https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aqueous-and-non-flammable-electrolyte-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Emerging Battery Chemistries
Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Patents: Who's Filing and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak of 32 records, with the midpoint year 2022 back down to 22 — this is a mature claim space, not a growing one.
  • H01M dominates at 761 of 762 records, but meaningful secondary claim activity sits in capacitors (H01G, 55) and metal-oxide compounds (C01G, 50).
  • Recent-year momentum has gone flat across every major incumbent, including a documented -100% YoY drop for one leading assignee — the frontier has shifted to newer entrants.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
762
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-79%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 762 patent families filed against aqueous electrolyte, water-in-salt electrolyte and non-flammable electrolyte claims, filtered to records that also address electrochemical stability window, salt concentration, safety, low-temperature performance or cost. The IPC scope centres on H01M battery and fuel-cell classifications, cross-referenced against capacitor (H01G) and inorganic compound (C01G, C01B) filings that share electrolyte formulation claims.

Filing activity ran from 2015 through the current data cut-off of 2026-07-31, peaking in 2018 and declining through the most recent full years. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity — treat the tail of the curve as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1KK TOSHIBA137
  2. 2PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP49
  3. 3SANYO ELECTRIC CO LTD44
  4. 4SONY GROUP CORP39
  5. 5SHIN KOBE ELECTRIC MASCH CO LTD36
  6. 6MU IONIC SOLUTIONS CORP35
  7. 7UACJ FOIL35
  8. 8UACJ CORP35
  9. 9MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP33
  10. 10BRIDGESTONE CORP27
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 762-family corpus: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

A peak-and-plateau filing curve

Filings rose to 21 records in 2017 and peaked at 32 in 2018. By the midpoint year of 2022, volume had fallen back to 22 — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth, consistent with a field where core claim territory was staked out early.

A peak-and-plateau filing curve010203040212017322018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01M dominance with a capacitor and oxide-compound tail

H01M covers 761 of the 762 records, confirming this is fundamentally a battery-cell claim set. The next largest subclasses — H01G capacitors at 55 and C01G metal-oxide compounds at 50 — point to electrolyte formulations being claimed across adjacent energy-storage devices, not just cells, while polymer additive classes (C08L, C08K, C08F) show smaller but recurring activity around separator and binder chemistry.

H01M dominance with a capacitor and oxide-compound tailH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells76199.9%H01G · Capacitors557.2%C01G · Compounds of other metals506.6%C08L · Polymer compositions314.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers233.0%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)202.6%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…192.5%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks131.7%Other13417.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 762 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aqueous and non-flammable electrolyte systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US20180277894A12018-09-27

Lithium Secondary Battery Containing Non-flammable Electrolyte and Manufacturing Method

HONEYCOMB BATTERY COMPANY

Filed by Honeycomb Battery Company, this record claims a rechargeable lithium cell built around a non-flammable electrolyte: a lithium salt dissolved in a liquid solvent at concentrations from 0.01 M to 10 M, engineered to a vapor pressure below 0.01 kPa at 20°C, a flash point at least 20°C above the base solvent, and in some formulations no flash point at all. Distinctively, the liquid solvent draws on cooking oils — palm oil, coconut oil, corn oil, soybean oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil among the named options.Abstract condensed from the published filing; see the linked record for full claim language.

US20180277894A1 — patent drawing 1US20180277894A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140170488A1Collector, electrode structure, non-aqueous electrolyte cell, and electricity storage component556
2US6447958B1Non-aqueous electrolyte battery separator244
3JP2002321323APolyolefin micro-porous film205
4JP2008186721APorous membrane having high thermal resistance and high permeability, and its manufacturing method185
5US20070178384A1Separator and non-aqueous electrolyte battery151
6JP2002042813APositive electrode active material and non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery using the same143
7US20050064291A1Battery and non-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery using the same142
8US6511774B1Separator for nonaqueous electrolyte batteries, nonaqueous electrolyte battery using it, and method for manuf…131
9US6001507ANon-aqueous electrolyte secondary battery122
10US6291107B1Non-aqueous electrolyte battery113

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current competitive activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, jurisdiction and citation data that matter more than the raw counts.

Filing Momentum
32 → 22
peak (2018) vs. midpoint (2022) filings

The core territory was claimed early

Filing peaked in 2018 and had fallen back to 22 by 2022, the dataset's midpoint. That pattern — a sharp rise followed by a plateau — usually means the foundational salt-concentration and stability-window claims are already occupied, and later entrants are filing around the edges rather than staking new core ground.

Read against the 2017–2026 trend
Jurisdiction Spread
300 US / 211 EP
leading receiving offices

US and Europe carry the bulk of filing pressure

The United States and the European Patent Office together account for more than two-thirds of the tracked receiving-office activity, with Japan, India, China and South Korea trailing well behind. A freedom-to-operate check that skips EP coverage is checking half the real exposure.

Based on 762 tracked records
Incumbent Momentum
0 in latest year
across every major legacy assignee tracked

Historic leaders have gone quiet

Every major incumbent assignee tracked in the recent-momentum view shows zero filings in the latest year, including a documented -100% year-on-year drop for one. That does not mean the technology is exhausted — publication lag alone would suppress this — but it does mean the visible activity has shifted away from the names that built the citation graph.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Cross-Class Activity
55 + 50
H01G capacitor and C01G oxide-compound records

Electrolyte claims extend beyond the cell

Fifty-five capacitor records and fifty metal-oxide compound records sit alongside the 761 H01M battery filings, indicating that non-flammable and aqueous electrolyte formulations are being claimed for hybrid and capacitor-adjacent devices, not exclusively for secondary battery cells.

IPC subclass composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aqueous and non-flammable electrolyte systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Filing concentrates among a small group of established battery and materials manufacturers, with co-filing pairs indicating supply-chain-driven joint development rather than pure competition.

Co-Filing Pattern
25 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Aluminium-materials partners file jointly

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset links two materials manufacturers on 25 shared records, well ahead of the next-strongest pair at 18. This points to foil and current-collector suppliers co-developing and co-filing electrolyte-adjacent claims rather than filing independently.

Based on 10 tracked co-assignee pairs
Legacy Concentration
0 latest-year filings
across tracked legacy assignees

Established Japanese manufacturers show no recent activity

Several long-tracked assignees — spanning consumer electronics, automotive-adjacent battery makers and specialty chemical firms — show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including one with a recorded -100% year-on-year change. Their historic volume still shapes the citation graph, but current filing pressure lies elsewhere.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Jurisdiction Concentration
511 of 762
records via US + EP receiving offices

Filing strategy centres on two offices

US and EPO receiving offices account for the large majority of tracked filings, meaning most competitive and freedom-to-operate risk in this space is decided by US and European prosecution outcomes rather than by activity in Japan, China, India or Korea.

Receiving office distribution
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with technical relevance to the search scope but comparatively thin dedicated claim density in this corpus.
cooking-oil-derived solvent blendsvapor-pressure-engineered electrolytescapacitor-grade aqueous formulationslow-temperature salt-concentration tuningseparator-electrolyte co-design for oxide compounds
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Toshiba Corporation0
Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.0
Sony Group Corporation0
Panasonic Corporation (Japan)0
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation0-100%
Shin-Kobe Electric Machinery Co., Ltd.0
UACJ Corporation0
Bridgestone Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a plateaued core with specific open branches — here is how to act on that.

Map claims against the cooking-oil solvent approach

The most detailed representative filing in this corpus claims a specific, unusual solvent family. Before filing anything adjacent to vapor-pressure or flash-point engineering, check how far that claim scope actually extends.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka →

Watch the co-filing pairs, not just single assignees

The strongest signal of active joint development in this space is a co-assignee pair, not a single top filer. Tracking pair activity forward will surface partnership shifts before they show up in headline rankings.

Track assignee relationships in Eureka →

Re-check jurisdiction coverage before committing budget

With filing concentrated in the US and at the EPO, a freedom-to-operate review limited to one office leaves real exposure unchecked.

Build a jurisdiction view in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aqueous and Non-Flammable Electrolyte Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aqueous and non-flammable electrolyte systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.