Book a demo

Anaerobic Digestion Reliability Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Anaerobic Digestion Reliability Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/anaerobic-digestion-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Water & Environmental · Patent Landscape
Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability Patents
  • Filing is still accelerating, not plateauing: the midpoint year sits well below the 2020 peak, and volume has climbed again since.
  • Claim density sits in wastewater treatment, with fermentation and bioreactor apparatus as the two heaviest secondary IPC subclasses.
  • The oldest cited patent still sets the boundary, US4735724A on solids-concentrating digestion carries far more citations than any later filing.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
158
Published Records
42%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 158 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families addressing process stability, digester reliability, resistance to inhibition, and long-term stable operation in anaerobic digestion and biogas systems, filtered to the core wastewater-treatment, bioreactor and sludge-handling IPC classes. It captures 158 published families filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, with the 2026 count necessarily partial because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months.

The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general anaerobic digestion filing, but the subset of that art explicitly claiming stability, inhibition resistance, or durability under sustained operation. That narrower lens is what makes the concentration patterns below meaningful rather than an artefact of a broad keyword search.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1ANAERGIA27
  2. 2VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT SAS12
  3. 3ANAECO10
  4. 4GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT9
  5. 5METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT9
  6. 6HIGHMARK RENEWABLES RES PARTNERSHIP8
  7. 7CH2M HILL INC7
  8. 8TAOPU SEWAGE TRAEATMENT PLANT OF SHANGHAI CHENGTOU SEWAGE TREATMENT7
  9. 9TONGJI UNIV7
  10. 10THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 158-family dataset: annual filing volume, and how those families distribute across the IPC subclasses that touch digester reliability.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2020, eased through a 2022 midpoint of 4, and have since climbed back to 7 in the most recent (partial) year — a pattern consistent with renewed rather than fading interest, though the 2026 figure will revise upward as later publications land.

Filing trend, 2017-202603691262017201820191120202021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) dominates at 148 of 158 records, confirming this is fundamentally a wastewater-process art. C12P (fermentation) and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus) each cover roughly a third of records as secondary classifications, while B09B (solid waste disposal) and C05F (organic fertilisers) mark the digestate-handling side of the same filings. B01D (separation), A62D (detox) and B02C (grinding) are present but thin, at 22, 10 and 10 records respectively.

IPC subclass compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment14893.7%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…5836.7%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus5635.4%B09B · Solid waste disposal3320.9%C05F · Organic & waste-derived fertil…3220.3%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2213.9%A62D · Chemical protection & detox106.3%B02C · Crushing, grinding & pulverisi…106.3%Other4931.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 158 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anaerobic digestion reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The patents setting the technical boundary

Representative patent
US4735724A1988-04-05

US4735724A — Solids concentrating anaerobic digestion process and apparatus

GAS TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

A non-mixed vertical tower anaerobic digester and anaerobic digestion process provides passive concentration of biodegradable feed solids and microorganisms in an upper portion of a continuous digester volume and effluent withdrawal from the middle to bottom portion of the digester, resulting in increased solids retention times, reduced hydraulic retention times, and enhanced bioconversion efficiency. In addition, due to passive concentration of solids, the non-mixed anaerobic digester accommodates high solids loadings and provides separation of microbial phases within the continuous digester volume to achieve substantially complete bioconversion of biodegradable feedstock components.Filed by Gas Technology Institute; granted 1988-04-05. Its citation count of 118 is the highest in this dataset by a wide margin.

US4735724A — patent drawing 1
View full patent record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4735724ASolids concentrating anaerobic digestion process and apparatus118
2WO2003043939A2Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste91
3US6905600B2Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste80
4US20030121851A1Method and apparatus for the treatment of particulate biodegradable organic waste75
5US4040953AAnaerobic digestion process65
6US20020192809A1Anaerobic digestion apparatus methods for anaerobic digestion and for minimizing the use of inhibitory polyme…60
7US20140033776A1Organics and nutrient recovery from anaerobic digester residues56
8US5863434APsychrophilic anaerobic treatment of waste in a sequencing semibatch/batch bioreactor51
9US5651890AUse of propane as stripper gas in anaerobic digestion of wastewaters50
10US20050040103A1System and method for enhanced wastewater treatment39

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; citation counts favour older records and should be read as a measure of influence, not current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three read-throughs from the trend, class composition and citation data, aimed at where a new filer should and should not expect open ground.

Filing momentum
6 → 7 (2017-2026)
families per year

Growth resumed after a mid-cycle dip

The trend line is not a straight climb: it peaked at 11 in 2020, fell to a 2022 midpoint of 4, and has since recovered to 7. That shape reads as a field working through an initial wave of stability-focused filings, then returning with a second cohort — likely responding to feedstock variability and co-digestion pressures rather than a single technology shift.

2026 figure is partial; publication lag typically understates the most recent year.
Class concentration
148 of 158 in C02F
records classed in wastewater treatment

Nearly all claims sit in one core class

94% of families carry a C02F classification, meaning the reliability and stability art is being claimed almost entirely as a wastewater-treatment problem rather than as fermentation microbiology or apparatus design. The secondary classes — C12P and C12M, each around a third of records — show where digester-internal biology and hardware claims are layered on top.

Multiple IPC assignments per family are common; totals exceed 158.
Citation concentration
118 citations
on the leading record

One 1988 patent still anchors the field

US4735724A, on passive solids concentration in a non-mixed digester, holds far more citations than any other record in this set, with the particulate-waste treatment family (WO2003043939A2 and its US counterparts) forming the next cluster. New filers should expect examiners to cite this lineage routinely on solids-retention and hydraulic-retention claims.

Citation counts favour older, foundational filings over recent ones.
Filing geography
US 43 · EPO 25 · WIPO 25
leading receiving offices

Filing is US-led but genuinely multi-jurisdictional

The United States leads at 43 records, but EPO and WIPO/PCT filings (25 each) plus India (22), Canada (18) and China (12) show this is not a single-market technology. A freedom-to-operate check limited to one office would miss a meaningful share of the art.

Receiving-office counts, not family counts; a family may appear in more than one office.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anaerobic digestion reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Assignee activity in this dataset is led by regional utilities and municipal partnerships rather than a single dominant corporate filer, with co-assignment patterns pointing to public-sector infrastructure projects.

Municipal co-filing
9 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Utility-district partnerships file together

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset is a regional utility and its sewerage and drainage district, sharing 9 families — a pattern typical of municipal infrastructure upgrades rather than product-vendor IP strategy.

Ten co-assignee pairs identified in total.
Academic-utility pairing
7 shared families
university + treatment-operator pair

A university and a city treatment operator co-file

A university and a municipal wastewater-treatment company share 7 families, suggesting applied research conducted directly on operating digester infrastructure rather than lab-only development.

Second-strongest pairing in the co-assignee data.
Recent-year momentum
0 in latest year
across several historically active assignees

No assignee shows fresh-year filings in this sample

None of the more active historical assignees in this dataset — including the leading municipal pair and the corporate names tracked — show a filing in the latest year, consistent with publication lag rather than a stop in activity; recent applications from these filers are likely still in the pipeline.

Expect upward revision to recent-year counts as filings publish.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches with filing activity but thin claim density relative to the core wastewater-treatment classes.
Grinding/pre-treatment for feedstock homogenisationChemical inhibition detox and antidote dosingDigestate-to-fertiliser separation claimsMembrane-based solids separation for digesters
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Anaergia0
Anaco Co., Ltd.0
METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT0
GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT0
BIOTHANE CORP0
Plateau Renewable Energy R&D Co., Ltd.0
Tongji University0
Shanghai Chengtou Wastewater Treatment Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

This landscape identifies where claim density and white space sit today; the next step is testing a specific technical route against the full claim text.

Check freedom-to-operate on a specific mechanism

Solids-retention, hydraulic-retention and inhibition-resistance claims cluster around a small set of foundational patents. Before committing engineering resources, map a proposed mechanism against the claim scope of the most-cited records.

Explore claims in Patsnap Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

Grinding-stage pre-treatment, chemical detox dosing and membrane-based digestate separation show filing activity well below the core wastewater classes. These are worth a dedicated watch as co-digestion and feedstock-variability pressures grow.

Set up a technology watch in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Anaerobic Digestion Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole anaerobic digestion reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.