Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of asymmetric and hybrid supercapacitor chemistry and micro-scale or on-chip integration — devices built for planar, embedded or flexible form factors rather than bulk energy storage. The search spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, capturing both the electrode-material side of the field and the device-architecture side.
With 56 total families, this is a compact, specialist field rather than a crowded one. That makes the identity of the few active filers, and the specific IPC subclasses they claim into, more informative than in a high-volume category — a single well-drafted family can define the boundary of a sub-area for years.
Two views of the same 56 families: when they were filed, and which technology classes they were filed under. Both point to a field that built its core claim base early and has since narrowed rather than broadened.
Filings rose to 14 in 2018, the high point of the dataset, then dropped back toward single digits by the 2022 midpoint of 4. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years will read lower than they eventually settle — but the multi-year decline from the 2018 peak predates that lag effect and reflects a genuine slowdown in new filing activity.
H01G (capacitors) appears in 43 of 56 records, confirming that most applicants frame their claims around the device itself. But C01B, C01G and C01F — inorganic and metal-compound chemistry — together appear in 43 records combined, and C25D (electroplating/electroforming) in 12, showing that a large share of the inventive content actually sits in electrode material and fabrication process, not device geometry alone.
Shares are the percentage of the 56 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about asymmetric supercapacitor miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network (ICCN) composite made of interconnected, expanded carbon layers forming a network of pores, with metallic nanoparticles disposed within those pores. The family covers both a light-exposure-only fabrication route and a light-exposure-plus-electrodeposition route, and claims a capacitor built from two such electrodes separated by an electrolyte.Filed by The Regents of the University of California; granted as US11810716B2, 2023-11-07.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160148759A1 | Porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network (ICCN) composite | 87 |
| 2 | US20180366280A1 | Electrodes and electrolytes for aqueous electrochemical energy storage systems | 46 |
| 3 | US20180355194A1 | Flexible, biodegradable, and biocompatible supercapacitors | 32 |
| 4 | US20160104582A1 | Periodic nanostructures for high energy-density and high power-density devices and systems and uses thereof | 14 |
| 5 | US10655024B2 | Flexible, biodegradable, and biocompatible supercapacitors | 9 |
| 6 | WO2016081638A1 | Porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network (ICCN) composite | 9 |
| 7 | CN110808180A | 一种微型非对称超级电容器的制备方法、微型非对称超级电容器及其应用 | 8 |
| 8 | US10734167B2 | Porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network (ICCN) composite | 8 |
| 9 | US20200136105A1 | Conductive yarn-based nickel-zinc textile batteries | 7 |
| 10 | US20150364267A1 | Passivated porous silicon nanowires | 6 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of which claims other applicants had to design around, not as a measure of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC spread and citation concentration are read together.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and had fallen to 4 by the 2022 midpoint, with 2026 still at 0 as a partial year. This is not a category attracting fresh entrants; it is one where the core claim territory was staked out several years ago and has seen limited new activity since.
H01G capacitor claims appear in the large majority of records, yet C01B, C01G and C01F chemistry classes and C25D fabrication claims appear across a comparable share of the same 56 families, meaning many filings combine a device claim with a materials or process claim rather than relying on device architecture alone.
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset accounts for 10 shared filings out of 56 total families — a large share for a single collaboration. Combined with flat recent-year momentum across the named assignees, this points to a small number of research groups having defined most of the field's active claim space.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to asymmetric supercapacitor miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
University-affiliated assignees dominate the named entities in this dataset, several tied together through the strongest co-assignee pairing on record. None of the tracked assignees show filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader slowdown seen in the trend data.
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset ties an academic assignee to an energy-technology company across 10 shared families — the single densest collaboration pattern in the corpus, and a strong signal of where the underlying research programme originated.
Every named assignee in the recent-momentum tracking, from university labs to national research centres, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the pre-2026 partial-year caveat, this suggests the active filing window for most current players has closed or paused rather than continuing to build.
The United States receives the largest share of filings at 18, with Europe, Australia, India and Canada each drawing a smaller but non-trivial share. This points to a field where protection strategy so far has concentrated on the US market first, with selective international filing rather than broad global coverage.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Regents of the University of California | 0 | — |
| Nanotech Energy, Inc. | 0 | — |
| VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd | 0 | — |
| City University of Hong Kong | 0 | — |
| Texas A&M University | 0 | — |
| Virginia Commonwealth University | 0 | — |
| Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research | 0 | — |
| Soochow University | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature but narrow claim landscape. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, acquisition targeting, or identifying open filing territory.
US20160148759A1 and US20180366280A1 anchor most of the citation activity in this corpus. Tracing which later filings cite them clarifies which design routes are already boxed in and which remain open.
Explore citation mapping in EurekaH10N solid-state device claims and C09D coating claims each appear in only a handful of records. A targeted search of recent non-patent literature in these branches would show whether the low patent density reflects genuine white space or just early-stage research not yet filed.
Run a white space search in EurekaWith filing peaking in 2018, several core families are approaching points where maintenance fees, term expiry or opposition outcomes could change the freedom-to-operate picture materially.
Check patent status in EurekaAn asymmetric supercapacitor pairs two electrodes made from different materials or storage mechanisms — typically a battery-like faradaic electrode and a capacitor-like electrostatic electrode — in a single cell. This combination widens the operating voltage window and increases energy density compared with a symmetric design, where both electrodes use the same material. In this patent dataset, the pairing is frequently combined with miniaturized or on-chip device architectures, which is why capacitor claims (H01G) and battery-related claims (H01M) both appear across a meaningful share of the 56 tracked families.
The filing trend in this dataset peaked at 14 records in 2018 and had fallen to 4 by the 2022 midpoint, with no recovery visible through the data cut-off. This pattern is consistent with a field where the foundational device architectures and electrode chemistries were claimed early, leaving later entrants fewer open angles to file around. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the very latest years will always understate true filing activity, but the multi-year decline from 2018 predates that lag and points to a genuine slowdown rather than a reporting artifact.
Academic and research-institute assignees are prominent in this dataset, including university groups working alongside an energy-technology company in the field's strongest co-assignee pairing, which spans 10 shared filings. The Regents of the University of California holds the most-cited family in the corpus, centered on a porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network composite. None of the tracked assignees show filing activity in the most recent year, suggesting current leadership is based on legacy claims rather than fresh filing momentum.
US11810716B2, assigned to The Regents of the University of California and granted in November 2023, claims a porous interconnected corrugated carbon-based network (ICCN) composite with metallic nanoparticles disposed in its pores, along with two fabrication routes — a light-exposure-only method and a light-exposure-plus-electrodeposition method. It also claims a capacitor built from two such electrodes separated by an electrolyte. Anyone designing a carbon-network electrode with embedded metallic nanoparticles fabricated by either of those two routes should review this family closely for overlap; electrode designs using different fabrication chemistry or non-metallic pore fillers sit outside its literal claim scope.
The IPC distribution shows H10N (other electric solid-state devices) at only 4 records and C09D (coatings, paints and inks) at just 2, both far below the 43-record H01G core and the 12-18 record range of the inorganic chemistry classes. That gap suggests solid-state micro-device integration and coating-based interface engineering are comparatively under-claimed relative to the dense capacitor and electrode-chemistry territory. A first claim in these branches would need to tie a specific solid-state or coating mechanism to the asymmetric device architecture to avoid overlapping the existing H01G-heavy claim base.
Go past this page: query the whole asymmetric supercapacitor miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.