https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/antioxidant-packages-for-polyolefins-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical Additives
Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins: Patents, Leading Filers and Where Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Filing has fallen sharply since its peak. from 32 records in 2018, filings fell to just 1 by 2024 (2021's 6 to 2024's 1 is an 83% drop) — a mature, thinly-refreshed claim space.
  • The top of the field is concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees hold 39.1% of all 366 records and the top 10 hold 57.1%, leaving a long tail of 85 further filers with smaller footprints.
  • Additive-use claims dominate over polymer-composition claims. C08K (additive use) appears in 70.8% of records versus 42.9% for C08L (polymer compositions), showing the crowding sits in how additives are used, not in the base resin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
366
Published Records
39%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-83%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 366 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Antioxidant packages for polyolefins combine a primary phenolic antioxidant, which protects against long-term thermal degradation, with a phosphite processing stabilizer, which limits discolouration and melt-flow loss during extrusion. The search underlying this page targets records that discuss these two chemistries together against specific failure modes: melt flow stability, long-term thermal exposure, discolouration, hydrolytic stability, blooming and multiple extrusion passes. That combination narrows the field to formulation-level claims rather than broader polymer-stabiliser patents.

The 366 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the most recent one or two years necessarily undercounted because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months. Read the trend and concentration figures on this page with that lag in mind, particularly for any year after 2024.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1SI GRP SWITZERLAND GMBH38
  2. 2SI GROUP SWITZERLAND (CHAA) GMBH30
  3. 3EASTMAN CHEM CO29
  4. 4EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO28
  5. 5SI GROUP INC18
  6. 6COVESTRO DEUTSCHLAND AG15
  7. 7ADEKA CORP15
  8. 8CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS HOLDING INC13
  9. 9GREAT LAKES CHEMICAL (EUROPE) GMBH12
  10. 10SOLUTIA INC11
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 366 records from different angles: one tracks when they were filed, the other what they claim.

A field that peaked and has been thinning out since

Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 32 in 2018, then declined; by the last complete year in this dataset, 2021's 6 filings had fallen to 1 in 2024, an 83% drop over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in rather than as evidence of a further decline.

A field that peaked and has been thinning out since01020304082017322018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Additive-use claims outnumber composition claims

C08K (use of additives in polymers) covers 70.8% of the 366 records, well ahead of C08L (polymer compositions) at 42.9%. Smaller but still notable shares sit in C08G condensation polymers (11.7%), C08J processing and solutions (9.3%), D01F fibre-specific claims (7.1%), C07C acyclic and carbocyclic compounds (6.6%), C10M lubricants (6.3%) and C07F organo-metallic compounds (4.6%). Because records can carry more than one class, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.

Additive-use claims outnumber composition claimsC08K · Use of additives in polymers25970.8%C08L · Polymer compositions15742.9%C08G · Condensation polymers4311.7%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions349.3%D01F · Chemical filament & fibre feat…267.1%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds246.6%C10M · Lubricants236.3%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…174.6%Other18350.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 366 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about antioxidant packages for polyolefins and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative filing
US6846859B22005-01-25

US6846859B2 — Polyolefin composition having reduced color bodies

FINA TECHNOLOGY, INC.

The polyolefin composition combines a primary phenolic antioxidant for long-term thermal stability with a phosphite processing stabilizer for melt-processing stability, plus a separate sacrificial phosphite antioxidant specifically to reduce yellowness index. The claim distinguishes the sacrificial phosphite from the processing-stabilizer phosphite as two different compounds performing two different jobs.Filed by FINA TECHNOLOGY, INC., published 2005-01-25.

US6846859B2 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4187212AStabilization systems from triarylphosphites and phenols104
2US5124388AFilms and containers of heat resistant copolyesters97
3US4094857ACopolymerizable phenolic antioxidant81
4US5464551AStabilized phosphate ester-based functional fluid compositions75
5US4290941AStabilization systems from triarylphosphites and phenols52
6US5596033AGas fade resistant stabilizer system for polypropylene fiber46
7US4548975ADiscoloration-resistant spandex fiber41
8US4185003AStabilized copolyetheresters41
9US7262319B2Phenolic antioxidants in crystalline form34
10WO1994024344A1Low color processing, heat and light stabilizer system for polypropylene fiber33

Citation counts favour older filings simply by having had longer to accumulate them; treat them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns matter more than the raw counts: where filings are concentrated, where they have gone quiet, and where the claim language is doing the real work.

Concentration
39.1% / 57.1%
top 5 / top 10 share of 366 records

The top of the field is dense but not closed

The top 5 assignees together hold 39.1% of all 366 records and the top 10 hold 57.1%, meaning close to half the field sits with 85 other filers, most with only a handful of records each. That combination — a dense top and a long tail — usually means the core chemistry is claimed but formulation-specific niches remain open.

Ranking covers 95 companies total.
Momentum
-83%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing activity has slowed from its 2018 peak

After peaking at 32 records in 2018, filings dropped steadily; the 2021-to-2024 window alone shows an 83% fall, from 6 records to 1. Recent-year momentum data shows the leading assignees with zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with a mature filing area rather than an active filing race.

2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag.
Claim structure
70.8% vs 42.9%
C08K vs C08L share of 366 records

Additive-use claims outweigh base-resin claims

C08K, covering use of additives in polymers, appears in 70.8% of records against 42.9% for C08L polymer compositions. The gap suggests most competitive activity happens in how the antioxidant package is deployed and dosed rather than in new polyolefin chemistries themselves.

Records may carry both classes; shares are not mutually exclusive.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to antioxidant packages for polyolefins, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it thins out

A small number of established stabiliser and specialty-chemical suppliers account for the leading share of filings, with momentum data showing all of them quiet in the most recent tracked year.

Leader
38 records
leading assignee filing count

One filer holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee holds 38 records, ahead of fifth place at 18 and tenth place at 11 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leader rather than a crowded plateau at the top.

Based on the 95-company ranking in scope.
Mid-field
18 → 11
fifth to tenth place record counts

A tight mid-field behind the leader

Between fifth place (18 records) and tenth place (11 records), the gap narrows considerably compared with the drop from first to fifth. This is where specialty-chemical suppliers and a few polymer producers compete on formulation-specific filings.

Together the top 10 hold 57.1% of all 366 records.
Long tail
85 filers
companies outside the top 10

Most of the ranking is single- or few-filing entrants

Outside the top 10, the remaining 85 companies in the ranking hold the balance of records, typically with small filing counts each. This tail is where formulation-specific or application-specific claims are more likely to have been left unaddressed by the larger players.

No assignee in the tracked momentum data shows filings in the latest year.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit inside the broader IPC classes above but carry comparatively thin direct coverage in this dataset.
Hydrolytic-stability-specific phosphite blendsBlooming resistance in thin-film polyolefinsMulti-pass extrusion colour retentionSacrificial phosphite / processing phosphite pairingFibre-grade antioxidant packages (D01F overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SI Group Switzerland GmbH0
SI GROUP SWITZERLAND (CHAA) GMBH0
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.0
Eastman Chemical Company0
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding Inc.0
Covestro Deutschland AG0
ADEKA Corporation0
Solutia Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to a mature core with specific gaps rather than an open field; the next steps depend on whether you are clearing a formulation or scouting for white space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the dense core

With additive-use claims (C08K) present in 70.8% of records and the top 10 assignees holding 57.1% of the field, any phenolic-plus-phosphite formulation should be checked against the leading filers' claim scope before commercial filing.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka →

Map the under-claimed branches

Hydrolytic stability, blooming resistance and multi-pass extrusion colour retention show thinner direct coverage than the broad additive classes; a targeted search can confirm whether a specific formulation is genuinely open.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Track the long tail for licensing or acquisition targets

The 85 companies outside the top 10 hold meaningful individual filings; several may be worth a closer look for licensing, freedom-to-operate clearance, or acquisition diligence.

Screen the long tail in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Antioxidant Packages for Polyolefins in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole antioxidant packages for polyolefins corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.