Autopilot and Autoland Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- 61.2% concentration. The top five assignees hold 972 of the 1,589 records in scope — this is a field claimed early and defended hard by a small group.
- Filing cooled after 2021. From 84 filings in 2021 to 38 in 2024, a documented -55% move over three years, after a 2022 peak of 90.
- Control and traffic classes dominate. G05D and G08G each cover close to a third of all records, while gas-turbine integration (F02C) sits at just 3.3%.
Filing growth compares 2021 (84 records) with 2024 (38) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,589 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This review covers 1,589 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine autopilot, automatic landing or flight-director claims with specific approach-and-landing functions: glide slope capture, automatic flare, rollout guidance, autothrottle, decision height logic or runway alignment. The scope is deliberately narrow — it excludes general autopilot claims that never touch the approach-to-landing phase, and excludes landing-gear or braking hardware that does not reference flight-control logic.
Filing activity in this set traces a rise into a 2022 peak and a pull-back since, though the two most recent years are still filling in under normal publication lag. Family counts, not raw document counts, are used throughout so that continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing by the largest assignees do not distort the picture.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,589-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
A 2022 peak, then a documented pull-back
Filings ran from 67 in 2017 to a peak of 90 in 2022, then declined to 38 by 2024 — a -55% move over the 2021-2024 span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still climbing as publications catch up with filing dates roughly 18 months earlier, so this is not evidence the field has gone quiet.
Control and traffic logic outweigh airframe and propulsion classes
G05D (control of non-electric variables) and G08G (traffic control systems) each touch roughly a third of the 1,589 records, with B64D (aircraft equipment) and G01C (navigation and gyroscopes) close behind. Gas-turbine integration under F02C appears in only 3.3% of records, suggesting autothrottle claims are written mostly at the control-logic level rather than tied to specific engine hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,589 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Autopilot and Autoland Systems with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about autopilot and autoland systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents that shaped this space
US3994455A — Automatic approach pitch axis control system for aircraft
The invention relates to a system utilizing an exponential control law for glide slope capture. The capture maneuver from above or below the beam, is a function of decreasing glide slope beam error. The present autopilot approach coupler is an altitude rate command system which provides switchless signal processing during glide slope capture, and tracking.Filed by The Boeing Company, granted 1976-11-30 — a foundational glide slope capture reference that predates the bulk of the dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030093187A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 977 |
| 2 | US6112141A | Apparatus and method for graphically oriented aircraft display and control | 750 |
| 3 | US20050187677A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 595 |
| 4 | US5714948A | Satellite based aircraft traffic control system | 527 |
| 5 | US6965816B2 | PFN/TRAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of airc… | 489 |
| 6 | US5978715A | Apparatus and method for aircraft display and control | 355 |
| 7 | US6057786A | Apparatus and method for aircraft display and control including head up display | 266 |
| 8 | US6038498A | Apparatus and method for aircraft monitoring and control including electronic check-list management | 263 |
| 9 | US6154151A | Integrated vertical situation display for aircraft | 223 |
| 10 | US20030225492A1 | Flight data transmission via satellite link and ground storage of data | 220 |
Citation counts favour older filings within this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-outs from the concentration, timing and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
A small group set the terms early
With 972 of 1,589 records held by five assignees, and the leader alone holding 392, claim space in core autopilot and autoland logic is dense. New entrants are more likely to find room in adjacent integration claims than in glide slope capture or autoflare logic itself.
Volume has pulled back from its 2022 peak
Filings fell from 84 in 2021 to 38 in 2024 after peaking at 90 in 2022. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025-2026 figures will rise as they fill in — treat the recent pull-back as directional, not final.
Influence sits with older, broad-scope filings
The most-cited records in this set date back well before the 2015-2026 window and describe broad remote-control and accountability systems rather than narrow autoland mechanics, which is typical: citation counts inside a searched corpus accumulate over time and favour older filings.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to autopilot and autoland systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where momentum sits now
The ranked leaders hold most of the volume, but recent-year filing activity has slowed even among the largest holders — a signal worth separating from historical share.
One assignee holds nearly a quarter of the field
The leading assignee's 392 records sit well ahead of fifth place at 53, meaning its portfolio shapes what freedom-to-operate looks like across most of the core claim space in this dataset.
Depth beyond the leader is real but thins fast
Combined, the top 10 hold 1,109 of 1,589 records. Tenth place holds just 22, meaning the drop from the leading group to the broader ranked field is steep rather than gradual.
Even the largest holders have slowed filing
The leading assignee filed only 2 records in the latest year, down 85% year over year, and several other major holders show zero filings in the same period. This tracks the broader 2021-2024 pull-back rather than signalling exit from the field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Honeywell International Inc | 2 | -85% |
| INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC | 1 | 0% |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | — |
| Rockwell Collins Inc | 0 | — |
| GE Aviation Systems LLC | 0 | — |
| Sperry Corporation | 0 | — |
| SAFE FLIGHT INSTR CORP | 0 | — |
| Airbus Operations SAS | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it thins out. The next step is testing a specific claim or design concept against it directly.
Check freedom-to-operate on a specific mechanism
Run a candidate glide slope, flare or rollout claim against the leading assignees' active families before committing engineering time to it.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack momentum, not just historical share
Concentration figures describe the past decade; year-over-year filing counts describe what is happening now. Watch both before assuming a leader's position is static.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaAutopilot and autoland patents: frequently asked questions
One assignee leads clearly with 392 of the 1,589 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked holder at 53. The top five assignees combined hold 972 records, or 61.2% of all records in scope, meaning a small group has shaped the core claim space in glide slope capture, autoflare and related functions. Beyond the top ten, holdings drop off quickly, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants making up the rest of the ranked field.
Filing volume fell from a peak of 90 in 2022 to 38 in 2024, a decline of 55% documented over that three-year span. However, patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as proof the field has gone quiet. The more reliable read is that activity cooled from an unusually active 2021-2022 period rather than that innovation has stopped.
Two IPC subclasses dominate: G05D, covering control of non-electric variables, appears in 37.1% of the 1,589 records, and G08G, traffic control systems, in 32.4%. Aircraft equipment (B64D) and navigation and gyroscope systems (G01C) both feature in roughly a quarter of records. Because a single patent can carry several classification codes, these percentages overlap rather than sum to 100%, and the pattern shows the field is claimed mainly at the control-logic and traffic-management level rather than at the airframe or propulsion-hardware level.
US3994455A, granted to The Boeing Company in 1976, claims an automatic approach pitch axis control system using an exponential control law for glide slope capture, with an altitude-rate command coupler that handles the capture manoeuvre from above or below the beam. It is a foundational reference for glide slope capture logic that predates almost all of the 1,589 records in the current dataset. While the specific patent term has long since expired, its approach — decreasing beam-error-driven capture — remains a conceptual baseline that later, still-active filings build on or design around.
The technology composition data shows gas-turbine integration (F02C) present in only 3.3% of records, well below the 25-37% range of the core control, traffic and navigation classes, suggesting autothrottle-to-engine integration claims are comparatively under-filed relative to control logic alone. Sub-areas tied to newer operating conditions — crosswind-adapted rollout guidance, GNSS-degraded runway alignment, and flare-law adaptation for variable loading — are not separately broken out in the classification data but are consistent with functions named in the search scope that see little concentrated ownership among the top holders. A freedom-to-operate check against the leading assignees' active families is the appropriate next step before relying on this as a filing strategy.
Research Autopilot and Autoland Systems in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole autopilot and autoland systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.