Book a demo

Battery Electric Excavator Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Battery Electric Excavator Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/battery-electric-excavator-powertrain-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Construction Machinery
Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain Patents
  • 38.8% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 26 of 67 records in scope, but the other 61% is spread across a long tail of 32 further companies.
  • Filings grew 60% from 2021 to 2024. From 5 records in 2021 to 8 in 2024, with 2023 the peak year so far at 20 records — before the usual 18-month publication lag understates the most recent years.
  • Thermal management is a proven choke point. A cited battery thermal-management filing from Deere sits alongside dense earth-moving (E02F) claim coverage at 85.1% of all records.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
67
Published Records
39%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+60%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 67 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the patent record shows about electrified excavator powertrains

Battery electric excavator powertrain patenting sits at the intersection of two established fields: earth-moving machine design and electric vehicle propulsion. The dataset in scope — 67 published records spanning 2015 to the 2026 cut-off — captures filings that combine excavator-specific structure (E02F) with battery, drive or thermal claims more typical of electric vehicles (B60L, B60K, B60H). That overlap is the defining feature of this space: most applicants are excavator manufacturers layering electrified drivetrain and thermal claims onto conventional machine architecture, rather than EV powertrain specialists moving into construction equipment.

Filing activity was negligible before 2021, rose through a peak in 2023, and the leading receiving office by a wide margin is China, followed by Europe, the WIPO PCT route, the United States, the United Kingdom and India. That office distribution points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate risk is concentrated today, and where a competitor is most likely to have live claims.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1CATERPILLAR INC7
  2. 2HD HYUNDAI INFRACORE CO LTD7
  3. 3GUANGXI LIUGONG MASCH CO LTD5
  4. 4XCMG EXCAVATOR MACHINERY CO LTD4
  5. 5KOMATSU LTD3
  6. 6SANY HEAVY MACHINERY3
  7. 7ZOOMLION SHAANXI WESTERN EARTHMOVING MASCH CO LTD3
  8. 8HUAQIAO UNIVERSITY3
  9. 9JIANGSU XCMG CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY RESEARCH INSTITUTE LTD3
  10. 10SINOMACH CHANGLIN CO LTD3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 67-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings were flat through the late 2010s, began climbing from 2021, and peaked at 20 records in 2023. The +60% rise from 5 records in 2021 to 8 in 2024 is the cleanest complete-year growth signal available; 2025 and 2026 figures will continue to fill in as publication catches up with filing.

Filing trend, 2017-20260510152002017201820192020202120222020232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

E02F (excavating and earth moving) appears on 85.1% of all 67 records, confirming that most filings are anchored in machine structure rather than pure electrical engineering. B60L and B60K, covering electric propulsion and drive systems, sit at 20.9% and 16.4% respectively, with thermal management (B60H, 7.5%) and fluid actuation (F15B, 9.0%) forming smaller but technically distinct clusters. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.

Technology composition by IPC subclassE02F · Excavating & earth moving5785.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion1420.9%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive1116.4%F15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…69.0%B60H · Vehicle heating & A/C57.5%B62D · Motor vehicles & steering57.5%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps34.5%B65H · Web, sheet & filament handling23.0%Other811.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 67 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about battery electric excavator powertrain and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing: integrated thermal management

Representative Record · Deere & Company · 2023-11-16
US20230366175A12023-11-16

Integrated vehicle and battery thermal management of an electric excavator

DEERE & COMPANY

An integrated vehicle and battery thermal management system for an electric work machine may include a battery module, a radiator, a fan to move air across the radiator, a battery coolant loop including a coolant pump, a refrigerant loop including a compressor, and a chiller providing heat transfer from the battery coolant loop to the refrigerant loop. A controller is operably connected to the coolant pump, the compressor and the fan and is configured to provide a passive cooling mode, a semi-passive cooling mode, and an active cooling mode, dependent upon monitored temperatures in the system.US20230366175A1

US20230366175A1 — patent drawing 1US20230366175A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN210884749U一种自行走履带式电源车18
2US20220355678A1Power supply device of electric excavator17
3CN114590104A一种电动挖机热管理系统及其控制方法9
4CN202450561U一种电动液压挖掘机8
5CN117027101A挖掘机控制方法、系统、挖掘机和存储介质7
6CN113594588A一种高原环境使用的电动挖掘机动力锂电池4
7CN117605666A电动挖掘机系统以及控制方法3
8CN117514979A电动挖掘机的热管理方法、控制器及热管理系统3
9CN117166554A电动挖掘机的电机控制方法、控制器及电动挖掘机3
10CN113833049A一种电动挖掘机散热系统3

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings and should be read as a signal of influence, not current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three findings that shape where to file, who to watch and where claim space is still open.

Concentration
38.8%
of 67 records held by top 5

The top of the field is thin, not dominant

26 of 67 records sit with the five leading assignees, and the top 10 combined reach 61.2% of all records in scope. That leaves a long tail of 32 further companies each holding a handful of filings, which is typical of a field still forming its claim structure rather than one already locked up by a small number of players.

Based on the 67-record assignee ranking
Momentum
+60%
growth, 2021 to 2024

Growth is real but recent, and understated

Filings rose from 5 in 2021 to 8 in 2024, with a peak of 20 in 2023 sitting between those points. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as a slowdown.

Complete-year figures only, 2021-2024
Technology mix
85.1%
of records carry E02F claims

Machine structure still anchors most filings

The dominant IPC class is earth-moving machine structure, not battery or propulsion technology in isolation. Electric propulsion (B60L, 20.9%) and drive systems (B60K, 16.4%) are present but secondary, meaning most applicants are protecting the excavator, with electrification claimed as an add-on.

Shares of all 67 records; a record may carry several classes
Geography
37 filings
at the China receiving office

China leads filing venue by a wide margin

China accounts for the largest share of receiving-office activity, ahead of Europe, the WIPO PCT route, the United States, the United Kingdom and India. Freedom-to-operate checks that skip the Chinese filing office will miss the majority of the documented activity in this field.

Receiving office counts, all 67 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to battery electric excavator powertrain, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked leaders span established excavator OEMs and a scattered group of single- or few-filing entrants, with limited co-filing between assignees.

Leader
7 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

A single-digit lead, not a dominant position

The leading assignee holds 7 of 67 records, a narrow margin over fifth and tenth place, which sit at 3 records each. No assignee shows recent-year momentum above zero in the latest year across the tracked names, consistent with a field where filing has slowed at the very top while the tail continues to add records.

Leader vs. 5th and 10th place, by record count
Collaboration
3 pairs
of co-assignees identified

Co-filing is rare and mostly intra-group

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing links two related entities within the same corporate group. This suggests most patenting in the space is done independently rather than through joint development programmes.

Co-assignee pairs across all 67 records
Long tail
32 companies
outside the top 5

Wide participation, low individual volume

Beyond the five leading assignees, 32 further companies appear in the ranking, most with only a few filings each. That spread includes research institutes and university-affiliated applicants alongside OEMs, indicating the technology is still attracting new entrants rather than consolidating.

Ranked assignees beyond the top 5, of 37 total
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show low record density relative to the core E02F and B60L clusters and are worth a freedom-to-operate check before drafting.
battery pack thermal-runaway isolationfast-charge connector sequencing for heavy equipmentregenerative boom/arm energy recoveryswappable battery module dockinghydraulic-electric hybrid actuator control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Caterpillar Inc.0
HD HYUNDAI INFRACORE CO LTD0
Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co., Ltd.0
Xuzhou XCMG Excavator Machinery Co., Ltd.0
Shaanxi Zoomlion West Earthmoving Machinery Co., Ltd.0
Weichai (Qingdao) Smart Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.0
Jiangsu XCMG Construction Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd.0
Komatsu Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the thermal-management cluster

Battery and vehicle thermal management claims, including the Deere filing highlighted here, are among the most cited records in this dataset and worth a dedicated clearance search before committing to a cooling architecture.

Explore thermal management claims in Eureka

Track the long tail for emerging entrants

With 32 companies outside the top five, new filers are still entering the field. Monitoring newly published applications from research institutes and smaller OEMs can surface competitive moves before they reach the ranked leaders.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Watch China-origin filings closely

China accounts for the largest share of receiving-office activity in this dataset, and any competitive or freedom-to-operate assessment that excludes it will miss most of the documented filing volume.

Search China filings in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Battery Electric Excavator Powertrain in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole battery electric excavator powertrain corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.