Book a demo

Ammonia Cracking Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Ammonia Cracking Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ammonia-cracking-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Hydrogen & Fuel Cells · Patent Landscape
Ammonia Cracking Patents: Mapping the Route to Hydrogen Release
  • Filing peaked in 2024 at 70 families then the pace looks flat-to-declining into 2025-26, though recent years are still understated by publication lag.
  • Catalysis and separation dominate the claim space B01J and B01D subclasses cover roughly half of all records, while engine and turbine integration (F02B, F02C, F02M) remain comparatively thin.
  • One Japanese pairing anchors the collaboration graph Hitachi Zosen and Toyota co-file more than any other pair, a signal of a live industrial partnership rather than isolated invention.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
232
Published Records
59%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
WO
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (56 records) with 2024 (70) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 232 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the ammonia cracking patent record shows

Ammonia cracking — splitting NH3 back into nitrogen and hydrogen for on-demand fuel-cell or engine use — sits at the intersection of classical inorganic chemistry and new hydrogen-carrier logistics. The search set combines cracking catalyst, hydrogen release from ammonia, reactor design and residual ammonia removal language against the core IPC codes for ammonia synthesis and catalytic conversion, so it captures both legacy ammonia-gas process patents and the newer wave of green-hydrogen carrier filings.

232 families span a filing window from 2015 through the middle of 2026. The distribution is not smooth: activity was negligible before the early 2020s, rose sharply through 2024, and the last one to two years read low mainly because publication trails filing by around 18 months. Treat the 2025-26 figures as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1AIR PROD & CHEM INC59
  2. 2JOHNSON MATTHEY DAVY TECHNOLOGIES LTD26
  3. 3AMOGY INC20
  4. 4CASALE SA16
  5. 5JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC16
  6. 6HALDOR TOPSOE AS15
  7. 7TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK9
  8. 8HITACHI ZOSEN CORP9
  9. 9LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE4
  10. 10SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 232-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up an ammonia cracking system.

A sharp run-up, then a flattening

Filings moved from essentially zero in 2017 to a peak of 70 in 2024, passing through 18 at the 2022 midpoint. That midpoint sitting well below the peak indicates most of the growth in this field is recent and concentrated, not a steady multi-year climb — and the apparent slowdown after 2024 is partly a publication-lag artefact rather than a real drop in inventive activity.

A sharp run-up, then a flattening02040608002017201820192020202120222023702024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis and separation carry the claim weight

C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears in nearly the entire corpus, as expected given the search scope. Within that, B01J (catalytic processes) at 102 records and B01D (separation, including hydrogen purification and residual ammonia removal) at 54 are the two heaviest sub-areas after the core ammonia chemistry class C01C at 33. Combustion and engine-integration codes — F25B, F02C, F02B, F02M — each sit in the 12-15 range, suggesting downstream system integration is claimed far less densely than the cracking reaction itself.

Catalysis and separation carry the claim weightC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…23099.1%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …10244.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…5423.3%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…3314.2%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps156.5%F02C · Gas-turbine plants146.0%F02B · Internal-combustion engines125.2%F02M · Fuel supply & carburettors125.2%Other3012.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 232 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ammonia cracking technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative filing
US9341111B22016-05-17

US9341111B2 — Ammonia-engine system (Hitachi Zosen, 2016)

HITACHI ZOSEN CORPORATION

The patent describes an ammonia-engine system that keeps an ammonia cracking catalyst at the temperature it needs to keep converting ammonia to hydrogen, even during low-load operation when engine exhaust runs cooler than the catalyst's operating point. It does this by placing an ammonia oxidizing device between the ammonia engine and the ammonia cracking device, using oxidation heat to hold the cracking reaction above its threshold across the load range.Filed and granted before the current wave of green-ammonia carrier filings, this record shows the thermal-management problem — keeping a cracking catalyst hot enough under partial load — was already being solved for combustion applications years before hydrogen-carrier logistics became the dominant framing.

US9341111B2 — patent drawing 1US9341111B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation ammonia cracking patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2021257944A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen90
2US20190084831A1Ammonia cracking58
3JP1993330802AProduction of ammonia-cracked gas and production of hydrogen57
4WO2022243410A1Ammonia cracking for hydrogen production50
5WO2022265650A1Ammonia cracking process45
6WO2021257944A9Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen45
7JP2010121509AAmmonia-engine system43
8WO2022265648A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen with NOX removal39
9WO2022265649A1Ammonia cracking for green hydrogen38
10US11084719B2Ammonia cracking36

Citation counts are measured within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical merit.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts do on their own.

Filing pace
70 in 2024
peak year

Growth is recent, not gradual

The jump from 18 filings at the 2022 midpoint to 70 at the 2024 peak means most of the corpus was built in a two-to-three-year window. Anyone benchmarking freedom-to-operate against a 2020-era search will miss most of the live prior art.

Recency window: 2022-2024
Claim density
102 B01J records
catalytic process filings

Catalysis is the most contested ground

With over 100 filings touching catalytic process claims against 33 in the ammonia-chemistry class C01C, new catalyst-composition claims are competing against a dense, recent prior-art base rather than an open field.

IPC B01J vs. C01C
Jurisdictions
45 PCT filings
WIPO receiving office

International filing route is favoured

PCT applications lead the receiving-office count ahead of EPO, US, Singapore, UK and Australia filings, consistent with applicants keeping options open across multiple national phases before committing to specific markets.

WIPO 45 · EPO 37 · US 35
Collaboration
9 co-filings
strongest assignee pair

One partnership stands out

Hitachi Zosen and Toyota co-file far more than any other pair in the ten identified co-assignee relationships, pointing to a sustained joint programme rather than incidental overlap.

Hitachi Zosen + Toyota
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ammonia cracking technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum tells a different story from cumulative counts: several assignees with substantial historical filings show no activity in the latest year, which is as informative as who is currently active.

Industrial gas incumbents
0 in latest year
recent momentum

Legacy gas players have gone quiet

Air Products, Casale, Haldor Topsoe and Johnson Matthey UK all show zero filings in the most recent year, several down -100% year over year. That does not mean they have exited the field — it may reflect a pause between filing waves — but it does mean the newest claims are coming from elsewhere.

Air Products · Casale · Haldor Topsoe
Hydrogen-carrier specialists
0 in latest year
recent momentum

Newer entrants show the same lull

AMOGY Inc, a dedicated ammonia-to-hydrogen carrier company, also registers no filings in the latest tracked year in this dataset, which given publication lag likely understates work already filed but not yet published.

AMOGY INC
Engine-integration pairing
9 co-filings
strongest pair

Hitachi Zosen and Toyota lead joint filing

Their nine shared filings dwarf every other co-assignee pair in the dataset, concentrated around combustion and thermal-management claims for ammonia-fuelled engines rather than pure carrier logistics.

Hitachi Zosen + Toyota
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively low relative to the core cracking-catalyst claim space.
Residual ammonia removal downstream of crackingGas-turbine integration of cracked hydrogenLow-load thermal management for cracking reactorsRefrigeration-cycle coupling with cracking heat recovery
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.0
Johnson Matthey PLC (UK)0-100%
AMOGY INC0
Casale SA0-100%
Haldor Topsoe A/S0-100%
Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies0-100%
Hitachi Zosen Corporation0
Toyota Motor Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, screening acquisition targets or planning your own filings.

Stress-test a claim against the densest prior art

Catalytic process claims under B01J face the heaviest recent filing activity in this corpus. Before drafting, run a claim-by-claim comparison against the 2022-2024 filing wave rather than older, more-cited records alone.

Explore in Eureka

Track dormant assignees for re-entry

Several established players show zero recent filings. A monitoring alert on those names would catch renewed activity earlier than a periodic manual search.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Scope the engine-integration white space

F02B, F02C and F02M codes remain thin relative to core cracking claims, suggesting downstream combustion and turbine integration is less crowded than the reaction chemistry itself.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ammonia cracking patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ammonia Cracking Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ammonia cracking technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.