Book a demo

Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/anaerobic-digestion-resource-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Water & Environmental · Patent Landscape
Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery Patents
  • Filing activity peaked in 2020 at 20 families and has since flattened rather than continued climbing — the field is not in a growth phase, it is holding ground.
  • Wastewater treatment claims (C02F) dominate at 123 of 166 families, well ahead of bioreactor apparatus (C12M, 81) and fermentation (C12P, 60), showing where claim space is most occupied.
  • The most-cited patent draws 100 citations for a combined nutrient-recovery-and-biogas-scrubbing system tied to animal manure digesters — a strong signal of which architecture other filers built on.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
166
Published Records
39%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+133%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 166 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of anaerobic digestion and downstream resource recovery — nutrient stripping, struvite production, volatile fatty acid recovery and biogas upgrading — rather than digestion technology on its own. The search combines digester and biogas terminology with recovery-specific claim language and IPC codes spanning wastewater treatment, bioreactor apparatus and fertiliser production. That combination is deliberate: it isolates the part of the value chain where digestate stops being waste and starts being a feedstock.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. As with any recent-year count, the last one or two years are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as records catch up.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1ANAERGIA24
  2. 2CLEAN WATER SERVICES12
  3. 3DVO10
  4. 4GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT9
  5. 5METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT9
  6. 6YARA INTERNATIONAL ASA8
  7. 7KANADEVIA INOVA AG6
  8. 8WATERMENT5
  9. 9DUCTOR5
  10. 10ECOTONE RENEWABLES CO5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

166 patent families make up this landscape, filed mainly through the United States, WIPO's PCT route and the EPO, with meaningful volume also from India, Canada and China.

A flat trajectory since a 2020 peak

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2020, then settled near the 2022 midpoint of 17. That pattern reads as a technology that found its claim boundaries early rather than one still expanding — later entrants are filing into space already staked out, not opening new ground.

A flat trajectory since a 2020 peak0510152022017201820192020202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Wastewater treatment codes carry the weight

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in 123 of 166 families, more than any other subclass, with C12M (bioreactors) and C12P (fermentation) well behind. C05F, the organic-fertiliser code, sits at 46 — a reminder that the fertiliser end-product side of nutrient recovery is claimed far less densely than the treatment-process side.

Wastewater treatment codes carry the weightC02F · Water & wastewater treatment12374.1%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus8148.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…6036.1%C05F · Organic & waste-derived fertil…4627.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1810.8%B09B · Solid waste disposal137.8%C05C · Nitrogen fertilisers116.6%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…84.8%Other7142.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 166 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anaerobic digestion resource recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The patents other filings build on

Representative filing
NZ700721B2016-08-02

NZ700721B — Nutrient recovery systems and methods (DVO, Inc.)

DVO, INC.

Discloses a nutrient recovery system that heats and aerates anaerobic digester effluent to convert soluble ammonium to gaseous ammonia, then strips that ammonia with acid in a tower to collect an ammonium salt fertiliser. The system specifies a defined aeration reactor, controlled acid dosing, and a settling stage, covering a full stripping-tower route from digestate to solid ammonium fertiliser.Filed 2016-08-02.

View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090206028A1Combined nutrient recovery and biogas scrubbing system integrated in series with animal manure anaerobic dige…100
2US7014768B2Process for removal and recovery of nutrients from digested manure or other organic wastes71
3US20100170845A1Waste activated sludge phosphorus and magnesium stripping process and struvite production system59
4US20140033776A1Organics and nutrient recovery from anaerobic digester residues56
5US20040164021A1Process for removal and recovery of nutrients from digested manure or other organic wastes40
6CN112047590A一种利用餐厨垃圾预醇化强化污泥厌氧消化的方法32
7US20120264197A1H2S Removal from Contaminated Gases30
8US20110091954A1Integration of anaerobic digestion in an algae-based biofuel system30
9US7909995B2Combined nutrient recovery and biogas scrubbing system integrated in series with animal manure anaerobic dige…30
10CA2416690A1Process for removal and recovery of nutrients from digested manure or other organic wastes25

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on subsequent claim drafting, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the trend line and IPC mix are read together.

Filing trajectory
20 in 2020, 17 by 2022
peak then plateau

A technology that stopped accelerating

The rise from 2 filings in 2017 to a 2020 peak, followed by a flattening rather than continued growth, suggests the core architectures — stripping towers, struvite reactors, membrane-based upgrading — were largely staked out by the early 2020s. New filers are more likely to be refining existing routes than opening new claim territory.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim density
123 of 166 families in C02F
wastewater treatment code

Treatment-side claims dominate over product-side claims

C02F leads by a wide margin over C05F (organic fertilisers, 46) and C05C/C01C (nitrogen fertilisers and ammonia compounds, 11 and 8). Most patent activity protects how nutrients are pulled out of digestate, not what is done with the recovered fertiliser product afterward.

IPC subclass distribution
Influence signal
100 citations
top-cited record

One combined-system patent anchors the field

The most-cited record pairs nutrient recovery with biogas scrubbing in a single system tied to animal manure digesters, and the next several most-cited records are also manure- or sludge-focused nutrient stripping patents. Citation weight concentrates on integrated systems rather than single-step processes.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anaerobic digestion resource recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the ground is open

Filing counts are concentrated among a small group of municipal, agricultural and specialty-chemical filers, with a long tail of single-filing entrants. One government-district pairing stands out for co-filing depth.

Municipal co-filing
9 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Metro Vancouver's regional utilities file jointly

Metro Vancouver Regional District and Greater Vancouver Sewerage & Drainage District share 9 families, the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — a sign that municipal-scale digestate recovery gets built and filed as a joint utility program rather than by a single commercial vendor.

Co-assignee pairs
Commercial specialist
DVO, Inc.
representative filer

Agricultural digestate specialists hold foundational claims

DVO's stripping-tower ammonium recovery patent, alongside other manure-focused nutrient recovery filings among the most-cited records, shows agricultural and manure-processing specialists rather than large industrial conglomerates driving some of the field's most-referenced claim architectures.

Representative record
Recent activity
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Momentum has stalled even among top filers

None of the most active named assignees in this dataset show filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend line and suggests the current wave of activity has already crested rather than being mid-build.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scouting
Branches with comparatively thin IPC coverage relative to the core treatment codes.
Volatile fatty acid separation trainsStruvite crystallisation control loopsBiogas-to-ammonia integrated strippingNitrogen fertiliser co-product formulationMembrane-based biogas upgrading
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Anaergia0
CleanWater0
METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT0
GREATER VANCOUVER SEWERAGE & DRAINAGE DISTRICT0
DVO, Inc.0
Corvinova0
Yara International0
Finndart Oy0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to a mature, plateaued filing base with specific gaps rather than a fast-growing frontier. Two directions make sense from here.

Map claim boundaries around the top-cited systems

The five most-cited records cluster around combined nutrient-recovery-and-biogas systems and manure-specific stripping processes. Before filing in this space, check how tightly those claims are drawn around specific reactor configurations and temperature/pH ranges.

Explore citing patents in Eureka

Test white space in VFA recovery and biogas-to-ammonia integration

B01D separation processes and C01C ammonia compounds are the thinnest-covered codes relative to C02F's dominance. A first claim combining volatile fatty acid separation with downstream ammonia stripping has comparatively little prior art to design around.

Run a freedom-to-operate search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Anaerobic Digestion Resource Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole anaerobic digestion resource recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.