Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (105 records) with 2024 (93) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,355 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Bidirectional DC-DC converters sit at the intersection of dual active bridge, resonant, and soft-switching circuit design, and the classification data reflects a field whose foundational claim space — H02M power conversion — is heavily filed. Secondary IPC subclasses tied to grid integration (H02J) and electric vehicle propulsion (B60L) show meaningful but smaller filing volumes, suggesting the core converter topology has been claimed more thoroughly than its downstream applications.
The filing trend from 2017 through the most recent partial year shows growth that peaked in 2019 and has since flattened or declined, with several major assignees recording zero filings in the latest year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year understates true activity, but the multi-year decline pattern predates that lag and is unlikely to be an artifact of it alone.
Two views of the same 1,355-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses beyond the core power-conversion class.
From 62 filings in 2017, volume climbed to a peak of 121 in 2019, held near a 112 midpoint in 2022, and fell to 17 in the latest (partial) year — a trajectory consistent with a technology whose core claim space is largely staked out rather than one still expanding.
H02M (power conversion) accounts for all 1,355 records by definition of the search, with H02J (grid systems, 218) and B60L (EV propulsion, 107) the largest secondary classes. G05F, H01F, G06F, H01L and H05B each register in the teens to low thirties, marking them as smaller but active adjacent branches rather than white space.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,355 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bidirectional dc-dc converter dc-dc converter and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA bidirectional DC-DC converter with three or more ports is described along with a method of operation thereof. The converter utilizes a common transformer for all ports and allows for power transfer from any port to any or all of the remaining ports. The converter may utilize a controller which implements variable-frequency control, delay-time control, and/or phase-delay control to achieve power transfer as desired between the converter ports. In some cases, power transfer between ports can operate similar to a series-resonant converter or a dual active bridge converter.Filed by DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC., published 2022-02-10.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040125618A1 | Multiple energy-source power converter system | 424 |
| 2 | US7479774B2 | High-performance solar photovoltaic (PV) energy conversion system | 306 |
| 3 | US5875103A | Full range soft-switching DC-DC converter | 248 |
| 4 | US20030142513A1 | Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters | 246 |
| 5 | US4504895A | Regulated dc-dc converter using a resonating transformer | 219 |
| 6 | US20020034083A1 | Zero voltage switching DC-DC converter | 192 |
| 7 | US20060227577A1 | DC-DC converter | 154 |
| 8 | US6016258A | Full bridge DC-DC converters | 147 |
| 9 | US20070171680A1 | Methods and apparatus for a resonant converter | 145 |
| 10 | US20120268969A1 | DC-ac inverter with high frequency isolation transformer | 141 |
Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once citation counts, receiving offices and co-filing pairs are read together.
Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has declined since, with the 2022 midpoint of 112 still below peak. Several major assignees show zero filings in the latest year, some down 100% year over year — a pattern more consistent with a settled claim landscape than an emerging one.
The United States and China together account for more filings than Europe, India, Japan and the WIPO PCT route combined. A freedom-to-operate review that skips either office is reviewing a minority of the enforceable landscape.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest link is a single corporate-group pair filing together eight times. Collaborative filing is the exception here, not the norm, which points to converter IP being developed and held internally rather than jointly.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bidirectional dc-dc converter dc-dc converter, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum data shows several historically active assignees recording zero filings in the latest year, which is more informative than the cumulative ranking alone for judging who is still actively building this portfolio.
Assignees including major Chinese, Japanese and European industrial groups show zero filings in the most recent year, with year-over-year drops of 100% recorded for at least two of them. This does not mean the portfolios are inactive — publication lag means recent filings may not yet be visible — but it does mean cumulative rankings alone overstate current filing intensity.
The strongest co-assignee relationship links a parent company and its engineering subsidiary, filing together eight times. Other detected pairs, including cross-border industry-inventor combinations, appear only twice each, indicating most collaborative filing in this space is intra-group rather than cross-company.
The highest-cited record in this landscape is a multi-source power converter system, followed by solar PV conversion and full-range soft-switching converter patents. These older records shaped the vocabulary the field still uses, but their citation counts reflect accumulated age within the corpus more than present-day relevance.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Diamond Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| Delta Electronics, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| BYD Company Limited | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field with a well-occupied core and thinner adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying filing opportunity.
Before committing to a dual active bridge or resonant topology, review claim scope on the highest-cited prior art in this landscape, since these older filings shaped much of the terminology and circuit structure still in use.
Explore prior art in EurekaH01F, G06F and H01L overlaps register far fewer filings than the core H02M class. Mapping specific claim language in those branches can surface filing opportunities that a keyword search on "bidirectional converter" alone would miss.
Run a white space analysis in EurekaThe dataset shows filing activity concentrated among a small set of major industrial and electronics groups, with a long tail of smaller entrants holding only one or two filings each. Recent-year momentum data is arguably more useful than cumulative counts alone, because several historically top-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest year. Anyone assessing current competitive activity should weight recent filings, not just total portfolio size, since publication lag means the newest filings from active players may not yet appear in the count.
Filing volume peaked in 2019 at 121 records, held near a 112 midpoint through 2022, and dropped to 17 in the most recent partial year. That decline pattern predates the roughly 18-month publication lag that always understates the newest year, so while the very latest figure should be read cautiously, the multi-year trend from 2019 onward points to a plateau or decline rather than continued growth. This is typical of a converter topology whose core claim space has already been substantially staked out.
The United States leads with 493 records, followed by China at 290, then Europe (EPO) and Japan each around 97, India at 97, and the WIPO PCT route at 81. Together the US and China account for more filings than the other four routes combined, which means a freedom-to-operate or filing strategy that ignores either jurisdiction is missing the majority of the documented activity. Companies building global products in this space should treat US and Chinese filings as the primary reference set.
Beyond the core power-conversion classification (H02M), the largest overlaps are with grid and power-supply systems (H02J, 218 records) and electric vehicle propulsion (B60L, 107 records). Smaller but active overlaps appear in variable control systems, magnetics and transformers, digital processing, semiconductor devices, and heating/lighting circuits. The relative size of these secondary classes suggests EV and grid applications are the most patent-active downstream uses of the core converter topology, while other application areas remain comparatively under-claimed.
US20220045618A1, filed by Delta Electronics and published in 2022, describes a bidirectional DC-DC converter with three or more ports sharing a common transformer, controlled through variable-frequency, delay-time, or phase-delay methods that can operate similarly to a series-resonant or dual active bridge converter. It matters because multi-port architectures sharing a single transformer are a less crowded claim area than two-port designs, based on the IPC distribution in this dataset. Anyone designing a multi-port converter with shared magnetics should review this filing's claim scope closely before finalizing a control architecture.
Go past this page: query the whole bidirectional dc-dc converter dc-dc converter corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.