Book a demo

Aseptic Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Aseptic Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/aseptic-packaging-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Packaging & Material Handling
Aseptic Packaging Patents: Who Leads and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open

A data-backed look at the aseptic packaging patent landscape: who leads filings, how the technology splits across IPC classes, where filing activity peaked, and where white space remains for new entrants.

2,157
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-35%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (57 records) → 2024 (37); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 2,157 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the aseptic packaging patent record shows

Aseptic packaging spans the equipment and materials that let sterile products be filled and sealed without refrigeration, from carton-based beverage systems to fitment-sealed pouches for medical fluids. The 2,157 records captured here run from 2015 through the partial 2026 filing year and are classified under B65D and B65B, the containers-and-packaging and packaging-and-wrapping subclasses. Filing has been dominated by a small group of established packaging manufacturers, but the ranked leaders account for a minority of the total, and most records belong to companies that appear only a handful of times.

The technology composition data shows claims layered across sterilisation methods, laminate materials and food-contact structures rather than concentrated in a single mechanism, which matters for anyone assessing where a new filing might actually clear prior art.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA383
  2. 2DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD49
  3. 3LIQUI BOX CORP46
  4. 4ABBOTT LAB INC39
  5. 5SERAC GROUP SAS37
  6. 6CRYOVAC INC34
  7. 7INT PAPER CO31
  8. 8GOGLIO29
  9. 9NESTEC SA28
  10. 10ECOLAB USA INC27
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,157-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the technology.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 21 in 2017 to a peak of 57 in 2021, then declined to 37 by 2024 — a 35% drop over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the recent-year numbers understate actual filing activity rather than confirming a slowdown.

Filing activity, 2017-2026015304560212017201820192020572021202220232024202572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B65B (packaging and wrapping) and B65D (containers and packaging) cover the majority of records at 68.4% and 44.6% of the 2,157 records respectively, confirming these are the structural core of the field. Smaller but meaningful shares sit in B32B laminates (12.3%), A23L food and beverage applications (11.7%), and A61L sterilising and disinfecting methods (10.6%) — since records can carry multiple classes, these percentages overlap rather than sum to 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB65B · Packaging & wrapping1,47568.4%B65D · Containers & packaging96144.6%B32B · Layered products & laminates26612.3%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages25211.7%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting22910.6%B29C · Shaping of plastics1255.8%A23B · Food preservation833.8%A61J · Containers for medicine673.1%Other1,09850.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,157 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about aseptic packaging patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20110146204A12011-06-23

Aseptic packaging system, packaging process and package with external fitment

CRYOVAC, LLC

An aseptic packaging system includes a film unwind device; a fitment feed device for feeding a plurality of fitments; an apparatus for attaching each of the fitments to a second surface of the film; an assembly for sterilizing the film and optionally each of the fitments; an assembly for drying the film and optionally each of the fitments; and a vertical form/fill seal apparatus for making packages from the sterilized film and each of the fitments, each package comprising a pouch comprising a first and second transverse seal, a first and second fold, an interior and exterior surface, and a longitudinal seal; and an external fitment sealed to the exterior surface of the pouch.Filed by Cryovac, this record ties together film sterilisation, fitment attachment and form/fill/seal assembly into a single claimed system, illustrating how commercial-scale aseptic packaging claims tend to bundle equipment and process steps rather than isolate one mechanism.

US20110146204A1 — patent drawing 1US20110146204A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the aseptic packaging corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030205029A1Method and apparatus for introducing a non-sterile component into a sterile device1,492
2US20160135895A1Medical device packaging643
3US4871091ADisposable package for liquids180
4US4021283AMethod of making aseptic packaging145
5US4910942AMethods for aseptic packaging of medical devices144
6WO1995005996A1Aseptic brick package132
7US5674546APackage for storing and cooking an omelet121
8US6096358AMethod of manufacturing an aseptically sterilized package containing a liquid nutritional product115
9US5960992AAseptic brick package spout114
10US5156295ABag lined carton with pour spout111

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and citation data mean for strategy

Three figures worth acting on: how concentrated the field is at the top, where the peak filing activity sat, and which older filings still anchor the citation graph.

Concentration
25.7%
of 2,157 records held by the top 5

Leadership is real but not dominant

The five most active filers together account for 25.7% of all 2,157 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 32.6%. That leaves roughly two-thirds of the field to a long tail of companies filing in smaller numbers, which is where freedom-to-operate analysis needs the most care rather than the least.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Filing trend
57 → 37
peak-year to 2024 filings

Activity has cooled from its 2021 peak

Filings rose from 21 in 2017 to a peak of 57 in 2021, then fell 35% to 37 by 2024. Because 2025 and 2026 data is still filling in, this should be read as activity easing off a peak rather than the field going quiet.

Filing years 2017-2024
Citation anchor
1,492 citations
on the top-cited record

One foundational filing still shapes the field

US20030205029A1, covering introduction of a non-sterile component into a sterile device, carries 1,492 citations — far ahead of the next most-cited record at 643. High citation counts mark historical influence within the corpus, not current commercial weight, since older filings accumulate citations simply by being available longer.

Most-cited records table
Technology mix
10.6%
of records classed under A61L

Sterilising methods are a distinct, smaller claim zone

A61L sterilising and disinfecting classifications appear on 10.6% of the 2,157 records, well below the packaging-structure classes but still substantial enough to represent an active, separately claimable dimension of the technology.

IPC subclass shares
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to aseptic packaging patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping a filing, tracking a competitor, or assessing freedom to operate.

Map a specific claim against this corpus

Run a candidate claim through Patsnap Eureka to see which existing records in this space it would need to be distinguished from before drafting.

Explore Eureka

Track the long tail of filers

With most of the field held by companies outside the ranked leaders, ongoing monitoring of new entrants matters more here than in a concentrated field.

Set up monitoring

Watch the sterilisation sub-field separately

A61L classifications sit apart from the core packaging-structure classes and may warrant their own competitive review as sterilisation methods evolve.

Review IPC breakdown
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the aseptic packaging patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Aseptic Packaging Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole aseptic packaging patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.