https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/auxiliary-power-units-for-aircraft-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aircraft Systems
Auxiliary Power Unit Patents in Aircraft: Who Files, What They Claim
  • 66.5% concentration. The top 5 assignees account for 103 of the 155 records in scope — this field is held by a small group of engine and airframe majors, not a fragmented crowd.
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. Filings peaked at 19 in 2019 and the 2022 midpoint sits back at 10, a flat-to-declining trend rather than a growth curve — though the most recent year is always understated by publication lag.
  • Claims cluster in two IPC subclasses. B64D aircraft equipment and F02C gas-turbine plants together dominate the record set, while control, combustion and electric-machine subclasses each hold single-digit percentage shares.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
155
Published Records
66%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-77%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Auxiliary power unit patenting sits at the intersection of gas-turbine engineering and aircraft systems integration: claims range from bleed air supply and starter-generator design to altitude start capability, fuel consumption and maintenance interval improvements. The search scope pulls 155 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from IPC classes covering gas-turbine plants (F02C6, F02C7) and aircraft equipment (B64D41).

Records here are counted as patent families, which is the fairer unit for comparing assignees across jurisdictions since it removes the effect of continuation filings and multi-country duplicates. The dataset skews toward established turbine and airframe manufacturers rather than new entrants, and receiving-office data shows filing activity concentrated in the United States and at the EPO.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC49
  2. 2PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP19
  3. 3RTX CORP14
  4. 4AIRBUS OPERATIONS SL14
  5. 5SAFRAN POWER UNITS7
  6. 6HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP6
  7. 7EMBRAER SA6
  8. 8YABORA IND AERONAUTICA SA5
  9. 9SAFRAN HELICOPTER ENGINES5
  10. 10AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 155-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records split across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 19 in 2019, then settled near the 2022 midpoint of 10 — a flat-to-declining pattern through the most recent full years. The final year in the chart is partial because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2026's true total will read higher once later filings publish.

Filing trend, 2017–202605101520102017201819201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B64D (aircraft equipment) appears in 78.1% of the 155 records and F02C (gas-turbine plants) in 60.0%, confirming that most APU claims are written jointly across airframe integration and turbine engineering. Smaller shares in F01D, B64C, H02K, F02B, F02D and F23R show where claim activity is thinner — each under 10% of records — though a record can carry more than one class, so these figures do not sum to 100%.

IPC subclass compositionB64D · Aircraft equipment12178.1%F02C · Gas-turbine plants9360.0%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines149.0%B64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters127.7%H02K · Electric motors & generators117.1%F02B · Internal-combustion engines95.8%F02D · Engine control63.9%F23R · Combustion chambers63.9%Other6541.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 155 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about auxiliary power units for aircraft and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Filing
US20060218934A12006-10-05

Auxiliary power unit with integral firebox — Honeywell International

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

An auxiliary power unit with integral firebox provides an integral unit for aircraft to utilize an APU without the use of a separate firebox. The design comprises a turbomachine intake air duct secured to an enclosure with a bleed air port extending from the combustor to outside of the enclosure, with an APU secured inside. The unit is described as retrofittable to existing aircraft or installable in newly built aircraft.Filed by Honeywell International, published 2006-10-05.

US20060218934A1 — patent drawing 1US20060218934A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20060260323A1Aircraft with disengageable engine and auxiliary power unit components388
2US6305156B1Integrated bleed air and engine starting system195
3US7805947B2Aircraft with disengageable engine and auxiliary power unit components108
4US5201798AMultifunction integrated power unit and power transfer apparatus therefor88
5US6450447B1Auxiliary power unit for an aircraft65
6US7251942B2Integrated gearless and nonlubricated auxiliary power unit62
7US3680309ATwo-spool auxiliary power unit and control means61
8US4759178AAircraft auxiliary power unit59
9US5309708AMultifunction integrated power unit57
10US20080066470A1Advanced hydrogen auxiliary power unit53

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data above.

Concentration
66.5%
of 155 records held by top 5

A small group holds most of the claim space

The top 5 assignees account for 103 of 155 records and the top 10 for 130 — 83.9% of the field. New entrants are filing into a space where the largest engine and airframe manufacturers already hold a majority of the claims, which raises the bar for a freedom-to-operate review before committing to a design direction.

Based on the 30-company ranked list returned for this search.
Momentum
19 in 2019
peak filing year

Filing has not grown since its 2019 high

Volume climbed from 10 in 2017 to 19 in 2019, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 10. That pattern reads as flat-to-declining rather than an emerging technology still gaining filers, though the last one to two years of any trend are always undercounted by publication lag.

Trend covers 2017 through the 2026 data cut-off.
Citation influence
388 citations
top-cited record

Early disengageable-component filings still anchor the field

The most-cited record in this set, on disengageable engine and APU components, carries 388 citations — well ahead of the next-ranked records. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside the corpus, not that the underlying approach is still the preferred design today.

Citation counts are corpus-internal, not global.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to auxiliary power units for aircraft, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the room to move sits

The ranked list of 30 companies is dominated by a handful of engine OEMs and airframe integrators, with a long tail of single- or low-digit filers behind them.

Leader
49 records
leading assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 49 of the 155 records in scope, more than four times the fifth-place count of 7 — a gap wide enough that any competitive filing strategy here has to account for one dominant portfolio rather than a level field.

Counted in patent families.
Mid-field
7 at fifth, 5 at tenth
records held

The drop-off after the leader is steep, then flattens

Positions five and ten sit close together at 7 and 5 records respectively, meaning the real competitive tier below the leader is fairly even — no single challenger is close to catching up on volume alone.

Based on the 30-company ranking.
Collaboration
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and mostly internal

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest of them links two divisions of the same corporate group. Cross-company joint filing is not a visible pattern here — most assignees are protecting their own portfolios independently.

Strongest pair recorded 4 shared filings.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Subclasses with single-digit-percentage record shares suggest room short of the dominant bleed-air and turbine-plant claim clusters.
Engine control integration (F02D)Combustion chamber design for APU-scale units (F23R)Electric starter-generator machine design (H02K)Internal-combustion APU variants (F02B)Non-positive turbine component claims (F01D)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Honeywell International Inc.0
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp0
Airbus Operations GmbH0
United Technologies Corp0
RTX Corp0
Safran Power Units0
Embraer SA0
Hamilton Sundstrand Corp0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a mature, concentrated field with flat recent filing — the open questions are about defensibility and design-around room, not about discovering a new leader.

Run a freedom-to-operate check before finalising a design

With 83.9% of records held by the top 10 assignees, any new APU subsystem design should be checked against the leading portfolios' claims before committing to a bleed-air or starter-generator architecture.

Explore FTO workflows in Eureka

Map the under-claimed subclasses against your roadmap

F02D, F23R, H02K, F02B and F01D each hold single-digit shares of the 155 records — worth a closer read if your roadmap touches engine control, combustion chamber design or starter-generator machines.

Build a white-space map in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about APU patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Auxiliary Power Units for Aircraft in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole auxiliary power units for aircraft corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.