https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/autonomous-underwater-vehicle-hull-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Marine & Offshore · Patent Landscape
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design Patents
  • Filing already peaked. 2017 was the high point at 6 filings; by the 2022 midpoint activity had dropped to 1, and the trend has stayed flat or declining since.
  • One dominant IPC axis. All 28 families sit in B63G (naval vessels), but a third also carry B63B hull/ship classification and a quarter carry G01V geophysics — this is survey-AUV hull art as much as pure hydrodynamics.
  • Ownership is thin and scattered. The only co-assignee link in the dataset is a single pairing between an Indian research institute and an individual inventor — there is no dense collaboration network to map.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
28
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
7
Active Filers Ranked
2017
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families where the claims combine an autonomous or unmanned underwater vehicle with hull-specific engineering language: pressure hull design, hydrodynamic hull shaping, buoyancy control hull structures, or streamlined body claims. The IPC filter anchors on B63G8/00 and related naval-vessel and hull subclasses, so the set captures hull and body engineering rather than the payload, sonar or navigation systems carried inside it.

28 published families sit inside the 2015–2026 window, concentrated heavily in a handful of filing years. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year figures understate real activity, but the multi-year decline from the 2017 peak is visible even accounting for that lag.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS15
  2. 2SEABED GEOSOLUTIONS BV6
  3. 3AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORP4
  4. 4PXGEO UK LTD1
  5. 5JIS COLLEGE OF ENG1
  6. 6INDIAN INST OF INFORMATION TECH1
  7. 7Hrishikesh Venkataraman1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The numbers below come directly from the underlying family set: a filing curve that peaked early, and an IPC spread that shows hull claims overlapping heavily with survey and geophysics equipment.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then decline

Filings ran at 6 in 2017, the peak year in the dataset. By the 2022 midpoint they had fallen to 1, and the curve to 2026 (partial) stays flat or declining — there is no second wave of filing visible yet.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then decline02356620172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: naval hull claims layered with survey equipment

Every family carries B63G (naval vessels / offensive equipment), 11 also carry B63B (ships & marine vessels generally), and 8 carry G01V (geophysics & gravity surveying) — evidence that a meaningful share of this hull art is built for seismic and seabed survey AUVs rather than generic underwater platforms. Smaller counts in B63C (launch/retrieval), G01S (sonar/positioning), G05D (non-electric control) and G06N (AI models) show hull claims occasionally bundled with adjacent control or deployment mechanisms.

IPC composition: naval hull claims layered with survey equipmentB63G · Naval vessels & offensive28100.0%B63B · Ships & marine vessels1139.3%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying828.6%B63C · Launching & salvaging vessels27.1%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive13.6%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning13.6%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…13.6%G06N · Computing based on AI models13.6%Other13.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 28 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about autonomous underwater vehicle hull design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited hull art in this set

Representative filing
US20200070942A12020-03-05

US20200070942A1 — Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS LIMITED

An autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) for sensing at a seabed is provided. The AUV is configured to be grounded in a stationary condition on the seabed. The AUV comprises a body, a sensing module configured to acquire data when the vehicle is grounded on the seabed, and a multiplane wing configuration extending from the body. The multiplane wing may be a box wing.Filed by Autonomous Robotics Limited; numbering in the original claims (100, 200) refers to the body and wing configuration.

US20200070942A1 — patent drawing 1US20200070942A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Top cited families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170137098A1Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle53
2US10322783B2Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle20
3US20200070942A1Autonomous Underwater Vehicle12
4US20030164135A1System for deploying cable11
5US20180319463A1Deployment and retrieval methods for auvs10
6US20030164134A1Method of deploying cable10
7US20190256181A1Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle9
8EP3156318A1Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle7
9US6681711B2System for deploying cable7
10US6691636B2Method of deploying cable6

Citation counts reward older filings in a searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against the filing curve and the citation table.

Filing momentum
6 → 1
2017 peak vs. 2022 midpoint

Activity has cooled, not grown

The 2017 peak of 6 filings has not been matched since; by 2022 the annual count was down to 1. A field this small with a declining curve suggests either consolidation around a few working hull geometries or a shift of R&D effort toward electronics and control rather than the physical hull.

Read against the 18-month publication lag before assuming 2025–2026 is truly quiet.
Citation concentration
53 citations
top-cited record

Two seismic-AUV filings dominate citation counts

The two most-cited records in the set are both titled "Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle," cited 53 and 20 times respectively — far ahead of the next tier. That concentration signals these hull-and-deployment approaches became the reference point for later seismic-survey AUV filings specifically, not for AUV hull design broadly.

Older filings accumulate citations by default; treat this as influence, not current best practice.
Filing geography
13 US filings
of 28 total records

Filing is US-centered with a thin international tail

The United States accounts for 13 of the 28 records, roughly double the next largest office (EPO, 6). Filers reaching for protection beyond the US and Europe are rare — AT, UK, India and PCT each show only 1–2 filings — which limits the freedom-to-operate risk in most jurisdictions outside the US and Europe.

Low counts elsewhere may reflect filing choice as much as absence of activity.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to autonomous underwater vehicle hull design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the hull art

No single assignee dominates this set, and recent-year momentum is essentially absent across the board — the most recent activity flagged is a single filing from JIS College of Engineering.

Momentum leader (latest year)
1 filing
latest year

JIS College of Engineering is the only assignee active in the most recent year

Every other tracked assignee — including Autonomous Robotics, Seabed Geosolutions, American Systems Corp, PXGEO UK and Indian Institute of Information Technology — shows zero filings in the latest year. This is a field where almost all visible activity is historical rather than current.

A single recent filing is not enough to call a trend; watch the next publication cycle.
Seismic-survey specialist
Cited 53 & 20
top two records

The most influential hull claims come from seismic-survey filers

The two highest-cited records in the dataset, both "Seismic autonomous underwater vehicle," point to survey-AUV specialists as the source of the hull and deployment concepts other filers built on. Their influence outweighs their raw filing count.

Check assignment history before assuming current ownership matches the original filer.
Collaboration density
1 co-assignee pair
in the whole dataset

Almost no joint filing

The only co-assignee relationship in the set links Indian Institute of Information Technology with an individual inventor, Hrishikesh Venkataraman. Outside that pairing, every family in this landscape is filed by a single assignee — there is no visible joint-venture or licensing cluster to track.

Sparse collaboration data can mean either genuine independence or under-reported assignment chains.
🔍
Under-claimed hull sub-areas
Sub-areas with thin claim density relative to the core pressure-hull and streamlined-body art
Multiplane/box-wing buoyancy structuresSeabed-grounding hull stabilizationModular launch-and-retrieval hull interfacesAI-assisted hull-form control couplingNon-seismic sensing hull integration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
JIS COLLEGE OF ENG1
AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS0
SEABED GEOSOLUTIONS BV0
AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORP0
PXGEO UK LTD0
INDIAN INST OF INFORMATION TECH0
Hrishikesh Venkataraman0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset is small enough that a single new filer or a reclassified family could shift the picture — treat the following as starting points for deeper diligence.

Check assignment history on the top-cited pairs

The two most-cited seismic-AUV records share a title and likely a lineage; confirm whether they remain with the original assignee or have been reassigned before relying on them for freedom-to-operate analysis.

Explore citation lineage in Eureka

Watch the next publication cycle before calling the trend dead

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent 2022–2026 decline may partly reflect filings not yet published rather than a genuine drop in R&D activity.

Track new filings in Eureka

Model claims around the under-claimed sub-areas

Buoyancy structures, seabed-grounding stabilization and modular launch interfaces show thin claim density relative to core hull-shape art — a good starting point for a freedom-to-operate check before drafting.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on AUV hull design patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Hull Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole autonomous underwater vehicle hull design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.