Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This dataset tracks 37 patent families filed against automotive and vehicle LiDAR sensing — solid-state architectures, MEMS mirror scanning, point cloud density claims, detection-range engineering and eye-safety constraints — classified under G01S17, G01S7 and G02B26. Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, though the most recent one or two years will always understate real filing activity because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
The technology composition skews heavily toward G01S (radar, sonar and positioning), with secondary depth in optical modulation, length measurement and light measurement subclasses — consistent with a field still built primarily around ranging and detection rather than downstream perception software.
Two views of the same 37-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying claims split across IPC subclasses.
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2020, then held at 6 through the 2022 midpoint before tapering toward the 2026 cut-off. That shape reads as a technology that reached a claims plateau rather than one still in a land-grab phase — new entrants now face denser prior art per incremental filing than they would have in 2017.
G01S accounts for the full 37-family set by construction of the search, with G02F (optical control and modulation) at 6, G01B and G01J at 4 each, and G05D, G02B, H01S and G01C trailing behind. The long tail of single-digit subclasses suggests component-level innovation — optics, lasers, control loops — is still being claimed in small pockets rather than consolidated.
Shares are the percentage of the 37 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automotive lidar systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA vehicle, Lidar system for the vehicle and method of scanning an object with the Lidar system. The Lidar system includes a first quarter wave plate, a first deflection stage and a detector. The first quarter wave plate produces a circularly polarized scanning beam of light. The first deflection stage selects a rotation direction for a polarization vector of the scanning beam and deflects the scanning beam by a selected angle based on the selected rotation direction of the polarization vector. The detector receives a reflected beam that is a reflection of the scanning beam from the object.Filed by GM Global Technology Operations, granted 2023-07-11 — a discrete polarization-based scanning mechanism rather than a continuously rotating or MEMS-driven one.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170184450A1 | Low power, high resolution solid state lidar circuit | 173 |
| 2 | US5241315A | Micro pulse laser radar | 83 |
| 3 | US20200326425A1 | Solid-State LIDAR Transmitter with Laser Control | 52 |
| 4 | US9823118B2 | Low power, high resolution solid state LIDAR circuit | 33 |
| 5 | US20210231806A1 | Solid-State LIDAR Transmitter with Laser Control | 22 |
| 6 | WO2020210176A1 | Solid-state lidar transmitter with laser control | 20 |
| 7 | US10281322B2 | Low power, high resolution solid state LIDAR circuit having a modulator to modulate a bit sequence onto a car… | 20 |
| 8 | US11320538B2 | Solid-state LIDAR transmitter with laser control | 17 |
| 9 | US20200072950A1 | Automotive lidar with multi-spectral depth imaging and discrete scanning mechanism | 16 |
| 10 | EP3953727A1 | Solid-state lidar transmitter with laser control | 14 |
Citation counts here are a proxy for influence within this searched corpus, not for current commercial relevance — older solid-state circuit filings dominate the list simply by having had longer to accumulate citations.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data that matter more than the raw counts alone.
Filings held at the 2020 peak through the 2022 midpoint rather than climbing further, which is unusual for a sensing technology still being designed into new vehicle platforms. Treat the apparent 2025-2026 dip with caution given publication lag, but do not read growth into a curve that was already flat before the lag window began.
The EPO, China and PCT combined account for only 11 of 37 records. For teams weighing where freedom-to-operate risk actually concentrates, that skew means US claims deserve the first and closest read, with European and Chinese filings treated as a secondary but growing check.
The most-cited filing in the set is a solid-state LIDAR circuit patent, cited well ahead of anything filed near the 2020 peak. New entrants building solid-state transmitter or receiver circuits should expect this lineage to surface in any prior-art search, regardless of how recent their own design is.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automotive lidar systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year filing momentum across the tracked assignees has gone quiet across the board — every major name in the ranking shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader plateau in the trend data and with publication lag masking the newest work.
Names including GM Global Technology Operations, Continental Automotive Systems and Visteon Global Technologies appear in the ranking but show no filings in the most recent year, matching the flat trend line rather than contradicting it.
Assignees such as Ouster, LeddarTech-type specialists and Intel appear in the same ranking as automotive OEMs, suggesting the claim space is being worked from both the sensor-component side and the vehicle-integration side rather than by one camp alone.
Names like Guangzhou-based optics firms and Shenzhen innovation companies appear in the dataset, but China's 3 receiving-office filings versus the US's 26 indicate the domestic claim base there is still forming rather than mature.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Ouster, Inc. | 0 | — |
| LeddarTech Inc. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | 0 | — |
| GM Global Technology Operations LLC | 0 | — |
| Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Ouster, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Guangzhou Guangwei Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for where to file.
With 26 of 37 records routed through the USPTO, any commercial launch plan should start its clearance search there before extending to Europe or China.
Run a claims search in EurekaEye-safety modulation and adaptive point cloud density claims remain thin relative to core scanning-mechanism art, which narrows the prior art a new filing has to clear.
Explore white space in EurekaBecause publication lag understates 2025-2026 filings, re-checking this trend in six to twelve months will show whether the plateau was temporary or a genuine ceiling.
Monitor this landscape in EurekaThe dataset's most-cited record is a solid-state LIDAR circuit patent with 173 citations, filed well before the 2020 filing peak, alongside related filings from the same lineage that also rank highly. Beyond citation counts, the assignee ranking includes a mix of automotive OEMs like GM, Tier 1 suppliers such as Continental and Visteon, and pure-play sensor and semiconductor firms including Ouster and Intel. No single assignee dominates the full 37-family set, so a freedom-to-operate review needs to check both the automotive-integration filers and the component-level specialists.
Based on this dataset, no — filings peaked at 6 in 2020 and held at that level through the 2022 midpoint rather than climbing further. The apparent drop toward 2026 should be read cautiously because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the newest work is undercounted. Even accounting for that lag, the shape is a plateau rather than an accelerating land grab, which changes how aggressively a new entrant needs to file to hold ground.
The United States dominates this dataset with 26 of 37 records, compared with 5 at the European Patent Office, 3 in China and 3 filed via the PCT route. That skew means US claims carry the highest freedom-to-operate risk for most companies, though the smaller China and EPO filing counts likely understate activity given how recent and regionally concentrated some entrants are. Anyone planning a China market entry should treat the thin domestic filing base as an opening rather than a settled position.
Relative to the dense core claims around scanning mechanisms and detection range, areas such as eye-safety power modulation, adaptive point cloud density control, and discrete polarization-based scanning show thinner coverage in this dataset. The IPC composition also shows a long tail of single-digit subclasses — including G05D control systems and H01S laser sources — suggesting component-level innovation is still fragmented rather than consolidated under a few dominant filers. These pockets are worth checking closely before assuming the space is fully occupied.
US11698445B2 claims a vehicle LiDAR system built around a discrete scanning mechanism using a quarter wave plate and a deflection stage that selects the rotation direction of a circularly polarized beam, rather than a continuously rotating or MEMS-mirror-driven scan. Granted in 2023 to GM Global Technology Operations, its claims are narrower to that polarization-selection approach rather than to LiDAR scanning broadly. Anyone designing a discrete or polarization-controlled scanning mechanism should read the full claim set closely, but continuously scanning or MEMS-based designs sit outside its core mechanism claims.
Go past this page: query the whole automotive lidar systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.