Book a demo

Autopilot and Autoland Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Autopilot and Autoland Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/autopilot-and-autoland-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent landscape · Fly-by-wire flight control
Autopilot and autoland systems: patents behind glide slope capture, autoflare and rollout guidance
  • 61.2% concentration. The top five assignees hold 972 of the 1,589 records in scope — this is a field claimed early and defended hard by a small group.
  • Filing cooled after 2021. From 84 filings in 2021 to 38 in 2024, a documented -55% move over three years, after a 2022 peak of 90.
  • Control and traffic classes dominate. G05D and G08G each cover close to a third of all records, while gas-turbine integration (F02C) sits at just 3.3%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,589
Published Records
61%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-55%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (84 records) with 2024 (38) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,589 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 1,589 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine autopilot, automatic landing or flight-director claims with specific approach-and-landing functions: glide slope capture, automatic flare, rollout guidance, autothrottle, decision height logic or runway alignment. The scope is deliberately narrow — it excludes general autopilot claims that never touch the approach-to-landing phase, and excludes landing-gear or braking hardware that does not reference flight-control logic.

Filing activity in this set traces a rise into a 2022 peak and a pull-back since, though the two most recent years are still filling in under normal publication lag. Family counts, not raw document counts, are used throughout so that continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing by the largest assignees do not distort the picture.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC392
  2. 2THE BOEING CO372
  3. 3ROCKWELL COLLINS INC90
  4. 4INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC65
  5. 5GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC53
  6. 6AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)38
  7. 7GENERAL ELECTRIC CO26
  8. 8GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE CORP26
  9. 9GARMIN INTERNATIONAL INC25
  10. 10PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP22
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,589-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A 2022 peak, then a documented pull-back

Filings ran from 67 in 2017 to a peak of 90 in 2022, then declined to 38 by 2024 — a -55% move over the 2021-2024 span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still climbing as publications catch up with filing dates roughly 18 months earlier, so this is not evidence the field has gone quiet.

A 2022 peak, then a documented pull-back0255075100672017201820192020202190202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control and traffic logic outweigh airframe and propulsion classes

G05D (control of non-electric variables) and G08G (traffic control systems) each touch roughly a third of the 1,589 records, with B64D (aircraft equipment) and G01C (navigation and gyroscopes) close behind. Gas-turbine integration under F02C appears in only 3.3% of records, suggesting autothrottle claims are written mostly at the control-logic level rather than tied to specific engine hardware.

Control and traffic logic outweigh airframe and propulsion classesG05D · Control of non-electric variab…59037.1%G08G · Traffic control systems51532.4%B64D · Aircraft equipment46028.9%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…41025.8%B64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters20713.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…19912.5%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning16610.4%F02C · Gas-turbine plants533.3%Other54234.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,589 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Autopilot and Autoland Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about autopilot and autoland systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational filings

The patents that shaped this space

Representative early filing
US3994455A1976-11-30

US3994455A — Automatic approach pitch axis control system for aircraft

THE BOEING COMPANY

The invention relates to a system utilizing an exponential control law for glide slope capture. The capture maneuver from above or below the beam, is a function of decreasing glide slope beam error. The present autopilot approach coupler is an altitude rate command system which provides switchless signal processing during glide slope capture, and tracking.Filed by The Boeing Company, granted 1976-11-30 — a foundational glide slope capture reference that predates the bulk of the dataset.

US3994455A — patent drawing 1US3994455A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030093187A1PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai…977
2US6112141AApparatus and method for graphically oriented aircraft display and control750
3US20050187677A1PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai…595
4US5714948ASatellite based aircraft traffic control system527
5US6965816B2PFN/TRAC system FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of airc…489
6US5978715AApparatus and method for aircraft display and control355
7US6057786AApparatus and method for aircraft display and control including head up display266
8US6038498AApparatus and method for aircraft monitoring and control including electronic check-list management263
9US6154151AIntegrated vertical situation display for aircraft223
10US20030225492A1Flight data transmission via satellite link and ground storage of data220

Citation counts favour older filings within this searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape signals

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the concentration, timing and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
61.2%
of all 1,589 records held by top 5

A small group set the terms early

With 972 of 1,589 records held by five assignees, and the leader alone holding 392, claim space in core autopilot and autoland logic is dense. New entrants are more likely to find room in adjacent integration claims than in glide slope capture or autoflare logic itself.

Based on the assignee ranking of 100 companies
Timing
-55%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Volume has pulled back from its 2022 peak

Filings fell from 84 in 2021 to 38 in 2024 after peaking at 90 in 2022. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025-2026 figures will rise as they fill in — treat the recent pull-back as directional, not final.

Peak year: 2022 at 90 filings
Citation profile
977
citations on the most-cited record

Influence sits with older, broad-scope filings

The most-cited records in this set date back well before the 2015-2026 window and describe broad remote-control and accountability systems rather than narrow autoland mechanics, which is typical: citation counts inside a searched corpus accumulate over time and favour older filings.

Top five cited records span 489 to 977 citations
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to autopilot and autoland systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive set

Who holds the ground, and where momentum sits now

The ranked leaders hold most of the volume, but recent-year filing activity has slowed even among the largest holders — a signal worth separating from historical share.

Leader
392
records held

One assignee holds nearly a quarter of the field

The leading assignee's 392 records sit well ahead of fifth place at 53, meaning its portfolio shapes what freedom-to-operate looks like across most of the core claim space in this dataset.

Fifth place: 53 records
Long tail
69.8%
of records held by top 10

Depth beyond the leader is real but thins fast

Combined, the top 10 hold 1,109 of 1,589 records. Tenth place holds just 22, meaning the drop from the leading group to the broader ranked field is steep rather than gradual.

Tenth place: 22 records
Recent momentum
-85% YoY
leader's latest-year change

Even the largest holders have slowed filing

The leading assignee filed only 2 records in the latest year, down 85% year over year, and several other major holders show zero filings in the same period. This tracks the broader 2021-2024 pull-back rather than signalling exit from the field.

One mid-tier holder held flat at 0% YoY
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the technology composition data shows lighter density relative to the core control and traffic classes.
Autothrottle-engine integration logicDecision-height computation methodsRunway alignment under GNSS degradationRollout guidance for crosswind conditionsFlare-law adaptation for variable aircraft loading
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Honeywell International Inc2-85%
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS & SUPPORT INC10%
The Boeing Company0
Rockwell Collins Inc0
GE Aviation Systems LLC0
Sperry Corporation0
SAFE FLIGHT INSTR CORP0
Airbus Operations SAS0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it thins out. The next step is testing a specific claim or design concept against it directly.

Check freedom-to-operate on a specific mechanism

Run a candidate glide slope, flare or rollout claim against the leading assignees' active families before committing engineering time to it.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka

Track momentum, not just historical share

Concentration figures describe the past decade; year-over-year filing counts describe what is happening now. Watch both before assuming a leader's position is static.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Common questions

Autopilot and autoland patents: frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Autopilot and Autoland Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Autopilot and Autoland Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole autopilot and autoland systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.