https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/battery-recycling-and-second-life-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Battery Recycling & Second Life
Battery recycling and second-life battery patents: who holds the ground and where it opens up
  • 64.3% of all 70 records sit with just five assignees, and 95.7% sit with ten — this field is a concentrated fight, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing fell 57% from 2021 to 2024 (7 to 3 records) among the leading assignees, the last span the data can treat as complete before publication lag distorts the count.
  • C22B metal-extraction claims sit under 71.4% of records alongside H01M battery-cell claims at 94.3%, meaning most filings pair a cell claim with a recovery-chemistry claim rather than filing on either alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
70
Published Records
64%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-57%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 70 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set actually covers

Battery recycling and second-life patenting spans two very different jobs: getting a spent cell apart safely and characterising what state it is in, and getting the metals back out of it once it is apart. The search behind this dataset ties those two together deliberately — pairing terms like cell disassembly, residual capacity assessment and battery repurposing with recovery routes such as hydrometallurgical leaching and active material recovery. That combination is why H01M (batteries and cells) and C22B (metal extraction and refining) dominate the class breakdown together rather than either one standing alone.

70 published records sit in scope, spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 15 records, and the most recent years are necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months — treat any apparent drop-off after 2024 with that lag in mind rather than as a real slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1UMICORE(BE)16
  2. 2NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE9
  3. 3REGAIN SP Z O O8
  4. 4HITHIUM TECH HK LTD6
  5. 5NORTHVOLT REVOLT AB6
  6. 6NORTHVOLT AB6
  7. 7HITACHI LTD5
  8. 8H C STARCK GMBH4
  9. 9LOHUM MATERIALS PTE LTD4
  10. 10SLOOP STEVEN E3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 70 records: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing rose to a 2019 peak, then declined through the last complete year

Filing peaked at 15 records in 2019. Among the leading assignees, output fell from 7 records in 2021 to 3 in 2024 — a 57% decline over that span, the last window unaffected by publication lag. Years after 2024 will fill in as more filings publish, so treat the tail of the chart as provisional rather than a confirmed drop.

Filing rose to a 2019 peak, then declined through the last complete year048111502017201815201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Cell-handling claims dominate; metal recovery is the second-largest branch by a wide margin

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) appears in 94.3% of the 70 records, and C22B (metal extraction & refining) in 71.4% — together they show most filers claim both the physical handling of the cell and the chemistry to recover value from it. Smaller branches — C25B electrolytic production, B02C crushing/grinding, B26D cutting, B60L EV propulsion, B09B solid waste disposal and G01R measurement — each sit at 11.4% or below, marking the mechanical and measurement steps as comparatively open ground.

Cell-handling claims dominate; metal recovery is the second-largest branch by a wide marginH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells6694.3%C22B · Metal extraction & refining5071.4%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…811.4%B02C · Crushing, grinding & pulverisi…57.1%B26D · Cutting machines57.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion57.1%B09B · Solid waste disposal45.7%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement45.7%Other1318.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 70 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about battery recycling & second life patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this field

Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100146761A1Disassembly of battery51
2WO2020212587A1Process for the preparation of battery precursors31
3WO2020086000A1A lithium ion battery materials recycling method23
4US20210391605A1A lithium ion battery materials recycling method18
5WO2010077982A2Automated battery disassembly for recycling14
6US20220056553A1Crushing method for galvanic cells with high energy densities7
7WO2025087875A1Battery overhaul device3
8WO2020145829A1Crushing method for galvanic cells with high energy densities3
9WO2024118655A2Lithium-ion battery recycling via customizable systems and methods2
10EP4198151A1Process for recovering battery active material concentrate2

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, class and citation data — useful for deciding where a new filing would actually add ground rather than restate it.

Concentration
64.3% / 95.7%
share held by top 5 / top 10 of 70 records

This is a small, dense field

With only 26 ranked assignees and the top ten holding 95.7% of all 70 records, there is very little room left for a new entrant to build a broad position by filing generally. Anyone entering now needs a specific mechanical or chemical angle the leaders have not already covered.

Source: assignee ranking, 70 records
Filing momentum
-57%
2021 → 2024 among leading assignees

Recent activity has cooled among the leaders

Leading assignees filed 7 records in 2021 and 3 in 2024 — a real decline over the last span the data can treat as complete. It does not mean the field is closing; several leaders show zero filings in the latest year, which is also consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Claim overlap
94.3% + 71.4%
H01M and C22B combined presence

Most filings claim both cell and chemistry

A record carries H01M in 94.3% of cases and C22B in 71.4% — the two nearly always travel together. A filing that claims only the mechanical disassembly step, or only the leaching chemistry, without tying to the other is comparatively rare in this set.

Source: IPC subclass distribution, 70 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to battery recycling & second life patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

The assignee landscape

26 companies make up the entire ranked field for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the complete list the dataset returns. The leader holds 16 records; fifth place holds 6; tenth place holds 3.

Leader
16 records
of 70 in scope

One assignee holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee's 16 records are more than double the fifth-place count of 6, marking a genuine leader rather than a tie among several similarly sized filers.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-field
6 records
fifth place

A tight cluster behind the leader

From second through fifth place the counts compress quickly, and the top five together account for 64.3% of all 70 records — most of the contest is settled well before the ranking reaches double digits.

Source: assignee ranking
Long tail
3 records
tenth place

A long tail of single- and few-filing entrants

Beyond tenth place, filers hold small counts each, consistent with a field where most organisations tested the space with one or two filings rather than building a sustained portfolio.

Source: assignee ranking, 26 companies
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where class-level presence is comparatively low relative to the core cell-and-chemistry claims
Automated residual capacity gradingElectrolytic recovery of black massNon-destructive cell-cutting methodsSecond-life pack repurposing controlsSolid-waste stream classification for cells
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Umicore (Belgium)0
National University of Singapore0
Hithium Tech HK Ltd0-100%
Northvolt AB0
Northvolt Revolt AB0
REGAIN SP Z O O0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
H.C. Starck GmbH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a concentrated core and a thinner set of mechanical and measurement branches around it. Two practical next steps follow from that shape.

Map a specific claim against the leaders' portfolios

Before filing in the H01M/C22B core, check what the top-ranked assignees already hold — with 95.7% of records held by the top ten, a broad claim is unlikely to clear.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches for freedom to operate

Residual capacity assessment, cutting/disassembly automation and electrolytic recovery each show lower class-level presence than the core — worth a focused search before committing R&D there.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on battery recycling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Battery Recycling & Second Life Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole battery recycling & second life patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.