Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Zonal architecture consolidates what used to be dozens of domain-specific electronic control units into a small number of zone controllers, each handling the electrical distribution, sensor fusion and network gateway functions of one physical vehicle zone. The patent record for this topic spans 66 families filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, concentrated overwhelmingly in China and weighted toward vehicle-hardware claims (B60R) rather than the software-defined, service-oriented layer that zonal architecture is meant to enable.
Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent filing years in any trend line — including the partial 2026 count here — understate real activity. The 2024 peak of 20 records is the most reliable recent signal; the drop-off after it should be read cautiously rather than as confirmed decline.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 66-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the technical scope of a zonal controller claim.
Filings were effectively absent before 2017, built gradually to a midpoint of 11 in 2022, then roughly doubled to a peak of 20 in 2024. The partial 2026 count of 2 is not yet comparable to prior full years, but the shape through 2024 already looks like a filing wave that has crested rather than one still accelerating.
B60R (vehicle parts and accessories) accounts for 52 of 66 records, far ahead of B60W hybrid/joint vehicle control (15) and H04L digital information transmission (14). Smaller counts in B60L electric propulsion (9), G05B control systems (6), G06F data processing (4), G07C checking devices (3) and B60Q lighting (2) show the software-defined-vehicle and network-protocol layers are only lightly claimed relative to the physical controller hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 66 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about automotive zonal controller landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe application covers a power distribution method and device for a vehicle zonal controller: it obtains the load current corresponding to a sampling resistor, determines a target power-distribution strategy once that load current meets a preset power-distribution condition, and applies the strategy to a target zonal controller that represents the next-level controller relative to the current one.Filed by CHINA FAW CO., LTD., published 2026-01-02 — one of the most recent records in the dataset, filed under the PCT route rather than directly in China.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN109995628A | 车用域控制器 | 35 |
| 2 | CN112428757A | 一种两栖车整车域控制器功能实现的方法 | 17 |
| 3 | KR102275144B1 | Can frame-ethernet packet converting method in domain control unit | 12 |
| 4 | CN115277287A | 一种基于以太网的可配置的CAN报文采集方法及系统 | 10 |
| 5 | CN114056264A | 一种基于国产芯片设计的车身域控制器及汽车 | 6 |
| 6 | CN214215682U | 车辆域控制器和车辆 | 6 |
| 7 | CN117348459A | 一种车辆域控制器系统的监控方法及系统 | 4 |
| 8 | CN118849973A | 车辆域控制器的配电方法、装置以及存储介质 | 3 |
| 9 | CN115649187A | 一种车辆扭矩控制方法、系统、整车域控制器及车辆 | 3 |
| 10 | CN115529099A | 一种整车域控制器校时方法、装置、设备及存储介质 | 3 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat this table as a map of influence, not of current technical importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and jurisdiction are read together: where claim density already makes filing crowded, where the architecture is still lightly claimed, and how reliable the recent-year numbers actually are.
With only 2 US records, 1 Korean record and 1 PCT filing, freedom-to-operate exposure for zonal controller hardware claims is concentrated almost entirely within Chinese jurisdiction. A company shipping zonal architecture into China faces the densest prior art; the same claim space is comparatively open in the US and Korea on this dataset alone.
H04L (digital information transmission) and G06F (data processing) together account for only 18 of 66 records combined. The service-oriented, software-defined layer that distinguishes zonal architecture from legacy domain controllers is comparatively under-claimed relative to the physical controller housing and wiring claims in B60R.
Growth from a midpoint of 11 filings in 2022 to a peak of 20 in 2024 was rapid, but the count is essentially flat or declining into the partial 2026 year. Because recent years are always undercounted at the point of publication, this should be treated as a signal to re-check in twelve months rather than a confirmed peak.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to automotive zonal controller landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum data shows several Chinese OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers with active filing histories now sitting at zero in the latest year, which is consistent with the broader flattening in the trend line rather than any single company's retreat.
Deep Blue Automotive Technology (深蓝汽车科技) recorded 1 filing in the latest year, making it one of the only tracked assignees with any activity in that period while several longer-established filers dropped to zero.
China FAW Co., Ltd., Deep Xiang Technology and Chongqing Changan Technology each show a -100% year-on-year change, moving from prior filing activity to none in the latest year. That pattern lines up with the broader plateau after the 2024 peak rather than indicating any one company exited the space.
Chongqing Changan Automobile and Wuhu ETEK Automotive Electronics both show zero filings in the latest tracked year without a percentage change noted, consistent with sparse, non-continuous filing histories typical of a young, still-consolidating technology category.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Blue Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 | — |
| China FAW Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Deep Xiang Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Chongqing Changan Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Wuhu ETEK Automotive Electronic Systems Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Wuhan Shiyou Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Huizhou Desay SV Automotive Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a filing pattern that is geographically concentrated and technically skewed toward hardware. Two follow-up angles are worth pursuing with a fuller claim-by-claim review.
H04L and G06F together cover only 18 of 66 records. Before filing in service-oriented architecture or Ethernet-CAN conversion, run a claim-level review against the specific records in those subclasses rather than relying on the subclass count alone.
Explore in EurekaBecause 2025 and 2026 filings are still being published, the apparent decline after 2024 needs re-checking against updated data before it is treated as a real trend rather than a publication-lag artefact.
Explore in EurekaA zonal controller is a single electronic control unit that manages all the sensors, actuators and network traffic within one physical zone of a vehicle, replacing the dozens of function-specific ECUs used in older domain-based architectures. It typically handles power distribution, local sensor fusion and gateway functions between the zone's local network and the vehicle's central compute platform. This dataset shows the patent activity around that consolidation is still weighted toward the physical controller hardware rather than the software-defined logic that coordinates zones.
The recent-year momentum data in this dataset shows a mix of Chinese OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, including China FAW, Deep Blue Automotive Technology, Deep Xiang Technology, Chongqing Changan Automobile and its technology subsidiary, and Wuhu ETEK Automotive Electronics. Filing activity across these assignees is uneven: several show recent filings dropping to zero after prior activity, while at least one, Deep Blue Automotive Technology, still recorded a filing in the latest tracked year. A full assignee ranking table sits alongside this analysis with the complete family counts.
Of the 66 records in this dataset, 62 were filed at the Chinese patent office, with only 2 in the United States, 1 in South Korea and 1 through the PCT route. This concentration reflects where the bulk of near-term zonal-architecture vehicle production and supplier development is happening rather than a technical limitation of the architecture itself. Companies planning to compete on zonal controller technology in the US, European or Korean markets should note that the prior art density there is currently much lower on this evidence, though that could change once PCT applications and current filings mature into national phase entries.
Filings rose from a midpoint of 11 in 2022 to a peak of 20 in 2024, but the count into the partial 2026 year suggests growth has flattened or reversed. Because patent publication lags actual filing by roughly eighteen months, the apparent slowdown in 2025 and 2026 may partly be an artefact of records not yet published rather than a genuine drop in filing activity. The honest read is that the 2024 peak is the most reliable recent data point, and the trend needs re-checking in twelve to eighteen months once more records publish.
The IPC composition shows B60R (vehicle parts and accessories) carrying 52 of 66 records, while H04L (digital transmission) and G06F (data processing) together account for only 18. That gap suggests the software-defined, service-oriented middleware layer connecting zones, along with dynamic load reallocation and cross-zone failover logic, is comparatively under-claimed relative to physical controller housing and wiring claims. Any first claim in that space should be checked directly against the specific records in those subclasses before filing, since a low subclass count is a starting signal, not a guarantee of open space.
Go past this page: query the whole automotive zonal controller landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.