Book a demo

Automated Drilling Advisory Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Automated Drilling Advisory Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/automated-drilling-advisory-and-optimisation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Oilfield Digital & Automation
Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation Patents
  • Concentrated at the top. the five leading assignees together hold 40.5% of all 1,727 records in scope, and the top ten hold 61.7%.
  • Growth has cooled, not collapsed. filings ran from 125 in 2021 to 94 in 2024, a -25% shift over that span, after peaking at 147 in 2019.
  • Drilling mechanics still dominate the claims. 89.9% of records sit in E21B, while AI-model classes like G06N (5.3%) and G06Q (2.3%) remain comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,727
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (125 records) with 2024 (94) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,727 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families that combine drilling parameter optimisation — mechanical specific energy, weight-on-bit control, founder-point detection, penetration-rate modelling, bit-wear estimation, stick-slip detection — with automated setpoint adjustment. It spans filings published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawing on 1,727 records across six major receiving offices.

The field sits at the intersection of downhole mechanics and control software: most records still classify primarily as earth-drilling hardware, but a growing minority also carry digital-processing and AI-model classifications, marking where advisory logic is moving from fixed rule sets toward learned models.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY(US)166
  2. 2HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC163
  3. 3MOTIVE DRILLING TECH128
  4. 4SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP125
  5. 5LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORP117
  6. 6HELMERICH & PAYNE TECH LLC102
  7. 7SERVICES PETROLIERS SCHLUMBERGER SA73
  8. 8SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV70
  9. 9GEOQUEST SYSTEMS BV66
  10. 10SCHLUMBERGER CANADA LTD56
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,727 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 63 in 2017 to a peak of 147 in 2019, then eased to 94 by 2024 — the last year that can be read as complete, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months and 2025-2026 counts (10 in 2026) will still fill in.

Filing trend, 2017-20260387511315063201720181472019202020212022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

E21B (earth and rock drilling) covers 89.9% of records, confirming this is fundamentally a drilling-hardware field with software layered on top; G06F, G01V and G05B each cover a meaningful minority, while G06N (AI models, 5.3%) and G06Q (business/admin processing, 2.3%) remain the smallest slices — evidence of where advisory logic has and hasn't yet been formally claimed.

IPC subclass distributionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1,55389.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…20111.6%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying1709.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems1136.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models915.3%G06G · Analogue computers663.8%G06T · Image data processing & genera…513.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…392.3%Other20111.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,727 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automated drilling advisory and optimisation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US8833487B22014-09-16

Mechanical specific energy drilling system (US8833487B2)

WWT NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC.

A mechanical specific energy downhole drilling assembly having a bottomhole assembly including drill pipe and a drill bit, a weight on bit and torque sub for sensing torque, weight on bit and revolutions per minute of the drill bit; a command and control sub for receiving input from the weight on bit and torque sub for determining instantaneous mechanical specific energy of the downhole drilling assembly and an anti-stall tool responsive to real time mechanical specific energy information from the command and control sub to adjust the weight on the drill bit to maximize rate of penetration of the drill bit.Filed by WWT North America Holdings, published 2014-09-16 — predates the bulk of the dataset's filing activity and anchors much of the downstream MSE-based claim language.

US8833487B2 — patent drawing 1US8833487B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090090555A1Automated directional drilling apparatus and methods443
2US20090132458A1Intelligent Drilling Advisor278
3US20110186353A1System and Method for Monitoring and Controlling Underground Drilling235
4US7142986B2System for optimizing drilling in real time232
5US20080156531A1Automated MSE-based drilling apparatus and methods190
6US5730234AMethod for determining drilling conditions comprising a drilling model190
7US20110280104A1Dual top drive systems and methods for wellbore operations169
8WO2009039448A2Automated directional drilling apparatus and methods154
9US20090076873A1Method and system to improve engineered system decisions and transfer risk150
10US20070185696A1Method of real-time drilling simulation148

Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later art, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field is headed

Three findings that shape how a filing or freedom-to-operate strategy should treat this space.

Concentration
40.5% / 61.7%
share held by top 5 / top 10 of 1,727 records

A small group holds the core claim space

The five leading assignees together account for 40.5% of all 1,727 records, and the top ten reach 61.7%. New entrants are filing into a space where the dominant service companies and equipment makers already hold dense, overlapping claim positions around MSE and setpoint control.

Ranking covers 100 companies total
Momentum
125 → 94
filings, 2021 to 2024 (-25%)

Growth has pulled back from its 2019 peak

After peaking at 147 filings in 2019, activity settled to 94 by 2024, a -25% move over the 2021-2024 window. That is a cooling from an unusually active period, not a collapse — later years in the count are still incomplete due to publication lag.

Peak year: 2019 at 147 filings
Composition
89.9% vs 5.3%
E21B share vs G06N share of records

Hardware claims dominate; AI-model claims are thin

Nearly nine in ten records touch E21B drilling-hardware classification, while only 5.3% carry a G06N AI-model class and 2.3% carry G06Q business-process classification. Advisory logic is still often claimed as embedded control rather than as a standalone learned model.

Based on 1,727 records, multi-class counts overlap
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automated drilling advisory and optimisation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

Filing leadership sits with a handful of large oilfield service and equipment companies, but their recent-year momentum has slowed across the board, opening room at the edges of the core claim set.

Leader
166 records
leading assignee

One assignee sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 166 records, well ahead of fifth place at 117 and tenth place at 56 — a steep drop-off that marks where the field moves from concentrated leadership to a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

100 companies ranked in total
Momentum
-60% to -75% YoY
recent-year filing change, leading assignees

Even the leaders are filing less than before

Recent-year momentum among the most active assignees is uniformly negative, with year-on-year drops ranging roughly from -60% to -75% among several top filers. This is consistent with a maturing core claim set rather than fresh land-grab activity.

Latest-year counts are still incomplete
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is limited and mostly internal

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links sit between related corporate entities under the same parent group rather than between independent competitors — cross-company joint filing is not yet a norm in this space.

Strongest pair recorded 57 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core E21B claim set.
AI-model-based penetration rate predictionbusiness-process layer for drilling optimisationimage-data-driven bit wear estimationanalogue-computer founder point detectionstick-slip detection via non-mechanical sensing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Schlumberger Technology Corporation5-64%
HELMERICH & PAYNE TECH LLC2-60%
Schlumberger2-71%
Schlumberger Canada Limited2-71%
Motive Drilling Technologies, Inc.10%
GeoQuest Systems BV1-75%
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.0-100%
ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is filing, freedom-to-operate, or partnership scouting.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leaders

With 40.5% of records held by five assignees, a new filing in MSE or setpoint control should be screened against their portfolios before drafting claims.

Run a freedom-to-operate check

Target the thinner IPC branches

G06N and G06Q classes remain comparatively open relative to E21B; a claim built around learned models or business-layer optimisation faces less prior art density.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch momentum, not just headcount

Recent-year YoY drops among top filers suggest the core claim set is maturing; tracking new entrants below the top ten may reveal where activity is shifting.

Track assignee momentum
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Automated Drilling Advisory and Optimisation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole automated drilling advisory and optimisation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.