Book a demo

SiC Dislocation Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

SiC Dislocation Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/basal-plane-dislocation-reduction-in-sic-crystals-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductor Materials · Patent Landscape 2026
Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals: Patents 2026
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 18 records and has run flat-to-declining since, with the 2022 midpoint at 13 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 44.3% of all 183 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 62.8% — a genuinely concentrated field with a long tail below it.
  • C30B crystal growth claims dominate at 65.0% of records, well ahead of H01L device claims at 56.3%, showing the contest is mostly won or lost at the boule and epitaxy stage.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
183
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-36%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 183 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Basal plane dislocations (BPDs) propagate from seed crystal into epitaxial layers and device structures, degrading forward voltage stability in bipolar SiC devices. This landscape tracks patent activity on reducing BPD density and converting BPDs into less harmful threading edge dislocations, spanning seed preparation, thermomechanical stress control during growth, and epitaxial conversion techniques. The dataset covers 183 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from applicants spanning crystal growers, device makers and research institutes.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart understate actual filing activity for those years; the shape of the curve up to 2023-2024 is the more reliable signal.

Filing activity, 2015-2026
  1. 1RESONAC CORP24
  2. 2WOLFSPEED INC20
  3. 3NO 55 INST CHINA ELECTRONIC SCI & TECHNOLOGYGROUP CO LTD15
  4. 4RICOH CO LTD11
  5. 5GLOBALWAFERS CO LTD11
  6. 6SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD8
  7. 7PROTERIAL LTD8
  8. 8CENT GLASS CO LTD6
  9. 9KWANSEI GAKUIN EDUCTIONAL FOUND6
  10. 10TOYO TANSO KK6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 183 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims sit in.

A field past its filing peak

Annual filings rose to a peak of 18 records in 2017, then softened. The 2022 midpoint of 13 records confirms the trend is flat or declining rather than recovering, and the partial 2026 count (1 record so far) reflects reporting lag rather than a sudden stop.

A field past its filing peak051015201820172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Growth-stage claims outweigh device-stage claims

C30B (crystal growth) appears in 65.0% of the 183 records, ahead of H01L (semiconductor devices) at 56.3%. H10P and H10D each cover roughly a fifth of records, while coating (C23C), inorganic materials (C01B), testing (G01N) and laminates (B32B) are minor branches — each under 5% and together suggesting most of the unclaimed room sits away from bulk crystal growth.

Growth-stage claims outweigh device-stage claimsC30B · Crystal growth11965.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices10356.3%H10P4625.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)3820.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…94.9%C23C · Coating & surface deposition31.6%G01N · Material analysis & testing31.6%B32B · Layered products & laminates21.1%Other158.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 183 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about basal plane dislocation reduction in sic crystals and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
EP3547349A12019-10-02

Reducing SiC epitaxial basal plane dislocation density via composite buffer layers

CHINA ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY GROUP CORPORATION NO.55 RESEARCH INSTITUTE

The method epitaxially grows a high-low doping concentration composite buffer layer with multiple cycles on an SiC substrate, applies interfacial high-temperature hydrogen etching to each buffer sub-layer, and uses interfacial doping induction together with interfacial image force to convert basal plane dislocation (BPD) defects into threading edge dislocation (TED) defects. The approach is aimed at reducing BPD defects that would otherwise propagate into the active epitaxial layer.Filed by China Electronics Technology Group Corporation No. 55 Research Institute, published as EP3547349A1.

EP3547349A1 — patent drawing 1EP3547349A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070290211A1Bipolar Semiconductor Device and Process for Producing the Same67
2US7279115B1Method to reduce stacking fault nucleation sites and reduce V<sub>f </sub> drift in bipolar devices52
3US20060075958A1Low basal plane dislocation bulk grown SiC wafers49
4US20050064723A1Method To Reduce Stacking Fault Nucleation Sites And Reduce Forward Voltage Drift In Bipolar Devices48
5CN107068539A降低碳化硅外延基平面位错密度的方法40
6US20150168311A1Defect classifying method and inspection apparatus40
7US20090114148A1Method of producing epitaxial layers with low basal plane dislocation concentrations40
8WO2017057742A1Sic single crystal ingot39
9US20130071643A1Silicon carbide substrate and method of manufacturing the same39
10US7294324B2Low basal plane dislocation bulk grown SiC wafers35

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a map of foundational art, not current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing strategy

Read together, the trend, concentration and citation data point to a field where the foundational conversion mechanisms are already staked out, and the remaining room is at the margins.

Concentration
44.3%
of 183 records held by the top 5 assignees

A crowded top, then a long tail

With the leader alone at 24 records and the field dropping to 11 by fifth place, new entrants are filing into a space where a handful of players already hold a large share of the priority art. The tail below tenth place (6 records) is thin and fragmented across single-digit filers.

Based on the 53-company ranked assignee list.
Filing momentum
18 → 1
peak-year (2017) vs. most recent partial year

Past the peak, not at a plateau

The 2022 midpoint of 13 filings shows the decline from the 2017 peak is not a blip; several of the most active historical filers show 0 filings in the latest year, including year-over-year declines of -100% for some. That is consistent with a technology where the core conversion mechanisms are patented and refinement has slowed.

Momentum figures are per-assignee, latest reporting year.
Claim geography
65.0% vs 25.1%
C30B crystal growth vs H10P share of 183 records

Growth-stage claims crowd out device-stage ones

Nearly two-thirds of records touch crystal growth (C30B), while device-level classes such as H10P and H10D sit at roughly a quarter and a fifth respectively. That gap suggests device integration and packaging claims building on BPD-reduced material are comparatively less contested.

IPC shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to basal plane dislocation reduction in sic crystals, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Wolfspeed Semiconductor Co., Ltd.SUMAKERIS JOSEPH JOHN2
NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPNippon Steel Corporation2
Wolfspeed Semiconductor Co., Ltd.TSVETKOV VALERI F1
Wolfspeed Semiconductor Co., Ltd.POWELL ADRIAN1
Wolfspeed Semiconductor Co., Ltd.BRADY MARK1
Resonac Holdings CorporationCentral Research Institute of Electric Power Industry1
Resonac Holdings CorporationDenso Corporation1
Nippon Steel & Sumikin Materials Co., Ltd.Nippon Steel & Sumikin Materials Co., Ltd.1

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pairings link a single company to individual named inventors rather than to other corporate assignees — this is a field of solo corporate filers, not joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims, and where the gate sits

The leader holds 24 of the 183 records, more than double the fifth-place filer at 11, and the ranked list of 53 companies thins quickly past the top ten.

Leader
24 records
of 183 total

A clear front-runner

The top-ranked assignee's filing volume is more than double the fifth-place company's, giving it the deepest coverage of conversion and seed-preparation claims in the dataset.

Ranked by patent family count.
Mid-field
11 records
fifth place

A compact second tier

Places two through five cluster in a band that together with the leader accounts for 44.3% of all 183 records — a group worth tracking for freedom-to-operate before filing into crystal growth claims.

Top 5 combined: 81 records.
Long tail
6 records
tenth place

Fragmentation below the top ten

By tenth place volume has dropped to 6 records, and the remaining 43 ranked companies split the balance of the field, many with only one or two filings each.

Top 10 combined: 115 records, 62.8% of scope.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Away from the dense C30B and H01L classes, several adjacent branches carry only a handful of records each — that low density is where a well-drafted first claim has room to stand.
Interfacial hydrogen etching parametersPost-growth BPD-to-TED conversion metrologyComposite buffer layer doping gradientsWafer-diameter-scaled seed preparationCoating-based stress field managementLaminate structures for dislocation trapping
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Wolfspeed Semiconductor Co., Ltd.0
China Electronics Technology Group Corporation No. 55 Research Institute0
GlobalWafers Co., Ltd.0-100%
Ricoh Co., Ltd.0
Proterial, Ltd.0
Resonac Corporation0-100%
Resonac Holdings Corporation0
Nippon Steel & Sumikin Materials Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with occupied core claims and a thinning tail — the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing, or clearing a design.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top 10

With 62.8% of records held by ten assignees, a targeted FTO review against that group is more efficient than screening all 53 ranked companies.

Run an FTO screen in Eureka

Track the conversion-mechanism claims specifically

Because C30B crystal growth claims cover 65.0% of records, any new filing on BPD-to-TED conversion should be checked against this subclass first.

Search C30B prior art in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

Flat-to-declining filings since 2017 could reverse if wafer-diameter scaling drives new seed-preparation art; monitoring the leader's and mid-field's activity catches that shift early.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Basal Plane Dislocation Reduction in SiC Crystals in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole basal plane dislocation reduction in sic crystals corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.