Backside Power Delivery Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Slow 2026
- Filing peaked in 2022 at 122 families and has not returned to that level since, despite the technology moving toward commercial node adoption — a sign claim space filled fast, then consolidated.
- Momentum has reversed at the top of the field. IBM, Samsung, Intel and TSMC each show 0 filings in the latest year and a -100% year-on-year change, though publication lag means the newest filings are still working through the pipeline.
- IBM anchors the densest collaboration cluster, co-filing with its own UK, China and Germany IP units — a pattern that points to centrally managed, multi-jurisdiction filing rather than external joint development.
Filing growth compares 2021 (94 records) with 2024 (60) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 423 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What backside power delivery patenting actually covers
Backside power delivery moves the power rail network from the front-side interconnect stack to the wafer’s backside, freeing front-side routing for signal lines and shrinking cell height. The claim activity in this dataset concentrates on three mechanics: buried power rails embedded in the substrate before backside reveal, backside metallization and via structures (including nano-TSV approaches) that connect the buried rail to a backside power delivery network, and the wafer-thinning and bonding sequence needed to expose and contact those structures reliably. Search terms and IPC codes in this landscape (H01L23/48, H01L21/768, H01L23/528) sit squarely in semiconductor device structure and interconnect classes, which is where the foundries and IDMs doing gate-all-around and nanosheet work are filing.
423 patent families span 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, concentrated almost entirely in H01L with heavy overlap into the H10W and H10D subclass groups that cover advanced transistor and interconnect structures. The receiving-office spread — dominated by the US, with EPO, PCT, Taiwan, China and South Korea all represented — tracks the geography of leading-edge logic fabrication rather than a broader consumer electronics footprint.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 423-family dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A sharp rise, a 2022 peak, then a pullback
Filings moved from a single family in 2017 to a peak of 122 in 2022, then declined. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years understate true filing activity — but the shape of the curve, rising fast and cresting mid-decade, matches a technology that moved from lab demonstration into foundry roadmap commitments and then saw its core claim space fill up.
Concentrated in device structure, with memory and packaging as secondary fronts
H01L carries all 423 families, and the H10W and H10D subclass groups (252 and 103 respectively) show that most claims describe specific transistor and interconnect structures rather than generic device classes. H10B (memory manufacture, 19 families), G06F and B82Y appear as smaller adjacent fronts, and H02M (power conversion) barely registers — a sign that circuit-level power management claims have not migrated into this structural filing cluster.
Shares are the percentage of the 423 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about backside power delivery technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited filings and a recent representative claim
Buried power rail directly contacting backside power delivery network
An approach to form a semiconductor structure with a plurality of buried power rails in a semiconductor substrate where at least one buried power rail extends below the backside of the semiconductor substrate. The semiconductor structure provides at least one portion of the first metal layer of the backside power delivery network that surrounds a bottom portion of the buried power rail below the backside of the semiconductor substrate. The bottom portion of the buried power rail is in direct contact with the portion of the first metal layer of the backside power delivery network where the buried power rail and the first metal layer are composed of the same conductive material.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation, published 2026-03-03 as US12568814B2 — the most recent granted filing in this dataset directly claiming a buried rail in contact with the backside power network.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US9570395B1 | Semiconductor device having buried power rail | 122 |
| 2 | US20200135634A1 | Buried Power Rail and Method Forming Same | 119 |
| 3 | US20190080969A1 | Semiconductor structure with buried power rail, integrated circuit and method for manufacturing the semicondu… | 83 |
| 4 | US20240186248A1 | Backside power delivery network | 76 |
| 5 | US20210399099A1 | Epitaxial backside contact | 73 |
| 6 | US20120292777A1 | Backside Power Delivery Using Die Stacking | 67 |
| 7 | US20200203276A1 | Vertical isolated gate field effect transistor integrated in a semiconductor chip | 62 |
| 8 | US20220406715A1 | Stacked FET integration with bspdn | 59 |
| 9 | US20240332267A1 | Interposer for backside power delivery network | 58 |
| 10 | US20220181258A1 | Power-tap pass-through to connect a buried power rail to front-side power distribution network | 57 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, the citation table and the assignee momentum data.
The core buried-rail claim space is largely staked
A single year, 2022, produced more filings than any two years before or since. New entrants filing on the basic buried-power-rail mechanic now face a dense prior-art floor; differentiation is more likely to succeed in the contact, metallization or thinning sequence around it than in the rail concept itself.
Influence sits with a handful of early structural patents
The most-cited records describe the buried power rail and backside power delivery network at a foundational structural level, filed years before the 2022 peak. Later filers cite these repeatedly, which is normal for an anchor claim but also means freedom-to-operate review should start there, not with recent filings.
Every major incumbent shows zero filings in the latest year
IBM, Samsung, Intel and TSMC all report 0 filings and a -100% year-on-year change in the most recent year tracked. Given an 18-month publication lag, this is at least partly a reporting artefact rather than a real halt — but it also means the public record cannot yet confirm where these firms are filing next.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to backside power delivery technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | IBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT | 13 |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | IBM (China) Co., Ltd. | 9 |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH | 9 |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | IBM ISRAEL SCI & TECH LTD | 4 |
| Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc. | Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc. | 3 |
| IBM (China) Co., Ltd. | IBM ISRAEL SCI & TECH LTD | 3 |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc. | 2 |
| IBM (China) Co., Ltd. | IBM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH | 2 |
The strongest co-assignee pairs all link IBM's own regional IP entities to each other, not to outside partners — a pattern of centralized, multi-jurisdiction filing rather than joint development with external collaborators.
The assignee landscape
Filing in this dataset concentrates among a small set of logic-fabrication incumbents, with momentum currently flat across the board.
IBM files across a coordinated internal network
IBM's strongest co-assignee links are to its own UK, China and Germany intellectual-property units, not to external partners. That points to a single filing strategy executed across jurisdictions rather than joint R&D with other companies.
Leading-edge logic makers show no new public filings
Samsung, Intel and TSMC each show zero filings in the most recent year with a -100% year-on-year change, alongside IBM. This tracks the group most likely to be implementing backside power delivery on advanced nodes, which makes the current filing gap worth watching rather than reading as disengagement.
Research consortia and equipment makers round out the field
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) and Tokyo Electron also appear among the tracked assignees with zero latest-year filings. Their presence signals that process-equipment and pre-competitive research groups are active in this space alongside device manufacturers, even if recent public output has paused.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | -100% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea) | 0 | -100% |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) | 0 | -100% |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
| Adeia Semiconductor Bonding Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| IBM UNITED KINGDOM LTD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and assignee data point to a field with a staked core and an unclear near-term pipeline. Three ways to act on that.
Map claims around the citation anchors
Start freedom-to-operate review with the most-cited early records, since later filings build on them rather than replace them.
Explore citation trees in EurekaWatch for the publication-lag catch-up
The zero-filing latest year across major incumbents is likely to revise upward as pending applications publish; re-check assignee momentum in 6-12 months.
Track assignee filings in EurekaDraft around the under-claimed branches
Nano-TSV contact resistance and backside-memory integration show lower claim density than the core buried-rail mechanic — a narrower opening for new filings.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions on backside power delivery patents
Backside power delivery moves the power rail network from the front side of a chip's interconnect stack to its backside, typically by embedding buried power rails in the substrate and connecting them through backside metallization after wafer thinning. This frees front-side routing layers for signal interconnect only, which helps shrink standard-cell height at advanced nodes. The patent evidence in this dataset shows the core mechanic — a buried rail directly contacted by a backside metal layer — is already densely claimed by early filers, so new work tends to focus on the contact, thinning or integration steps around it.
IBM, Samsung, Intel and TSMC are the most prominent assignees tracked in this landscape, alongside research and equipment players such as imec and Tokyo Electron. IBM shows the densest internal co-filing network, coordinating across its US, UK, China and Germany intellectual-property units rather than filing jointly with outside companies. Notably, all of these leading filers show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which given normal publication lag likely reflects pending applications not yet public rather than an actual stop in R&D.
Filing volume rose from a single family in 2017 to a peak of 122 in 2022, then fell in the following years. That pattern is typical of a technology moving from early demonstration into a period where the foundational structural claims — the buried rail itself and its basic backside contact — get staked out quickly by a handful of filers, after which the pace of genuinely new structural claims slows. It does not mean R&D activity has stopped; publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent one to two years of this trend are understated in the public record.
US12568814B2, assigned to International Business Machines Corporation and published 2026-03-03, claims a semiconductor structure where a buried power rail extends below the substrate's backside and is in direct contact with a portion of the first metal layer of the backside power delivery network, with the rail and that metal layer made of the same conductive material. That same-material direct-contact detail is the specific feature to check against: any design routing a buried rail into direct contact with a backside first-metal layer using matching conductive materials sits close to this claim's scope and warrants a closer freedom-to-operate read rather than an assumption of clearance.
Based on IPC composition, the core buried-rail and backside-metallization structures under H01L, H10W and H10D are heavily claimed, while adjacent areas show visibly lower density: memory-specific integration (H10B, 19 families), data-processing co-design (G06F, 7 families), nanotechnology-scale contact approaches (B82Y, 5 families) and power-conversion circuit co-design (H02M, just 2 families) are comparatively open. Nano-TSV contact resistance reduction and wafer-thinning defect control for buried rails are two specific mechanics inside those adjacent areas worth a first-claim search before filing.
Research Backside Power Delivery Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole backside power delivery technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.