Axial Compressor Aerodynamics Patents: Who Leads, White Space 2026
- 76.9% concentration. The top five assignees account for 971 of the 1,263 records in scope — a field with one dominant filer and a long tail behind it.
- Filing has plateaued, not collapsed. Annual filings moved from 31 in 2021 to 29 in 2024, a -6% shift over that span; 2025-2026 figures are still filling in under normal publication lag.
- Combustion-adjacent classes dominate. F02C gas-turbine plants (35.8%) and F23R combustion chambers (35.5%) outrank pure aerodynamics classes, showing compressor claims are usually filed as part of engine-system disclosures.
Filing growth compares 2021 (31 records) with 2024 (29) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,263 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This review covers 1,263 patent records published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine axial-flow-compressor terminology (“axial flow compressor”, “high pressure compressor”, “compressor blade row”) with aerodynamic-performance concepts such as diffusion factor, incidence angle, endwall loss, corner separation, stage matching and polytropic efficiency. The scope is deliberately narrow: it captures compressor aerodynamics claims wherever they surface, whether filed as standalone blade-row inventions or folded into gas-turbine and combustion-system disclosures.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was. Treat 2024 as the last complete year for growth comparisons, and read 2025-2026 as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,263-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings ran from 114 in 2017 to a peak of 119 in 2018, then held in a comparable band through the early 2020s. The 2021-to-2024 comparison — 31 down to 29 records, a -6% move — is the cleanest recent read; years after 2024 are still incomplete because of publication lag and should not be read as a decline.
IPC subclass composition
F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F23R (combustion chambers) each cover roughly a third of the 1,263 records, ahead of F01D (turbines, 34.5%) and F04D (non-positive-displacement pumps, 22.2%). Aircraft-specific classes B64C and B64D sit further down at 6.2% and 5.2%. Because records carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read individually against the 1,263-record total, not against each other as parts of a whole.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,263 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Axial Compressor Aerodynamics with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about axial compressor aerodynamics and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative disclosure
Axial Flow Compressor, Gas Turbine System Having the Axial Flow Compressor and Method of Modifying the Axial Flow Compressor
The disclosure addresses blade loading on the last-stage stator vane of an axial flow compressor during partial-load operation. It sets the blade loading of the first, most-upstream stator vane below that of a second downstream stator vane, redistributing loading across two or more stator vanes positioned downstream of the last rotor blade in the annular flow passage.Filed by Mitsubishi Power in 2012, this record illustrates a common pattern in the corpus: stage-matching and blade-loading claims filed as modifications to an existing compressor architecture rather than as a new stage design.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040219079A1 | Trifluid reactor | 237 |
| 2 | US6195983B1 | Leaned and swept fan outlet guide vanes | 227 |
| 3 | US7523603B2 | Trifluid reactor | 222 |
| 4 | US7416137B2 | Thermodynamic cycles using thermal diluent | 185 |
| 5 | US5397215A | Flow directing assembly for the compression section of a rotary machine | 176 |
| 6 | US4976102A | Unducted, counterrotating gearless front fan engine | 170 |
| 7 | US20040238654A1 | Thermodynamic cycles using thermal diluent | 166 |
| 8 | US5088892A | Bowed airfoil for the compression section of a rotary machine | 161 |
| 9 | US20070234702A1 | Thermodynamic cycles with thermal diluent | 148 |
| 10 | US6364602B1 | Method of air-flow measurement and active operating limit line management for compressor surge avoidance | 144 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the concentration, composition and citation data above.
One filer sets the density of this field
The leading assignee alone accounts for 456 records, and the top five together hold 971 of the 1,263 records in scope — 76.9%. That level of concentration means most incremental blade-row and stage-matching claims are being filed against a dense prior-art base controlled by a small number of players, not against open ground.
Plateau, not decline
Annual filings moved from 31 in 2021 to 29 in 2024. That is a mild pull-back, not a collapse, and it should be read alongside the fact that 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete under normal publication lag rather than as evidence the field is winding down.
Compressor claims travel inside engine-system filings
F02C and F23R each cover more than a third of the 1,263 records, ahead of the aerodynamics-adjacent F01D and F04D classes. That pattern says compressor aerodynamics inventions are more often protected as part of a broader gas-turbine or combustion-chamber filing than as a standalone blade-row patent.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to axial compressor aerodynamics, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where activity has cooled
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted by record; it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, it is the full list the data endpoint returns.
A single filer dominates the ranking
The top-ranked assignee holds 456 of the 1,263 records — more than a third of the entire corpus on its own — before the field drops sharply toward fifth place at 40 records and tenth place at 10.
Recent-year activity has cooled across the leaders
Latest-year momentum among the top filers ranges from flat to sharply down: one assignee held steady at 0% YoY with a single record, while several others recorded 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% YoY move from the prior year's activity.
Collaboration is limited and specific
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus. The strongest links pair an engine manufacturer with a university research foundation, suggesting collaborative filings cluster around applied-research partnerships rather than broad industry consortia.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Raytheon Technologies Corp | 1 | 0% |
| General Electric Co | 1 | -50% |
| United Technologies Corp | 0 | — |
| Rolls-Royce plc | 0 | -100% |
| Jetoptera Inc | 0 | -100% |
| Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp | 0 | -100% |
| Honeywell International Inc | 0 | — |
| SpaceRolls Aerospace Technologies Private Limited | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next questions depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying a filing gap.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee
With one filer holding 456 of 1,263 records, any new blade-row or stage-matching claim should be checked against that portfolio first, before the rest of the top-five concentration.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaTest claim language in the under-claimed branches
Corner-separation control and non-axisymmetric endwall contouring show thinner representation than the core gas-turbine classes — worth a targeted prior-art pull before drafting.
Run a white-space search in EurekaTrack momentum, not just totals
Several leading assignees show 0 filings in the latest complete year against prior activity, a -100% YoY shift. Watching who resumes filing first is a useful signal for competitive tracking.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
One assignee leads the ranked field with 456 of the 1,263 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked filer at 40 records. The top five assignees combined hold 971 records, or 76.9% of all records in scope, which means most new filings in this space are entering a field already dense with prior art from a small number of companies. The ranking itself covers 100 companies total, not just the leaders, so there is a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below the top ten.
Filings ran from 114 in 2017 to a peak of 119 in 2018, then held roughly steady before easing slightly from 31 records in 2021 to 29 in 2024, a -6% change. That is a mild pull-back rather than a sustained decline. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in any chart will look artificially low and should not be read as evidence the field is shrinking further.
The largest classes by record count are F02C, gas-turbine plants, at 35.8% of the 1,263 records, and F23R, combustion chambers, at 35.5%, followed by F01D, turbines and non-positive engines, at 34.5%. Aircraft-specific classes such as B64C and B64D cover a smaller share, around 6% and 5% respectively. Since a single record can carry several IPC codes, these percentages add up to well over 100% and each should be compared only against the 1,263-record total, not against one another as slices of a pie.
This Mitsubishi Power filing covers an axial flow compressor where two or more stator vanes are placed downstream of the last rotor blade, with the most-upstream stator vane's blade loading set deliberately lower than a second, further-downstream vane. It is a stage-matching and blade-loading distribution claim aimed at reducing loading stress on the last-stage stator vane during partial-load operation. It does not block axial compressor designs generally; it is specific to that particular loading arrangement across multiple downstream stator vanes, so alternative loading schedules or single-stator-vane configurations sit outside its claim scope.
The core gas-turbine and combustion classes (F02C, F23R, F01D) are heavily filed, but branches like corner-separation control in low-aspect-ratio stators, non-axisymmetric endwall contouring for loss reduction, and incidence-angle tolerance under off-design partial-load conditions show thinner representation relative to that core. These are not zero-filing areas, but they sit well below the density seen in the leading classes, which makes them worth a targeted prior-art search before assuming the space is occupied. Stage-matching for variable-speed operation is a related area worth checking given the corpus's emphasis on fixed-point performance metrics like diffusion factor and polytropic efficiency.
Research Axial Compressor Aerodynamics in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole axial compressor aerodynamics corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.