Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 271 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Bauxite residue, commonly called red mud, is the caustic solid byproduct of the Bayer process for refining bauxite into alumina. Patent activity in this dataset spans the practical problems that follow: dewatering and dry stacking the residue for storage, neutralising its alkalinity before disposal or reuse, recovering iron and sodium values that would otherwise be lost, and revegetating storage surfaces once residue is stabilised. This is a downstream, waste-management field rather than a core smelting one — most of the filing activity sits at the intersection of metallurgy, ceramics and water treatment rather than in primary aluminium production itself.
The 271 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, with filings published across United States, Chinese, Australian, Indian, PCT and Canadian offices. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart are undercounts, not a genuine slowdown.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 271-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying technology splits across IPC subclasses.
Filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2022, then eased to 10 by 2024 — a 47% decline from 2021's 19 filings over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as a continued fall.
C22B (metal extraction & refining) and C01F (alkaline-earth, aluminium and rare-earth compounds) are the two dominant classes, present in 52.4% and 34.3% of the 271 records respectively. Ceramics and refractory reuse (C04B, 18.8%) and separation techniques (B01J, B03C) sit well behind, and iron production (C21B) and water treatment (C02F) each appear in roughly one in ten records — smaller footprints that point to where extraction chemistry, rather than downstream reuse, still gets most of the claim attention.
Shares are the percentage of the 271 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bauxite residue management and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRed mud bauxite residue produced in the Bayer Process is treated in a plurality of centrifuges and repulp tanks to successively wash and dewater the red mud. A final centrate liquor is obtained in a first upstream centrifuge stage which is rich in alumina and caustic values for respective recovery and reuse. The concentrated red mud cake produced in the final downstream washing/centrifuge step is low in caustic and alumina concentration permitting environmentally friendly disposal. The concentrated red mud cake is reslurried and mixed with bauxite sand for disposal in a dry stacking impoundment area.Filed by MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLC, published 1997-03-04 — a foundational multi-stage washing and dry-stacking approach still cited against later dewatering claims.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030024806A1 | Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use | 296 |
| 2 | US7622693B2 | Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use | 214 |
| 3 | WO2012149642A1 | Processes for recovering rare earth elements from various ores | 66 |
| 4 | US20120024718A1 | Method for treating a substance with wave energy from plasma and an electrical arc | 63 |
| 5 | US8324523B2 | Plasma whirl reactor apparatus and methods of use | 63 |
| 6 | WO2012126092A1 | Processes for recovering rare earth elements from aluminum-bearing materials | 57 |
| 7 | CN103290207A | 一种赤泥综合回收利用铁和铝的方法 | 52 |
| 8 | US20150104361A1 | Processes for recovering rare earth elements and rare metals | 43 |
| 9 | WO2000000285A1 | Catalysts and processes for treatment of industrial process and waste streams | 40 |
| 10 | WO2012145797A1 | Recovery of soda from bauxite residue | 36 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate cites within this corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings from this dataset that change where a new filing or a freedom-to-operate check should look first.
A leader on 29 filings sits well ahead of fifth place at 9 and tenth at 5. Below that the ranking runs out to 100 companies, most holding only a handful of families — a classic concentrated-plus-long-tail shape rather than a fragmented market.
Filings peaked at 24 in 2022 before falling to 10 by 2024, the last year that can be treated as complete. Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the sector-wide pullback rather than an isolated exit.
C22B and C01F together cover the bulk of activity — iron, sodium and rare-earth recovery chemistry. Ceramics reuse, separation techniques and water treatment each sit at under 20% of records, marking them as comparatively open relative to the extraction core.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bauxite residue management, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates around a small group of specialist and state-linked entities, with co-filing patterns showing tight collaboration clusters rather than broad industry consortia.
The top-ranked assignee holds 29 of the 271 records in scope, more than triple the count at fifth place (9). That gap suggests a sustained, focused filing programme rather than opportunistic single filings.
The strongest co-filing relationships in the dataset repeat the same small set of named inventors across multiple pairs, each appearing 6 times together — a pattern of one team filing jointly across related applications rather than cross-company partnership.
United States (59) and China (54) lead the receiving offices tracked, with Australia (36), India (30), WIPO/PCT (26) and Canada (23) all represented — a spread consistent with bauxite residue being a problem tied to wherever alumina refining and residue storage physically happen.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Orbite Aluminae Inc. | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | 0 | — |
| Foret Plasma Labs LLC | 0 | — |
| Red Mud Enterprises LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Kresys | 0 | — |
| Aluminum Corporation of China Limited | 0 | — |
| ABBAS MOHAMMAD KHAN ABBAS | 0 | — |
| Central South University | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next checks rather than a general read of the field.
With one assignee holding 29 of 271 records, any new dewatering or dry-stacking filing should be checked against that portfolio specifically, not just the field average.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaRevegetation, storage design and water-treatment integration sit well below the extraction-chemistry core in filing density — a narrower window to establish a first position.
Explore white space in EurekaThe apparent post-2022 decline is partly a publication-lag artefact; a re-check in a year will show whether the pullback is real or an undercount.
Track this landscape in EurekaFiling in this dataset is concentrated: the leading assignee holds 29 of the 271 records in scope, more than three times the count at fifth place (9 records). Below the top ten filers, activity spreads across a long tail of roughly 100 ranked companies, most with only one or two families. This shape means a freedom-to-operate check should weight the leader's portfolio heavily rather than treat the field as evenly distributed.
Filings peaked at 24 in 2022 and had fallen to 10 by 2024, a 47% decline from the 19 filings recorded in 2021. Because patent publication typically lags the filing date by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend chart are still incomplete and should not be read as continued decline. The honest read is a pullback from a 2022 peak, with the most recent one to two years too thin to interpret yet.
Metal extraction and refining (IPC class C22B) appears in 52.4% of the 271 records in scope, the single largest technology grouping, followed by alkaline-earth and aluminium compound chemistry (C01F) at 34.3%. Ceramics and refractory reuse, separation techniques, iron production and water treatment each appear in under 20% of records. That gap indicates extraction and recovery chemistry is the most heavily claimed area, while reuse and treatment applications remain comparatively open.
US5607598A describes a multi-stage centrifuge and repulp washing process that produces a caustic-lean, alumina-lean red mud cake, then reslurries that cake with bauxite sand for disposal in a dry stacking impoundment. Anyone implementing sequential centrifuge washing followed by sand-blended dry stacking should review this filing's specific claim scope before designing a process around that combination. It does not obviously reach single-stage dewatering, non-centrifuge separation methods, or reuse pathways that avoid impoundment disposal entirely, which is where alternative approaches typically sit.
Based on the IPC composition, surface revegetation, residue storage geotechnical design, and integration of water treatment with leachate management all sit at meaningfully lower filing density than the extraction-chemistry core of C22B and C01F. Magnetic and electrostatic separation of iron fractions (B03C, 12.2% of records) and ceramic reuse of treated residue (C04B, 18.8%) are also less crowded than the core recovery chemistry. These branches are worth checking first for a new filing, since claim space there is less occupied — though lower density is not proof the technology is easy to practise, only that fewer claims currently sit on it.
Go past this page: query the whole bauxite residue management corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.