Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 307 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Bidirectional DC-DC converters move power in both directions between two voltage buses — charging a battery on one pass, discharging it on the next — and are core to EV traction inverters, energy storage, and onboard chargers. This landscape isolates the miniaturization and integration slice of that field: claims built around high power density, integrated power modules, and planar magnetics integration, rather than converter topology in general. The search combines topical terms with three IPC anchors — H02M3/335, H01L25/07, and H01F27/28 — to keep the corpus focused on packaging and density claims rather than pure control-loop or topology patents.
307 patent families were published between 2015 and mid-2026. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts will rise as those applications clear examination queues — the apparent decline since 2020 is partly a filing-trend signal and partly a data artifact of that lag.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 307-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Annual filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2020, sat at 18 by the 2022 midpoint, and have trended down since — a pattern consistent with a technology area where the core claim space is already occupied rather than one still in an early land-grab phase.
H02M (power conversion) appears in 298 of 307 records, confirming the search is well-targeted. H02J (power supply/grid, 60), H01L (semiconductor devices, 44) and B60L (EV propulsion, 29) show where converter claims cross into system integration, packaging, and vehicle applications; H01F (magnetics, 25) marks the planar-magnetics-integration branch specifically.
Shares are the percentage of the 307 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA motor controller combining an AC-DC converter, a regenerative-mode inverter, and a bidirectional DC-DC converter placed in the DC link between them. The converter uses transistor input/output stages coupled by a transformer, PWM control, and closed-loop regulation of output voltage based on input/output voltage, current, and temperature.Filed by Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha, 1996 — predates the miniaturization-specific claim language that now dominates the corpus, but establishes the baseline transformer-coupled bidirectional topology many later integration patents build on.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030142513A1 | Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters | 246 |
| 2 | US5636107A | DC-DC converters | 213 |
| 3 | US20040189432A1 | Integrated magnetics for a dc-dc converter with flexible output inductor | 201 |
| 4 | US20070171680A1 | Methods and apparatus for a resonant converter | 145 |
| 5 | US7046523B2 | Core structure and interleaved DC—DC converter topology | 124 |
| 6 | US7034647B2 | Integrated magnetics for a DC-DC converter with flexible output inductor | 111 |
| 7 | US7889519B2 | Methods and apparatus for a resonant converter | 101 |
| 8 | US20040136209A1 | Switching power supply device and the semiconductor integrated circuit for power supply control | 97 |
| 9 | US20090059622A1 | Bi-directional DC-DC converter and method for controlling the same | 96 |
| 10 | US20130020989A1 | Ac-DC power converter and DC charging station thereof | 88 |
Citation counts favor older records simply because they've had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on subsequent filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals worth weighing before committing R&D or filing budget to this space.
2020's peak of 26 filings and the drop to 18 by 2022 point to a maturing claim landscape rather than an emerging one. Because the most recent 1-2 years are always undercounted at this data cut-off, treat the 2025-2026 figures as a floor, not a ceiling.
More than half of all records route through the USPTO, with Europe a distant second and China, India and Japan each in the teens to twenties. A freedom-to-operate check weighted toward the US will catch most of the blocking art; China and India warrant a targeted second pass given EV manufacturing footprints there.
The bulk of the corpus sits squarely in power conversion, but the semiconductor-packaging (H01L, 44) and magnetics (H01F, 25) subclasses mark where miniaturization claims actually differentiate from generic converter art. Filing directly into H02M alone risks colliding with dense prior art; the packaging and magnetics edges are comparatively thinner.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum shows several historically active assignees with zero filings in the latest year — a signal that either the technology has settled for them or that filings are still working through the publication pipeline.
Renesas Electronics Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., VLT, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., and others show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects pipeline timing more than withdrawal from the space.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest repeated pairings all involve the same organisation (Magna International Inc.) paired with different named inventors. This points to in-house inventor teams rather than cross-company joint filing as the norm here.
With over half the corpus routed through the USPTO, US-based competitive intelligence should weight most heavily there, while China's 27 and India's 24 suggest emerging but still secondary filing bases relative to manufacturing scale in those markets.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Renesas Electronics Corporation | 0 | — |
| Renesas Technology Corp. | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| VLT, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Ericsson AB | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you're clearing freedom-to-operate or scoping a filing strategy.
With H01L and H01F marking the thinner-claimed edges of the corpus, a targeted FTO search on integrated-power-module and planar-magnetics claims will surface fewer blocking references than a generic H02M search.
Explore in EurekaSeveral historically active filers show zero recent-year filings. Given the publication lag, monitoring their pipelines over the next 12-18 months will show whether that's a real pullback or a reporting artifact.
Set up monitoring in EurekaIn this landscape, it's a record that combines bidirectional DC-DC converter or related converter terminology with claim language around high power density, integrated power modules, planar magnetics integration, or miniaturization, anchored to IPC classes H02M3/335, H01L25/07, or H01F27/28. This excludes patents on pure converter topology or control algorithms that don't address size, density, or integration. The distinction matters because generic converter topology art is far more crowded than the integration-specific slice mapped here.
The data shows a rise from 14 filings in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2020, then a decline through the 2022 midpoint of 18 and beyond. This pattern is typical of a technology area where core claim space has become occupied — later entrants face more prior art to design around, which can suppress new filing volume. However, the most recent one to two years in any patent dataset are always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the true 2025-2026 filing rate is higher than currently visible.
The United States accounts for 164 of 307 records, more than half the corpus, making it the primary jurisdiction for a freedom-to-operate check. Europe (45) is a clear second, with China (27), India (24), and Japan (16) trailing at meaningfully lower volumes. Companies manufacturing in China or India should still run a targeted regional search, since local filing bases there are smaller but growing relative to EV production footprints.
Not necessarily. Citation counts inside a searched corpus favor older records simply because they've had more years to accumulate citations from later filings — the most-cited records here date back to the early 2000s or earlier. High citation counts are a better signal of foundational influence on later claim drafting than of current commercial relevance or enforceability, especially since many older core patents will have expired.
The IPC composition shows H02M as the dominant subclass at 298 of 307 records, while H01L (semiconductor devices, 44) and H01F (magnetics, 25) appear far less often despite being directly relevant to integration and miniaturization claims. This gap suggests that claims combining converter function with specific semiconductor-packaging or planar-magnetics structures — rather than converter circuitry alone — face thinner prior art. Multi-port topology control and stacked power-module packaging are two areas within that gap worth deeper diligence.
Go past this page: query the whole bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.