Bearing Condition Monitoring Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Bearing Condition Monitoring and Defect Frequency Patents
Filing has fallen sharply since 2020's peak. filings dropped from 17 in 2021 to just 2 in 2024, an 88% decline over the complete-year window. Filings ran from 12 in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2020. The clearest complete-year signal is the drop from 17 in 2021 to 2 in 2024, an 88% decline over that span; 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued fall.
- 1SIEMENS AG17
- 2NSK LTD16
- 3ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG12
- 4AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT11
- 5ROCKWELL COLLINS INC9
See the full bearing condition monitoring and defect frequencies analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Frequently asked questions
What is bearing condition monitoring in patent terms, and how does it relate to defect frequency analysis?
In this dataset, bearing condition monitoring patents cover systems and methods that collect vibration, acoustic emission, or other sensor data from a rotating machine and compare it against known defect signatures such as ball pass frequency. Defect frequency analysis is the mathematical technique used to derive those signatures from a bearing’s geometry and rotation speed. Most filings pair the two: a sensing or data-collection claim combined with a signal-processing or envelope-analysis claim that converts raw vibration into a diagnosable frequency spectrum. This is why G01M (testing and structure balance) and G01H (measuring vibrations and sound) both show heavy representation across the 157 records in scope.
Which companies hold the most patents in bearing condition monitoring?
The assignee ranking covers 83 companies across the 157 records in scope, with the leading assignee holding 17 records and the fifth-ranked holding 9. Filing is concentrated rather than evenly spread: the top five assignees together account for 41.4% of all records, and the top ten account for 59.2%. Beyond that group the ranking runs into a long tail of companies with only one or two filings each, so a competitive read of this field has to separate the small cluster of repeat filers from the much larger group of one-off entrants.
Is patent filing activity in bearing condition monitoring still growing?
Filing peaked at 20 records in 2020 and has since declined; the clearest complete-year comparison shows a drop from 17 filings in 2021 to 2 in 2024, an 88% fall over that span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because patent publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those final years will fill in further and should not be read as confirming a continued decline. Anyone using this trend to time a filing decision should treat 2024 as the most recent reliable data point rather than the partial years after it.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bearing Condition Monitoring and Defect Frequencies covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.