Book a demo

Antennas & RF Systems Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Antennas & RF Systems Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/antennas-and-rf-systems-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Antennas & RF Systems
Antennas and RF systems patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • 52.8% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 76,190 of 144,394 records in scope, so most core claim space sits with a small group of filers.
  • Filing cooled after 2022. Annual filings peaked at 1,812 in 2022 and fell 28% from 1,809 in 2021 to 1,301 in 2024, the last year with complete publication data.
  • Antennas and transmission dominate the IPC mix. H04B and H01Q alone each cover roughly 5-6% of all records, while radar/positioning and waveguide classes sit under 1.5%, marking thinner but still active branches.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
144.4K
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-28%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,809 records) with 2024 (1,301) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 144,394 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape draws on 144,394 published records matching antenna array, RF system and network antenna terms combined with radio channel, beamforming, wireless signal, frequency band, synchronization and topology concepts. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026-08-31 data cut-off, capturing both mature cellular RF work and newer beamforming and millimeter-wave filings. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart are still filling in and should be read as provisional rather than declining.

The assignee ranking returned by the data endpoint covers 100 companies, not a fixed top-50 or top-100 cut chosen for editorial reasons — it is the full ranked set the dataset provides. Reading concentration, technology composition and filing trend together gives a fuller picture than any single chart: a class can carry high filing density without the underlying technology being settled, since density mostly signals where claim space is already occupied.

Antennas & RF systems filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1QUALCOMM INC46,003
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD12,779
  3. 3TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)7,916
  4. 4HUAWEI TECH CO LTD5,434
  5. 5LG ELECTRONICS INC4,058
  6. 6INTEL CORP2,872
  7. 7APPLE INC2,154
  8. 8AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD1,776
  9. 9SONY GROUP CORP1,504
  10. 10NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY1,182
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 144,394-record corpus: the pace of filing over time, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 1,029 in 2017 to a peak of 1,812 in 2022, then eased to 1,301 by 2024 — a 28% decline over 2021-2024 that marks the last fully comparable window. 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 73 in 2026) are undercounts still catching up to publication.

Filing trend, 2017-202605001,0001,5002,0001,029201720182019202020211,8122022202320242025732026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H04B (Transmission, general) leads at 6.0% of all records, closely followed by H01Q (Antennas) at 5.3% and H04W (Wireless communication networks) at 4.5%. Radar and positioning (G01S), multiplex communication (H04J), waveguides (H01P) and digital data processing (G06F) each sit at 1.3% or below, marking smaller but distinct filing pockets. Since a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total and should not be added together.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH04B · Transmission (general)8,6466.0%H01Q · Antennas7,7025.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks6,5004.5%H04L · Digital information transmissi…3,9502.7%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning1,9471.3%H04J · Multiplex communication6660.5%H01P · Waveguides & microwave elements6110.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…6040.4%Other4,8893.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 144,394 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about antennas & rf systems patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US11304134B22022-04-12

US11304134B2 — Radio frequency system based on millimeter wave communication, method for adjusting transmit power, and terminal

VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO., LTD.

A radio frequency system based on millimeter wave communication, a method for adjusting transmit power, and a terminal are provided. The radio frequency system includes a Doherty power amplification unit, an antenna array, and a micro control unit (MCU), where an output end of the Doherty power amplification unit is connected to an input end of the antenna array, a control end of the Doherty power amplification unit and a control end of the antenna array are both connected to the MCU, and the MCU controls a radiation direction of an antenna in the antenna array.Filed by VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO., LTD., granted 2022-04-12.

US11304134B2 — patent drawing 1US11304134B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040198386A1Applications for a wireless location gateway1,332
2US20070270660A1System and method for determining a location of an orthopaedic medical device916
3US20190364492A1Methods and devices for radio communications876
4US20010022558A1Wireless location using signal fingerprinting814
5US20080300055A1Game with hand motion control773
6US5933421AMethod for frequency division duplex communications746
7US20050273218A1System for obtaining vehicular information703
8US20040110469A1Repeaters for wireless communication systems682
9US7298327B2Geographic location using multiple location estimators681
10US6222503B1System and method of integrating and concealing antennas, antenna subsystems and communications subsystems677

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations, not necessarily current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
52.8%
of 144,394 records held by top 5

Core claim space is crowded at the top

The five leading assignees together hold 76,190 of the 144,394 records in scope. New entrants filing in mainstream antenna array or RF chain claims are filing against dense prior art from a small group of established players, not a fragmented field.

Top 10 combined reaches 59.3% of all records.
Filing pace
-28%
2021 to 2024 filings

Volume has eased from its 2022 peak

Filings peaked at 1,812 in 2022 and dropped to 1,301 by 2024, a 28% decline over that span. That is the last window with complete publication data; 2025-2026 counts are still filling in and should not be read as confirming a further slowdown.

Peak year: 2022 at 1,812 filings.
Technology mix
6.0%
of records in H04B

Transmission and antenna classes lead, but narrowly

H04B (6.0%) and H01Q (5.3%) are the two densest classes, with H04W close behind at 4.5%. The gap to G01S, H04J, H01P and G06F — each under 1.5% — suggests those adjacent branches carry comparatively lighter filing pressure.

Classes overlap; shares do not sum to 100%.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to antennas & rf systems patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum is shifting

The ranked set covers 100 companies. Momentum in the most recent year points to broad pullback across the leaders rather than one company pulling ahead.

Leader position
46,003
records, leading assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 46,003 records, far above the fifth-place figure of 4,058 and tenth-place figure of 1,182. That gap defines the shape of the whole ranking: a steep drop after the top few names, then a long tail.

Fifth place: 4,058 records.
Recent momentum
-93% YoY
leading filer, latest year

Even top filers show sharp recent-year pullback

The leading assignee filed 10 records in the latest year, down 93% year-on-year; other major filers show similar drops of 70-93%. This pattern is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine collapse in activity, since the most recent year is always undercounted.

Read latest-year momentum figures as provisional.
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairs linked to a small number of individual co-inventors and one university technology-transfer office. Joint filing is the exception here, not the norm.

Strongest pairs recur around the same leading filers.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas with comparatively lighter filing density relative to the core antenna and transmission classes.
Radar/positioning fusion with beamforming controlWaveguide and microwave element integrationMultiplex link synchronization schemesSoftware-defined RF topology managementMillimeter-wave power amplifier control loops
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Inc10-93%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.9-78%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.8-70%
DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS INC8-93%
Intel Corp2-50%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)1-67%
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.1
Apple Inc1-89%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with concentrated core claims and a cooling but still active filing pace. Two directions follow from that.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top filers

With 52.8% of records held by five assignees, any new antenna array or RF chain filing should be checked against their claim scope first, not the long tail of single-filing entrants.

Run a freedom-to-operate check →

Watch the under-claimed IPC branches

Radar/positioning, waveguide elements and multiplex synchronization each sit under 1.5% of records — worth monitoring for whether filing density there rises as beamforming and mmWave designs mature.

Track emerging filing activity →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on antennas and RF systems patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Antennas & RF Systems Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole antennas & rf systems patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.