Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 987 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks 987 published records at the intersection of anodizing and electrophoretic coating processes for aluminium and aluminium-alloy profiles, filtered on process controls that matter for production sign-off: sealing quality, film thickness uniformity, colour consistency, sulfuric acid bath parameters, hard anodizing, and corrosion test hours. It spans filings from 2015 through the July 2026 data cut-off, with the most recent one or two years understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
The field sits mostly inside electroplating and electroforming classifications, with meaningful overlap into alloy composition, coating deposition, and non-ferrous metal treatment — a signature of process patents that combine an electrochemical bath step with a downstream material or finish claim.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 987 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Annual filings ran from 8 in 2017 up to a peak of 21 in 2020, then eased to 5 in 2021 and 3 in 2024 — a -40% move over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 1) are still filling in under the usual publication lag and should not be read as a collapse in activity.
C25D (electroplating and electroforming) covers 60.8% of the 987 records, far ahead of C22C alloys (9.4%), C23C coating and surface deposition (8.8%), and G03F photolithography (8.2%). Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to well over 100% and should be read as coverage, not as a partition of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 987 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about anodizing and electrophoretic coating of aluminium profiles and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaProvided are an anodic oxide film of an aluminum-based material and a method for performing a sealing treatment on the anodic oxide film which can achieve both high corrosion resistance and high repairing ability. A method may comprise applying direct current electrolysis to an aluminum-based material to form a second anodic oxide film. After which, an AC-DC superimposition electrolysis may be applied to the aluminum-based material to further form a first anodic oxide film. A sealing treatment may then be performed on the first and second anodic oxide films with a solution containing lithium ions.Filed by Suzuki Motor Corporation, published 2016-03-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5289030A | Semiconductor device with oxide layer | 390 |
| 2 | US6323528B1 | Semiconductor device | 180 |
| 3 | US6822261B2 | Semiconductor device and method for forming the same | 103 |
| 4 | US20020058143A1 | Chemical vapor deposition methods for making powders and coatings, and coatings made using these methods | 95 |
| 5 | US5892278A | Aluminum and aluminum alloy radiator for semiconductor device and process for producing the same | 95 |
| 6 | US5884600A | Aluminum bore engine having wear and scuff-resistant aluminum piston | 70 |
| 7 | US20020086185A1 | Magnetic recording medium and production method thereof | 66 |
| 8 | US5474945A | Method for forming semiconductor device comprising metal oxide | 64 |
| 9 | US20170047792A1 | Electric machine | 59 |
| 10 | US4606796A | Colored, anodized aluminum-base article and method of preparing same | 58 |
Citation counts reflect influence inside this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals worth weighing before drafting claims in this space.
The leader alone accounts for 85 records, and the gap down to fifth place (30) and tenth place (18) is steep. That means the dense claim territory around sealing and film-thickness control is already staked out by a small group, and a new entrant should expect to design around them rather than file into open space.
Filing peaked at 21 in 2020 and has since eased toward single digits by 2024. Treat 2025-2026 counts as provisional given the roughly 18-month publication lag rather than evidence of an active decline.
570 of the tracked records route through Japan's receiving office, against 150 in the United States and 90 at the EPO. Freedom-to-operate work that skips a Japanese-language search on this topic is working with a partial picture.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to anodizing and electrophoretic coating of aluminium profiles, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation | Konica Corporation | 30 |
| Sankyo Tateyama, Inc. | TATEYAMA ARUMINIUMU IND | 19 |
| Yoshida Kogyo K.K. (YKK) | YKK Corporation | 16 |
| Nippon Light Metal Co., Ltd. | NIKKEI MC ALUMINUM | 12 |
| TATEYAMA ARUMINIUMU IND | SUMITOMO ALUMINUM SMELTING CO LTD | 9 |
| Pilot Corporation | PAIROTSUTO PURESHIJON | 9 |
| Nippon Light Metal Co., Ltd. | Nikkei Giken, Inc. | 7 |
| Fujikura Ltd. | SKY ALUMINIUM CO LTD | 5 |
The dataset records 10 co-assignee pairs, with the strongest combination appearing on 30 shared records — a sign that some of this work is being filed jointly across a parent-and-affiliate structure rather than by a single legal entity.
The ranking covers 100 companies, all counted by their record volume in this dataset — it is the complete ranking the data endpoint returns, not a curated top tier.
The top-ranked assignee holds 85 records against a fifth-place count of 30 and a tenth-place count of 18 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-pack structure rather than an even spread.
Several of the assignees with the deepest filing history show zero records in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader cooldown from the 2020 peak rather than any single company's exit.
The strongest co-assignee pair appears on 30 shared records, and a second pair on 19 — evidence that a portion of the leading volume is filed jointly by parent-and-subsidiary pairs rather than by one name alone.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Light Metal Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sankyo Tateyama, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation | 0 | — |
| Konica Corporation | 0 | — |
| TATEYAMA ARUMINIUMU IND | 0 | — |
| Suzuki Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Fujikura Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Yoshida Kogyo K.K. (YKK) | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field with an entrenched leader group and a cooling but not dead filing rate. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or monitoring.
With the top 5 assignees holding 24.2% of all 987 records, any product using sealing or film-thickness control processes should be checked against their specific claims before development locks in.
Search assignees in EurekaColour consistency, hard-anodizing bath control and sealing chemistry show thinner coverage relative to the core electroplating classification and may offer more room for a first-mover claim.
Explore white space in EurekaWith 570 of 987 records routed through Japan against 150 in the US, any monitoring program that skips Japanese-language filings is missing the majority of new activity.
Set up monitoring in EurekaThe assignee ranking in this dataset covers 100 companies, with the single leader holding 85 records against a fifth-place count of 30 and a tenth-place count of 18. That drop-off shows a genuine leader-plus-pack structure rather than an evenly spread field. The top 5 assignees together account for 24.2% of all 987 records in scope, and the top 10 account for 35.8%, so a meaningful share of the field still sits outside any single dominant filer.
Filing peaked at 21 records in 2020 and has since eased, moving from 5 in 2021 down to 3 in 2024, a -40% change over that span. Counts for 2025 and 2026 look lower still, but publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so those most recent years are understated rather than proof of a real decline. Read the 2021-2024 window as the most reliable recent signal.
Japan's receiving office accounts for 570 of the 987 records in this dataset, far ahead of the United States at 150 and the European Patent Office at 90. The United Kingdom, Canada and Australia each sit in the twenties. Anyone running a clearance search on this topic without a Japanese-language pass is missing the majority of documented activity.
US20160068986A1, filed by Suzuki Motor Corporation, covers a two-step anodizing sequence: a direct-current electrolysis step forming a second anodic oxide film, followed by an AC-DC superimposition electrolysis step forming a first anodic oxide film, then a sealing treatment using a lithium-ion-containing solution on both films. Work that replicates that specific DC-then-AC/DC sequence combined with lithium-ion sealing sits closest to its claims. Processes using a single-step anodizing bath, a different sealing chemistry, or a different electrolysis order are the more likely paths around it, though a formal freedom-to-operate opinion should confirm claim scope against the granted claim set rather than the published application.
The technology composition data shows the field concentrated heavily in electroplating and electroforming (C25D, 60.8% of the 987 records), with much thinner coverage in areas like colour consistency measurement, hard-anodizing bath temperature control, and corrosion test hour benchmarking. Those thinner branches are worth a closer look for a first claim, particularly where they combine a specific measurable quality control step with the anodizing bath chemistry. High density in the core electroplating classification means that ground is occupied, not that it is exhausted of value — but new entrants are better served looking at the adjacent, thinner branches first.
Go past this page: query the whole anodizing and electrophoretic coating of aluminium profiles corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page