Book a demo

AMR Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance Patents 2026 — PatSnap Eureka

AMR Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance Patents 2026 — PatSnap Eureka
Explore in Eureka
2026 Patent Landscape

AMR Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance: 2026 Technology Landscape

Classical geometric planners are being augmented by deep reinforcement learning pipelines, enabling AMRs to navigate genuinely unstructured, human-populated environments. This report maps 62 retrieved records spanning 2004–2026.

62
total patent and literature records in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
11
patent records with assignee metadata in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
6 of 11
patent filings from India in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
2004–2026
coverage span of records in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··9 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Technology Overview

Four Technical Families Shaping AMR Obstacle Avoidance

Dynamic obstacle avoidance (DOA) for AMRs requires robots to respond in real time to obstacles whose positions, velocities, and trajectories change over time. Within this dataset, four broad technical families are visible: velocity-space and geometric planning methods, sampling-based and graph-search planners, reinforcement and deep learning methods, and sensor fusion and perception pipelines.

Velocity-space methods model obstacle motion as velocity obstacles (VO), generalized velocity obstacles (GVO), dynamic window approaches (DWA), or artificial potential fields (APF), translating obstacle kinematics directly into robot control commands. Sampling-based methods such as RRT, RRT*, A*, and D* Lite construct or continuously re-plan collision-free paths as new obstacles are detected.

Patent Filings by Jurisdiction — AMR Obstacle Avoidance (Dataset Snapshot)
Patent filings by jurisdiction in this dataset: IN=6, US=3, WO=2, SG=1, CN=1Horizontal bar chart showing filing counts by jurisdiction among 11 patent records retrieved. India leads with 6 filings in this dataset.India (IN)6United States (US)3International (WO)2Singapore (SG)1China (CN)1↗ Click bars to explore

Deep reinforcement learning methods — including DQN, PPO, SAC, and LSTM-based controllers — learn avoidance policies through environmental interaction. The challenge motivating virtually all retrieved records is the same: static-environment planning assumptions break down when people, vehicles, or other robots share the workspace, requiring both accurate obstacle state estimation and planners capable of reasoning about future positions.

Publication dates in this dataset span from 2004 to 2026, revealing three phases: a foundational phase (2004–2014) establishing core algorithmic primitives, a development phase (2015–2020) driven by ROS and LiDAR commoditization, and a convergence phase (2021–2026) marked by hybrid architectures and increased commercial patent filings. Among 11 patent records with assignee metadata in this dataset, India accounts for 6 filings, followed by the US with 3.

PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records, 11 patent filings with jurisdiction metadata, dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Explore the data ↗
Filing & Algorithm Trends

Patent Filing Activity and Algorithm Cluster Distribution

Patent filing activity in this dataset accelerated after 2020, with the majority of commercial filings appearing in 2024–2026. Algorithm distribution across retrieved records shows deep reinforcement learning and sensor fusion methods gaining ground over classical geometric planners.

Algorithm Cluster Distribution Across Retrieved Records (Dataset Snapshot)

Sensor fusion and DRL-based methods together represent the majority of records in this dataset from 2020 onward, while velocity-space methods anchor foundational filings from the 2004–2018 period.

Algorithm cluster distribution in dataset: DRL Methods ~14 records, Sensor Fusion ~12, Sampling-Based ~10, Velocity-Space ~8 recordsHorizontal bar chart showing approximate record counts per algorithm cluster in the retrieved dataset of 62 records covering 2004–2026.DRL Methods~14Sensor Fusion~12Sampling-Based~10Velocity-Space~8↗ Click bars to explore

Patent Filing Activity by Phase — AMR Obstacle Avoidance (Dataset Snapshot)

Commercial patent filings in this dataset are concentrated in 2021–2026, with 8 of 11 assignee-identified patents filed after 2020, reflecting accelerating commercialization of AMR navigation technology.

Patent filing counts by phase in dataset: 2004-2014=0, 2015-2020=3, 2021-2026=8Vertical bar chart showing patent filing counts per innovation phase in this dataset. The 2021-2026 convergence phase accounts for 8 of 11 assignee-identified patent records.8402004–201402015–202032021–20268↗ Click bars to explore
PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records, 11 patent filings with assignee and jurisdiction metadata, dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Explore the data ↗
Key Application Domains

Where AMR Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance Is Being Deployed

Retrieved records across this dataset reveal AMR dynamic obstacle avoidance being applied across four major domains: warehouse logistics, autonomous ground vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, and service robots in human-shared environments.

APF-MPC · AGV Fleet Control

Warehouse Logistics & Industrial AMRs

Zebra Technologies Corporation’s 2020 US patent addresses mobile automation apparatus navigation using dynamic perimeter regions calibrated by localization confidence for warehouse environments. A 2023 literature record applies hybrid APF-MPC to AGV fleets at automated container terminals, handling both static lane boundaries and dynamic conflicting vehicles simultaneously.

Industrial Automation
DDPG · V2X Sensing · Anytime D*

Autonomous Ground Vehicles

A 2022 literature record applies DDPG with V2X sensor data to extend perception beyond local sensors for connected autonomous vehicles. A 2026 IN patent by Mandapalli Mahikumar uses Anytime Dynamic A* replanning with ML-based navigation efficiency evaluation for autonomous vehicle routing. Shanghai Electric-Hydrogen’s 2026 CN patent targets autonomous transport robots with multi-objective path scoring for safety, smoothness, and efficiency.

Autonomous Vehicles
MPC · Depth-Map · Computer Vision

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Everseen Limited’s 2024 US patent uses depth maps re-scaled to global environment maps to trace routes avoiding both static and dynamic obstacles in aerial navigation systems. The 2022 DPMPC-Planner literature record separates static mapping from dynamic object representation using computer vision, then applies chance-constrained MPC for reactive UAV avoidance in complex environments.

UAV Navigation
DRL · Semantic Navigation · HRI

Service Robots & Human Environments

A 2020 literature record on DRL-based semantic navigation addresses mobile robots operating among unpredictable pedestrians in service contexts. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.’s trajectory planner patents (US, 2021 and 2024) address all-terrain vehicles and wheelchairs operating in unknown dynamic environments. The RL-DOVS 2022 record represents environmental dynamism as a robocentric velocity space fed to an RL agent for human-shared navigation.

Human-Robot Interaction
PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records covering warehouse, AGV, UAV, and service robot application domains, dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Explore insights ↗
Key Patent Assignees

Leading Assignees in AMR Obstacle Avoidance — Dataset Snapshot

Among 11 patent records with assignee metadata in this dataset, Delta Electronics Int’l (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Indian Institute of Technology Madras each hold 2 filings in retrieved records, tied with Honda Motor Co., Ltd. at 2 filings, making them the most active individual assignees in this dataset.

Top Assignees by Filing Count in Retrieved Records (Dataset Snapshot)

Top assignees in dataset: Delta Electronics Int’l (Singapore) Pte Ltd=2, Indian Institute of Technology Madras=2, Honda Motor Co., Ltd.=2, Zebra Technologies Corporation=1, Everseen Limited=1Horizontal bar chart of top assignees by patent filing count in retrieved records, dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Delta Electronics Int’l(Singapore) Pte Ltd2Indian Institute ofTechnology Madras2Honda Motor Co., Ltd.2Zebra Technologies Corporation1Everseen Limited1↗ Click bars to explore
Direction-Aware AMR Navigation · Sensor Fusion

Delta Electronics Int’l (Singapore) Pte Ltd

Delta Electronics Int’l (Singapore) Pte Ltd holds 2 patent filings in retrieved records: one US filing and one SG filing, both from 2025, covering autonomous mobile robot operating methods. The patents claim explicit logic for distinguishing dynamic obstacle direction — same vs. opposite to the AMR — and adjusting avoidance strategy based on obstacle speed thresholds, including maintaining safe distance or re-routing. This direction-aware behavioral approach is described as a step beyond simple collision avoidance toward socially-aware navigation in this dataset.

Singapore / United States
3D Geometric Obstacle Representation · Route Planning

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Indian Institute of Technology Madras holds 2 patent filings in retrieved records: one WO filing and one IN filing, both from 2025, covering a route planning method for autonomous mobile objects. The patents generate virtual triangulated 3D geometric casings around obstacles, enabling more accurate 3D free-space computation compared to 2D cost maps, applicable to both ground and aerial platforms. The WO filing signals intent to seek international protection for this 3D obstacle representation approach.

India — IN / International WO
🔍
Unlock All 7 Named Assignees and Their Technology Focus Areas
Beyond Delta Electronics and IIT Madras, this dataset includes filings from Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (trajectory planners, US 2021 and 2024), Zebra Technologies Corporation (dynamic perimeter regions, US 2020), Tata Consultancy Services Limited (VO-integrated planning, IN 2026), Everseen Limited (aerial depth-map avoidance, US 2024), and Chennai Institute of Technology (BiRRT-SARSA hybrid, IN 2025).
Honda trajectory planner patents Tata Consultancy VO integration + more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records, 11 patent records with assignee metadata, dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Explore players ↗
Emerging Directions

Five Converging Technical Directions in AMR Obstacle Avoidance (2024–2026)

The most recent filings and publications in this dataset (2024–2026) point to five converging technical directions: hybrid DRL and classical planner architectures, direction- and speed-aware obstacle classification, 3D geometric obstacle representation, multi-modal sensing with AI classification, and transport robot specialization.

Hybrid DRL + Classical Planner Architectures

Records from 2021–2022 established the theoretical bridge between DRL local planners and conventional global planners via intermediate waypoint generators. The 2025 IN patent on BiRRT-SARSA hybrid dynamic path finding and the All-in-One DRL control switch architecture (2022) illustrate this convergence moving into products. R&D investment should focus on the integration layer — waypoint generators, control switches, and planner arbitration logic — rather than either paradigm alone.

Direction- and Speed-Aware Obstacle Classification

Delta Electronics’ 2025 US and SG patents introduce fine-grained behavioral rules: if a dynamic obstacle moves in the same direction at lower speed, re-route; if opposite, determine pathway width and execute a passing strategy. This behavioral specificity goes beyond simple collision avoidance and is directly relevant to human-facing service robots. Freedom-to-operate assessments in this sub-domain are recommended for firms deploying AMRs in human-shared environments.

🔒
Access Full Analysis of All 5 Emerging Directions
Multi-modal sensing with AI classification — including the 2024 IN patent combining CapsNet-CNN with Elephant Search Algorithm for LiDAR-based obstacle classification — and transport robot specialization are covered in the full dataset analysis.
CapsNet-CNN LiDAR classificationMulti-criteria transport path scoring+ more
Unlock full analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records, filings and publications 2024–2026, dataset snapshot.Explore emerging trends ↗
Method Comparison

Classical Geometric Planners vs. Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods

Click any row to explore further.

DimensionClassical Geometric Planners (VO/DWA/RRT)Deep Reinforcement Learning (DQN/PPO/SAC)
Core MechanismModel obstacle kinematics as velocity obstacles or forbidden velocity cones; select robot action outside forbidden setLearn avoidance policy by rewarding collision-free goal-reaching behavior through environmental interaction
Obstacle HandlingExplicitly models obstacle velocity vectors; fails when static-environment planning assumptions are violated in dense dynamic scenesHandles unpredictable pedestrians and multi-obstacle scenarios; struggles with long-range navigation consistency
Key AlgorithmsVO, GVO, DWA, APF, A*, RRT, RRT*, D* Lite, PRM, hybrid A*DQN, PPO, SAC, DDPG, LSTM-based controllers, Q-learning
Sensor InputLiDAR, laser range finders, Kalman filter-tracked obstacle state estimatesRaw sensor observations, robocentric velocity space representations, semantic inputs
Compute RequirementsLower; geometric computation suitable for edge hardware in ROS navigation stacksHigher training overhead; inference cost depends on policy complexity and hardware
Representative RecordsRRT*+GVO (2018 literature), OP-PRM+D* Lite (2022 literature), IIT Madras 3D casing patents (2025)SAC+ROS (2021 literature), DRL-waypoint bridge (2021 literature), DQN/PPO/SAC survey of 34 studies (2023)
Commercial Filings (dataset)Zebra Technologies 2020 US, Delta Electronics 2025 US/SG, Chennai Institute of Technology 2025 INTata Consultancy Services 2026 IN (VO+DRL hybrid), Honda Motor 2021/2024 US trajectory planners
Hybrid Integration TrendUsed as global planner backbone; combined with DRL local planners via waypoint generator bridge layersUsed as local planner; depends on classical global planner for long-range route generation
PatSnap Eureka Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records, algorithm comparison derived from 62 records in dataset snapshot 2004–2026.Compare in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions: AMR Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance Patents

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and research data.Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Generate Your AMR Obstacle Avoidance Patent Report with PatSnap Eureka

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to generate reports like this one for any technology area.

Data and insights on this page are based on a limited patent and literature dataset and are for reference only. Figures may not represent the complete technology landscape.

Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Eureka built for innovation research

Eureka built for research
Domain-specific AI agents for IP, Engineering, Life Sciences, and Materials
Patents, Scientific Literature, Compounds & More Unified in One Platform
Ask, Research, Solve, Draft, and Validate Your Work from Weeks to Minutes
Try it for Free

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.