Anaerobic Digestion Digester Mixing Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- Concentration is modest. the leader holds 13 records and the top 5 combined account for 22.9% of all 218 records in scope — no single assignee controls the mixing-intensity claim space.
- Filing has kept climbing. from 4 records in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a +50% rise over that span, even as 2017 remains the peak filing year on record at 15.
- Mechanical mixing is a minority claim. B01F (mixing & stirring) sits at just 7.8% of records against C02F's 77.1%, suggesting most claims describe the digestion process, not the mixing hardware itself.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 218 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape maps 218 published records at the intersection of anaerobic digestion process claims and digester mixing techniques — mixing intensity, sludge circulation, dead-zone control, solids suspension, gas mixing and power input — filed under IPC classes covering fermentation, wastewater treatment and bioreactor apparatus. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, capturing both the process chemistry side (C12P, C02F) and the mechanical mixing side (B01F, C12M) of the same digesters.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend understate actual filing activity. Family-level counting is used throughout to avoid double-counting continuations and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 218 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing activity, 2017 peak to present
2017 remains the peak year at 15 records. Filing dipped afterward but has since climbed again, moving from 4 records in 2021 to 6 in 2024 — a +50% increase over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as incomplete rather than as a slowdown.
Where the claims sit across IPC subclasses
C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in 77.1% of the 218 records, and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus) in 43.6% — the two dominant classes for this dataset. B01F, the subclass most directly tied to physical mixing and stirring hardware, appears in only 7.8% of records, meaning most filings claim digestion process or reactor configuration rather than the mixing mechanism itself. Records can carry more than one class, so these shares sum to over 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 218 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Anaerobic Digestion Digester Mixing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anaerobic digestion digester mixing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
US6254775B1 — Anaerobic digester system and method
A vertically upright digester vessel houses a matrix supporting a microorganism biomass, with an upper slurry input, a top gas output and a bottom effluent output. The vessel specifies a preferred liquid height-to-diameter ratio of 2:1 and is built from fiberglass-reinforced plastic coated with a translucent blue gel pigment layer that filters light at wavelengths promoting biomass cultivation.Filed by Renergy LLC; issued 2001-07-03. One of the most-cited records in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5616241A | Treatment of wastewater and sludges | 157 |
| 2 | US4323367A | Gas production by accelerated in situ bioleaching of landfills | 134 |
| 3 | US6254775B1 | Anaerobic digester system and method | 115 |
| 4 | US4632758A | Anaerobic wastewater treatment system | 102 |
| 5 | US5514277A | Treatment of wastewater and sludges | 91 |
| 6 | US5409610A | Method for anaerobic sludge digestion | 87 |
| 7 | US4396402A | Gas production by accelerated bioleaching of organic materials | 78 |
| 8 | US5779996A | Microbial remediation reactor and process | 67 |
| 9 | US20180112142A1 | Method and system for providing upgraded biogas | 58 |
| 10 | US20100032370A1 | Anaerobic digester design and operation | 58 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are set against their denominators.
No single owner controls the space
The leading assignee holds 13 records and the top 5 combined reach 22.9% of the 218 records in scope. That is meaningful concentration relative to a fully fragmented field, but it leaves most of the space open — filing here means competing with a handful of repeat filers, not one dominant blocker.
Momentum has returned after the 2017 peak
Filing fell back from its 2017 peak of 15 records but has since rebuilt, rising from 4 records in 2021 to 6 in 2024. That three-year growth rate should anchor any claim that activity here is picking up again — later years are still filling in behind the 18-month publication lag.
Mixing hardware claims are the minority
C02F wastewater-treatment claims dominate at 77.1% of records and C12M bioreactor apparatus claims sit at 43.6%, while B01F — the subclass most tied to physical mixing and stirring mechanisms — appears in only 7.8%. Most digester patents describe the process or the vessel, not the impeller, pump or gas-lift hardware that actually moves the sludge.
Filing is US-led with a thin PCT layer
The United States receives the largest share of filings at 71, ahead of Europe (29), WIPO/PCT (25), Japan (21), Canada (16) and Australia (12). A comparatively thin PCT layer relative to the US total suggests many applicants are not yet pursuing broad international protection for mixing-specific claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anaerobic digestion digester mixing, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee landscape
The ranking covers 100 companies, counted in records — it is the full set the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Ownership is spread across utilities, technology licensors and a university, with no single filer approaching a blocking position.
A modest lead, not a monopoly
The top-ranked assignee holds 13 records against a field of 100 ranked companies — enough to matter in freedom-to-operate checks, not enough to foreclose the space.
A long shoulder below the leader
Filing volume drops off quickly after the leader: fifth place holds 8 records and tenth place holds 5, pointing to a genuine long tail of single- and low-digit filers rather than a two-tier market.
Co-filing is rare and concentrated
Only a handful of co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and one utility-and-university pairing accounts for the strongest link at 8 shared records. Most assignees in this space file alone.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet among top filers
Every one of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, including the top-ranked filer, shows zero records in the latest year — consistent with publication lag rather than an actual stop in filing, since 2025–2026 data is still incomplete.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| United Utilities | 0 | — |
| Anaergia | 0 | — |
| Viresco AD LLC | 0 | — |
| Vestforsyning | 0 | — |
| Cambi Tech AS | 0 | -100% |
| Technical University of Denmark | 0 | — |
| ULTRA CLEAN ECOLENE INC | 0 | — |
| INNOVATIVE BIOSYST | 0 | — |
Where to take this from here
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing.
Check freedom-to-operate against the cited core
The most-cited records in this dataset, several dating to the 1980s and 1990s, still shape the claim boundaries that later filings design around. Any new mixing-hardware filing should be checked against these before drafting.
Explore prior art in EurekaWatch the mid-field for licensing openings
With no single assignee holding a blocking position and a long tail below the leader, licensing or cross-filing conversations are more tractable here than in a field with one dominant owner.
Map assignees in EurekaTarget the mechanical mixing gap
B01F mixing-and-stirring claims remain thin relative to the process-heavy C02F and C12M classes, leaving specific impeller, gas-lift and sensing configurations comparatively open for new claims.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCommon questions on digester mixing patents
No single company dominates this field. The leading assignee in this dataset holds 13 of the 218 records in scope, and the top 5 assignees combined account for 22.9% of all records. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of companies, utilities and one university, each holding a handful of records. For freedom-to-operate purposes this means checking several mid-sized filers rather than clearing one dominant owner.
Filing peaked in 2017 at 15 records, dipped afterward, and has since risen again from 4 records in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a +50% increase over that span. The most recent one to two years in any patent dataset understate true activity because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures should not be read as a slowdown. On the basis of the last complete years, momentum is building rather than fading.
US6254775B1, assigned to Renergy LLC and issued in 2001, claims a vertically upright digester vessel with a matrix supporting microorganism biomass, a slurry input above the matrix, a gas output at the top and an effluent output at the bottom. It specifies a preferred liquid height-to-diameter ratio of 2:1 and a fiberglass-reinforced plastic construction with a translucent blue gel-pigment coating for light filtering. It is among the most-cited records in this dataset, meaning later filings in this space have repeatedly had to design around its vessel geometry and biomass-support configuration.
Mechanical mixing hardware itself is comparatively thin: B01F, the IPC subclass most directly tied to mixing and stirring, appears in only 7.8% of the 218 records, against 77.1% for wastewater-treatment process claims and 43.6% for bioreactor apparatus claims. Specific configurations such as gas-lift dead-zone elimination, variable-speed impeller control tied to power input, and retrofit sludge-circulation loops for existing digesters show thinner filing density than the core digestion process claims. That gap is where new claims are more likely to clear prior art cleanly.
The United States receives the largest volume in this dataset at 71 filings, followed by Europe (EPO) at 29, WIPO/PCT at 25, Japan at 21, Canada at 16 and Australia at 12. The relatively thin PCT count compared to the US total suggests that many applicants file domestically first and do not always pursue the broader international route for mixing-specific claims. That pattern matters for competitors assessing exposure outside the US market.
Research Anaerobic Digestion Digester Mixing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole anaerobic digestion digester mixing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.