Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 200 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent families combining automated guided vehicle terminology with machine-vision-specific concepts — machine vision, visual navigation, object detection and visual servoing — restricted to IPC classes covering image recognition (G06V), navigation control (G05D1/02) and robotic manipulators (B25J9/16). It captures 200 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning six receiving offices.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. Read the tail of the chart as incomplete, not as a genuine drop-off, and weight conclusions toward the years with settled counts.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 200-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings ran at 19 in 2017, rose to a peak of 30 in 2019, then settled near 13 by the 2022 midpoint. The flat-to-declining shape suggests the core AGV vision concepts filed early are now being refined or defended rather than expanded into new filing volume.
G05D (control of non-electric variables) accounts for 170 of the records, far ahead of G01C (navigation/gyroscopes, 30), B25J (manipulators, 27), G06Q (business data processing, 27) and G06V (image recognition, 24). B65G (conveying), G05B (control systems) and B60P (load handling) round out the mix. The vision-recognition class itself is comparatively thin, which matters for anyone assuming machine vision is the crowded part of this space.
Shares are the percentage of the 200 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automated guided vehicle machine vision and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn automated guided vehicle (AGV) is described. In an example implementation, the AGV may include an AGV body; one or more elevator mechanisms coupled to the AGV body; a support surface coupled to the AGV body and vertically movable along the AGV body by the one or more elevator mechanisms, the support surface supporting an object from underneath the object when the object is placed on the support surface; one or more arms coupled to the AGV body and vertically movable along the AGV body by the one or more elevator mechanisms, the one or more arms articulating to move the object from a first position of the object and place the object on the support surface; and an AGV controller configured...Abstract truncated as published.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5367456A | Hierarchical control system for automatically guided vehicles | 304 |
| 2 | US5283739A | Static collision avoidance method for multiple automatically guided vehicles | 233 |
| 3 | US20180137454A1 | Autonomous Multimodal Logistics | 227 |
| 4 | US20180127212A1 | Hybrid Modular Storage Fetching System | 201 |
| 5 | US20180072212A1 | Free ranging automated guided vehicle and operational system | 159 |
| 6 | CN105607635A | 自动导引车全景光学视觉导航控制系统及全向自动导引车 | 152 |
| 7 | US5280431A | Method for controlling the movements of a mobile robot in a multiple node factory | 152 |
| 8 | US5801506A | Method and device for control of AGV | 142 |
| 9 | US20180127211A1 | Hybrid Modular Storage Fetching System | 136 |
| 10 | US4940925A | Closed-loop navigation system for mobile robots | 115 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as evidence of influence on subsequent filings, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before you draft a freedom-to-operate memo or a filing strategy in this area.
The peak year (2019, 30 families) is well behind the current run rate. A midpoint of 13 in 2022 confirms this is a maturing filing cycle rather than an emerging one — new entrants are competing over a fixed body of prior art, not a growing one.
China's 81 filings outnumber the US's 60, with Europe, WIPO, Japan and Canada well behind. Anyone building a defensive filing strategy in this space needs a China-first read on prior art, not just a USPTO search.
170 records sit in control-of-non-electric-variables (G05D) versus 24 in image/video recognition (G06V). The vision-detection layer itself carries far less claim density than the navigation and control logic wrapped around it.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including established robotics and logistics names, shows zero filings in the latest year and negative year-on-year movement where measured. Given the 18-month publication lag, this understates true activity but still signals a lull rather than a filing race.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automated guided vehicle machine vision, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking underneath this page draws on 200 patent families. Filing activity spans large logistics and robotics operators alongside narrower single-filing entrants, with one notable co-assignee relationship in the imaging space.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset runs between Ricoh Company, Ltd. (Ricoh) and its UK products arm, with 4 shared families. This points to a coordinated imaging/vision filing programme run across group entities rather than opportunistic joint filing.
Large logistics and industrial names in the tracked assignee set — including Siemens — show zero filings in the latest year, with Siemens specifically down 100% year-on-year. That is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a company-specific retreat.
Total tracked families sit at 200, with citation leadership concentrated in a handful of older foundational filings. Below that core sits a longer tail of single or few-filing entrants working narrower implementations.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Staples, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Amazon Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Symbotic LLC | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | -100% |
| ABB (Switzerland) Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Apoyeum Corporation | 0 | — |
| Ricoh Company, Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or deciding where to file next.
With only 24 records in image/video recognition against 170 in control logic, the vision-detection layer is comparatively open — but it still needs a dedicated FTO check against the specific detection method you plan to deploy.
Explore in EurekaChina's 81 filings outpace the US's 60 at the receiving-office level, so a China-first watch list will surface new claim activity earlier than a US-only search.
Explore in EurekaThe Ricoh/Ricoh UK Products link shows that group entities can split a filing programme across jurisdictions — checking for sister-entity filings avoids missing coverage.
Explore in EurekaThis dataset tracks 200 published patent families combining AGV terminology with machine-vision-specific concepts such as visual navigation, object detection and visual servoing, filed between 2015 and mid-2026. That figure reflects one specific search definition tied to particular IPC classes, so a broader or narrower keyword set would return a different total. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for the most recent one to two years will end up higher once those applications publish.
Filing activity in this space includes established logistics and robotics operators alongside a long tail of single or few-filing entrants, with citation leadership concentrated in a small number of older foundational filings. Rather than naming a fixed leaderboard here, look at the assignee ranking table on this page, which is drawn directly from the 200-family dataset and updates as new filings publish. The one clear structural signal is a coordinated co-filing pattern between Ricoh and its UK products entity.
No — filing activity peaked at 30 families in 2019 and had fallen to 13 by the 2022 midpoint, a flat-to-declining pattern rather than continued growth. Recent-year momentum figures for tracked assignees show zero filings in the latest year across the board, including a documented 100% year-on-year drop for at least one major industrial filer. Some of that recent softness is an artefact of the roughly 18-month publication lag, but the multi-year trend from 2019 onward is a genuine slowdown, not just a reporting gap.
G05D, covering control of non-electric variables, dominates with 170 of the 200 tracked records, far ahead of navigation-focused G01C (30), manipulator class B25J (27), business-process class G06Q (27) and image-recognition class G06V (24). This means the bulk of claim density sits in how the vehicle is controlled and navigated, not in the vision-detection algorithms themselves. Anyone assuming the vision layer is the most crowded part of this landscape should recheck that assumption against the IPC breakdown before drafting claims.
The clearest under-claimed ground sits in the image-recognition class G06V, which carries only 24 records against 170 in the dominant control class — proportionally thin coverage for a search built specifically around machine vision. Sub-areas such as multi-camera visual servoing fusion, load-aware visual pose correction and detection performance under adverse lighting show comparatively little dedicated claim activity in this dataset. That said, thin filing density in a class does not guarantee an open path; it means the area warrants a closer, claim-by-claim freedom-to-operate check rather than being assumed clear.
By receiving office, China leads with 81 filings against 60 for the United States, with Europe (23), WIPO/PCT (11), Japan (7) and Canada (4) well behind both. This is a receiving-office count, not a count of where assignees are headquartered, so it reflects where protection is being sought rather than where R&D originates. A team building watch lists for this technology should treat Chinese patent offices as a primary, not secondary, source.
Go past this page: query the whole automated guided vehicle machine vision corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.