Book a demo

Automotive Glazing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Automotive Glazing Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/automotive-glazing-and-windshields-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Automotive Glazing
Automotive Glazing and Windshield Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • Filing peaked in 2018 at 7 records and has run flat to declining since, with the 2022 midpoint down to a single record — this is a settled claim map, not a fast-moving one.
  • One glass maker leads with 8 records against a fifth-place holder at just 1, and the ranked list covers only 7 assignees in total — concentration is visible but the tail is thin, not deep.
  • B32B laminate claims sit in every one of the 20 records while H05B heating-circuit claims appear in 45.0% of them — heatable glazing is the dominant cross-class combination, not a niche add-on.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
20
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
7
Active Filers Ranked
2018
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent activity at the intersection of laminated glass structures and vehicle-specific glazing functions: acoustic PVB interlayers, heatable zones, head-up display wedge geometry, thin lightweight glass and ADAS camera bracket areas. The scope is defined by B32B17 (layered products), B60J1 (vehicle windows and fittings) and C03C27 (glass laminating), filtered to documents whose title and abstract name these specific automotive glazing functions rather than general laminated-glass manufacture. It captures 20 published records between 2015 and 2026, ranked across 7 assignees.

The dataset is small enough that individual filings move the picture, which is itself informative: this is a mature, narrowly claimed corner of automotive glass rather than an emerging one. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 count understates whatever has actually been filed most recently.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1AGC Glass Europe8
  2. 2Corning Incorporated7
  3. 3Saint-Gobain Glass France3
  4. 4Glaverbel2
  5. 5JAIN ANURAG1
  6. 6FRISKE MARK STEPHEN1
  7. 7FISHER WILLIAM KEITH1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 20-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A peak in 2018, then a long flat tail

Filings ran to 7 in 2018, the high point across the window, then fell back; the 2022 midpoint sits at just 1 record. Nothing in the trend suggests renewed acceleration, though the most recent year is necessarily undercounted given publication lag.

A peak in 2018, then a long flat tail024680201772018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Laminate claims dominate; heating is the main cross-class pairing

B32B (layered products) appears in all 20 records in scope, confirming that every filing here is fundamentally a laminate-structure claim. H05B (electric heating and lighting circuits) rides alongside it in 45.0% of records, making heatable glazing the clearest recurring combination. Vehicle lighting (B60Q), radar/positioning (G01S) and glass composition (C03C) each sit at 10.0%, and dedicated B60J window-and-fitting claims appear in only 5.0% — a signal that most filers here are claiming the laminate and its embedded function, not the window assembly itself.

Laminate claims dominate; heating is the main cross-class pairingB32B · Layered products & laminates20100.0%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…945.0%B60Q · Vehicle lighting & signalling210.0%B61D · Railway vehicle bodies210.0%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions210.0%F21V · Lighting device components210.0%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning210.0%B60J · Windows, doors & vehicle fitti…15.0%Other525.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 20 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Automotive Glazing and Windshields with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automotive glazing and windshields and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US11648751B22023-05-16

Side laminated automotive glazing (US11648751B2)

AGC GLASS EUROPE

The filing describes an electrically heatable laminated glazing unit combining a curved, tempered exterior glass sheet with a thin tempered interior sheet joined by a thermoplastic interlayer. A portion of the exterior sheet is left uncovered by the thin interior sheet to allow mechanical fastening, and the heatable zone uses a transparent conductive coating with spaced busbars to carry voltage across the glazing.Assigned to AGC Glass Europe, published 2023-05-16.

US11648751B2 — patent drawing 1
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2013181484A1Stiff interlayers for laminated glass structures65
2US20150111016A1Stiff interlayers for laminated glass structures59
3US20210107401A1Luminous laminated automotive glazing comprising inorganic light-emitting diodes and manufacture thereof8
4US20210100074A1Side laminated automotive glazing4
5US20200180275A1Stiff interlayers for laminated glass structures3
6WO2018210612A1Side laminated automotive glazing3
7EP1081987B2Heatable glazing2
8EP1081987B1Heatable glazing2
9WO2023144066A1Heatable wired laminated glazing with temperature control1
10US11648751B2Side laminated automotive glazing1

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data tells you

Three findings that shape where to file, where not to, and who to watch.

Citation concentration
65 citations
on the lead family

Stiff-interlayer claims anchor the field

The two highest-cited records in this corpus, both titled 'Stiff interlayers for laminated glass structures', carry 65 and 59 citations respectively — far ahead of anything else in the set. New interlayer-stiffness claims will be read against this pair first.

WO2013181484A1 / US20150111016A1
Filing trend
7 in 2018, 1 by 2022
peak vs. midpoint

Activity has cooled since 2018

The filing count peaked at 7 in 2018 and had fallen to a single record by the 2022 midpoint, with no sign of renewed acceleration through the years given. That pattern points to a technology where the core claim space was staked out early.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Assignee spread
8 vs. 1
leader to fifth place

A short ranked list, not a crowded field

The assignee ranking returns only 7 companies, with the leader at 8 records and fifth place down to 1. That is a narrow set of active filers rather than a long tail of entrants competing for the same claims.

7 ranked assignees
Cross-class filing
45.0% H05B
of 20 records

Heatable glazing is the recurring pairing

Almost half of all records in scope combine a B32B laminate claim with an H05B heating-circuit claim, confirming heated glazing as the dominant functional overlay on the base laminate structure in this dataset.

B32B 100.0% / H05B 45.0% of 20 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automotive glazing and windshields, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked list is short and led by one glass maker, with named individual inventors also holding standalone records rather than assigning to a corporate entity.

Leader
8 records
top of 7 ranked assignees

One glass maker leads a narrow field

The top assignee holds 8 of the records in this corpus, well ahead of the rest of the ranking, but recent-year momentum for every named assignee, including the leader, sits at 0 in the latest year — activity has not carried through recent filing cycles.

Recent-year momentum: 0 for all listed assignees
Co-filing
6 pairs
co-assignee pairs recorded

Named inventors pair consistently with one corporate filer

Six co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with three of them linking the same corporate glass maker to three different individually named inventors — a pattern consistent with in-house inventor teams rather than cross-company collaboration.

Strongest pairs each recorded once
Filing geography
10 US filings
of the tracked receiving offices

US and EPO carry most of the filing activity

The United States receives the largest share of filings tracked here, with Europe (EPO) second and WIPO/PCT and India each accounting for smaller portions. Anyone clearing freedom to operate should prioritise US and EPO prior art first.

US 10 / EPO 6 / WIPO 3 / India 1
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show low or no representation in the IPC composition above, relative to how central they are to the search scope.
Head-up display wedge interlayer geometryThin lightweight glass lamination for weight reductionADAS camera bracket mounting zonesAcoustic PVB interlayer damping profilesDedicated B60J window-fitting claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
AGC Glass Europe0
Corning Incorporated0
Saint-Gobain Glass France0
Glaverbel0
JAIN ANURAG0
FRISKE MARK STEPHEN0
FISHER WILLIAM KEITH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are clearing freedom to operate or looking for open claim space.

Check the stiff-interlayer family before filing

Any new interlayer-stiffness or laminate-strength claim should be checked against the two highest-cited records in this corpus, since they anchor the citation graph for the whole field.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed sub-areas

HUD wedge geometry, thin lightweight glass and ADAS camera bracket zones all show thin representation in the IPC composition despite being named in the search scope — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

Filing has been flat to declining since the 2018 peak, but publication lag means the most recent year is undercounted; a fresh pull closer to the 18-month lag window would confirm whether activity is genuinely dormant.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on automotive glazing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Automotive Glazing and Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Automotive Glazing and Windshields in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole automotive glazing and windshields corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.