Automotive Camera Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing peaked in 2017 at 18 families and has fallen since, with the trend flat-to-declining through the most recent full years of data.
- United States dominates as receiving office with 61 of the tracked filings landing there, versus single digits for WIPO, EPO and other jurisdictions.
- Recent-year momentum has gone quiet across every major assignee including Texas Instruments, which shows a -100% YoY drop to zero filings in the latest year tracked.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 77 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine automotive camera or surround-view hardware claims with specific image-processing problems: dynamic range handling, lens distortion correction, low-light performance, LED flicker mitigation, and calibration. The IPC scope spans H04N23 (image pickup), G06V20 (scene/vehicle recognition) and B60R11 (vehicle-mounted equipment), which means the corpus sits at the intersection of imaging hardware and vehicle-specific mounting and control claims rather than either alone.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity; treat the tail of the curve as incomplete rather than as evidence of a slowdown on its own.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The two views below show when filings happened and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume. Read them together: a subclass with high density is where claim space is already occupied, not necessarily where the most valuable unclaimed problems remain.
Filings by year
Filings rose to a peak of 18 in 2017, then declined; by the 2022 midpoint the count had dropped to 0, and the pattern from there reads flat or declining rather than resurgent. That trajectory is consistent with a technology area where the core camera-and-calibration claims were staked out early and later activity shifted into adjacent IPC classes rather than fresh filing volume in the core scope.
IPC subclass distribution
H04N (pictorial communication, 67 records) and B60R (vehicle parts and accessories, 52 records) dominate, confirming this is fundamentally an imaging-hardware-on-a-vehicle corpus. G06T (22) and G06V (19) show meaningful but secondary weight in image processing and recognition, while B60K, B60W and G07C each sit in single digits — these are the joint-control and driver-monitoring edges of the space, not its centre.
Shares are the percentage of the 77 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Automotive Camera and Vision Systems with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automotive camera and vision systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
Calibration of a surround view camera system (US11838497B2)
The patent describes automatic generation of calibration parameters for a surround-view camera system: each camera in the system captures a video stream containing two calibration charts, the streams are displayed with bounding boxes overlaid on the charts, and feature points are detected and displayed against those boxes to drive the calibration process.Filed by Texas Instruments; granted 2023-12-05.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5949331A | Display enhancements for vehicle vision system | 1,600 |
| 2 | US7567291B2 | Vehicle vision system | 353 |
| 3 | US20140333729A1 | Vehicle vision system with customized display | 247 |
| 4 | US20150296135A1 | Vehicle vision system with driver monitoring | 234 |
| 5 | US20140347486A1 | Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration | 191 |
| 6 | US20150015710A1 | Vehicle vision system | 150 |
| 7 | US20170297488A1 | Surround view camera system for object detection and tracking | 95 |
| 8 | US20140139676A1 | Vehicle vision system with enhanced display functions | 95 |
| 9 | US10065574B2 | Vehicle vision system with gesture determination | 90 |
| 10 | US20160368417A1 | Vehicle vision system | 78 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: where the claim density sits, where the jurisdictional bet is concentrated, and how citation weight is distributed.
The peak has already passed
2017 is the high-water mark for filing volume in this corpus, and the midpoint year of 2022 shows zero. A declining or flat trend after an early peak usually means foundational claims on core camera-mounting and calibration methods were filed first, and later entrants have had to work around them rather than repeat them.
This is overwhelmingly a US-first filing pattern
United States receiving-office filings outnumber WIPO (8), EPO (5) and all other offices combined by a wide margin. Anyone building freedom-to-operate analysis for markets outside the US should not assume the same density of prior art applies; European and Chinese coverage of this exact claim combination is thin by comparison.
Influence is concentrated in a handful of early patents
The most-cited record in this corpus carries 1,600 citations, an order of magnitude above the next tier. That gap signals a small number of foundational display-and-vision-system patents that later filings had to cite or design around, rather than broad citation spread across the field.
Every major assignee has gone quiet recently
Assignees including Magna Electronics, Gentex, Sarnoff, Texas Instruments, Ford and Geo Semiconductor all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Texas Instruments recording a -100% year-on-year drop. This is consistent with the broader flat trend rather than any single company retreating from the space.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automotive camera and vision systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
Filing activity concentrates among a small set of automotive suppliers and imaging specialists, with co-assignee links pointing to long-running collaboration rather than one-off joint filings.
Sarnoff and Ford form the strongest link
The Sarnoff-Ford pairing appears 4 times, ahead of Sarnoff's ties to individual named inventors John Southall and David Hirvonen at 2 each. That pattern points to a sustained joint research relationship on vehicle vision systems rather than a single co-filed application.
The visible field is a small, stable set of firms
Magna Electronics, Gentex, Sarnoff, Texas Instruments, Geo Semiconductor and Ford all appear in the recent-momentum tracking, suggesting the active-filer set for this specific claim combination has stayed narrow rather than attracting a wave of new entrants.
Filing is concentrated, not dispersed
With US, WIPO, EPO, Australia, Canada and China as the only receiving offices represented, and the US alone accounting for the large majority, this is not a globally distributed filing strategy. Firms competing for share in Asian or European markets should check separately whether equivalent protection was sought there at all.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Magna Electronics | 0 | — |
| Gentex Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sarnoff Corporation | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Geo Semiconductor Inc. | 0 | — |
| Ford Motor Company | 0 | — |
| Robert Bosch GmbH | 0 | — |
| Ford Global Technologies, LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core with narrow but real openings at its edges. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitive tracking.
Run a freedom-to-operate check outside the US
With 61 of 77 records filed via the US receiving office, claim coverage in Europe, China and other markets is comparatively thin. Confirm whether the specific calibration or flicker-mitigation method you plan to use was actually filed in your target jurisdiction before assuming the US density applies there too.
Explore jurisdictional coverage in EurekaTest claim language against the top-cited patents
The most-cited records, led by the 1,600-citation display-enhancement patent, define the boundaries later filers had to design around. Any new calibration or display-overlay claim should be checked against these first.
Compare claim scope in EurekaWatch for renewed filing activity
Every tracked assignee shows zero filings in the latest year, but publication lag means 2025-2026 activity is not yet fully visible. Re-run this trend in six to twelve months before concluding the field has gone cold.
Set up filing alerts in EurekaCommon questions about automotive camera and vision system patents
The tracked corpus shows a small, stable set of assignees including Magna Electronics, Gentex, Sarnoff, Texas Instruments, Geo Semiconductor and Ford, all appearing in recent-year momentum tracking. Sarnoff and Ford also show the strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset, appearing together in 4 filings, which points to a sustained joint research programme rather than a one-off collaboration. No single firm dominates the full 77-family corpus outright; the field is concentrated among a handful of automotive suppliers and imaging specialists rather than one clear leader.
Filing in this specific claim combination, automotive cameras paired with dynamic range, calibration, distortion correction, low-light or LED flicker claims, peaked at 18 families in 2017 and had dropped to 0 by the 2022 midpoint. This does not necessarily mean the underlying technology stopped developing; it more likely means the core mounting, calibration and display-overlay methods were staked out early, pushing later work into adjacent IPC classes like G06T image processing or B60W vehicle control that fall partly outside this exact search scope. Publication lag of roughly 18 months also means the most recent one to two years in the trend understate real activity.
US11838497B2, assigned to Texas Instruments and granted in December 2023, covers a method for automatically generating calibration parameters for a surround-view camera system using two calibration charts per camera, bounding-box overlays, and detected feature points displayed against those boxes. It blocks that specific combination of steps, not calibration generally; a method that calibrates surround-view cameras without dual calibration charts per camera, or without displaying bounding-box overlays tied to feature-point detection, sits outside its literal claim scope. Anyone building an automatic calibration workflow should compare their specific chart, overlay and feature-detection sequence against the granted claims rather than assuming all camera calibration is covered.
Based on IPC composition, the core H04N and B60R claim space is dense, but adjacent branches carry noticeably lighter density: LED flicker mitigation timing circuits, targetless dynamic calibration performed while the vehicle is in motion, joint camera-drivetrain control spanning B60K and B60W, and low-light HDR fusion specifically for surround-view stitching. These sit at the edges of the tracked IPC classes rather than in classes with zero coverage, so a first claim there would need to specify the exact technical combination, for example dynamic in-motion recalibration triggered by drivetrain state, to clear the existing art. A freedom-to-operate search focused on these narrower combinations is more useful than a broad search across the whole H04N/B60R space.
The United States accounts for 61 of the 77 tracked records as receiving office, far ahead of WIPO's 8, the EPO's 5, and single-digit counts for Australia, Canada and China. That imbalance means US freedom-to-operate risk in this space is comparatively well mapped, while coverage in China and Europe for this exact claim combination is thin. A filer targeting those markets should not assume the US claim density transfers directly and should run a separate regional search rather than relying on this corpus's US-heavy picture.
Research Automotive Camera and Vision Systems in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole automotive camera and vision systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.