Anaerobic Digestion Membrane Filtration Patents: Trends & Leaders 2026
- Filing peaked in 2017 at 15 families and has not returned to that level since, with the 2022 midpoint at 8 — a flat-to-declining trend rather than a technology still accelerating.
- China leads receiving offices with 27 filings, more than double the United States' 13, shifting the centre of prosecution activity away from the US and Europe combined.
- No tracked assignee, including the most active research groups, filed in the latest year, a gap consistent with reporting lag but also with a maturing, consolidating claim landscape.
Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 69 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Anaerobic digestion membrane filtration pairs an anaerobic digester or bioreactor with a membrane separation step, most often described as an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) or as digestate filtration. The search corpus behind this page combines anaerobic digestion terms in the title and abstract with membrane-specific claim language, filtered against C02F3/28, B01D61 and C02F3/12 — the wastewater treatment, membrane separation and biological treatment classifications that anchor this art.
The 69 families in this dataset span 2015 through mid-2026, giving a decade-long view of a niche but persistent cross-over between biological treatment and physical separation engineering. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years of the trend line will fill in further as those applications publish.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The volume and classification data below frame where claim density sits today and how the field's activity has moved over the tracked decade.
A 2017 peak that has not been repeated
Filings reached 15 in 2017, the high point of the tracked window, then eased toward a midpoint of 8 by 2022. That pattern reads as flat-to-declining rather than an emerging technology still building momentum, though the most recent one to two years are understated by publication lag.
Concentrated in wastewater treatment, with filtration hardware a distant second
All 69 records sit under C02F (water and wastewater treatment), confirming the corpus is correctly scoped. B01D (separation processes) appears in only 5 records and B30B (presses) in 4, meaning the physical membrane and dewatering hardware claims are a minority relative to the process-level wastewater claims — a signal of where equipment-specific white space may sit.
Shares are the percentage of the 69 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Anaerobic Digestion Membrane Filtration with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anaerobic digestion membrane filtration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents and the most-cited prior art
Hybrid solar still and anaerobic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
Filed by Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research and published 2026-01-15, this application combines a solar still with an anaerobic membrane bioreactor: the still concentrates feed wastewater into condensed and concentrated streams, the concentrated stream feeds an anaerobic process tank producing digested sludge and process liquid, and a membrane tank receives both the process liquid and the condensed water for final treatment.Notable for coupling solar thermal concentration directly to the digestion-membrane train rather than treating the two as separate unit operations.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20130264280A1 | Process for Removing Ammonium from a Wastewater Stream | 48 |
| 2 | US20150076059A1 | Anaerobic treatment of industrial wastewater | 21 |
| 3 | US20110253624A1 | Anaerobic digester-membrane bioreactor for treating a waste stream | 19 |
| 4 | WO2013155631A1 | Anaerobic treatment of industrial wastewater | 17 |
| 5 | WO2017218239A1 | Method of combining recuperative digestion with a contact tank and dissolved air flotation | 16 |
| 6 | CN107055813A | 一种厌氧污水处理装置及工艺 | 16 |
| 7 | US8864993B2 | Process for removing ammonium from a wastewater stream | 13 |
| 8 | CN104710005A | 外置式厌氧膜生物反应器 | 8 |
| 9 | CN106673190A | 一种废水高效厌氧处理工艺及装置 | 7 |
| 10 | CN117446970A | 厌氧膜生物反应器耦联厌氧氨氧化废水生物脱氮产能系统 | 6 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them; treat them as a signal of influence within this searched set, not as a ranking of current importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers indicate for filing strategy
Three figures matter most for anyone deciding whether and where to file next in this space.
Activity has cooled since its 2017 peak
The decline from a 2017 high of 15 families to a 2022 midpoint of 8 suggests the field is not currently in a filing surge. New entrants should expect a settled prior-art base in the core process claims rather than open ground.
China is the dominant filing jurisdiction
China accounts for well over a third of all receiving-office filings, ahead of the United States (13), WIPO PCT (8), Europe (6), Japan (4) and Canada (3). Freedom-to-operate work should weight Chinese prior art accordingly.
Process claims dominate over hardware claims
Every record touches C02F wastewater treatment classification, but only 5 touch B01D separation processes and 4 touch B30B presses. Membrane module design and dewatering hardware are comparatively thin relative to the process-level claims layered on top of them.
Filing is mostly solo, with one tight academic-industry cluster
Only four co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, and the strongest links all involve the same three parties working together repeatedly rather than a broad web of joint filers.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anaerobic digestion membrane filtration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space, and who has gone quiet
Filing history in this niche is dominated by a small set of water-technology majors and one recurring academic-industry cluster; none of the tracked assignees added a new family in the most recent year.
Veolia Water Technologies
Among the more active corporate assignees in this dataset, but its filing activity in the most recent tracked year sits at zero, consistent with the broader post-2017 slowdown.
Evoqua Water Technologies
A recurring assignee in the anaerobic-digester and membrane bioreactor claim space, also showing no new filings in the latest tracked year.
Universitat de Valencia, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and FCC Aqualia
These three parties form the strongest co-filing cluster in the dataset, each pairing sharing five families — evidence of a sustained academic-industry research partnership rather than isolated joint filings.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Veolia Water Technologies | 0 | — |
| Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Anaergia Inc. | 0 | — |
| Universitat de Valencia | 0 | — |
| Universitat Politecnica de Valencia | 0 | — |
| FCC AQUALIA | 0 | — |
| Guangzhou University | 0 | -100% |
| KUWAIT INST FOR SCI RES | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next questions for R&D and IP teams rather than a single conclusion.
Check freedom-to-operate against the China filing base
With 27 of 69 families filed in China, any commercialisation plan touching that market should start prior-art review there rather than with US or EPO filings alone.
Explore Eureka for FTO searchProbe the hardware-versus-process claim gap
B01D and B30B classifications are thin relative to C02F, suggesting membrane module and press hardware claims may have more room than the crowded process-level filings.
Map white space in EurekaTrack the Valencia-Aqualia cluster for continuations
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset is active and specific; monitoring its follow-on filings is a low-cost way to anticipate the next claim moves in this niche.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This dataset identifies 69 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine anaerobic digestion or biogas digestion terminology with membrane bioreactor or digestate filtration claim language, classified under wastewater treatment and membrane separation codes. That figure reflects a specific search scope rather than every patent that ever touches anaerobic digestion or membranes separately, so a broader search string would return a larger and less precise set. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for 2025 and 2026 will rise as pending applications publish.
Water-technology majors including Veolia Water Technologies and Evoqua Water Technologies appear repeatedly across the tracked decade, alongside a distinct academic-industry cluster formed by Universitat de Valencia, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia and FCC Aqualia, which share the strongest co-filing relationship in the dataset. None of these assignees, however, show new filings in the most recent tracked year, a pattern consistent with the broader post-2017 slowdown in this niche. Anyone assessing competitive position should track both the corporate filers and this academic cluster together, since their claims interact.
The data shows filings reaching 15 in 2017, the high point of the tracked window, before easing to a midpoint of 8 by 2022 and continuing lower since. This pattern is consistent with a technology whose core process claims filled in during the mid-2010s, after which incremental filings became harder to differentiate against existing prior art. It does not necessarily mean commercial interest has declined — dense claim coverage often precedes, rather than follows, wider deployment.
China's receiving office accounts for 27 of the 69 families in this dataset, more than double the United States' 13 and well ahead of WIPO PCT filings (8), the European Patent Office (6), Japan (4) and Canada (3). That concentration means prior-art and freedom-to-operate searches focused only on US or European filings will miss a large share of the relevant claim base. Teams planning to commercialise in China specifically should treat local prior art as the primary risk, not a secondary check.
Classification data shows every record touches C02F wastewater treatment codes, but only a small minority touch B01D separation-process or B30B press codes, meaning membrane hardware and dewatering equipment claims are comparatively thin relative to process-level digestion claims. Specific under-claimed branches include fouling control tailored to digestate composition, press integration with AnMBR trains, and electrochemical or solar-thermal pre-treatment coupled to digestion. These are narrower, more defensible filing targets than the crowded core process claims.
Research Anaerobic Digestion Membrane Filtration in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole anaerobic digestion membrane filtration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.