Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 92 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Ammonia cracking reactors split ammonia back into hydrogen and nitrogen so that ammonia can serve as a dense, transportable carrier for hydrogen released on demand. The claims in this dataset span the reactor itself, the catalyst inside it, and the downstream steps — heat integration, residual ammonia slip handling and pressure swing purification — needed to deliver fuel-cell or turbine-grade hydrogen. The search string narrows to records that explicitly address start-up behaviour, dynamic response, ruthenium-free catalysis or heat integration, so this is a filtered technical slice rather than every ammonia-hydrogen patent filed.
92 published records sit in scope, spanning 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any trend understate actual filing activity; treat the tail of the chart as incomplete rather than as a genuine slowdown.
Two views of the same 92 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Annual filings ran to zero in 2017, climbed to a peak of 53 in 2021, then fell to 6 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the final year or two on the chart will fill in further as more records publish, but the shape of the decline from 2021 predates that lag.
C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) touches 95.7% of the 92 records, confirming the core reaction chemistry is the dataset's anchor. B01D (separation processes) reaches 54.3%, meaning more than half of these filings also claim downstream purification — pressure swing adsorption and related separation are core patent territory here, not peripheral. F25B (refrigeration/heat pumps, 16.3%) and B01J (catalysis, 14.1%) trail well behind, and B23K, C23C and B60K each sit under 3%, marking the thinly claimed edges of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 92 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaUS20240194915A1, filed by Fuzhou University, describes an ammonia fuel cell system built around an ammonia decomposition reactor paired with a self-evaporation ammonia tank, dual heat exchangers, an adsorption column, a fuel cell, gas circulation and exhaust combustion. The architecture routes decomposed gas through heat recovery before adsorption, aiming at rapid switching between adsorption and desorption states.Published 2024-06-13 — illustrates how reactor, thermal management and adsorption-based purification are increasingly claimed as one integrated system rather than separate inventions.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2021257944A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 90 |
| 2 | WO2022189560A1 | Method and system for producing hydrogen from ammonia cracking | 81 |
| 3 | WO2021257944A9 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 45 |
| 4 | WO2022265650A1 | Ammonia cracking process | 45 |
| 5 | WO2022265648A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen with NOX removal | 39 |
| 6 | WO2022265649A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 38 |
| 7 | WO2022265651A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 36 |
| 8 | WO2022265647A1 | Recovery of a renewable hydrogen product from an ammonia cracking process | 31 |
| 9 | US20230242395A1 | Ammonia Cracking for Green Hydrogen | 16 |
| 10 | CN116943541A | 一种管式氨裂解反应器 | 7 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records — treat these as a signal of influence within the field, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where new claims can still land and where prior art is already dense.
The top five assignees combine for 84 of the 92 records in scope, a level of concentration that leaves narrow room for new entrants to claim the core reactor-and-catalyst combination without running into existing filings. The leader alone accounts for 58 records.
Filing volume peaked in 2021 and dropped sharply by the 2022 midpoint. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this suggests the field consolidated around established claims rather than continuing to expand at the pace seen earlier in the trend.
More than half of records in scope combine core ammonia decomposition (C01B, 95.7%) with separation processes such as pressure swing purification (B01D). Filers are protecting the full hydrogen-delivery chain, not just the cracking step, which raises the bar for anyone entering with a reactor-only claim.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release, with the prior art for and against each one.
Twelve companies make up the entire ranked field for this search, with filings running from a single leader down to a long tail of single-digit filers.
The leading assignee holds 58 of the 92 records in scope — well over half the field — indicating a company that has built a broad claim position across the core reactor and likely adjacent separation and heat-integration steps.
By fifth place, filing counts have already fallen to 3 records, and the tenth-ranked assignee holds just 1. The top 10 together cover 100% of the 92 records, meaning there is effectively no unranked filer outside this group in this search.
Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, each linked by a single shared filing. Most activity in this field is filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development structures.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Étude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | 0 | -100% |
| Haldor Topsoe A/S | 0 | — |
| Technip Energies France SAS | 0 | — |
| Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Limited | 0 | — |
| Xiamen Yishuo Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Limited | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a concentrated core and several thinly claimed edges. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or identifying open claim space.
With one assignee holding 58 of 92 records, a freedom-to-operate review should start by pulling that portfolio's independent claims before drafting anything touching the core reactor or catalyst.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaB23K, C23C and B60K each sit under 3% of records — before assuming that means open space, check whether it reflects genuine white space or simply low commercial interest so far.
Run a white space search in EurekaOne assignee leads clearly with 58 of the 92 records in scope for this search, and the top five assignees combined account for 91.3% of all records. This is a highly concentrated field rather than one with many comparably sized players. The remaining seven ranked assignees in the twelve-company list hold small, single-digit counts each, down to one record at tenth place.
Filing activity peaked in 2021 at 53 records and had fallen to 6 by the 2022 midpoint, suggesting a flat-to-declining trend rather than continued growth. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years on any chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, so some caution is warranted before calling the field in decline outright. Even accounting for that lag, the drop from the 2021 peak is steep enough to suggest consolidation around existing claims rather than a slowdown purely from publication timing.
Separation processes are the biggest co-claimed category: B01D appears in 54.3% of the 92 records in scope, meaning more than half of filings pair the cracking reaction with a purification step such as pressure swing purification. Catalysis (B01J, 14.1%) and refrigeration/heat integration (F25B, 16.3%) follow at lower shares. Since a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read as overlapping coverage, not a breakdown of distinct segments.
The thinnest-claimed IPC classes in this dataset are B23K (welding, soldering and brazing, 2.2% of records), C23C (coatings and surface deposition, 2.2%) and B60K (vehicle propulsion and drive, 1.1%). These point toward under-claimed sub-areas such as brazed heat-exchanger construction inside the reactor, anti-coking catalyst coatings, and vehicle-mounted cracking modules. A low share does not guarantee an easy filing path — it can also mean lower commercial interest so far — so any white-space claim should be checked against the leading assignees' broader portfolios before drafting.
In this dataset, the top ten assignees account for 100% of the 92 records in scope, and the top five alone cover 91.3% — there is essentially no long tail of unranked filers beyond the twelve companies the ranking captures. That is a tight structure: a new entrant is very likely to encounter prior art from one of a small handful of established filers regardless of which sub-claim they pursue. Co-filing is also rare, with only two co-assignee pairs identified, so most of this concentration comes from individual companies building their own portfolios rather than joint ventures.
Go past this page: query the whole ammonia cracking reactors for hydrogen release corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.