https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/bauxite-residue-management-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aluminium Smelting
Bauxite residue management patents: who is filing, and where the field is still open
  • Concentrated at the top. The five most active filers account for 87 of 271 records in scope (32.1%), with a leader on 29 filings and a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants below tenth place (5 filings).
  • Filing has cooled from its 2022 peak. Filings peaked at 24 in 2022; on the most recent complete comparison, 2021's 19 filings fell to 10 by 2024, a 47% drop over that span.
  • Metal extraction dominates the claim map. C22B (metal extraction & refining) appears in 52.4% of the 271 records, more than triple the smallest tracked class, C01B, at 9.6%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
271
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-47%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 271 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Bauxite residue, commonly called red mud, is the caustic solid byproduct of the Bayer process for refining bauxite into alumina. Patent activity in this dataset spans the practical problems that follow: dewatering and dry stacking the residue for storage, neutralising its alkalinity before disposal or reuse, recovering iron and sodium values that would otherwise be lost, and revegetating storage surfaces once residue is stabilised. This is a downstream, waste-management field rather than a core smelting one — most of the filing activity sits at the intersection of metallurgy, ceramics and water treatment rather than in primary aluminium production itself.

The 271 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, with filings published across United States, Chinese, Australian, Indian, PCT and Canadian offices. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart are undercounts, not a genuine slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1ORBITE TECHNOLOGIES INC29
  2. 2COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG18
  3. 3FORET PLASMA LABS LLC18
  4. 4RED MUD ENTERPRISES LLC13
  5. 5AEM TECHNOLOGIES INC9
  6. 6ALUMINUM CORP OF CHINA LTD8
  7. 7HK BROS AMERICA LLC6
  8. 8CENT SOUTH UNIV6
  9. 9KRSYS6
  10. 10ABBAS MOHAMMAD KHAN ABBAS5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 271-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying technology splits across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2022, then eased to 10 by 2024 — a 47% decline from 2021's 19 filings over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as a continued fall.

Filing trend, 2017–20260613192552017201820192020202124202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C22B (metal extraction & refining) and C01F (alkaline-earth, aluminium and rare-earth compounds) are the two dominant classes, present in 52.4% and 34.3% of the 271 records respectively. Ceramics and refractory reuse (C04B, 18.8%) and separation techniques (B01J, B03C) sit well behind, and iron production (C21B) and water treatment (C02F) each appear in roughly one in ten records — smaller footprints that point to where extraction chemistry, rather than downstream reuse, still gets most of the claim attention.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC22B · Metal extraction & refining14252.4%C01F · Alkaline-earth, Al & rare-eart…9334.3%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories5118.8%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …3914.4%B03C · Magnetic/electrostatic separat…3312.2%C21B · Iron production (blast furnace)3312.2%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment2910.7%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…269.6%Other19772.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 271 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Bauxite Residue Management with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bauxite residue management and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Record
US5607598A1997-03-04

US5607598A — Treatment and disposal of red mud generated in the Bayer Process

MATLINPATTERSON GLOBAL ADVISERS LLC

Red mud bauxite residue produced in the Bayer Process is treated in a plurality of centrifuges and repulp tanks to successively wash and dewater the red mud. A final centrate liquor is obtained in a first upstream centrifuge stage which is rich in alumina and caustic values for respective recovery and reuse. The concentrated red mud cake produced in the final downstream washing/centrifuge step is low in caustic and alumina concentration permitting environmentally friendly disposal. The concentrated red mud cake is reslurried and mixed with bauxite sand for disposal in a dry stacking impoundment area.Filed by MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLC, published 1997-03-04 — a foundational multi-stage washing and dry-stacking approach still cited against later dewatering claims.

US5607598A — patent drawing 1US5607598A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030024806A1Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use296
2US7622693B2Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use214
3WO2012149642A1Processes for recovering rare earth elements from various ores66
4US20120024718A1Method for treating a substance with wave energy from plasma and an electrical arc63
5US8324523B2Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use63
6WO2012126092A1Processes for recovering rare earth elements from aluminum-bearing materials57
7CN103290207A一种赤泥综合回收利用铁和铝的方法52
8US20150104361A1Processes for recovering rare earth elements and rare metals43
9WO2000000285A1Catalysts and processes for treatment of industrial process and waste streams40
10WO2012145797A1Recovery of soda from bauxite residue36

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate cites within this corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing strategy

Three findings from this dataset that change where a new filing or a freedom-to-operate check should look first.

Concentration
32.1%
of 271 records held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is tight, the rest is thin

A leader on 29 filings sits well ahead of fifth place at 9 and tenth at 5. Below that the ranking runs out to 100 companies, most holding only a handful of families — a classic concentrated-plus-long-tail shape rather than a fragmented market.

Source: assignee ranking, 271 records
Momentum
-47%
2021 (19 filings) to 2024 (10 filings)

Volume has pulled back from its 2022 peak

Filings peaked at 24 in 2022 before falling to 10 by 2024, the last year that can be treated as complete. Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the sector-wide pullback rather than an isolated exit.

Source: filing trend and momentum-by-assignee data
Claim density
52.4%
of records carry a C22B classification

Extraction and refining claims crowd the centre of the map

C22B and C01F together cover the bulk of activity — iron, sodium and rare-earth recovery chemistry. Ceramics reuse, separation techniques and water treatment each sit at under 20% of records, marking them as comparatively open relative to the extraction core.

Source: IPC subclass composition, 271 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bauxite residue management, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what they are not yet claiming

Filing activity concentrates around a small group of specialist and state-linked entities, with co-filing patterns showing tight collaboration clusters rather than broad industry consortia.

Leader
29
records

A single filer well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 29 of the 271 records in scope, more than triple the count at fifth place (9). That gap suggests a sustained, focused filing programme rather than opportunistic single filings.

Source: assignee ranking
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs

Inventor clusters, not broad alliances

The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset repeat the same small set of named inventors across multiple pairs, each appearing 6 times together — a pattern of one team filing jointly across related applications rather than cross-company partnership.

Source: co-assignee pair data
Geography
59
US-office records (highest of any office)

Filing is spread across offices, led narrowly by the US

United States (59) and China (54) lead the receiving offices tracked, with Australia (36), India (30), WIPO/PCT (26) and Canada (23) all represented — a spread consistent with bauxite residue being a problem tied to wherever alumina refining and residue storage physically happen.

Source: receiving-office counts
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where filing density is visibly lower than the extraction-chemistry core, based on the IPC composition above.
Surface revegetation of stored residueResidue storage geotechnical designWater treatment integration for leachateMagnetic/electrostatic separation of iron fractionsCeramic and refractory reuse of treated residue
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Orbite Aluminae Inc.0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0
Foret Plasma Labs LLC0
Red Mud Enterprises LLC0-100%
Kresys0
Aluminum Corporation of China Limited0
ABBAS MOHAMMAD KHAN ABBAS0
Central South University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next checks rather than a general read of the field.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 29 of 271 records, any new dewatering or dry-stacking filing should be checked against that portfolio specifically, not just the field average.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed branches before they fill in

Revegetation, storage design and water-treatment integration sit well below the extraction-chemistry core in filing density — a narrower window to establish a first position.

Explore white space in Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 publications catch up

The apparent post-2022 decline is partly a publication-lag artefact; a re-check in a year will show whether the pullback is real or an undercount.

Track this landscape in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on bauxite residue patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bauxite Residue Management covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Bauxite Residue Management in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole bauxite residue management corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.