Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (20 records) with 2024 (16) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 142 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Second-life battery reconfiguration sits at the intersection of two demands: recovering value from batteries that no longer meet automotive or grid-scale specifications, and reassembling their remaining capacity into usable modules. The 142 records in scope span module reconfiguration, spent-battery recovery, and the diagnostic work needed to sort cells before they go back into service. Filing activity runs from 2017 through the current partial year of 2026, giving a decade-scale view of how claim space has filled in.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as a genuine slowdown.
The two views below cover the same 142 records from different angles: one tracks when the claims were filed, the other tracks what they claim.
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 37 in 2022. The 2021-to-2024 window — the last span both years of which are far enough past to be considered complete — shows a -20% change, from 20 filings down to 16. Read the 2025 and 2026 bars as incomplete rather than as evidence of a genuine decline.
H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) appears on 42.3% of the 142 records, but G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) is close behind at 37.3% and B60L (EV propulsion) at 29.6%. H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 28.9% confirms that second-life claims are as much about integration and diagnostics as about the cell itself. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to well over 100% and should not be summed.
Shares are the percentage of the 142 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about battery recycling & second life — second-life battery reconfiguration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method for determining use of a second life battery under load conditions to reduce CO2 emissions, using Monte Carlo simulations to model uncertainties in a load profile, a renewable energy profile and CO2 emissions rate, then setting an initial state of charge on a Gaussian distribution basis to time charging and discharging around high- and low-emission hours.Filed by NEC Corporation, granted 2015-11-10 — one of the earliest records in this dataset to tie second-life battery dispatch directly to an emissions-reduction objective.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20140056371A1 | MIMO-OFDM-Based Flexible Rate Intra-Data Center Network | 86 |
| 2 | US20200055421A1 | Power cell tracking and optimization system | 62 |
| 3 | WO2014181081A1 | Energy transfer apparatus and distribution control method therefor | 48 |
| 4 | US20180009328A1 | Battery having at least two battery cells, and motor vehicle | 30 |
| 5 | US20220149630A1 | Method and system for using second life batteries as energy storage in a renewable energy system | 14 |
| 6 | WO2021014406A1 | Method and device for predicting state of health and remaining lifetime for used electric vehicle batteries | 13 |
| 7 | WO2020036984A1 | Power cell tracking and optimization system | 13 |
| 8 | US10926644B1 | Compact electric vehicle fast charger with energy storage | 13 |
| 9 | US20220146589A1 | Method and device for predicting state of health and remaining lifetime for used electric vehicle batteries | 12 |
| 10 | US20220149451A1 | System and method for reusing an electric vehicle battery | 11 |
Citation counts favour older records that have had longer to accumulate them inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence within the searched set, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns in this dataset matter more than the headline counts: where filings concentrate, what the technology mix implies about claim strategy, and how citation weight is distributed.
The five leading assignees hold 46.5% of all 142 records, and the ten leading hold 62.7%. Below that, the ranking runs to 61 companies total, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants. A new entrant is not fighting one dominant player so much as a small cluster.
G01R (measurement) appears on more than a third of records and B60L (EV propulsion) on nearly 30%, both close behind the core H01M battery class at 42.3%. Filing purely on cell chemistry or module hardware without a measurement or integration angle means competing directly in the most crowded slice.
Annual filings peaked at 37 in 2022 before easing to 16 by 2024, a -20% shift over that three-year span. That is a genuine signal for the 2021-2024 window specifically; 2025 and 2026 figures are too recent to read as continuation of the trend given publication lag.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to battery recycling & second life — second-life battery reconfiguration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The dataset points to a field with concentrated core claims and thinner coverage in the diagnostic and grid-integration layers around them. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or identifying where to file.
With 46.5% of records held by five companies, a targeted FTO review of their claim scope is more efficient than screening the full 61-company ranking.
Start an FTO workspace in Patsnap Eureka →G01R and G05B classes intersect with core H01M claims on a meaningful share of records; understanding where they overlap clarifies whether a diagnostics-first filing avoids the densest prior art.
Explore IPC overlap in Patsnap Eureka →Several named assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year; revisiting this once publication lag closes will clarify whether that is a genuine pullback or an artifact of the reporting delay.
Set a filing-trend alert in Patsnap Eureka →It is moderately concentrated: the five leading assignees hold 46.5% of the 142 records in scope, and the ten leading hold 62.7%. That leaves roughly 37% of records spread across the remainder of a 61-company ranking, with many holding only a handful of filings each. A new entrant should expect to compete against a small cluster at the top rather than a single dominant holder, and there is meaningful room below that cluster.
Filings rose steadily to a peak of 37 in 2022, then eased to 16 by 2024 — a -20% shift over that three-year span. Because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as a continued decline. The honest read is that the field passed an early peak around 2022 and the post-2024 trajectory is not yet clear from published data.
H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) is the core class, appearing on 42.3% of the 142 records, but it is closely trailed by G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) at 37.3% and B60L (EV propulsion) at 29.6%. H02J (power supply and grid systems) sits close behind at 28.9%. This spread shows that claims in this field are as much about diagnostics, integration and vehicle systems as about the battery cell itself, so a filing strategy limited to cell-level hardware misses most of the contested space.
US9183327B2, assigned to NEC Corporation and granted in 2015, covers a method for scheduling charge and discharge of a second-life battery using Monte Carlo-modelled uncertainty in load, renewable generation and CO2 emissions rate, with an initial state of charge set from a Gaussian distribution. It is narrow to that specific probabilistic scheduling approach rather than to second-life battery use broadly. Anyone building emissions-aware dispatch logic for repurposed batteries should review its claims closely, but deterministic or rule-based scheduling approaches, or scheduling tied to different optimization objectives, sit outside its specific method claims.
The technology composition data shows lighter filing in AI-based diagnostics (G06N at 3.5% of records) and control/regulating systems (G05B at 4.9%) compared with the dominant H01M, G01R and B60L classes. Sub-areas such as automated cell-sorting logic, cross-chemistry reconfiguration, and grid-integration control layered on top of repurposed packs look under-claimed relative to the core hardware and measurement classes. These are reasonable areas to prioritize prior-art search before drafting new claims, though thinner filing density does not by itself guarantee patentability.
Go past this page: query the whole battery recycling & second life — second-life battery reconfiguration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.