Bacterial Chassis Promoter Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
Bacterial Chassis Promoter Engineering Patents: Who Leads and Where the Field Is Still Open
26.5% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 1,416 of the 5,348 records in scope, but the sixth-ranked filer onward drops off fast into a long tail. Annual filings peaked at 248 in 2017. Complete-year data shows a drop from 206 filings in 2021 to 80 in 2024, a 61% decline over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under normal publication lag and should not be read as a continuation of the decline until later data confirms it.
- 1OXFORD NANOPORE TECH LTD11.6%
- 2MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC4.1%
- 3RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA3.9%
- 4NOVOZYMES AS3.8%
- 5YALE UNIVERSITY3.0%
See the full bacterial chassis promoter engineering analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
How many patents exist for bacterial chassis promoter engineering?
There are 5,348 published patent records in this scope, covering filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. The search combines terms for engineered or recombinant bacterial hosts with promoter-mutation, operator-sequence, transcription-strength and reporter-assay language, restricted to the core genetic-engineering and DNA/enzyme measurement classification codes. This figure counts records, and patent families are the fairer unit for cross-jurisdiction comparison since they neutralise duplicate filings of the same invention in different countries.
Who are the leading companies filing bacterial promoter engineering patents?
The ranked leaders comprise 100 assignees identified in this dataset, with the top filer holding 620 records and a clear step down to the fifth-ranked filer at 159. The top 5 assignees combined account for 26.5% of all 5,348 records in scope, and the top 10 for 36.2%, so while there is a recognisable leading group, the majority of the field is held by a long tail of smaller filers. Several of the most active historical filers show negative year-on-year filing momentum in the latest complete year, which matters more for competitive tracking than the raw historical count.
Is patent filing in bacterial promoter engineering growing or slowing?
Filings are slowing on the complete-year data available: 2021 filings stood at 206 and fell to 80 by 2024, a 61% decline over that three-year span. The peak year in the dataset was 2017 at 248 filings. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not yet be read as confirmation the decline has continued or bottomed out.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bacterial Chassis Promoter Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.