https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/bidirectional-dc-dc-converter-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2020 at 26 and have since declined, with the most recent year understated by the usual 18-month publication lag.
  • H02M dominates at 298 of 307 records, but H01L and H01F co-occurrence shows integration claims spilling into semiconductor packaging and magnetics.
  • The United States receives more than half of all filings (164), with China, India and Europe trailing well behind despite EV supply chains growing there.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
307
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-8%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (13 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 307 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Bidirectional DC-DC converters move power in both directions between two voltage buses — charging a battery on one pass, discharging it on the next — and are core to EV traction inverters, energy storage, and onboard chargers. This landscape isolates the miniaturization and integration slice of that field: claims built around high power density, integrated power modules, and planar magnetics integration, rather than converter topology in general. The search combines topical terms with three IPC anchors — H02M3/335, H01L25/07, and H01F27/28 — to keep the corpus focused on packaging and density claims rather than pure control-loop or topology patents.

307 patent families were published between 2015 and mid-2026. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts will rise as those applications clear examination queues — the apparent decline since 2020 is partly a filing-trend signal and partly a data artifact of that lag.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORP33
  2. 2VLT CORP10
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD9
  4. 4HONDA MOTOR CO LTD8
  5. 5HITACHI LTD8
  6. 6ERICSSON INC8
  7. 7DANMARKS TEKNISKE UNIV7
  8. 8TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC7
  9. 9DELPHI INT OPERATIONS LUXEMBOURG SARL6
  10. 10MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 307-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filings rose to a 2020 peak, then eased

Annual filings climbed from 14 in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2020, sat at 18 by the 2022 midpoint, and have trended down since — a pattern consistent with a technology area where the core claim space is already occupied rather than one still in an early land-grab phase.

Filings rose to a 2020 peak, then eased08152330142017201820192620202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H02M anchors the corpus; H01L and H01F mark the integration edge

H02M (power conversion) appears in 298 of 307 records, confirming the search is well-targeted. H02J (power supply/grid, 60), H01L (semiconductor devices, 44) and B60L (EV propulsion, 29) show where converter claims cross into system integration, packaging, and vehicle applications; H01F (magnetics, 25) marks the planar-magnetics-integration branch specifically.

H02M anchors the corpus; H01L and H01F mark the integration edgeH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)29897.1%H02J · Power supply & grid systems6019.5%H01L · Semiconductor devices4414.3%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion299.4%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…258.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)206.5%H10W165.2%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…134.2%Other6621.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 307 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this corpus

Representative record
GB2294369A1996-04-24

GB2294369A — Motor controller and bidirectional dc-dc converter

MITSUBISHI DENKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA

A motor controller combining an AC-DC converter, a regenerative-mode inverter, and a bidirectional DC-DC converter placed in the DC link between them. The converter uses transistor input/output stages coupled by a transformer, PWM control, and closed-loop regulation of output voltage based on input/output voltage, current, and temperature.Filed by Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha, 1996 — predates the miniaturization-specific claim language that now dominates the corpus, but establishes the baseline transformer-coupled bidirectional topology many later integration patents build on.

GB2294369A — patent drawing 1GB2294369A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030142513A1Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters246
2US5636107ADC-DC converters213
3US20040189432A1Integrated magnetics for a dc-dc converter with flexible output inductor201
4US20070171680A1Methods and apparatus for a resonant converter145
5US7046523B2Core structure and interleaved DC—DC converter topology124
6US7034647B2Integrated magnetics for a DC-DC converter with flexible output inductor111
7US7889519B2Methods and apparatus for a resonant converter101
8US20040136209A1Switching power supply device and the semiconductor integrated circuit for power supply control97
9US20090059622A1Bi-directional DC-DC converter and method for controlling the same96
10US20130020989A1Ac-DC power converter and DC charging station thereof88

Citation counts favor older records simply because they've had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on subsequent filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three signals worth weighing before committing R&D or filing budget to this space.

Filing momentum
26 → 2 (peak to latest)
annual filings, 2020 vs. 2026 partial

The peak has passed — but the lag matters

2020's peak of 26 filings and the drop to 18 by 2022 point to a maturing claim landscape rather than an emerging one. Because the most recent 1-2 years are always undercounted at this data cut-off, treat the 2025-2026 figures as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim geography
US 164 · EPO 45 · CN 27
records by receiving office

The US carries the claim density

More than half of all records route through the USPTO, with Europe a distant second and China, India and Japan each in the teens to twenties. A freedom-to-operate check weighted toward the US will catch most of the blocking art; China and India warrant a targeted second pass given EV manufacturing footprints there.

Receiving office distribution
Technology spread
H02M 298 · H01L 44 · H01F 25
IPC subclass record counts

Integration claims cluster at two edges

The bulk of the corpus sits squarely in power conversion, but the semiconductor-packaging (H01L, 44) and magnetics (H01F, 25) subclasses mark where miniaturization claims actually differentiate from generic converter art. Filing directly into H02M alone risks colliding with dense prior art; the packaging and magnetics edges are comparatively thinner.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gate sits

Recent-year momentum shows several historically active assignees with zero filings in the latest year — a signal that either the technology has settled for them or that filings are still working through the publication pipeline.

Momentum check
0 in latest year
across six tracked assignees

Historical leaders have gone quiet — for now

Renesas Electronics Corporation, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., VLT, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., and others show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects pipeline timing more than withdrawal from the space.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
total identified

Co-filing is sparse and concentrated

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest repeated pairings all involve the same organisation (Magna International Inc.) paired with different named inventors. This points to in-house inventor teams rather than cross-company joint filing as the norm here.

Co-assignee analysis
Geographic concentration
US 164 of 307
more than half of all records

US filing dominance shapes competitive exposure

With over half the corpus routed through the USPTO, US-based competitive intelligence should weight most heavily there, while China's 27 and India's 24 suggest emerging but still secondary filing bases relative to manufacturing scale in those markets.

Receiving office split
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show up in the IPC spread but carry comparatively thin claim density relative to core H02M art.
Planar magnetics thermal co-designWide-bandgap module integration densityInterleaved inductor coupling structuresStacked power-module packagingMulti-port bidirectional topology control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Renesas Electronics Corporation0
Renesas Technology Corp.0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0
VLT, Inc.0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.0
Ericsson AB0
Texas Instruments Incorporated0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you're clearing freedom-to-operate or scoping a filing strategy.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on packaging claims

With H01L and H01F marking the thinner-claimed edges of the corpus, a targeted FTO search on integrated-power-module and planar-magnetics claims will surface fewer blocking references than a generic H02M search.

Explore in Eureka

Track the six dormant assignees for renewed activity

Several historically active filers show zero recent-year filings. Given the publication lag, monitoring their pipelines over the next 12-18 months will show whether that's a real pullback or a reporting artifact.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole bidirectional dc-dc converter miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.