Book a demo

Axial Compressor Aerodynamics Patents: Who Leads, White Space 2026

Axial Compressor Aerodynamics Patents: Who Leads, White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/axial-compressor-aerodynamics-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Fan & Compressor Aerodynamics
Axial compressor aerodynamics patents: mapping who holds the claim space and where it is still open
  • 76.9% concentration. The top five assignees account for 971 of the 1,263 records in scope — a field with one dominant filer and a long tail behind it.
  • Filing has plateaued, not collapsed. Annual filings moved from 31 in 2021 to 29 in 2024, a -6% shift over that span; 2025-2026 figures are still filling in under normal publication lag.
  • Combustion-adjacent classes dominate. F02C gas-turbine plants (35.8%) and F23R combustion chambers (35.5%) outrank pure aerodynamics classes, showing compressor claims are usually filed as part of engine-system disclosures.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,263
Published Records
77%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (31 records) with 2024 (29) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,263 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 1,263 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine axial-flow-compressor terminology (“axial flow compressor”, “high pressure compressor”, “compressor blade row”) with aerodynamic-performance concepts such as diffusion factor, incidence angle, endwall loss, corner separation, stage matching and polytropic efficiency. The scope is deliberately narrow: it captures compressor aerodynamics claims wherever they surface, whether filed as standalone blade-row inventions or folded into gas-turbine and combustion-system disclosures.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was. Treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons, and read 2025-2026 as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1RTX CORP456
  2. 2UNITED TECH CORP238
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO121
  4. 4ROLLS ROYCE PLC116
  5. 5JETOPTERA INC40
  6. 6PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP36
  7. 7HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC25
  8. 8IOWA STATE UNIV RES FOUND INC16
  9. 9SPACEROLLS AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED15
  10. 10GARRETT TRANSPORTATION I INC10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,263-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 114 in 2017 to a peak of 119 in 2018, then held in a comparable band through the early 2020s. The 2021-to-2024 comparison — 31 down to 29 records, a -6% move — is the cleanest recent read; years after 2024 are still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as a decline.

Filing trend, 2017-2026030609012011420171192018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F23R (combustion chambers) each cover roughly a third of the 1,263 records, ahead of F01D (turbines, 34.5%) and F04D (non-positive-displacement pumps, 22.2%). Aircraft-specific classes B64C and B64D sit further down at 6.2% and 5.2%. Because records carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read individually against the 1,263-record total, not against each other as parts of a whole.

IPC subclass compositionF02C · Gas-turbine plants45235.8%F23R · Combustion chambers44835.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines43634.5%F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps28122.2%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion12710.1%F23M · Furnace casings & linings12610.0%B64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters786.2%B64D · Aircraft equipment665.2%Other41332.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,263 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about axial compressor aerodynamics and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative disclosure

Representative record
US20120070267A12012-03-22

Axial Flow Compressor, Gas Turbine System Having the Axial Flow Compressor and Method of Modifying the Axial Flow Compressor

MITSUBISHI POWER, LTD.

The disclosure addresses blade loading on the last-stage stator vane of an axial flow compressor during partial-load operation. It sets the blade loading of the first, most-upstream stator vane below that of a second downstream stator vane, redistributing loading across two or more stator vanes positioned downstream of the last rotor blade in the annular flow passage.Filed by Mitsubishi Power in 2012, this record illustrates a common pattern in the corpus: stage-matching and blade-loading claims filed as modifications to an existing compressor architecture rather than as a new stage design.

US20120070267A1 — patent drawing 1US20120070267A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040219079A1Trifluid reactor237
2US6195983B1Leaned and swept fan outlet guide vanes227
3US7523603B2Trifluid reactor222
4US7416137B2Thermodynamic cycles using thermal diluent185
5US5397215AFlow directing assembly for the compression section of a rotary machine176
6US4976102AUnducted, counterrotating gearless front fan engine170
7US20040238654A1Thermodynamic cycles using thermal diluent166
8US5088892ABowed airfoil for the compression section of a rotary machine161
9US20070234702A1Thermodynamic cycles with thermal diluent148
10US6364602B1Method of air-flow measurement and active operating limit line management for compressor surge avoidance144

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, composition and citation data above.

Concentration
76.9%
of 1,263 records held by top 5 assignees

One filer sets the density of this field

The leading assignee alone accounts for 456 records, and the top five together hold 971 of the 1,263 records in scope — 76.9%. That level of concentration means most incremental blade-row and stage-matching claims are being filed against a dense prior-art base controlled by a small number of players, not against open ground.

Top 5 = 971 of 1,263 records
Growth
-6%
2021 (31) to 2024 (29) filings

Plateau, not decline

Annual filings moved from 31 in 2021 to 29 in 2024. That is a mild pull-back, not a collapse, and it should be read alongside the fact that 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete under normal publication lag rather than as evidence the field is winding down.

2021: 31 records → 2024: 29 records
Composition
35.8%
of records in F02C, gas-turbine plants

Compressor claims travel inside engine-system filings

F02C and F23R each cover more than a third of the 1,263 records, ahead of the aerodynamics-adjacent F01D and F04D classes. That pattern says compressor aerodynamics inventions are more often protected as part of a broader gas-turbine or combustion-chamber filing than as a standalone blade-row patent.

F02C 35.8% · F23R 35.5% · F01D 34.5%
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to axial compressor aerodynamics, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has cooled

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted by record; it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, it is the full list the data endpoint returns.

Leader
456 records
leading assignee

A single filer dominates the ranking

The top-ranked assignee holds 456 of the 1,263 records — more than a third of the entire corpus on its own — before the field drops sharply toward fifth place at 40 records and tenth place at 10.

1st: 456 · 5th: 40 · 10th: 10
Momentum
0 to -100% YoY
recent-year change among leading assignees

Recent-year activity has cooled across the leaders

Latest-year momentum among the top filers ranges from flat to sharply down: one assignee held steady at 0% YoY with a single record, while several others recorded 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% YoY move from the prior year's activity.

Latest-year filings: 0-1 records among leading assignees
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and specific

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus. The strongest links pair an engine manufacturer with a university research foundation, suggesting collaborative filings cluster around applied-research partnerships rather than broad industry consortia.

Strongest pair: 7 shared records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thin representation relative to the core gas-turbine and combustion classes above.
Corner-separation control in low-aspect-ratio statorsEndwall-loss reduction via non-axisymmetric hub contouringStage-matching for variable-speed compressor operationDiffusion-factor limits in transonic rotor bladingIncidence-angle tolerance in off-design partial-load operation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Raytheon Technologies Corp10%
General Electric Co1-50%
United Technologies Corp0
Rolls-Royce plc0-100%
Jetoptera Inc0-100%
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp0-100%
Honeywell International Inc0
SpaceRolls Aerospace Technologies Private Limited0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee

With one filer holding 456 of 1,263 records, any new blade-row or stage-matching claim should be checked against that portfolio first, before the rest of the top-five concentration.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Test claim language in the under-claimed branches

Corner-separation control and non-axisymmetric endwall contouring show thinner representation than the core gas-turbine classes — worth a targeted prior-art pull before drafting.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track momentum, not just totals

Several leading assignees show 0 filings in the latest complete year against prior activity, a -100% YoY shift. Watching who resumes filing first is a useful signal for competitive tracking.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Axial Compressor Aerodynamics in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole axial compressor aerodynamics corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.