https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/automated-guided-vehicle-machine-vision-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Robotics & Automation · Patent Landscape
Automated guided vehicle machine vision patents: filing activity, leading assignees and open claim space
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. activity peaked at 30 families in 2019 and the 2022 midpoint (13) sits below that peak, with no assignee in the tracked group showing positive year-on-year momentum in the latest year.
  • China now outfiles the US at the receiving-office level. 81 China filings versus 60 US filings, with Europe, WIPO, Japan and Canada trailing well behind — a sign that claim contests are increasingly happening in Chinese patent offices first.
  • Control logic dominates over vision itself. 170 of the underlying records sit in G05D (control of non-electric variables) against only 24 in G06V (image/video recognition) — most of the claim density is in navigation and control, not in the vision pipeline.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
200
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-54%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 200 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families combining automated guided vehicle terminology with machine-vision-specific concepts — machine vision, visual navigation, object detection and visual servoing — restricted to IPC classes covering image recognition (G06V), navigation control (G05D1/02) and robotic manipulators (B25J9/16). It captures 200 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning six receiving offices.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Read the tail of the chart as incomplete, not as a genuine drop-off, and weight conclusions toward the years with settled counts.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1STAPLES INC21
  2. 2TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC16
  3. 3AMAZON TECH INC9
  4. 4SYMBOTIC LLC6
  5. 5SIEMENS AG5
  6. 6ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG5
  7. 7RICOH CO LTD4
  8. 8RICOH UK PRODS4
  9. 9COLUMBIA INSURANCE CO4
  10. 10HITACHI IND EQUIP SYST CO LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 200-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak in 2019, no clear recovery since

Filings ran at 19 in 2017, rose to a peak of 30 in 2019, then settled near 13 by the 2022 midpoint. The flat-to-declining shape suggests the core AGV vision concepts filed early are now being refined or defended rather than expanded into new filing volume.

A peak in 2019, no clear recovery since08152330192017201830201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control and navigation outweigh the vision claims

G05D (control of non-electric variables) accounts for 170 of the records, far ahead of G01C (navigation/gyroscopes, 30), B25J (manipulators, 27), G06Q (business data processing, 27) and G06V (image recognition, 24). B65G (conveying), G05B (control systems) and B60P (load handling) round out the mix. The vision-recognition class itself is comparatively thin, which matters for anyone assuming machine vision is the crowded part of this space.

Control and navigation outweigh the vision claimsG05D · Control of non-electric variab…17085.0%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…3015.0%B25J · Manipulators & robots2713.5%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2713.5%G06V · Image/video recognition2412.0%B65G · Conveying & material handling199.5%G05B · Control & regulating systems178.5%B60P · Load handling vehicles115.5%Other11658.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 200 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automated guided vehicle machine vision and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational filings

Key patents shaping this space

Representative recent filing
US11630447B12023-04-18

US11630447B1 — Automated guided vehicle for transporting objects

STAPLES, INC.

An automated guided vehicle (AGV) is described. In an example implementation, the AGV may include an AGV body; one or more elevator mechanisms coupled to the AGV body; a support surface coupled to the AGV body and vertically movable along the AGV body by the one or more elevator mechanisms, the support surface supporting an object from underneath the object when the object is placed on the support surface; one or more arms coupled to the AGV body and vertically movable along the AGV body by the one or more elevator mechanisms, the one or more arms articulating to move the object from a first position of the object and place the object on the support surface; and an AGV controller configured...Abstract truncated as published.

US11630447B1 — patent drawing 1US11630447B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5367456AHierarchical control system for automatically guided vehicles304
2US5283739AStatic collision avoidance method for multiple automatically guided vehicles233
3US20180137454A1Autonomous Multimodal Logistics227
4US20180127212A1Hybrid Modular Storage Fetching System201
5US20180072212A1Free ranging automated guided vehicle and operational system159
6CN105607635A自动导引车全景光学视觉导航控制系统及全向自动导引车152
7US5280431AMethod for controlling the movements of a mobile robot in a multiple node factory152
8US5801506AMethod and device for control of AGV142
9US20180127211A1Hybrid Modular Storage Fetching System136
10US4940925AClosed-loop navigation system for mobile robots115

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as evidence of influence on subsequent filings, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal read

What the data implies

Three patterns worth acting on before you draft a freedom-to-operate memo or a filing strategy in this area.

Filing shape
30 in 2019 → 13 by 2022
peak vs. midpoint filings

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

The peak year (2019, 30 families) is well behind the current run rate. A midpoint of 13 in 2022 confirms this is a maturing filing cycle rather than an emerging one — new entrants are competing over a fixed body of prior art, not a growing one.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Geography
China 81 vs. US 60
receiving-office filings

China leads at the receiving-office level

China's 81 filings outnumber the US's 60, with Europe, WIPO, Japan and Canada well behind. Anyone building a defensive filing strategy in this space needs a China-first read on prior art, not just a USPTO search.

Receiving offices
Claim density
G05D 170 vs. G06V 24
records by IPC subclass

The crowded ground is control, not vision

170 records sit in control-of-non-electric-variables (G05D) versus 24 in image/video recognition (G06V). The vision-detection layer itself carries far less claim density than the navigation and control logic wrapped around it.

IPC composition
Momentum
0 latest-year filings across tracked assignees
recent-year momentum

No assignee shows current-year momentum

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including established robotics and logistics names, shows zero filings in the latest year and negative year-on-year movement where measured. Given the 18-month publication lag, this understates true activity but still signals a lull rather than a filing race.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automated guided vehicle machine vision, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who is filing

Assignee landscape

The ranking underneath this page draws on 200 patent families. Filing activity spans large logistics and robotics operators alongside narrower single-filing entrants, with one notable co-assignee relationship in the imaging space.

Co-filing signal
4 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Ricoh's internal co-filing pattern

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset runs between Ricoh Company, Ltd. (Ricoh) and its UK products arm, with 4 shared families. This points to a coordinated imaging/vision filing programme run across group entities rather than opportunistic joint filing.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum check
-100% YoY
example: Siemens AG

Established names have gone quiet

Large logistics and industrial names in the tracked assignee set — including Siemens — show zero filings in the latest year, with Siemens specifically down 100% year-on-year. That is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a company-specific retreat.

Recent-year momentum
Filing base
200 families
total tracked

A long tail beneath a concentrated core

Total tracked families sit at 200, with citation leadership concentrated in a handful of older foundational filings. Below that core sits a longer tail of single or few-filing entrants working narrower implementations.

Assignee ranking, full dataset
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer freedom-to-operate look
Based on the IPC composition, these branches carry comparatively low filing density relative to the core control/navigation claims.
Dynamic obstacle re-planning under occlusionMulti-camera visual servoing fusionLoad-aware visual pose correctionVision-based fleet coordination handoffLow-light/adverse-condition detection
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Staples, Inc.0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0
Amazon Technologies, Inc.0
Symbotic LLC0
Siemens AG0-100%
ABB (Switzerland) Ltd.0
Apoyeum Corporation0
Ricoh Company, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or deciding where to file next.

Run a full freedom-to-operate pass on G06V claims

With only 24 records in image/video recognition against 170 in control logic, the vision-detection layer is comparatively open — but it still needs a dedicated FTO check against the specific detection method you plan to deploy.

Explore in Eureka

Track China filings as the leading indicator

China's 81 filings outpace the US's 60 at the receiving-office level, so a China-first watch list will surface new claim activity earlier than a US-only search.

Explore in Eureka

Reassess co-filing structures before assuming a single owner

The Ricoh/Ricoh UK Products link shows that group entities can split a filing programme across jurisdictions — checking for sister-entity filings avoids missing coverage.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Questions practitioners ask

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Automated Guided Vehicle Machine Vision in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole automated guided vehicle machine vision corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.