Antibody-Drug Conjugate Chemistry Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2024 at 108, then trend down toward the partial 2026 count of 9 — publication lag understates the most recent year, but the plateau after 2022 (51 records) is visible before that lag matters.
- The leader holds 38 records while the top 5 assignees combine for 24.6% of all 687 records in scope — concentrated at the top, with a long tail across the remaining ranked companies.
- A61K coverage sits at 96.7% of records, while fermentation and enzymatic synthesis (C12P) appears in only 1.6% — a signal of where conjugation chemistry claims are dense and where bioprocessing-side claims are thin.
What the ADC chemistry patent record shows
Antibody-drug conjugate chemistry sits at the intersection of linker design, payload potency, conjugation site control and formulation stability — each governed by a distinct claim strategy. The 687 records in scope, filed between 2015 and 2026 under IPC classes spanning A61K47, C07K16 and A61P35, capture the period in which site-specific conjugation and drug-antibody-ratio control moved from academic technique to contested claim territory. Filing volume rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2024, and has since turned down — though the most recent year is always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months.
Family-level counting is used throughout rather than raw document counts, which keeps aggressive continuation filing and multi-jurisdiction duplication from inflating any single assignee's apparent footprint. That matters here: the leader's 38 records and the top 10's combined 287 records (41.8% of all 687 in scope) describe genuine distinct inventions, not filing volume alone.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 687-record dataset: filing activity by year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, subclass shares sum to well over 100% of the record total — that is expected and reflects how ADC chemistry claims typically span formulation, therapeutic activity and peptide structure at once.
Filing activity, 2017-2026
Filings rose from 38 in 2017 to a peak of 108 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 51 records. The partial 2026 figure of 9 reflects publication lag rather than a sudden drop in filing activity.
IPC subclass composition
A61K (medicinal preparations) covers 96.7% of records and A61P (therapeutic activity) 68.6%, confirming that most filings claim formulation or therapeutic-use elements alongside conjugate structure. C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) appears in just 1.6% of records, the thinnest coverage among the tracked subclasses.
Shares are the percentage of the 687 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Antibody-Drug Conjugate Chemistry with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about antibody-drug conjugate chemistry and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
US20160058884A1 — Methods for formulating antibody drug conjugate compositions
The present invention provides improved methods for formulating therapeutic compositions comprising an antibody drug conjugate ("ADC") that reduce potency variability between batches of ADC and provide administration of such therapeutic compositions within a narrow intended range.Filed by ImmunoGen, Inc., published 2016-03-03. Illustrative of the formulation-stability claim family rather than a novel conjugation chemistry.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20070134243A1 | Antibody drug conjugates and methods | 117 |
| 2 | US20060182751A1 | Heterocyclic-substituted bis-1,8 naphthalimide compounds, antibody drug conjugates, and methods of use | 111 |
| 3 | WO2006060533A2 | Conjugates of 1, 8-BIS-naphthalimides with an antibody | 88 |
| 4 | WO2017062271A2 | Antibody drug conjugate for Anti-inflammatory applications | 83 |
| 5 | US20140286969A1 | Anti-EGFR antibody drug conjugate formulations | 45 |
| 6 | CN111110862A | 抗CLDN18.2抗体的药物偶联体及其制备方法和用途 | 37 |
| 7 | WO2014143765A1 | Anti-EGFR antibody drug conjugate formulations | 32 |
| 8 | US20200164085A1 | Antibody drug conjugate for Anti-inflammatory applications | 30 |
| 9 | WO2016094455A1 | C-met antibody drug conjugate | 26 |
| 10 | US20150376276A1 | Anti-NTB-a antibodies and related compositions and methods | 22 |
Citation counts favour older records inside any searched corpus — read these as signals of influence on subsequent filings, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Reading concentration, technology composition and citation patterns together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is not.
The top of the field is compact, the rest is long-tail
Five assignees combine for 169 of the 687 records in scope, and the ranked leader alone holds 38. Below tenth place (21 records) the ranking spreads across many single- and low-digit filers, typical of a field where core chemistry patents are held tightly but application-specific formulations are widely distributed.
Filing activity has plateaued since 2022
Volume grew steadily from 38 records in 2017 to a peak of 108 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 51 shows growth had already begun to flatten well before the visible 2026 dip. Recent-year momentum by assignee shows most of the largest historical filers recording zero filings in the latest year, consistent with a maturing rather than expanding filing wave.
Fermentation and enzymatic synthesis claims are thin
While A61K and A61P dominate at 96.7% and 68.6% of records respectively, bioprocessing-adjacent classes such as C12P (1.6%) and C07H sugars and nucleic acids (2.3%) are comparatively under-claimed. That gap sits between conjugation chemistry and manufacturing process, a boundary worth checking before assuming it is occupied.
Influence is concentrated in early naphthalimide and formulation art
The most-cited records date to the mid-2000s and concern naphthalimide-based conjugates and antibody drug conjugate formulations — citation counts inside a searched corpus structurally favour older filings, so treat this list as a map of foundational art rather than current competitive weight.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to antibody-drug conjugate chemistry, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it is open
The ranked leaders combine scale with narrow recent activity; several of the largest historical filers show no filings in the latest year, which changes who to watch going forward versus who to cite as prior art.
A single assignee holds the largest distinct footprint
The leading assignee's 38 records sit well ahead of fifth place at 30 and tenth place at 21, giving it the clearest individual claim density in the dataset. Recent-year momentum data shows this and other large historical filers recording zero filings in the latest tracked year.
The densest collaboration link is a corporate-affiliate pair
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset; the strongest, at 37 shared records, links two entities under the same corporate umbrella rather than two independent competitors, which is typical of ADC chemistry's split filing between parent and subsidiary entities.
One newer entrant is still filing while historical leaders have gone quiet
Against a backdrop where several top-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest year, one assignee continues to file at a modest but non-zero pace, suggesting active prosecution work while the broader field's filing wave recedes.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Lepu Biopharma Co., Ltd. | 4 | — |
| Magenta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Seagen Inc. | 0 | — |
| AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | 0 | — |
| AbbVie Inc. | 0 | — |
| MedImmune, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Amgen Inc. | 0 | — |
| RemeGen Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying open claim territory.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top 10
With 41.8% of all 687 records held by ten assignees, a targeted FTO pass against just those portfolios covers a disproportionate share of the field's claim density before wider searching is needed.
Run an FTO scan in EurekaMap the under-claimed sub-areas in detail
Fermentation-based payload synthesis and enzymatic site-specific conjugation show thin direct coverage relative to the A61K/A61P core — worth a deeper claim-by-claim read before assuming the space is open.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack assignees still actively filing
Several historically dominant filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year, while at least one assignee continues at a modest pace — recent-year momentum is a better signal of who to monitor than cumulative totals alone.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaCommon questions on ADC chemistry patents
The dataset's ranked leader holds 38 of the 687 records in scope, with the top five assignees combining for 169 records, or 24.6% of the total. That concentration is meaningful but not dominant — the top ten together hold 41.8% of all records, leaving a substantial long tail across the remaining ranked companies. Recent-year momentum data also shows that several of the largest historical filers recorded zero filings in the latest tracked year, so cumulative rank and current activity are not the same thing.
Filing volume rose from 38 records in 2017 to a peak of 108 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 51 shows the growth rate had already begun to flatten before that peak. The visible decline toward 2026 partly reflects publication lag, since filings typically take around eighteen months to publish, but the plateau after 2022 is real and predates that lag effect. Read the trend as maturing rather than expanding.
Relative to the dense core of A61K (96.7% of records) and A61P (68.6%), classes tied to fermentation and enzymatic synthesis (C12P, 1.6%) and sugars and nucleic acids (C07H, 2.3%) show much thinner direct coverage. That points to under-claimed territory around enzymatic conjugation methods, fermentation-derived payload synthesis, and glycan-based site-specific linker chemistry. A claim-by-claim review of that boundary is warranted before assuming it is fully occupied, since low IPC coverage indicates less claim density, not the absence of relevant art.
US20160058884A1, filed by ImmunoGen, Inc. and published in March 2016, claims methods for formulating antibody-drug conjugate compositions that reduce potency variability between batches and keep dosing within a narrow intended range. It sits in the formulation-stability claim family rather than covering novel linker or conjugation chemistry itself. Anyone formulating an ADC therapeutic for batch-to-batch potency consistency should read its claim scope closely, since it addresses a manufacturing and quality-control step common to many conjugate programmes regardless of the underlying antibody or payload.
The highest-cited record in this dataset is US20070134243A1, covering antibody drug conjugates and methods, cited 117 times, followed closely by a naphthalimide-substituted conjugate patent cited 111 times. These are older filings, and citation counts inside any searched corpus structurally favour earlier records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations. Treat the most-cited list as a map of foundational chemistry rather than a ranking of current commercial importance.
Research Antibody-Drug Conjugate Chemistry in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole antibody-drug conjugate chemistry corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.