Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 70 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Battery recycling and second-life patenting spans two very different jobs: getting a spent cell apart safely and characterising what state it is in, and getting the metals back out of it once it is apart. The search behind this dataset ties those two together deliberately — pairing terms like cell disassembly, residual capacity assessment and battery repurposing with recovery routes such as hydrometallurgical leaching and active material recovery. That combination is why H01M (batteries and cells) and C22B (metal extraction and refining) dominate the class breakdown together rather than either one standing alone.
70 published records sit in scope, spanning 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 15 records, and the most recent years are necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months — treat any apparent drop-off after 2024 with that lag in mind rather than as a real slowdown.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 70 records: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filing peaked at 15 records in 2019. Among the leading assignees, output fell from 7 records in 2021 to 3 in 2024 — a 57% decline over that span, the last window unaffected by publication lag. Years after 2024 will fill in as more filings publish, so treat the tail of the chart as provisional rather than a confirmed drop.
H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) appears in 94.3% of the 70 records, and C22B (metal extraction & refining) in 71.4% — together they show most filers claim both the physical handling of the cell and the chemistry to recover value from it. Smaller branches — C25B electrolytic production, B02C crushing/grinding, B26D cutting, B60L EV propulsion, B09B solid waste disposal and G01R measurement — each sit at 11.4% or below, marking the mechanical and measurement steps as comparatively open ground.
Shares are the percentage of the 70 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about battery recycling & second life patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try Eureka| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20100146761A1 | Disassembly of battery | 51 |
| 2 | WO2020212587A1 | Process for the preparation of battery precursors | 31 |
| 3 | WO2020086000A1 | A lithium ion battery materials recycling method | 23 |
| 4 | US20210391605A1 | A lithium ion battery materials recycling method | 18 |
| 5 | WO2010077982A2 | Automated battery disassembly for recycling | 14 |
| 6 | US20220056553A1 | Crushing method for galvanic cells with high energy densities | 7 |
| 7 | WO2025087875A1 | Battery overhaul device | 3 |
| 8 | WO2020145829A1 | Crushing method for galvanic cells with high energy densities | 3 |
| 9 | WO2024118655A2 | Lithium-ion battery recycling via customizable systems and methods | 2 |
| 10 | EP4198151A1 | Process for recovering battery active material concentrate | 2 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the concentration, class and citation data — useful for deciding where a new filing would actually add ground rather than restate it.
With only 26 ranked assignees and the top ten holding 95.7% of all 70 records, there is very little room left for a new entrant to build a broad position by filing generally. Anyone entering now needs a specific mechanical or chemical angle the leaders have not already covered.
Leading assignees filed 7 records in 2021 and 3 in 2024 — a real decline over the last span the data can treat as complete. It does not mean the field is closing; several leaders show zero filings in the latest year, which is also consistent with publication lag rather than withdrawal.
A record carries H01M in 94.3% of cases and C22B in 71.4% — the two nearly always travel together. A filing that claims only the mechanical disassembly step, or only the leaching chemistry, without tying to the other is comparatively rare in this set.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to battery recycling & second life patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
26 companies make up the entire ranked field for this search — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the complete list the dataset returns. The leader holds 16 records; fifth place holds 6; tenth place holds 3.
The top-ranked assignee's 16 records are more than double the fifth-place count of 6, marking a genuine leader rather than a tie among several similarly sized filers.
From second through fifth place the counts compress quickly, and the top five together account for 64.3% of all 70 records — most of the contest is settled well before the ranking reaches double digits.
Beyond tenth place, filers hold small counts each, consistent with a field where most organisations tested the space with one or two filings rather than building a sustained portfolio.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Umicore (Belgium) | 0 | — |
| National University of Singapore | 0 | — |
| Hithium Tech HK Ltd | 0 | -100% |
| Northvolt AB | 0 | — |
| Northvolt Revolt AB | 0 | — |
| REGAIN SP Z O O | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| H.C. Starck GmbH | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a concentrated core and a thinner set of mechanical and measurement branches around it. Two practical next steps follow from that shape.
Before filing in the H01M/C22B core, check what the top-ranked assignees already hold — with 95.7% of records held by the top ten, a broad claim is unlikely to clear.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaResidual capacity assessment, cutting/disassembly automation and electrolytic recovery each show lower class-level presence than the core — worth a focused search before committing R&D there.
Run a white-space search in EurekaAmong the 26 companies in the ranked field, one assignee leads clearly with 16 of the 70 records in scope, more than double the fifth-place count of 6. The top five assignees together hold 64.3% of all records, and the top ten hold 95.7%, so the field is concentrated among a small group rather than spread evenly. Anyone assessing competitive position should look at that top-ten group first, since almost everything else in the ranking is a single- or few-filing entrant.
Not on the most recent complete data: filing among the leading assignees fell from 7 records in 2021 to 3 in 2024, a 57% decline over that span. Overall filing peaked at 15 records in 2019 and has not returned to that level since. That said, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so years after 2024 are still filling in and should not yet be read as a confirmed downward trend.
Cell-and-battery claims under IPC class H01M appear in 94.3% of the 70 records in scope, and metal-extraction claims under C22B appear in 71.4% — the two classes overlap in most filings, meaning claims typically cover both the physical handling of a spent cell and the chemistry used to recover value from it. Smaller classes covering electrolytic production, crushing/grinding, cutting, EV propulsion, solid waste disposal and electrical measurement each sit at 11.4% or below, indicating comparatively less-claimed mechanical and measurement territory around that dense core.
The class-level data points to under-claimed territory in residual capacity assessment automation, non-destructive cell-cutting methods, electrolytic recovery of black mass, and controls for second-life pack repurposing — all of which show lower patent presence than the core H01M/C22B combination. These are process and measurement steps that sit adjacent to the dominant cell-and-chemistry claims rather than replacing them. A freedom-to-operate search focused specifically on these narrower branches is more likely to surface open ground than a general search across the whole field.
US20100146761A1, titled Disassembly of battery, leads the set with 51 citations, notably ahead of the next-most-cited record, WO2020212587A1 on battery precursor preparation, at 31 citations. High citation counts in this kind of searched corpus tend to favour older filings that have simply had more time to be cited, so treat this as a measure of influence on later filers rather than a ranking of which patents matter most commercially today.
Go past this page: query the whole battery recycling & second life patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.