Antisense Oligonucleotide Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Antisense oligonucleotide chemistry patents: mapping backbone claims, RNase H recruitment and the filers who hold them
22.5% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees account for 14,996 of the 66,588 records in scope — a narrow group holding a meaningful share of the whole field. Filings rose from 662 in 2017 to a peak of 986 in 2022, then eased to 714 by 2024 — an 18% decline over the 2021-to-2024 window. The 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounted because of publication lag and should not be read as a continued slide.
- 1GENENTECH INC8.7%
- 2IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC7.0%
- 3ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC3.1%
- 4SIRNA THERAPEUTICS INC2.0%
- 5CURAGEN CORP1.7%
See the full antisense oligonucleotide chemistry analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
How many patents exist for antisense oligonucleotide chemistry?
This landscape tracks 66,588 published patent records from 2015 through mid-2026 that combine antisense oligonucleotide or gapmer terminology with nuclease resistance, RNase H recruitment, chirality control or related chemistry terms. That figure is a records count, not a family-deduplicated count, and it reflects a specific search boundary around chemistry claims rather than every antisense-related filing in existence. Broader or narrower search terms would produce a different total, so treat this as the scope of this particular dataset rather than an absolute figure for the field.
Who are the leading patent holders in antisense oligonucleotide chemistry?
The ranking in this dataset covers 100 assignees, with the leader holding 5,812 records and the top five combined accounting for 22.5% of all 66,588 records in scope. That leaves a long tail of smaller filers holding the remaining share individually. The concentration is meaningful but not extreme — the top ten together reach 29.7% of records, so most of the corpus sits outside the leading group.
Why do the most-cited antisense patents date from the 1990s?
Citation counts accumulate over time within a searched corpus, so older foundational patents on backbone modification and phosphorothioate chirality naturally out-cite newer filings even when the newer chemistry is more advanced. The most-cited record here, US5602240A, carries 4,271 citations largely because it established terminology and structural claims that later filings had to reference or design around. High citation counts should be read as a signal of influence on the field’s vocabulary and freedom-to-operate landscape, not as evidence that the underlying chemistry is still the state of the art.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Antisense Oligonucleotide Chemistry covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.