https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ammonia-cracking-reactors-for-hydrogen-release-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hydrogen & Fuel Cells
Ammonia cracking reactor patents for hydrogen release: who leads and where the field is heading
  • 91.3% concentration. The top five assignees account for 84 of the 92 records in scope, leaving little room between the leaders and everyone else.
  • Filings peaked in 2021. 53 records that year against 6 at the 2022 midpoint — momentum has flattened or declined since, not accelerated.
  • Separation is nearly as claimed as the reaction itself. B01D separation processes appear in 54.3% of the 92 records, alongside 95.7% touching C01B — the purification step is not an afterthought.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
92
Published Records
91%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-60%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 92 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Ammonia cracking reactors split ammonia back into hydrogen and nitrogen so that ammonia can serve as a dense, transportable carrier for hydrogen released on demand. The claims in this dataset span the reactor itself, the catalyst inside it, and the downstream steps — heat integration, residual ammonia slip handling and pressure swing purification — needed to deliver fuel-cell or turbine-grade hydrogen. The search string narrows to records that explicitly address start-up behaviour, dynamic response, ruthenium-free catalysis or heat integration, so this is a filtered technical slice rather than every ammonia-hydrogen patent filed.

92 published records sit in scope, spanning 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any trend understate actual filing activity; treat the tail of the chart as incomplete rather than as a genuine slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AIR PROD & CHEM INC58
  2. 2LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE13
  3. 3JOHNSON MATTHEY DAVY TECHNOLOGIES LTD5
  4. 4HALDOR TOPSOE AS5
  5. 5Xiamen Yishuo Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd.3
  6. 6TECHNIP ENERGIES FRANCE SAS3
  7. 7CHEVRON USA INC2
  8. 8HARBIN INST OF TECH1
  9. 9FUZHOU UNIV1
  10. 10FZU ZIJIN HYDROGEN POWER TECH CO LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 92 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend: a 2021 peak, then a drop-off

Annual filings ran to zero in 2017, climbed to a peak of 53 in 2021, then fell to 6 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the final year or two on the chart will fill in further as more records publish, but the shape of the decline from 2021 predates that lag.

Filing trend: a 2021 peak, then a drop-off01530456002017201820192020532021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: separation is claimed almost as heavily as the reaction

C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) touches 95.7% of the 92 records, confirming the core reaction chemistry is the dataset's anchor. B01D (separation processes) reaches 54.3%, meaning more than half of these filings also claim downstream purification — pressure swing adsorption and related separation are core patent territory here, not peripheral. F25B (refrigeration/heat pumps, 16.3%) and B01J (catalysis, 14.1%) trail well behind, and B23K, C23C and B60K each sit under 3%, marking the thinly claimed edges of the field.

Technology composition: separation is claimed almost as heavily as the reactionC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…8895.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…5054.3%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…2021.7%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps1516.3%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1314.1%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing22.2%C23C · Coating & surface deposition22.2%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive11.1%Other66.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 92 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Filing
US20240194915A12024-06-13

Ammonia fuel cell system with fast adsorption-desorption switching by self-evaporation of ammonia

FUZHOU UNIVERSITY

US20240194915A1, filed by Fuzhou University, describes an ammonia fuel cell system built around an ammonia decomposition reactor paired with a self-evaporation ammonia tank, dual heat exchangers, an adsorption column, a fuel cell, gas circulation and exhaust combustion. The architecture routes decomposed gas through heat recovery before adsorption, aiming at rapid switching between adsorption and desorption states.Published 2024-06-13 — illustrates how reactor, thermal management and adsorption-based purification are increasingly claimed as one integrated system rather than separate inventions.

US20240194915A1 — patent drawing 1US20240194915A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2021257944A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen90
2WO2022189560A1Method and system for producing hydrogen from ammonia cracking81
3WO2021257944A9Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen45
4WO2022265650A1Ammonia cracking process45
5WO2022265648A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen with NOX removal39
6WO2022265649A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen38
7WO2022265651A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen36
8WO2022265647A1Recovery of a renewable hydrogen product from an ammonia cracking process31
9US20230242395A1Ammonia Cracking for Green Hydrogen16
10CN116943541A一种管式氨裂解反应器7

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records — treat these as a signal of influence within the field, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three findings that shape where new claims can still land and where prior art is already dense.

Concentration
91.3% of 92 records
top 5 assignees

The field is held by a small group

The top five assignees combine for 84 of the 92 records in scope, a level of concentration that leaves narrow room for new entrants to claim the core reactor-and-catalyst combination without running into existing filings. The leader alone accounts for 58 records.

Ranked leaders, 12 companies total
Momentum
Peak 53 (2021) vs 6 (2022)
annual filings

Growth has flattened since 2021

Filing volume peaked in 2021 and dropped sharply by the 2022 midpoint. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this suggests the field consolidated around established claims rather than continuing to expand at the pace seen earlier in the trend.

2017–2026 window, most recent year partial
Technology mix
54.3% of 92 records
carry B01D separation claims

Purification is co-claimed with the reactor

More than half of records in scope combine core ammonia decomposition (C01B, 95.7%) with separation processes such as pressure swing purification (B01D). Filers are protecting the full hydrogen-delivery chain, not just the cracking step, which raises the bar for anyone entering with a reactor-only claim.

IPC shares sum above 100% — records carry multiple classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Key Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Twelve companies make up the entire ranked field for this search, with filings running from a single leader down to a long tail of single-digit filers.

Leader
58 records
of 92 in scope

One assignee dominates the count

The leading assignee holds 58 of the 92 records in scope — well over half the field — indicating a company that has built a broad claim position across the core reactor and likely adjacent separation and heat-integration steps.

Top 5 combined: 84 records (91.3%)
Long tail
1 record
tenth-place assignee

A steep drop after the leaders

By fifth place, filing counts have already fallen to 3 records, and the tenth-ranked assignee holds just 1. The top 10 together cover 100% of the 92 records, meaning there is effectively no unranked filer outside this group in this search.

12 companies make up the full ranking
Collaboration
2 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Co-filing is rare, not a pattern

Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, each linked by a single shared filing. Most activity in this field is filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development structures.

Strongest pairs each show 1 shared record
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where the IPC composition shows thin coverage relative to the core reactor claims.
Ruthenium-free catalyst formulationsReactor-integrated brazed heat exchangers (B23K)Anti-coking surface coatings (C23C)Vehicle-mounted cracking modules (B60K)Dynamic start-up control logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude0-100%
Haldor Topsoe A/S0
Technip Energies France SAS0
Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Limited0
Xiamen Yishuo Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd.0
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.0-100%
Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated core and several thinly claimed edges. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or identifying open claim space.

Map claims against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 58 of 92 records, a freedom-to-operate review should start by pulling that portfolio's independent claims before drafting anything touching the core reactor or catalyst.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

B23K, C23C and B60K each sit under 3% of records — before assuming that means open space, check whether it reflects genuine white space or simply low commercial interest so far.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ammonia cracking reactor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ammonia Cracking Reactors for Hydrogen Release in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.