Book a demo

Backside Power Delivery Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Slow 2026

Backside Power Delivery Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Slow 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/backside-power-delivery-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors & Microelectronics · Patent Landscape
Backside power delivery patents: buried power rails, nano-TSVs and who actually holds the claims
  • Filing peaked in 2022 at 122 families and has not returned to that level since, despite the technology moving toward commercial node adoption — a sign claim space filled fast, then consolidated.
  • Momentum has reversed at the top of the field. IBM, Samsung, Intel and TSMC each show 0 filings in the latest year and a -100% year-on-year change, though publication lag means the newest filings are still working through the pipeline.
  • IBM anchors the densest collaboration cluster, co-filing with its own UK, China and Germany IP units — a pattern that points to centrally managed, multi-jurisdiction filing rather than external joint development.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
423
Published Records
78%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-36%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (94 records) with 2024 (60) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 423 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What backside power delivery patenting actually covers

Backside power delivery moves the power rail network from the front-side interconnect stack to the wafer’s backside, freeing front-side routing for signal lines and shrinking cell height. The claim activity in this dataset concentrates on three mechanics: buried power rails embedded in the substrate before backside reveal, backside metallization and via structures (including nano-TSV approaches) that connect the buried rail to a backside power delivery network, and the wafer-thinning and bonding sequence needed to expose and contact those structures reliably. Search terms and IPC codes in this landscape (H01L23/48, H01L21/768, H01L23/528) sit squarely in semiconductor device structure and interconnect classes, which is where the foundries and IDMs doing gate-all-around and nanosheet work are filing.

423 patent families span 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, concentrated almost entirely in H01L with heavy overlap into the H10W and H10D subclass groups that cover advanced transistor and interconnect structures. The receiving-office spread — dominated by the US, with EPO, PCT, Taiwan, China and South Korea all represented — tracks the geography of leading-edge logic fabrication rather than a broader consumer electronics footprint.

Filing activity by year, 2015–2026
  1. 1INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION181
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD47
  3. 3INTEL CORP46
  4. 4TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD37
  5. 5TOKYO ELECTRON LTD18
  6. 6INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)16
  7. 7IBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT13
  8. 8ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR BONDING TECHNOLOGIES INC11
  9. 9IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH9
  10. 10IBM CN9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 423-family dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A sharp rise, a 2022 peak, then a pullback

Filings moved from a single family in 2017 to a peak of 122 in 2022, then declined. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity — but the shape of the curve, rising fast and cresting mid-decade, matches a technology that moved from lab demonstration into foundry roadmap commitments and then saw its core claim space fill up.

A sharp rise, a 2022 peak, then a pullback03875113150120172018201920202021122202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in device structure, with memory and packaging as secondary fronts

H01L carries all 423 families, and the H10W and H10D subclass groups (252 and 103 respectively) show that most claims describe specific transistor and interconnect structures rather than generic device classes. H10B (memory manufacture, 19 families), G06F and B82Y appear as smaller adjacent fronts, and H02M (power conversion) barely registers — a sign that circuit-level power management claims have not migrated into this structural filing cluster.

Concentrated in device structure, with memory and packaging as secondary frontsH01L · Semiconductor devices423100.0%H10W25259.6%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)10324.3%H10B · Memory device manufacture194.5%H10P143.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…71.7%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications51.2%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)20.5%Other30.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 423 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about backside power delivery technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited filings and a recent representative claim

Representative recent filing
US12568814B22026-03-03

Buried power rail directly contacting backside power delivery network

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

An approach to form a semiconductor structure with a plurality of buried power rails in a semiconductor substrate where at least one buried power rail extends below the backside of the semiconductor substrate. The semiconductor structure provides at least one portion of the first metal layer of the backside power delivery network that surrounds a bottom portion of the buried power rail below the backside of the semiconductor substrate. The bottom portion of the buried power rail is in direct contact with the portion of the first metal layer of the backside power delivery network where the buried power rail and the first metal layer are composed of the same conductive material.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation, published 2026-03-03 as US12568814B2 — the most recent granted filing in this dataset directly claiming a buried rail in contact with the backside power network.

US12568814B2 — patent drawing 1US12568814B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US9570395B1Semiconductor device having buried power rail122
2US20200135634A1Buried Power Rail and Method Forming Same119
3US20190080969A1Semiconductor structure with buried power rail, integrated circuit and method for manufacturing the semicondu…83
4US20240186248A1Backside power delivery network76
5US20210399099A1Epitaxial backside contact73
6US20120292777A1Backside Power Delivery Using Die Stacking67
7US20200203276A1Vertical isolated gate field effect transistor integrated in a semiconductor chip62
8US20220406715A1Stacked FET integration with bspdn59
9US20240332267A1Interposer for backside power delivery network58
10US20220181258A1Power-tap pass-through to connect a buried power rail to front-side power distribution network57

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the citation table and the assignee momentum data.

Filing trajectory
122 in 2022, declining since
peak year filings

The core buried-rail claim space is largely staked

A single year, 2022, produced more filings than any two years before or since. New entrants filing on the basic buried-power-rail mechanic now face a dense prior-art floor; differentiation is more likely to succeed in the contact, metallization or thinning sequence around it than in the rail concept itself.

Based on year-by-year filing counts, 2015-2026.
Citation concentration
Top record cited 122 times
leading citation count

Influence sits with a handful of early structural patents

The most-cited records describe the buried power rail and backside power delivery network at a foundational structural level, filed years before the 2022 peak. Later filers cite these repeatedly, which is normal for an anchor claim but also means freedom-to-operate review should start there, not with recent filings.

Citation counts reflect activity inside the searched corpus and favour older records.
Assignee momentum
-100% YoY across leading filers
latest-year change

Every major incumbent shows zero filings in the latest year

IBM, Samsung, Intel and TSMC all report 0 filings and a -100% year-on-year change in the most recent year tracked. Given an 18-month publication lag, this is at least partly a reporting artefact rather than a real halt — but it also means the public record cannot yet confirm where these firms are filing next.

Momentum measured against each assignee's own prior-year filing count.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to backside power delivery technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Filing partnerships are internal, not cross-company
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT13
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM (China) Co., Ltd.9
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH9
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)IBM ISRAEL SCI & TECH LTD4
Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc.Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc.3
IBM (China) Co., Ltd.IBM ISRAEL SCI & TECH LTD3
Tokyo Electron LimitedTokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.2
IBM (China) Co., Ltd.IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH2

The strongest co-assignee pairs all link IBM's own regional IP entities to each other, not to outside partners — a pattern of centralized, multi-jurisdiction filing rather than joint development with external collaborators.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

The assignee landscape

Filing in this dataset concentrates among a small set of logic-fabrication incumbents, with momentum currently flat across the board.

Leading filer cluster
13 co-filed records
IBM + IBM UK IP dept.

IBM files across a coordinated internal network

IBM's strongest co-assignee links are to its own UK, China and Germany intellectual-property units, not to external partners. That points to a single filing strategy executed across jurisdictions rather than joint R&D with other companies.

Co-assignee pair counts from the 9 pairs identified in this dataset.
Foundry and IDM incumbents
0 filings, latest year
Samsung, Intel, TSMC

Leading-edge logic makers show no new public filings

Samsung, Intel and TSMC each show zero filings in the most recent year with a -100% year-on-year change, alongside IBM. This tracks the group most likely to be implementing backside power delivery on advanced nodes, which makes the current filing gap worth watching rather than reading as disengagement.

Momentum figures reflect the latest tracked year against each firm's prior year.
Equipment and research entrants
0 filings, latest year
imec, Tokyo Electron

Research consortia and equipment makers round out the field

Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) and Tokyo Electron also appear among the tracked assignees with zero latest-year filings. Their presence signals that process-equipment and pre-competitive research groups are active in this space alongside device manufacturers, even if recent public output has paused.

Assignee list drawn from the recent-momentum tracking in this dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a freedom-to-operate check before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense buried-rail and metallization core, where claim density is visibly lower.
Nano-TSV contact resistance reductionBackside metallization material selectionWafer-thinning defect control for buried railsBackside power network integration with memory (H10B) structuresPower-conversion circuitry co-design with backside delivery
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0-100%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0-100%
Intel Corporation0-100%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC)0-100%
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)0
Tokyo Electron Limited0
Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc.0
IBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a field with a staked core and an unclear near-term pipeline. Three ways to act on that.

Map claims around the citation anchors

Start freedom-to-operate review with the most-cited early records, since later filings build on them rather than replace them.

Explore citation trees in Eureka

Watch for the publication-lag catch-up

The zero-filing latest year across major incumbents is likely to revise upward as pending applications publish; re-check assignee momentum in 6-12 months.

Track assignee filings in Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed branches

Nano-TSV contact resistance and backside-memory integration show lower claim density than the core buried-rail mechanic — a narrower opening for new filings.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on backside power delivery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole backside power delivery technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.