignees filing in bulk rather than broad-based entry.

Peak year 2025, 13 families
Claim geography
60 China
filings by receiving office

China is now the primary filing venue

With 60 records against 23 at the EPO and 19 in the US, most new claim scope is being established under Chinese examination first. Freedom-to-operate work that only checks US and EPO registers will miss the majority of active filings.

China 60 · EPO 23 · US 19
Technical balance
112 vs 18
C22C alloys vs C21D heat treatment

Composition claims outnumber process claims by 6:1

Alloy composition (C22C) and non-ferrous treatment (C22F) together cover the bulk of the corpus, while dedicated heat-treatment classification (C21D) and the shaping classes (rolling, casting, extrusion, powder metallurgy) are comparatively thin. That imbalance is where downstream process claims have more room to be filed without running into dense prior art.

C22C 112 · C22F 103 · C21D 18
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aluminum-lithium alloy microstructure control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gate stands

Assignee activity is led by a small mix of aerospace incumbents and Chinese universities, with recent-year momentum concentrated in one academic filer.

Momentum leader
1 latest year
Shanghai Jiao Tong University

The only assignee still filing at pace

Shanghai Jiao Tong University shows one filing in the latest year while every other tracked assignee — including Boeing Company (Boeing) and Central South University — shows zero, with Central South University down 100% year over year.

1 in latest year vs 0 across the rest of the tracked set
Collaboration pattern
3 pairs
co-assignee links

Co-filing is rare and mostly academic-industry

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus. The strongest link, Boeing Company with its Japanese-registered counterpart The Boeing Company at 4 shared filings, is an internal corporate pairing rather than a cross-industry collaboration; the other two pairs both involve Shanghai Jiao Tong University partnering with materials suppliers.

Strongest pair: Boeing Company + The Boeing Company, 4 shared filings
Incumbent base
Aerospace + academic mix
assignee composition

Legacy aerospace holders sit alongside newer academic filers

Names like Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell), Reynolds Metals Company (Reynolds Metals) and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (Kaiser Aluminum) anchor the older aerospace-alloy filings, while institutions such as Central South University and Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences represent more recent, research-driven entries into the same classification space.

Mix of legacy aerospace assignees and university filers
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit inside the search scope but carry noticeably fewer records than the core composition claims — early movers still have room here.
T1 phase nucleation control during agingpowder-metallurgy Al-Li consolidationsheet-metal working of Al-Li stockextrusion-specific grain refinementinvestment-casting heat-treatment schedules
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Shanghai Jiao Tong University1
Boeing Company0
Central South University0-100%
Honeywell International Inc.0
Reynolds Metals Company0
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation0
Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences0
Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — each depends on which side of the alloy-versus-process divide matters to your work.

Check China-first filings before committing claim language

With 60 of 131 records filed through China, a freedom-to-operate review anchored only in US or EPO registers will systematically under-count active scope.

Explore China filings in Eureka →

Map the C21D heat-treatment gap against your own process claims

Heat treatment classification carries a fraction of the volume seen in composition classes — worth confirming whether that gap is real white space or simply under-classified prior art.

Run a classification deep-dive in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aluminum-Lithium Alloy Microstructure Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aluminum-lithium alloy microstructure control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.