Book a demo

Terrain Awareness System Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Terrain Awareness System Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/avionics-and-flight-control-terrain-awareness-system-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Avionics & Flight Control
Terrain awareness system patents: who is filing, and where the field is heading
Get a prior-art report on your approach
25.6K
Published Records
20%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-17%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,405 records) with 2024 (1,169) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 25,598 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What terrain awareness system patents cover

Terrain awareness systems sit at the intersection of flight-deck safety electronics and the sensing, positioning and processing stacks that feed them. The 25,598 records in this scope span classical radar-based terrain warning through to database-driven and vision-augmented approaches, reflecting decades of iteration on a single problem: telling a pilot, or an autonomous system, when the ground is coming up faster than expected. Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS) lineage anchors the field, but the class mix shows the boundary has widened well past avionics hardware into general navigation, wireless networking and image processing.

The filing footprint is dominated by United States receiving-office activity, with meaningful volume also filed into the EPO and via the PCT route, which points to a field where multinational aerospace and avionics suppliers still treat US filing as the anchor jurisdiction before extending coverage abroad.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC3,155
  2. 2THE BOEING CO629
  3. 3THALES SA535
  4. 4ROCKWELL COLLINS INC479
  5. 5DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS INC405
  6. 6QUALCOMM INC384
  7. 7TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK335
  8. 8BAE SYSTEMS PLC313
  9. 9SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP216
  10. 10ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD176
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 25,598 records from different angles: one tracks when the filings happened, the other tracks what they claim.

A cooling filing curve, not a dying one

Annual filings rose from 892 in 2017 to a peak of 1,405 in 2021, then eased to 1,169 by 2024 — a -17% move over that three-year window. Years after 2024 in the raw data show lower counts still, but that reflects publication lag of roughly 18 months rather than an actual drop in filing behaviour; those most recent years will keep filling in as records publish.

A cooling filing curve, not a dying one03757501,1251,50089220172018201920201,405202120222023202420251252026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit

G08G (traffic control systems) and G06F (electric digital data processing) are the two largest classes, each covering roughly 13-14% of records, ahead of G01C (navigation and gyroscopes) at 12.7% and G05D (control of non-electric variables) at 10.2%. G01S (radar, sonar and positioning), H04W (wireless networks), G06T (image processing) and B64D (aircraft equipment specifically) round out the picture — B64D's comparatively modest 6.4% share is notable given the field's aviation roots, suggesting much of the recent claim activity is landing in general-purpose data and sensing classes rather than aircraft-specific hardware.

Where the claims sitG08G · Traffic control systems3,64114.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…3,43913.4%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…3,24112.7%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…2,60710.2%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning2,55910.0%H04W · Wireless communication networks2,4379.5%G06T · Image data processing & genera…1,9007.4%B64D · Aircraft equipment1,6486.4%Other22,77389.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 25,598 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about avionics & flight control: terrain awareness system patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative record
US7633430B12009-12-15

Terrain awareness system with false alert suppression (US7633430B1)

ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.

A terrain awareness and warning system includes electronics for receiving radar returns and providing terrain and/or obstacle alerts or warnings in response to the radar returns. The electronics receives information from a database and the information is utilized to suppress false alerts or warnings.Filed by Rockwell Collins, this 2009 grant sits squarely in the false-alert-suppression branch of terrain warning, a recurring theme across the dataset's most defensible claims.

US7633430B1 — patent drawing 1US7633430B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090254572A1Digital information infrastructure and method2,827
2US6606744B1Providing collaborative installation management in a network-based supply chain environment2,512
3US6571282B1Block-based communication in a communication services patterns environment2,353
4US20130278631A13D positioning of augmented reality information2,103
5US20080004904A1Systems and methods for providing interoperability among healthcare devices1,924
6US20170006135A1Systems, methods, and devices for an enterprise internet-of-things application development platform1,906
7US20130127980A1Video display modification based on sensor input for a see-through near-to-eye display1,897
8US20100250497A1Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) hardened information infrastructure with extractor, cloud dispersal, secure stora…1,776
9US20080001735A1Mesh network personal emergency response appliance1,720
10US7100195B1Managing user information on an e-commerce system1,649

Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records are structurally favoured — treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the concentration and the trend together

Three patterns stand out once filing volume and technology class are viewed side by side: where the field is dense, where it is thinning, and where the class mix is shifting away from aviation-specific hardware.

Concentration
20.3%
top 5 share of all records

A strong core, not a monopoly

The leading assignee alone holds 3,155 records, but the top 5 combined still account for only 20.3% of the 25,598 records in scope, and the top 10 just 25.9%. That leaves roughly three-quarters of filing activity spread across a long tail of contributors, which is unusual for a field this mature.

Read against the assignee ranking table
Momentum
-17%
2021 to 2024 change

Past-peak, not in decline

Filing rose steadily to a 2021 peak of 1,405 records before easing to 1,169 by 2024. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, years closer to the data cut-off will always look lighter than they eventually turn out to be — the -17% figure is the most defensible read of direction available in this dataset.

Compare against the annual trend chart
Technology mix
6.4%
B64D share of records

Aircraft-specific hardware is a minority class

Aircraft equipment claims (B64D) sit behind traffic control, data processing, navigation and radar/positioning classes. The field's centre of gravity has moved toward general sensing and software claims that could, in principle, migrate to other vehicle types.

See the IPC composition chart
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to avionics & flight control: terrain awareness system patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish the shape of the field. Turning that shape into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim.

Map claim scope against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 3,155 records, understanding exactly which sub-claims it has staked out is the first step before drafting anything adjacent.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches as they fill in

Wireless-fed updates and non-aircraft adaptation show thinner density today; that can change quickly once a well-resourced filer moves in.

Monitor white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about terrain awareness system patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Avionics & Flight Control: Terrain Awareness System Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole avionics & flight control: terrain awareness system patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.