Book a demo

Automotive Camera Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Automotive Camera Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/automotive-camera-and-vision-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Autonomous Driving · Patent Landscape
Automotive Camera and Vision System Patents: Who Filed, What They Claimed, and Where Filing Has Stalled
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 18 families and has fallen since, with the trend flat-to-declining through the most recent full years of data.
  • United States dominates as receiving office with 61 of the tracked filings landing there, versus single digits for WIPO, EPO and other jurisdictions.
  • Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across every major assignee including Texas Instruments, which shows a -100% YoY drop to zero filings in the latest year tracked.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
77
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+300%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 77 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine automotive camera or surround-view hardware claims with specific image-processing problems: dynamic range handling, lens distortion correction, low-light performance, LED flicker mitigation, and calibration. The IPC scope spans H04N23 (image pickup), G06V20 (scene/vehicle recognition) and B60R11 (vehicle-mounted equipment), which means the corpus sits at the intersection of imaging hardware and vehicle-specific mounting and control claims rather than either alone.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity; treat the tail of the curve as incomplete rather than as evidence of a slowdown on its own.

Filing activity, 2015–2026
  1. 1MAGNA ELECTRONICS INC43
  2. 2GENTEX CORP6
  3. 3FORD MOTOR CO6
  4. 4GEO SEMICONDUCTOR INC5
  5. 5TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC5
  6. 6SARNOFF CORP4
  7. 7SOUTHALL JOHN2
  8. 8ROBERT BOSCH GMBH2
  9. 9ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG2
  10. 10SRI INTERNATIONAL2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below show when filings happened and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume. Read them together: a subclass with high density is where claim space is already occupied, not necessarily where the most valuable unclaimed problems remain.

Filings by year

Filings rose to a peak of 18 in 2017, then declined; by the 2022 midpoint the count had dropped to 0, and the pattern from there reads flat or declining rather than resurgent. That trajectory is consistent with a technology area where the core camera-and-calibration claims were staked out early and later activity shifted into adjacent IPC classes rather than fresh filing volume in the core scope.

Filings by year051015201820172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H04N (pictorial communication, 67 records) and B60R (vehicle parts and accessories, 52 records) dominate, confirming this is fundamentally an imaging-hardware-on-a-vehicle corpus. G06T (22) and G06V (19) show meaningful but secondary weight in image processing and recognition, while B60K, B60W and G07C each sit in single digits — these are the joint-control and driver-monitoring edges of the space, not its centre.

IPC subclass distributionH04N · Pictorial communication (video…6787.0%B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories5267.5%G06T · Image data processing & genera…2228.6%G06V · Image/video recognition1924.7%G06K · Data recognition & presentation1519.5%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive79.1%B60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle control67.8%G07C · Time/attendance & checking dev…67.8%Other4153.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 77 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automotive camera and vision systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US11838497B22023-12-05

Calibration of a surround view camera system (US11838497B2)

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED

The patent describes automatic generation of calibration parameters for a surround-view camera system: each camera in the system captures a video stream containing two calibration charts, the streams are displayed with bounding boxes overlaid on the charts, and feature points are detected and displayed against those boxes to drive the calibration process.Filed by Texas Instruments; granted 2023-12-05.

US11838497B2 — patent drawing 1US11838497B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5949331ADisplay enhancements for vehicle vision system1,600
2US7567291B2Vehicle vision system353
3US20140333729A1Vehicle vision system with customized display247
4US20150296135A1Vehicle vision system with driver monitoring234
5US20140347486A1Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration191
6US20150015710A1Vehicle vision system150
7US20170297488A1Surround view camera system for object detection and tracking95
8US20140139676A1Vehicle vision system with enhanced display functions95
9US10065574B2Vehicle vision system with gesture determination90
10US20160368417A1Vehicle vision system78

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: where the claim density sits, where the jurisdictional bet is concentrated, and how citation weight is distributed.

Filing concentration
18 filings in 2017
peak year

The peak has already passed

2017 is the high-water mark for filing volume in this corpus, and the midpoint year of 2022 shows zero. A declining or flat trend after an early peak usually means foundational claims on core camera-mounting and calibration methods were filed first, and later entrants have had to work around them rather than repeat them.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Jurisdictional bet
61 of 77 records
US receiving office

This is overwhelmingly a US-first filing pattern

United States receiving-office filings outnumber WIPO (8), EPO (5) and all other offices combined by a wide margin. Anyone building freedom-to-operate analysis for markets outside the US should not assume the same density of prior art applies; European and Chinese coverage of this exact claim combination is thin by comparison.

Receiving office breakdown
Citation weight
1,600 citations
on the top-cited record

Influence is concentrated in a handful of early patents

The most-cited record in this corpus carries 1,600 citations, an order of magnitude above the next tier. That gap signals a small number of foundational display-and-vision-system patents that later filings had to cite or design around, rather than broad citation spread across the field.

Most-cited records table
Momentum
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

Every major assignee has gone quiet recently

Assignees including Magna Electronics, Gentex, Sarnoff, Texas Instruments, Ford and Geo Semiconductor all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Texas Instruments recording a -100% year-on-year drop. This is consistent with the broader flat trend rather than any single company retreating from the space.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automotive camera and vision systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Filing activity concentrates among a small set of automotive suppliers and imaging specialists, with co-assignee links pointing to long-running collaboration rather than one-off joint filings.

Supplier concentration
9 co-assignee pairs
identified

Sarnoff and Ford form the strongest link

The Sarnoff-Ford pairing appears 4 times, ahead of Sarnoff's ties to individual named inventors John Southall and David Hirvonen at 2 each. That pattern points to a sustained joint research relationship on vehicle vision systems rather than a single co-filed application.

Co-assignee pair frequency
Named assignees
6 tracked
in momentum data

The visible field is a small, stable set of firms

Magna Electronics, Gentex, Sarnoff, Texas Instruments, Geo Semiconductor and Ford all appear in the recent-momentum tracking, suggesting the active-filer set for this specific claim combination has stayed narrow rather than attracting a wave of new entrants.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Geographic footprint
6 receiving offices
total

Filing is concentrated, not dispersed

With US, WIPO, EPO, Australia, Canada and China as the only receiving offices represented, and the US alone accounting for the large majority, this is not a globally distributed filing strategy. Firms competing for share in Asian or European markets should check separately whether equivalent protection was sought there at all.

Receiving office breakdown
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit adjacent to the dense H04N/B60R core but carry noticeably lighter claim density in this corpus.
LED flicker mitigation timing circuitsTargetless dynamic calibration in motionJoint camera-drivetrain control (B60K/B60W overlap)Low-light HDR fusion for surround-view stitching
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Magna Electronics0
Gentex Corporation0
Sarnoff Corporation0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0-100%
Geo Semiconductor Inc.0
Ford Motor Company0
Robert Bosch GmbH0
Ford Global Technologies, LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core with narrow but real openings at its edges. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check outside the US

With 61 of 77 records filed via the US receiving office, claim coverage in Europe, China and other markets is comparatively thin. Confirm whether the specific calibration or flicker-mitigation method you plan to use was actually filed in your target jurisdiction before assuming the US density applies there too.

Explore jurisdictional coverage in Eureka

Test claim language against the top-cited patents

The most-cited records, led by the 1,600-citation display-enhancement patent, define the boundaries later filers had to design around. Any new calibration or display-overlay claim should be checked against these first.

Compare claim scope in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

Every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year, but publication lag means 2025-2026 activity is not yet fully visible. Re-run this trend in six to twelve months before concluding the field has gone cold.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about automotive camera and vision system patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Automotive Camera and Vision Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole automotive camera and vision systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.