Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Simulation and Modeling Patents
Filing is accelerating, not maturing. the 2022 midpoint sits at zero filings, then activity climbs to a 2025 peak of 7 — this is an early-stage claim race, not a settled field. Filings sat at 2 in 2017, dropped to nothing at the 2022 midpoint, then rose to a peak of 7 in 2025. The 2026 count of 1 reflects a partial year and the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication — actual 2026 filing activity is understated here.
- 1BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG3
- 2INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JODHPUR3
- 3SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIV2
- 4HARBIN ENG UNIV2
- 5HARBIN INST OF TECH1
See the full bidirectional dc-dc converter simulation and modeling analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions
How many patents exist for bidirectional DC-DC converter simulation and modeling?
This landscape identifies 18 published patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, using a search combining bidirectional converter hardware terms with simulation, average-model, electro-thermal, and digital-twin language restricted to relevant IPC classes. That is a small, specialized set compared to the broader bidirectional converter hardware category, reflecting how narrow the modeling-specific overlap actually is. The true 2025-2026 count is likely higher once publication catches up, since patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Who are the leading filers in bidirectional DC-DC converter digital twin patents?
The assignee base is a long tail rather than a concentrated leaderboard: universities such as Harbin Engineering University and Southwest Jiaotong University appear alongside Chinese state grid research entities, with isolated single filings from firms like BMW and SK hynix. No single organization holds a commanding share of the 18 tracked families. Recent-year momentum data shows most named assignees at zero filings in the latest year, which is more likely a publication-lag artifact than a sign the field has gone quiet.
What is the difference between an average model and a digital twin for a DC-DC converter?
An average model is a simplified mathematical representation that captures a converter’s steady-state and slow dynamic behavior for control design and simulation, without modeling every switching event. A digital twin, as described in filings like WO2026157018A1, goes further: it pairs a physical converter with real-time data sampling, a control system, and a synchronized virtual model — often FPGA-accelerated — for continuous monitoring, fault diagnosis, and lifecycle health management. In this patent set, average-model and electro-thermal modeling claims are older and more established, while digital-twin system claims are the newer, more actively filed category.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.