https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/bacterial-chassis-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent landscape · Synthetic biology & biomanufacturing
Bacterial chassis patents: mapping who holds the engineered-host claim space
  • 58.2% concentration. The five most active assignees account for 427 of 734 records in scope — a field with a narrow leadership tier rather than a broad crowd of filers.
  • Filings past their peak year. Annual filings rose to 61 in 2021 and fell to 30 by 2024, a documented -51% swing over that span, before the most recent, still-incomplete years.
  • Claims cluster in two IPC classes. C12N and A61K each cover roughly half of all 734 records, meaning most granted and pending claims sit on microorganism engineering or medicinal-preparation use, not on adjacent process or food applications.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
734
Published Records
58%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-51%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (61 records) with 2024 (30) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 734 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the bacterial chassis patent record shows

A bacterial chassis patent claims an engineered microbial host built to carry a gene construct, run a metabolic pathway, or produce a target metabolite under defined culture conditions. The 734 records in scope span filings from 2015 onward, concentrated around gene-construct design, strain engineering and downstream metabolite or therapeutic output rather than raw microbiology. Family-level counting is used throughout this dataset, which discounts continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction duplicates relative to raw document counts.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since declined through the last complete filing year on record. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final one or two years in any chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — that lag, not a real drop in activity, explains most of the tail.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1MACROGENICS INC260
  2. 2EVOLVA SA(CH)50
  3. 3SYNLOGIC OPERATING CO INC50
  4. 4DANSTAR FERMENT AG41
  5. 5ELIGO BIOSCI26
  6. 6THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIV20
  7. 7EVOLVA INC17
  8. 8LALLEMAND BIO INGREDIENTS USA LLC16
  9. 9C3 BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD16
  10. 10XOMA TECHNOLOGY LTD(US)15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 734 records: annual filing volume, and the IPC subclasses those filings sit under. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, the class shares below add up to more than the record total — that is expected, not an error.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings climbed from 22 in 2017 to a peak of 61 in 2021, then fell to 30 by 2024 — a documented -51% change over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the usual publication lag and should not be read as a continued slide.

Filing trend, 2017–2026020406080222017201820192020612021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC technology composition

C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) covers 59.9% of the 734 records and A61K (medicinal preparations) covers 47.8%, confirming that most claims tie chassis engineering to a therapeutic end use. C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) at 32.6% and A23L (foods) at just 6.8% mark where industrial and food-grade production claims remain comparatively thin.

IPC technology compositionC12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…44059.9%A61K · Medicinal preparations35147.8%C07K · Peptides & proteins30741.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…23932.6%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…8812.0%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages506.8%C07H · Sugars & nucleic acids415.6%A01H · New plants / plant breeding304.1%Other12917.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 734 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bacterial chassis patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative recent filing
WO2025073895A12025-04-10

Engineered microorganisms for improved production of metabolites (WO2025073895A1)

UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI

The filing describes strain improvement through a chromosomal deletion introduced near a target metabolic pathway or biosynthetic gene cluster, sized and positioned to change expression of that cluster in a primary or secondary metabolite-producing strain without disrupting the pathway itself.Filed by Univerza v Ljubljani, published 2025-04-10 — illustrates the current claim style: precise, positional genomic edits near a gene cluster rather than broad host-organism claims.

WO2025073895A1 — patent drawing 1WO2025073895A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2011109400A2Antibodies reactive with b7-h3, immunologically active fragments thereof and uses thereof869
2WO2010080538A1Covalent diabodies and uses thereof571
3WO2008157379A2Covalent diabodies and uses thereof406
4WO2013022989A2Recombinant production of steviol glycosides402
5WO2011153378A1Recombinant Production of Steviol Glycosides372
6WO2012018687A1Covalent diabodies and uses thereof314
7US20090060910A1Covalent diabodies and uses thereof312
8US20100174053A1Covalent diabodies and uses thereof307
9US20120294796A1Antibodies Reactive with B7-H3 and Uses Thereof287
10WO2012162068A2Deimmunized serum-binding domains and their use for extending serum half-life207

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings from the dataset that change where a competitive or freedom-to-operate search should start.

Concentration
58.2% of 734 records
held by the top 5 assignees

Leadership is narrow, not fragmented

The five most active assignees hold 427 of the 734 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 511, or 69.6%. A new entrant filing near the core chassis-engineering claims is filing into occupied space, not a crowded but open field.

Source: assignee ranking, 734 records
Momentum
61 → 30
peak-year filings vs. 2024

The field has passed its filing peak

Annual filings peaked at 61 in 2021 and had fallen to 30 by 2024, a -51% change over that span. That decline predates the publication-lag window, so it reflects a real pullback in new filing rather than incomplete recent data.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2024
Claim geography
6.8% of 734 records
A23L food & beverage applications

Food and industrial uses are comparatively open

C12N and A61K dominate the claim set, together covering the large majority of records, while A23L food applications sit at just 6.8% and A01H plant-related claims at 4.1%. Chassis engineering aimed at food-grade or agricultural metabolite production carries far less prior art to route around.

Source: IPC composition, 734 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bacterial chassis patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where the gaps sit

The leader in this ranking holds 260 records against a fifth-place figure of 26 and a tenth-place figure of 15 — a steep drop-off that marks a genuine leadership tier rather than a gradual tail.

Leader
260 records
vs. 26 at fifth place

One assignee sets the pace by a wide margin

The leading assignee's record count is roughly ten times the tenth-place figure of 15, a gap size that is unusual even among concentrated fields and suggests a dominant early filer whose core claims other entrants have had to design around.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-tier
26 to 15 records
fifth through tenth place

A defined second tier, not a long flat tail

Positions five through ten hold between 26 and 15 records each — active, repeat filers rather than one-off entrants. Co-assignee pairings among several of these firms suggest joint development or licensing relationships worth checking before any freedom-to-operate conclusion.

Source: co-assignee pairs, assignee ranking
Momentum
0 to 1 in latest year
recent-year filings, ranked assignees

Recent-year activity has thinned even among leaders

Several of the assignees that built the largest portfolios show zero or a single filing in the latest year on record. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity, but the drop is consistent across most of the ranked leaders rather than isolated to one firm.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is visibly lower than the core chassis-engineering claims, based on the IPC composition above.
Food-grade metabolite chassis (A23L)Plant-associated microbial chassis (A01H)Nucleic-acid/sugar co-production pathways (C07H)Non-therapeutic industrial fermentation hostsChromosomal-deletion strain design near biosynthetic clusters
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Synlogic Operating Co Inc1
MacroGenics Inc (US)0
Evolva SA0
Eligo Bioscience0-100%
EVOLVA INC0
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University0
JOHNSON LESLIE S0
HUANG LING0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying open claim territory.

Check the leadership tier's core claims first

With 58.2% of all 734 records held by five assignees, any new filing near chassis-engineering or gene-construct claims should start with a freedom-to-operate read of that tier's granted claims, not a general prior-art sweep.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

A23L food applications and A01H plant-related claims sit well below the C12N and A61K core, at 6.8% and 4.1% of records respectively — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is occupied.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the post-peak filing shift

Filings fell from 61 in 2021 to 30 in 2024. Understanding which assignees pulled back versus which kept filing helps separate a maturing sub-field from one where activity has simply moved elsewhere.

Compare assignee momentum in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about bacterial chassis patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Bacterial Chassis Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole bacterial chassis patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.