Anaerobic Digestion Reliability Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing is still accelerating, not plateauing: the midpoint year sits well below the 2020 peak, and volume has climbed again since.
- Claim density sits in wastewater treatment, with fermentation and bioreactor apparatus as the two heaviest secondary IPC subclasses.
- The oldest cited patent still sets the boundary, US4735724A on solids-concentrating digestion carries far more citations than any later filing.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 158 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families addressing process stability, digester reliability, resistance to inhibition, and long-term stable operation in anaerobic digestion and biogas systems, filtered to the core wastewater-treatment, bioreactor and sludge-handling IPC classes. It captures 158 published families filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, with the 2026 count necessarily partial because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months.
The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general anaerobic digestion filing, but the subset of that art explicitly claiming stability, inhibition resistance, or durability under sustained operation. That narrower lens is what makes the concentration patterns below meaningful rather than an artefact of a broad keyword search.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 158-family dataset: annual filing volume, and how those families distribute across the IPC subclasses that touch digester reliability.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Annual filings rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2020, eased through a 2022 midpoint of 4, and have since climbed back to 7 in the most recent (partial) year — a pattern consistent with renewed rather than fading interest, though the 2026 figure will revise upward as later publications land.
IPC subclass composition
C02F (water and wastewater treatment) dominates at 148 of 158 records, confirming this is fundamentally a wastewater-process art. C12P (fermentation) and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus) each cover roughly a third of records as secondary classifications, while B09B (solid waste disposal) and C05F (organic fertilisers) mark the digestate-handling side of the same filings. B01D (separation), A62D (detox) and B02C (grinding) are present but thin, at 22, 10 and 10 records respectively.
Shares are the percentage of the 158 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anaerobic digestion reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents setting the technical boundary
US4735724A — Solids concentrating anaerobic digestion process and apparatus
A non-mixed vertical tower anaerobic digester and anaerobic digestion process provides passive concentration of biodegradable feed solids and microorganisms in an upper portion of a continuous digester volume and effluent withdrawal from the middle to bottom portion of the digester, resulting in increased solids retention times, reduced hydraulic retention times, and enhanced bioconversion efficiency. In addition, due to passive concentration of solids, the non-mixed anaerobic digester accommodates high solids loadings and provides separation of microbial phases within the continuous digester volume to achieve substantially complete bioconversion of biodegradable feedstock components.Filed by Gas Technology Institute; granted 1988-04-05. Its citation count of 118 is the highest in this dataset by a wide margin.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4735724A | Solids concentrating anaerobic digestion process and apparatus | 118 |
| 2 | WO2003043939A2 | Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste | 91 |
| 3 | US6905600B2 | Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste | 80 |
| 4 | US20030121851A1 | Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste | 75 |
| 5 | US4040953A | Anaerobic digestion process | 65 |
| 6 | US20020192809A1 | Anaerobic digestion apparatus methods for anaerobic digestion and for minimizing the use of inhibitory polyme… | 60 |
| 7 | US20140033776A1 | Organics and nutrient recovery from anaerobic digester residues | 56 |
| 8 | US5863434A | Psychrophilic anaerobic treatment of waste in a sequencing semibatch/batch bioreactor | 51 |
| 9 | US5651890A | Use of propane as stripper gas in anaerobic digestion of wastewaters | 50 |
| 10 | US20050040103A1 | System and method for enhanced wastewater treatment | 39 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; citation counts favour older records and should be read as a measure of influence, not current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Three read-throughs from the trend, class composition and citation data, aimed at where a new filer should and should not expect open ground.
Growth resumed after a mid-cycle dip
The trend line is not a straight climb: it peaked at 11 in 2020, fell to a 2022 midpoint of 4, and has since recovered to 7. That shape reads as a field working through an initial wave of stability-focused filings, then returning with a second cohort — likely responding to feedstock variability and co-digestion pressures rather than a single technology shift.
Nearly all claims sit in one core class
94% of families carry a C02F classification, meaning the reliability and stability art is being claimed almost entirely as a wastewater-treatment problem rather than as fermentation microbiology or apparatus design. The secondary classes — C12P and C12M, each around a third of records — show where digester-internal biology and hardware claims are layered on top.
One 1988 patent still anchors the field
US4735724A, on passive solids concentration in a non-mixed digester, holds far more citations than any other record in this set, with the particulate-waste treatment family (WO2003043939A2 and its US counterparts) forming the next cluster. New filers should expect examiners to cite this lineage routinely on solids-retention and hydraulic-retention claims.
Filing is US-led but genuinely multi-jurisdictional
The United States leads at 43 records, but EPO and WIPO/PCT filings (25 each) plus India (22), Canada (18) and China (12) show this is not a single-market technology. A freedom-to-operate check limited to one office would miss a meaningful share of the art.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anaerobic digestion reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
Assignee activity in this dataset is led by regional utilities and municipal partnerships rather than a single dominant corporate filer, with co-assignment patterns pointing to public-sector infrastructure projects.
Utility-district partnerships file together
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset is a regional utility and its sewerage and drainage district, sharing 9 families — a pattern typical of municipal infrastructure upgrades rather than product-vendor IP strategy.
A university and a city treatment operator co-file
A university and a municipal wastewater-treatment company share 7 families, suggesting applied research conducted directly on operating digester infrastructure rather than lab-only development.
No assignee shows fresh-year filings in this sample
None of the more active historical assignees in this dataset — including the leading municipal pair and the corporate names tracked — show a filing in the latest year, consistent with publication lag rather than a stop in activity; recent applications from these filers are likely still in the pipeline.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Anaergia | 0 | — |
| Anaco Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT | 0 | — |
| GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT | 0 | — |
| BIOTHANE CORP | 0 | — |
| Plateau Renewable Energy R&D Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tongji University | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Chengtou Wastewater Treatment Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
This landscape identifies where claim density and white space sit today; the next step is testing a specific technical route against the full claim text.
Check freedom-to-operate on a specific mechanism
Solids-retention, hydraulic-retention and inhibition-resistance claims cluster around a small set of foundational patents. Before committing engineering resources, map a proposed mechanism against the claim scope of the most-cited records.
Explore claims in Patsnap EurekaTrack the under-claimed branches
Grinding-stage pre-treatment, chemical detox dosing and membrane-based digestate separation show filing activity well below the core wastewater classes. These are worth a dedicated watch as co-digestion and feedstock-variability pressures grow.
Set up a technology watch in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
In this dataset, a process-stability patent is one whose title or claims explicitly address maintaining stable digester operation under variable conditions — resistance to inhibition from ammonia or volatile fatty acid build-up, long-term stable operation across feedstock changes, or digester reliability more broadly. This is narrower than general anaerobic digestion filing, which also covers biogas yield, reactor design and feedstock pre-treatment without a stability claim. The search here combines those stability terms with IPC classes covering wastewater treatment, bioreactor apparatus and sludge digestion, so it captures the operational-robustness slice of the art specifically.
US4735724A, on a non-mixed vertical tower digester that passively concentrates solids, has accumulated citations over nearly four decades, which mechanically gives it more opportunities to be cited than a 2023 filing. Its foundational claims on solids retention and hydraulic retention time are also the kind of basic mechanism that later, narrower patents tend to reference when distinguishing their own claims. High citation count here should be read as a marker of influence within the searched corpus, not as evidence that the underlying technology is still the most commercially relevant approach.
The trend in this dataset suggests yes, with caveats. Filings rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2020, dipped to a midpoint of 4 in 2022, and have climbed back to 7 in the most recent year tracked. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, that most recent figure is likely understated and will revise upward, so the underlying trajectory looks like renewed rather than declining interest.
The United States leads with 43 records in this dataset, but European (EPO) and international (WIPO/PCT) filings each account for 25, with India, Canada and China also represented at meaningful volumes. This spread means a filing strategy or freedom-to-operate search confined to a single office would miss a substantial share of the relevant art, particularly given the international WIPO/PCT filings that have not yet been routed to national phase in all jurisdictions.
The core wastewater-treatment classification (C02F) is heavily claimed, appearing in nearly all records, but adjacent branches are comparatively thin: grinding and pre-treatment for feedstock homogenisation, chemical detoxification and antidote dosing for inhibitory compounds, and membrane-based solids separation for digesters each show meaningfully lower filing density than the core class. These are plausible areas for a first-mover claim, particularly as co-digestion of mixed feedstocks increases the practical need for pre-treatment and inhibition-management technology.
Research Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole anaerobic digestion reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.