Ammonia Cracking Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked in 2024 at 70 families then the pace looks flat-to-declining into 2025-26, though recent years are still understated by publication lag.
- Catalysis and separation dominate the claim space B01J and B01D subclasses cover roughly half of all records, while engine and turbine integration (F02B, F02C, F02M) remain comparatively thin.
- One Japanese pairing anchors the collaboration graph Hitachi Zosen and Toyota co-file more than any other pair, a signal of a live industrial partnership rather than isolated invention.
Filing growth compares 2021 (56 records) with 2024 (70) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 232 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the ammonia cracking patent record shows
Ammonia cracking — splitting NH3 back into nitrogen and hydrogen for on-demand fuel-cell or engine use — sits at the intersection of classical inorganic chemistry and new hydrogen-carrier logistics. The search set combines cracking catalyst, hydrogen release from ammonia, reactor design and residual ammonia removal language against the core IPC codes for ammonia synthesis and catalytic conversion, so it captures both legacy ammonia-gas process patents and the newer wave of green-hydrogen carrier filings.
232 families span a filing window from 2015 through the middle of 2026. The distribution is not smooth: activity was negligible before the early 2020s, rose sharply through 2024, and the last one to two years read low mainly because publication trails filing by around 18 months. Treat the 2025-26 figures as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 232-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up an ammonia cracking system.
A sharp run-up, then a flattening
Filings moved from essentially zero in 2017 to a peak of 70 in 2024, passing through 18 at the 2022 midpoint. That midpoint sitting well below the peak indicates most of the growth in this field is recent and concentrated, not a steady multi-year climb — and the apparent slowdown after 2024 is partly a publication-lag artefact rather than a real drop in inventive activity.
Catalysis and separation carry the claim weight
C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears in nearly the entire corpus, as expected given the search scope. Within that, B01J (catalytic processes) at 102 records and B01D (separation, including hydrogen purification and residual ammonia removal) at 54 are the two heaviest sub-areas after the core ammonia chemistry class C01C at 33. Combustion and engine-integration codes — F25B, F02C, F02B, F02M — each sit in the 12-15 range, suggesting downstream system integration is claimed far less densely than the cracking reaction itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 232 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ammonia cracking technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this corpus
US9341111B2 — Ammonia-engine system (Hitachi Zosen, 2016)
The patent describes an ammonia-engine system that keeps an ammonia cracking catalyst at the temperature it needs to keep converting ammonia to hydrogen, even during low-load operation when engine exhaust runs cooler than the catalyst's operating point. It does this by placing an ammonia oxidizing device between the ammonia engine and the ammonia cracking device, using oxidation heat to hold the cracking reaction above its threshold across the load range.Filed and granted before the current wave of green-ammonia carrier filings, this record shows the thermal-management problem — keeping a cracking catalyst hot enough under partial load — was already being solved for combustion applications years before hydrogen-carrier logistics became the dominant framing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2021257944A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 90 |
| 2 | US20190084831A1 | Ammonia cracking | 58 |
| 3 | JP1993330802A | Production of ammonia-cracked gas and production of hydrogen | 57 |
| 4 | WO2022243410A1 | Ammonia cracking for hydrogen production | 50 |
| 5 | WO2022265650A1 | Ammonia cracking process | 45 |
| 6 | WO2021257944A9 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 45 |
| 7 | JP2010121509A | Ammonia-engine system | 43 |
| 8 | WO2022265648A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen with NOX removal | 39 |
| 9 | WO2022265649A1 | Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen | 38 |
| 10 | US11084719B2 | Ammonia cracking | 36 |
Citation counts are measured within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical merit.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Four read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts do on their own.
Growth is recent, not gradual
The jump from 18 filings at the 2022 midpoint to 70 at the 2024 peak means most of the corpus was built in a two-to-three-year window. Anyone benchmarking freedom-to-operate against a 2020-era search will miss most of the live prior art.
Catalysis is the most contested ground
With over 100 filings touching catalytic process claims against 33 in the ammonia-chemistry class C01C, new catalyst-composition claims are competing against a dense, recent prior-art base rather than an open field.
International filing route is favoured
PCT applications lead the receiving-office count ahead of EPO, US, Singapore, UK and Australia filings, consistent with applicants keeping options open across multiple national phases before committing to specific markets.
One partnership stands out
Hitachi Zosen and Toyota co-file far more than any other pair in the ten identified co-assignee relationships, pointing to a sustained joint programme rather than incidental overlap.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ammonia cracking technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where activity has cooled
Recent-year momentum tells a different story from cumulative counts: several assignees with substantial historical filings show no activity in the latest year, which is as informative as who is currently active.
Legacy gas players have gone quiet
Air Products, Casale, Haldor Topsoe and Johnson Matthey UK all show zero filings in the most recent year, several down -100% year over year. That does not mean they have exited the field — it may reflect a pause between filing waves — but it does mean the newest claims are coming from elsewhere.
Newer entrants show the same lull
AMOGY Inc, a dedicated ammonia-to-hydrogen carrier company, also registers no filings in the latest tracked year in this dataset, which given publication lag likely understates work already filed but not yet published.
Hitachi Zosen and Toyota lead joint filing
Their nine shared filings dwarf every other co-assignee pair in the dataset, concentrated around combustion and thermal-management claims for ammonia-fuelled engines rather than pure carrier logistics.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Johnson Matthey PLC (UK) | 0 | -100% |
| AMOGY INC | 0 | — |
| Casale SA | 0 | -100% |
| Haldor Topsoe A/S | 0 | -100% |
| Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies | 0 | -100% |
| Hitachi Zosen Corporation | 0 | — |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, screening acquisition targets or planning your own filings.
Stress-test a claim against the densest prior art
Catalytic process claims under B01J face the heaviest recent filing activity in this corpus. Before drafting, run a claim-by-claim comparison against the 2022-2024 filing wave rather than older, more-cited records alone.
Explore in EurekaTrack dormant assignees for re-entry
Several established players show zero recent filings. A monitoring alert on those names would catch renewed activity earlier than a periodic manual search.
Set up monitoring in EurekaScope the engine-integration white space
F02B, F02C and F02M codes remain thin relative to core cracking claims, suggesting downstream combustion and turbine integration is less crowded than the reaction chemistry itself.
Map white space in EurekaCommon questions about ammonia cracking patents
Ammonia cracking, also called ammonia decomposition, is the catalytic reaction that splits NH3 back into nitrogen and hydrogen gas. It matters because ammonia is far easier to ship and store as a liquid than hydrogen is, so a workable cracking step at the point of use turns ammonia into a practical hydrogen-carrier for shipping fuel, power generation and fuel-cell applications. The patent record in this space is concentrated on the catalyst and reactor design needed to make that release efficient at usable temperatures and pressures.
The filing base includes long-standing industrial catalyst and gas-process companies alongside newer dedicated ammonia-to-hydrogen carrier specialists and combustion-engine developers. Several of the historically largest filers show no activity in the most recent tracked year, while a Japanese engine-and-shipbuilding pairing shows the strongest sustained co-filing relationship in the dataset. Rather than a single dominant leader, the field currently looks like a set of parallel programmes with different technical entry points — catalysis, separation and engine integration.
Filing volume rose sharply from near zero in the mid-2010s to a peak of 70 families in 2024, but the two most recent years in the dataset show lower counts. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, that apparent slowdown is at least partly an artefact of the data cut-off rather than a genuine drop in R&D activity. A fair read is that the field grew fast through 2024 and current momentum is still being resolved as more recent filings publish.
Relative to the catalytic cracking reaction itself, which is covered densely under IPC class B01J, the engine and turbine integration codes — covering internal combustion engines, gas turbines and fuel supply systems — carry noticeably fewer filings. Residual ammonia removal downstream of the cracking step, captured partly under separation class B01D, also shows comparatively lighter density than the core catalyst claims. These are reasonable areas to search more granularly before assuming the space is occupied.
US9341111B2, held by Hitachi Zosen, claims an ammonia-engine architecture that places an ammonia oxidizing device between the engine and the cracking device specifically to keep the cracking catalyst hot enough during low-load operation. Anyone designing a similar thermal-management scheme for an ammonia-fuelled engine — using oxidation heat to sustain cracking-catalyst temperature across load conditions — should review this claim scope closely. Alternative approaches, such as electrical pre-heating or exhaust-gas recirculation strategies that do not rely on an intermediate oxidizing device, sit outside its specific claim language.
Research Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole ammonia cracking technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.